Update patch set 5

Patch Set 5:

(1 comment)

Patch-set: 5
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000229 \u003c1000229@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"arehbein replied on the change"}
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000074 \u003c1000074@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"ADD","reason":"arehbein replied on the change"}

8f200fc1f551a18be7d7d24c70b01ddf25a04d89

@@ -69,6 +69,24 @@
       "parentUuid": "844c4e63_fa7ced61",
       "revId": "8f200fc1f551a18be7d7d24c70b01ddf25a04d89",
       "serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
+    },
+    {
+      "unresolved": true,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "6768e90a_54853f4a",
+        "filename": "scripts/osmotestconfig.py",
+        "patchSetId": 5
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 80,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 1000229
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2023-02-18T18:02:16Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "So that would boil down to adding a new parameter to `osmotestconfig.py` to account for ignores being passed up the call stack in the script, plus changing the invocation of this script in each project to pass the socket file to be ignored.\n\nMaybe for now it\u0027s easier/quicker to just ignore the given file name since it\u0027s not likely to change any time soon (?). Of course the parameter solution would be cleaner.",
+      "parentUuid": "97c240cd_7130f0fc",
+      "revId": "8f200fc1f551a18be7d7d24c70b01ddf25a04d89",
+      "serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
     }
   ]
 }