Update patch set 7

Patch Set 7:

(1 comment)

Patch-set: 7
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000074 \u003c1000074@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"msuraev replied on the change"}
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000159 \u003c1000159@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"msuraev replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
Gerrit User 1000159 2022-08-12 10:57:59 +00:00 committed by Gerrit Code Review
parent 9b21923224
commit 21056103db
1 changed files with 18 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -16,6 +16,24 @@
"message": "What do we win with this? I see only drawbacks: allocating and freeing N more buffers on the heap everytime it is called.",
"revId": "df43910c8f6b3edfeb985f391b15632e04a75a41",
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
},
{
"unresolved": true,
"key": {
"uuid": "b6fc0b29_1b59f0eb",
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
"patchSetId": 6
},
"lineNbr": 0,
"author": {
"id": 1000159
},
"writtenOn": "2022-08-12T10:57:59Z",
"side": 1,
"message": "We gain decrease of code duplication - we use the same function which is also used in other place in the follow-up patches. I don\u0027t think heap alloc matter - that code is called only at the socket init and the number of sockets is a limited resource so it\u0027s very unlikely to ever end up on a hot codepath.",
"parentUuid": "f0224e4c_231aaeff",
"revId": "df43910c8f6b3edfeb985f391b15632e04a75a41",
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
}
]
}