Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Harald Welte 785d484709 utils: Fix bugs in DataObject encoders
The DataObject is some weird / rarely used different code than the
normal TLV encoder/decoder.  It has apparently so far only been used
for decoding, without testing the encoding side, resulting in related
bugs.

Let's fix those that I encountered today, and add a test case.

Change-Id: I31370066f43c22fc3ce9e2b9ee75986a652f6fc4
2022-04-05 14:33:00 +02:00
Bjoern Riemer ffee89a031 add missing bit definition for NG-RAN in xAcT
when encoding the AcT value bit 11 is correctly set
when NG-RAN is present in the string representation,
however the decoding of bit 11 was missing.
Adds tests for the decoder as well.

Change-Id: I910df28c4c59ec94cce9603377786325f6d8c1a3
2022-01-22 12:58:00 +00:00
Harald Welte 9f3b44d6ff utils: COMPREHENSION-TLV support
Change-Id: I8d969382b73fa152ee09c456fa4aee428fb36285
2021-05-29 22:13:56 +02:00
Harald Welte e7506036bd Introduce unit test for bertlv_parse_one()
Change-Id: I3adbe22afd4b6503a7454de39b7663e9ede8995f
2021-05-25 09:43:13 +02:00
Harald Welte de02718631 add unit tests for BER-TLV encoder/decoder functions
... and while at it resolve a bug in bertlv_parse_len()
discovered by those new tests.

Change-Id: I9f14dafab4f712c29224c4eb25cacab7885e2b68
2021-05-25 09:43:13 +02:00
Philipp Maier e7d417955d ts_51_011, utils: fix Access Technology Identifier coding
When the Access Technology Identifier encoder sets the bits for E-UTRAN
it does not respect that bit "100" is also a valid bit combination that
encodes E-UTRAN WB-S1 and E-UTRAN NB-S1. Lets encode this bit
combination if the user is just specifying "E-UTRAN" without further
spefication of WB or NB.

The decoder only looks at bit 14 and decodes "1xx" always to "E-UTRAN".
This is not specific enough. Lets make sure that the decoder is
complementary to the encoder.

Change-Id: Ibfe8883a05f9ad6988d8e212cb9a598229954296
Related: OS#4963
2021-05-03 17:08:37 +02:00
Philipp Maier b919f8bd75 utils: fix dec_xplmn_w_act() and format_xplmn_w_act()
The function dec_xplmn_w_act(), which is also used by
format_xplmn_w_act() is using integer numbers as MCC/MNC representation.
This causes various problems since the information about leading zeros
gets lost.

Change-Id: I57f7dff80f48071ef9a3732ae1088882b127a6d4
2021-05-03 15:08:27 +00:00
Philipp Maier 6c5cd8031d utils: fix mcc/mnc encoding in dec_plmn (EF_PLMNsel)
The dec_plmn function takes an hexstring and returns the decoded MCC and
MNC as integer values. The result is then used by the json encoder in
EF_PLMNsel, which means the json output will contrary to the input, use
integer values instead of strings.

This is not correct since there may be leading zeros (e.g. mnc 01 and
001 both exist are different) which must be retained in order to know
the correct length of the MNC.

Related: OS#4963
Change-Id: I393e04836814d992d2a6d0a4e4e01850976d6e81
2021-05-03 15:07:50 +00:00
Philipp Maier b46cb3ffa2 utils: fix encoding of EF.MSISDN
The encoding of EF.MSISDN is a bit unstrutured. The encoder function
does not return a valid result since it lacks the parameters
Capability/Configuration2 Record Identifier and Extension5 Record
Identifier, which are mandatory but can be set to 0xFF. Also the
encoder gets its input from pySim-shell, so it should have some
more input validation, especially when the user encodes an empty
string. The encoder and decoder function also do not have unit-tests.

Since the encoder now adds the missing two bytes by isself this does
not have to be done manually anymore, so cards.py needs to be
re-aligned.

For pySim-shell.py the encoder is used from ts_51_011.py. Unfortunately
it is used wrongly there. The optional Alpha Identifier is required
here as well.

Related: OS#4963
Change-Id: Iee5369b3e3ba7fa1155facc8fa824bc60e33b55b
2021-04-23 15:52:10 +02:00
Merlin Chlosta 05ca36b3f3 Add decoder/encoder for EF.SUCI_Calc_Info
Change-Id: I848a766e6d00be497c7db905475e0681cce197ac
2021-04-02 14:10:10 +02:00
Vadim Yanitskiy 46c49d5256 tests/test_utils.py: update expectations for format_xplmn_w_act()
Change-Id: I520328e3490cc3a333d2daad84e745d115196626
2021-03-12 01:12:11 +01:00
Vadim Yanitskiy c8458e2477 pySim/utils.py: fix 3-digit MNC encoding in enc_plmn()
The bug that was attempted to be fixed in [1] actually was in the
encoding API - pySim.utils.enc_plmn().  According to 3GPP TS 31.102,
which points to TS 24.008, the three-digit (E)HPLMN shall be encoded
as shown below (ASCII-art interpretation):

    0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
  |  MCC Digit 2  |  MCC Digit 1  |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
  |  MNC Digit 3  |  MCC Digit 3  |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
  |  MNC Digit 2  |  MNC Digit 1  |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

while pySim.utils.enc_plmn() would produce the following:

    0   1   2   3   4   5   6   7
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
  |  MCC Digit 2  |  MCC Digit 1  |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
  |  MNC Digit 1  |  MCC Digit 3  |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
  |  MNC Digit 3  |  MNC Digit 2  |
  +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

Initially the _decoding_ API was correct, but then got changed in
[1] to follow buggy pySim's encoding API.  As a result, a (E)HPLMN
programmed with pySim-prog.py would look correct if verified by
pySim-read.py, but the actual file content would be wrong.

This situation shows that our 'program-read-match' build verification
approach alone is insignificant.  The lack of unit test coverage,
at least for the core parts of the project, makes it possible to have
symmetrical bugs in both encoding and decoding API parts unnoticed.

This problem was found while trying to enable dead unit tests in [3].
Change [1] that introduced a symmetrical bug is reverted in [2].

Change-Id: Ic7612502e1bb0d280133dabbcb5cb146fc6997e5
Related: [1] I799469206f87e930d8888367890babcb8ebe23a9
Related: [2] If6bf5383988ad442e275efc7c5a159327d104879
Related: [3] I4d4facfabc75187acd5238ff4d0f26022bd58f82
2021-03-12 01:00:32 +01:00
Vadim Yanitskiy 4ae7c49076 pySim/utils_test.py: prepare this to be executed on Jenkins
As it turns out, we had this set of unit tests since 2018, but
so far they were not executed during the build verification.

Let's fix this:

  * run unittest in discovery mode for all files in 'tests/' (commented out);
  * rename this file, so it can be automatically detected and executed;
  * properly import the API to be tested.

Currently 2 out of 16 unit tests are failing, so we need to get
them passing first and then uncomment the unittest execution.

Change-Id: I4d4facfabc75187acd5238ff4d0f26022bd58f82
2021-03-11 23:54:15 +01:00