mirror of https://gerrit.osmocom.org/libosmocore
Update patch set 2
Patch Set 2: Code-Review-1 (1 comment) Patch-set: 2 Reviewer: Gerrit User 1000074 <1000074@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326> Label: Code-Review=-1 Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000159 \u003c1000159@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"pespin replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
parent
e519f3621b
commit
db2fc272ce
|
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"comments": [
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"unresolved": false,
|
||||||
|
"key": {
|
||||||
|
"uuid": "0b88f7c8_082a77c6",
|
||||||
|
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
||||||
|
"patchSetId": 2
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
"lineNbr": 0,
|
||||||
|
"author": {
|
||||||
|
"id": 1000074
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
"writtenOn": "2022-10-17T09:01:02Z",
|
||||||
|
"side": 1,
|
||||||
|
"message": "I think the main point of a realloc API is to avoid allocating a new chunk and having to copy over all the memory in the old chunk unless it\u0027s really unneeded.\nSo I think msgb_copy() should be kept as it was, and msgb_realloc in any case implemented with \"man realloc\" API.\n\nThe API you are proposing there is more actually \"msgb_copy_new_length()\" or something similar, not a realloc function.",
|
||||||
|
"revId": "2496668d42670999460635ab6bb86a8cdd52e2d9",
|
||||||
|
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue