2020-09-13 19:24:07 +00:00
|
|
|
Mechanical Engineering Change Notes
|
|
|
|
===================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revision 0.0
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original design
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Manufactured
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Two pairs of front/back panels were ordered at [Schaeffer](https://www.schaeffer-ag.de/en/) in
|
|
|
|
1.5 mm thickness since 1.2 mm is not available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Back panel was cut at Makilab by @tnt .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Issues noticed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After trying to fit the back panel, it became obvious that the calculations were off and the
|
|
|
|
height of the PCB (1.6 mm) was not properly accounted for, resulting in openings that were all
|
|
|
|
1.6 mm too low.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* DXF files were not kept.
|
|
|
|
* Feeds & Speeds in the FreeCAD toolpaths were completely off and were overriden manually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revision 0.1
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First revision done after the 1.6 mm offset error was noticed. It was done even before the
|
|
|
|
rev 0.0 panels were back from Schaeffer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Changes compared to previous revision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Moved all opening 1.6 mm up.
|
|
|
|
* Size of the 'mouse ears' (for square holes) has been reduced to 2 mm diameter.
|
|
|
|
* Also made sure each square opening is a single poly-line in the DXF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Manufactured
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Cut two pairs of front/back panels at Makilab for the two proto cases. One of the back
|
|
|
|
panel was the previously 'bad' one (rev 0.0) and so the opening is now too wide and not
|
|
|
|
looking great, but it fits and is functional.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Issues noticed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The SMA hole height is too low. Nominal height above PCB was 6.4mm but that's for the
|
|
|
|
TE-Connectivity part. The SMA we're using is more like 6.85mm above the surface. To fix
|
|
|
|
this, the hole will be changed to be taller than wide to accomodate both parts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* All the square opening (single RJ45, dual RJ45, USB) have their excess located at the top
|
|
|
|
and have their bottom flush with the expected pcb height. This is different from the circular
|
|
|
|
opening which are aligned on their center. So change the positions so the excess clearance is
|
|
|
|
evenly distributed top/bottom of the expected position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Although new FrontPanelDesigner files were made for this revision, they were never
|
|
|
|
submitted / manufactured.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revision 1.0
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production version, sent to manufacturer for production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Changes compared to previous revision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Converted the SMA opening from a pure-circle to two half circles connected by lines.
|
|
|
|
The upper half circle is 0.5 mm above the previous center
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Moved USB, 1xRJ45 and 2xRJ45 opening 0.2 mm down
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Manufactured
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-27 23:41:55 +00:00
|
|
|
* A run of 55 cases has been done, with end panels cut by the manufacturer.
|
2020-09-13 19:24:07 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Issues noticed
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-27 23:41:55 +00:00
|
|
|
* The cases are nominally 85 mm long, however seems all of them (both from prototype and
|
|
|
|
production were slightly longer by about 0.2-0.4mm). This might be a result of the surface
|
|
|
|
processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The SMA hole is very close to the chamfer of the screw hole, leaving very little material
|
|
|
|
between the two and on a couple of panels, it was ripped out or slightly bent by the end-mill
|
|
|
|
during manufacturing. Most panels were fine and some slightly bent one could be corrected,
|
|
|
|
but something to keep in mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Also as a consequence of that we can't put a nut on the SMA on the inside (to grab panel by
|
|
|
|
both side). Although I'm not sure it'd be good anyway. The SMA is the only element fixed to
|
|
|
|
the panel (and thus the case), so all the forces of plugging connector are transfered through
|
|
|
|
the PCB, through the SMA to the case. (because the PCB is slightly loose in the case to account
|
|
|
|
for possible tolerances, see also comments in the PCB ECN).
|