The intention was to use the file's basename, but __BASE_FILE__ means "the root
file that is being parsed and contains #include statements".
If we had a function using __BASE_FILE__ and that was defined in an #included
file, __BASE_FILE__ would indicate the first file where the #include is, and
not the file where the function is defined. __BASE_FILE__ works for us because
we don't ever include function definitions that log something, so __BASE_FILE__
always coincides with __FILE__ for our logging; but still __BASE_FILE__ is
semantically the wrong constant.
Related: OS#2740
Change-Id: Icdf7af7a31fbba9197b3711eaf102fc0ae333bcc
Neels Hofmeyr