Use primitives instead of parsing the message a second time.
Set bctx->is_sgsn to false to allow the BSSGP layer to send back a
RESET_ACK with cell information.
Related: OS#3879
Depends: Ibcbaffa94cbdc4296a8a7c372304ac11d50d9559 (libosmocore)
Change-Id: I3afaf826798e362270ffa622c24bfd124ef25cd1
If Idle TBF timer (X2031) is set to 0, it means the TBF release is
immediately started once all queued data has been scheduled. In that
case, we must set FBI=1 (by setting cv=0) and move to FINISH state.
This used to work over the usual path where X2031 != 0, because release
start will alays happen at a later sched poll time where a dummy LLC
frame is sent and FBI set accordingly.
Change-Id: Ib20602936ae084c413f6bfe14eea33b602020be0
Old commit getting rid of LLC UI dummy and updating create_new_bsn()
function introduced a bug by not moving update of value m_last_dl_drained_fn
prior to a new break introduced.
As a result, the value is not updated in the case LLC queue becomes
drained but last few bytes are drained at exactly that moment.
Furthermore, then the IDLE tbf timer (X2031, keep_open())) returns always
true since according to it the drain never happened.
The impact of the bug is basically delaying a bit more than expected the
time the TBF stays in IDLE state with the TBF release process yet
to be started.
Related: OS#4849
Fixes: 7d0f9a0ec3
Change-Id: I7420aeffda3500bcdc990291e4a56511af433ff9
This is specially useful to detect for instance if a cell is handling
too many users, ending up in TFI or USF exhaustions. This information
can be later in the future used to tune TBF allocation algorithm behavior
(either manually/statially through config file, or
automatically/dynamically in code based on some thresholds).
Related: OS#5042
Change-Id: I5402e937ff8d800684655e500ef8e5c867141dc3
Since a while ago, the data architecture was changed so that TBF is
guaranteed to always have a MS object associated. Hence, it makes no
sense to pass the MS object as a separate param as we can take it from
tbf object and makes code less confusing.
Change-Id: Idc0c76cf6f007afa4236480cdad0d8e99dabec5f
Before this patch, allocate_usf() was implemented to only allocate 1 USF
per TBF, regardless of the available ul_slot mask.
As a result, only 1 slot at max was allocated to any TBF. That's a pity
because usual multislot classes like 12 support up to 2 UL slots per TBF
(in common TS with DL).
This patch reworks allocate_usf() to allocate as many UL multislots as
possible (given mslot class, current USF availability, TFI availability,
related DL TBF slots for the same MS, etc.).
As a result, it can be seen that AllocTest results change substantially
and maximum concurrent TBF allocation drops under some conditions.
That happens due to more USFs being reserved (because each TBF has now
more UL slots reserved). Hence now USF exhaustion becomes the usual
limitation factor as per the number of concurrent TBFs than can be
handled per TRX (as opposed to TFIs previously).
Some of the biggest limitations in test appear though because really
high end multislot classes are used, which can consume high volumes of
UL slots (USFs), and which are probably not the most extended devices in
the field.
Moreover, in general the curren timeslot allocator for a given
multislot class will in general try to optimize the DL side gathering
most of the possible timeslots there. That means, for instance on ms
class 12 (4 Tx, 4Rx, 5 Sum), 4 DL slots and 1 UL slot will still be
selected. But in the case where only 3 PDCHs are available, then with
this new multi-slot UL support a TBF will reserve 3 DL slots and 2 UL
slots, while before this patch it would only taken 1 UL slot instead of
2.
This USF exhaustion situation can be improved in the future by
parametrizing (VTY command?) the maximum amount of UL slots that a TBF
can reserve, making for instance a default value of 2, meaning usual
classes can gather up 2 UL timelosts at a time while forbidding high-end
hungry classes to gather up to 8 UL timeslots.
Another approach would be to dynamically limit the amount of allowed
reservable UL timeslots based on current USF reservation load.
Related: OS#2282
Change-Id: Id97cc6e3b769511b591b1694549e0dac55227c43
The old VTY command is marked as deprecated and still overrides the use
in case it's used.
Related: SYS#5358
Depends: libosmocore.git Change-Id I74fb0a3afc1ac4aadbfc609b882d929401f790eb
Depends: osmo-bsc.git Change-Id I8b97ea11bad5fe05f2f634945b5703ee9abde81d
Change-Id: I46f2a955b157a409055fca7fb917dc4f75482426
Let's disable category here since we don't care about its formatting here.
In any case, every test relying on logging output validation should
always explicitly state the config to avoid issues in the future if
default values change.
Change-Id: I7f9c56313cfaa74ebe666f44763a83d8102f5484
Related: OS#5034
The gprs_ns2 now requires to specify every bind which should be used by the NSE for IP-SNS
Related: SYS#5354
Depends: I9ab8092bf286e7d90e92f5702a5404425e959c84 (libosmocore)
Change-Id: I35c987224ce098f7ee9f189ce0fce9e68ad3feac
The DL NACC related message (PKT Cell Neighbor Data/Change Continue)
are filled with the TFI of the target TBF. Hence, only select the tbf
for NACC transmission if the related TBF already has a TFI assigned.
Otherwise, "OSMO_ASSERT(tbf_is_tfi_assigned(tbf));" in nacc_fsm.c when
generating messages may be hit.
Related: SYS#4909
Change-Id: I72b2dff28aacdb04909c098c94834ff79f55b31d
Add support for multiple SNS endpoints.
Move the NSE allocation to the top in preparation of IP-SNS binds.
The future gprs_ns2 library will require to manual add every bind to the NSE for IP-SNS.
Rename the function to match more it's purpose.
Related: SYS#5354
Change-Id: I69cf48ab168a6dca4f649157bf6556d7cd27d4fb
Similar to what's done in the previous commit, but this time when we are
further forward in the resolution process.
This can be triggered for instance because we are taking too much time
to resolve and MS has timer to retransmit the Pkt cell Change Notify in
case no response was received in time.
This commit fixes osmo-pcu exiting due to ASSERT(0) since the event was
already accepted but not being handled in the state function.
Related: SYS#4909
Change-Id: I0c29e5979fec6eebe9dfb151907a4cd2f5e4a737
If the message is a duplicate (same tgt cell), simply ignore it.
If the message contains a different tgt cell, restart the resolution:
* Avoid re-creating the socket in that case
* Avoid potentially picking a CTRL response for an older request
Related: SYS#4909
Change-Id: Ia2ed2580bbbdd6d3464833257b0dcb8ec6f8d699
We don't care about those messages anymore if we already transitioned
further than NACC_ST_WAIT_REQUEST_SI. Furthermore, RIM code dispatching
the event to the FSM is only doing it in the mentioned state above.
Related: SYS#4909
Change-Id: If420b49e437ff02073669522408763e5e84fe477
Same filler will be needed in different places since that message can
arrive at different points of time (different states).
It also helps supporting newer key types in the future.
Change-Id: Idfd4db8408f767b1847b04c88047a1c4996e543e
Now that we have the required System Information in osmo-pcu to craft
the Packet Neigbour Cell Change packet for cells it controls, let's
avoid starting a RIM procedure to gather the SI info, since the SGSN
would end up routing the RIM request back at us and we'd answer back to
ourselves.
This same optimization cannot be done on the first step (CTRL Neighbor
Resolution against BSC), because the PCU cannot know if the target
ARFCN+BSIC requested by the MS is actually managed by a cell under the
PCU or it's another cell managed by another external PCU, because
ARFCN+BSIC keys can be resued among non-neighbor cells. Hence, it shall
always ask the BSC since only it holds the information about neighboring
cells.
Related: OS#4909
Change-Id: I928875b6b66dff55fc12f51b6b1ad919fef7d03b
Use the fact that the MS must answer the RRBP of the Pkt Cell Change
Continue with a CTRL ACK to find out whether the message was received
successfuly or a retransmission is potentially required.
3GPP TS 44.060:
"""
When the mobile station receives the PACKET CELL CHANGE ORDER or
the PACKET CELL CHANGE CONTINUE message the mobile station shall
transmit a PACKET CONTROL ACKNOWLEDGMENT message in the specified
uplink radio block if a valid RRBP field is received as part of the
message; the mobile station may then switch to a new cell.
"""
Related: SYS#4909
Change-Id: I7cc28922e71699598da0ef6eb90136a47d3c002f
Answer an incoming RAN INFORMATION REQUEST RIM PDU with RAN INFORMATION
PDU that contains system information type 1, 3 and 13
Depends: osmo-bts I5138ab183793e7eee4dc494318d984e9f1f56932
Change-Id: Id72118120c14984d2fb1b918b41fac4868150d41
Related: SYS#5103
Those fields were ment to be 0 (non-valid), just the comments were
copied over from somewhere else, and they are misleading.
Change-Id: Ic95853e115f60c65f7f11187d49d6e870d08c7bb
Pau Espin
Alexander Couzens
Vadim Yanitskiy
Philipp Maier