That's one of the most important information bits about a TBF when
debugging, and it's not shown currently, only when "show ms" is used.
Change-Id: I98e3c9cac4ca6fc29695768ecc6e0444e618b945
Previous code did use a ctrg based on MS being EGPRS capable or not.
However, an MS being EGPRS capable doesn't mean necessarily that all its
TBFs are EGPRS, since we may known about the capability after we already
created some previous TBF, so it was not ugpraded. Hence, we were
sometimes accessing the wrong NULL ctrg.
Let's simply check for non NULL ctrg when deciding what to print.
"""
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff7561ea6 in vty_out_rate_ctr_group (vty=vty@entry=0x897850, prefix=prefix@entry=0x4482cd " ", ctrg=0x0) at utils.c:82
82 utils.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff7561ea6 in vty_out_rate_ctr_group (vty=vty@entry=0x897850, prefix=prefix@entry=0x4482cd " ", ctrg=0x0) at utils.c:82
#1 0x000000000041437b in tbf_print_vty_info (vty=vty@entry=0x897850, tbf=0x3fb61f0) at pcu_vty_functions.cpp:98
#2 0x0000000000414acc in pcu_vty_show_tbf_all (vty=vty@entry=0x897850, bts=bts@entry=0x7be650, flags=4294967295) at pcu_vty_functions.cpp:127
#3 0x000000000041206f in show_tbf (self=<optimized out>, vty=0x897850, argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x7fffffffe040) at pcu_vty.c:1150
#4 0x00007ffff755d167 in cmd_execute_command_real (vline=vline@entry=0x7bc300, vty=vty@entry=0x897850, cmd=<optimized out>) at command.c:2604
"""
Related: SYS#5689
Change-Id: I3979bfc12dd3b9a53b34b284537f271c356a3024
This way it fits better the structure where the general one counts all
rachs, and 11bit only the 11 bits. More per-type splitting will be done
in follow-up commits where new types are added.
Change-Id: Ibdfb10dcc65d71e98e2fe8b05001cafea786f071
If it's not single block packets access, then it's one phase packet
access. TS 44.018 Table 9.1.8.1:
"""
One phase packet access with request for single timeslot uplink transmission;
one PDCH is needed.
"""
Change-Id: Ic6beb6dcfebb77fd264b179b028f99a29c644fb1
ns_configure_nse() only sets bind when it doesn't exist yet. If it
already exists bind[i] stays NULL and causes a segfault in
gprs_ns2_is_ip_bind() later on.
This patch ensures bind[i] is either created of set to the existing
bind.
Change-Id: I103e82e6c64324c087a4ff325a83eeab0e5a4ee9
Related: SYS#4971
Fixup for previous patch, which forgot to update the pui using the new
variable, as done already in the same patch for M_NEXT_EXIST.
Change-Id: I92a04c708bcc6c15348324321e8890361bbc5c31
Fixes: 72cdb30ee2b1c0d71ff6d9583d51f46b2e5fdcea
If we decode Exist bit as "1" but we are at the end of the message, and
all the Next items we'd read are expected to be possibly NULL, then swap
the Exist bit in the decoded structure as "0" in order to tell the
decoder user that the related information structure is actually unset,
as if "0" was received.
Related: SYS#5552
Related: OS#4955
Related: OS#5020
Change-Id: I38602e4b680ed87297c7e440691a494c07cad446
All additional release fields are considered optional, and the
CSN_DESCR for Content_t already marks almost all as such, except
DownlinkDualCarrierCapability_r7.
It has been found that some MS transmits a MS RA Capability with a Length=61 bits
where the last bit in the buffer is setting the Exist bit for
DownlinkDualCarrierCapability_r7 as 1. Hence, the CSN1 decoder failed to
decode the whole message because it expected to keep reading there
despite there's no more bytes to read.
While this is could actually be considered an MS bug, let's relax our
expectancies and simply consider the case { 1 <end> } as it was { 0 },
and mark skip decoding DownlinkDualCarrierCapability_r7. That waht
wireshark (packet-gsm_a_gsm.c) or pycrate do for instance.
This patch itself doesn't fix the problem where actually the Exist bit
is stored as 1 in the output decoded structure, but simply allows keep
ongoing with decoding until the end. This issue will be fixed in a
follow-up patch.
Related: SYS#5552
Related: OS#4955
Related: OS#5020
Change-Id: I9a2541bd3544802a646890f32725201836abb0da
The CSN1 encoder/decoder code is already lengthy and complex enough,
there's no need to keep it in the same file, specially because when
debugging, only is interested in one of the 2 functions, and they both
look really similar (long spaghetti switches).
Change-Id: I7d1b1f7e6d7f89b052b3fd73a960419bb2673020
This way PCU always answers DATA.ind and the BTS can still clearly
identify idle frames. It also simplifies testing and verification of
correct behavior.
Related: SYS#4919
Change-Id: Ife718eeed2af011479c03099ea109518f04567bc
This function is expected to be used only on DL TBF so far, so let's
really assert to avoid going through if something is wrong and ending up
later with other issues.
Change-Id: If398ee48364fce5b5e38830b2b278b3bad9a48a2
Code above setting the timer in same tbf_fsm already has this kind of
assert, but it helps understanding the code having this assert here.
Change-Id: I7588deef5073694eb5fecdb516c241a04594e2b0
In that function, previous PDCHs are unlinked and then alloc_algorithm
is expected to assign new TFIs.
Change-Id: I7bcbb223ca32400bede7ab638695ba3c015c9946
Off the top of my head: The tbf_ was kept during a previous refactoring
a while ago to avoid changing lots of more lines in the same patch.
Change-Id: I8ae689a272b7c4d244576ff157f6019a87041abc
TSC is not really a property of a TBF, so let's drop it in order to avoid
confusing and possible misuse of that accessor.
Change-Id: I105eb65d507e45631faddb23420c42bc9560e580
There's no real need to pass a tlli per separate, the information is
already contained in the MS. Furthermore, when doing so, it becomes
clear the TLLI was only passed to set it again on the MS, so actually
that ms_update() can be totally dropped since it will act as a no-op.
Change-Id: Ie761c3c7c222458ab0514117ae637ad3267139a0
The situation holds true as long as the assignment is resolved. Hence,
it can also happen that the TBF is in RELEASE state, because it was
unable to do the assignment (and after retrying, MAX_N3105 moved it into
RELEASING).
Let's not explicitly check states, the other conditions should be
enough.
Related: SYS#5647
Change-Id: I05fb0ea44aeb3fbda9e8e1c449e9366efaa2c511
It doesn't make sense to keep asking the scheduler to retransmit Pkt Ul
Ass if the tbf_fsm already decided we are going to release the TBF.
It can be seen in following log extract:
"""
tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:112 TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0xe1c12303 DIR=UL STATE=ASSIGN EGPRS) start Packet Uplink Assignment (PACCH)
tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:131 TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0xe1c12303 DIR=UL STATE=ASSIGN EGPRS) Scheduled UL Assignment polling on PACCH (FN=612941, TS=7)
tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:188 UL_ASS_TBF(UL-TFI_1)[849e50]{SEND_ASS}: state_chg to WAIT_ACK
pdch_ul_controller.c:330 PDCH(bts=0,trx=1,ts=7) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=612937, reason=DL_ASS): TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0xe1c12303 DIR=UL STATE=ASSIGN EGPRS)
tbf.cpp:550 TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0xe1c12303 DIR=UL STATE=ASSIGN EGPRS) poll timeout for FN=612937, TS=7 (curr FN 612937)
tbf.cpp:392 TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0xe1c12303 DIR=UL STATE=ASSIGN EGPRS) N3105 exceeded MAX (8)
tbf.cpp:602 TBF(UL-TFI_1)[7bd530]{ASSIGN}: Received Event MAX_N3105
tbf_fsm.c:194 TBF(UL-TFI_1)[7bd530]{ASSIGN}: state_chg to RELEASING
pdch_ul_controller.c:330 PDCH(bts=0,trx=1,ts=7) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=612941, reason=UL_ASS): TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0xe1c12303 DIR=UL STATE=RELEASING EGPRS)
tbf.cpp:550 TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0xe1c12303 DIR=UL STATE=RELEASING EGPRS) poll timeout for FN=612941, TS=7 (curr FN 612941)
tbf.cpp:589 UL_ASS_TBF(UL-TFI_1)[849e50]{WAIT_ACK}: Received Event ASS_POLL_TIMEOUT
tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:224 TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0xe1c12303 DIR=UL STATE=RELEASING EGPRS) Timeout for polling PACKET CONTROL ACK for PACKET UPLINK ASSIGNMENT: |Assignment was on PACCH|No uplink data received yet|
tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:226 UL_ASS_TBF(UL-TFI_1)[849e50]{WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to SEND_ASS
tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:308 UL_ASS_TBF(UL-TFI_1)[849e50]{SEND_ASS}: Received Event CREATE_RLCMAC_MSG
tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:112 TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0xe1c12303 DIR=UL STATE=RELEASING EGPRS) start Packet Uplink Assignment (PACCH)
tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:131 TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0xe1c12303 DIR=UL STATE=RELEASING EGPRS) Scheduled UL Assignment polling on PACCH (FN=612976, TS=7)
tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:188 UL_ASS_TBF(UL-TFI_1)[849e50]{SEND_ASS}: state_chg to WAIT_ACK
"""
Change-Id: I94243ff99dfaf3664a1a4b3c4c87b5104ba4f7d1
When MS sends us the Packet Resource Request as RRBP from final UL ACK/NACK, we create a new TBF
with a different set of allocated TS. However, we must send the Pkt UL Assignment with information
of the new TBF using that same TS where we receive the Packet Resource Request, which happens to
be the control TS of the previous/old TBF. The original control TS of the new TBF is kept in
tbf->first_common_ts.
Hence the code does gprs_rlcmac_pdch::rcv_resource_request():
"""
ul_tbf->control_ts = ts_no;
"""
And later, when we receive a CTRL ACK answering the Pkt UL Assigment, we change the control TS of
the new TBF back to the new one, by calling tbf_assign_control_ts(), which basically does:
"""
tbf->control_ts = tbf->first_common_ts;
"""
So, for instance we have a TBF which was allocated with tbf->control_ts=4 and hence is only attached
to PDCH 4 (tbf->pdch[]), but for which is temporarily applied tbf->control_ts=7. Hence, when a poll
is requested, it is done in control_ts, aka 7, which is not in the array of attached PDCH.
The problem is of course if we never reach the point where the final control_ts is set, due to never
receiving the CTRL ACK. If the TBF is freed (due to timer X2001) before receiving the CTRL ACK and
hence tbf_assign_control_ts() is called, a crash may occur, because potentially a poll for the TBF is
left in TS 7 because it's not a PDCH attached to the TBF and hence poll
entries on that TS are not released, hence keeping a pointer to the
freed TBF.
Related: SYS#5647
Change-Id: I0c49f2695e0d932d956c01976c9458eebee63cd4
Seen on a runnig osmo-pcu against real MS:
"""
pdch_ul_controller.c:329 PDCH(bts=0,trx=1,ts=7) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=751140): TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xe8c12143 DIR=UL STATE=ASSIGN EGPRS)
tbf.cpp:542 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xe8c12143 DIR=UL STATE=ASSIGN EGPRS) poll timeout for FN=751140, TS=7 (curr FN 751140)
tbf.cpp:384 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xe8c12143 DIR=UL STATE=ASSIGN EGPRS) N3105 exceeded MAX (8)
tbf.cpp:594 TBF(UL-TFI_0)[9bc050]{ASSIGN}: Received Event MAX_N3105
tbf.cpp:594 TBF(UL-TFI_0)[9bc050]{ASSIGN}: Event MAX_N3105 not permitted
"""
It was first though when FSMs where introduced that an FSM in ASSIGN
state could not receive this kind of event because it was believed to be
sending no CTRL blocks at all until flow state. That's because the
believe was that Assignment over PACCH was done by another existing TBF.
It turns out this is usually the case, but not in all cases. In at least
one case, the tbf object (and tbf_fsm/tbf_{ul,dl}_ass_fsm) itself is
handling its own assignment (hence eg. sending the UL assignment and waiting
response through tbf_ul_ass_fsm. This happens if a UL TBF sends a Pkt
Resource Req as a response to RRBP of final UL ACK/NACK in order to
request a new TBF, where it temporarily uses the control_ts of the
previous TBF to get a new Pkt UL Assignment over PACCH.
If Pkt Ul Assignment doesn't receive a CTRL ACK, tbf_ul_ass_fsm will
retrnamist it, until MAX_N3015 is reached (the event we failed to
handle until now). At this point, we really want to transition to
RELEASING in order to avoid keeping the TBF allocating resources (until
X2001 times out).
Related: SYS#5647
Change-Id: I86d5c1bbccd06673d08451b812d149e727404733
Move the required conditions to generate a message to the rts()
function, this way the scheduler knows this TBF cannot yet attempt the
procedure and hence will not request it to create a message which will
fail.
This way the scheduler will schedule other itneresting messages instead
of failing and scheduling a dummy block as a result.
Change-Id: Idbe4f9bbd23005a43c586b737cf9adc2114287e2
This helps distinguishing the case where a TBF is in the initial state
and the unexpected case where osmo_fsm_inst_state_name reports "NULL"
due to fi pointer being NULL.
Change-Id: Ieaabfc9fa0dedb299bcf4541783cf80e366a88c3
Let's only release PDCH ULC entry if it was indeed what we expected.
In other case, time it out.
Move the case in the switch statement to the start to easy function
readibility (early return style).
Change-Id: I3d8749acca8e7859295d73cce556b2083169f726
If we didn't expect this kind of UL messages according to pdch ULC, then
we shouldn't allow going forward and releasing the ULC entry: let it
time out instead so that TBF runs whatever appopiate action is needed in
this case, be it retransamission, releasing itself, etc.
Change-Id: I8ab3f5e4f2f802944269453db13a80c9ede67714
If it doesn't match out expectancies, it means we early return and hence
don't push forward / update whatever state was requested upon receival
of the UL message for the expected TBF. Hence, we shall not remove the
allocated ULC entry: in this scenario we need to keep it so that timeout
procedure times out and the tbf applies whatever measures are required,
be it retransmission, releasing itself, etc.
Change-Id: Ia69a7d92c4b5c98ec71a75605c8dc3a755e63a35
Fixes following error log line:
"{RELEASING}: Event DL_ACKNACK_MISS not permitted"
Rationale: We may move to RELEASING state at some point, for instance
due to MAX_N3101/MAX_N3105 while still having some active poll
registered in some PDCH ulc. Upon that poll (most probably) timing out,
it will send a DL_ACKNACK_MISS event to us. Since we are already
determined to release the TBF (waiting for T3195 or T3169 to trigger),
simply ignore the event and avoid logging an error.
Fixes: OS#5240
Change-Id: Ibfb49356d2b3b5fccb6d59db8593b2256e5c51fb
This clarifies the different paths and uniforms them. Makes code far
easier to read and debug.
New improved verification already found some misehavior in some tests.
Change-Id: I7e4a88d6e004bbb7974595320ed73742162c7ad7
Move FSM internal state checks to its own file. Re-use the helper
function in the 2 places where same stuff is checked.
Change-Id: I9ded6e1c80e6cd7bcf6883bc2e853b6dafb33f7c
As seen operating PCU after BTS restart, lots of following message
sequences due to FSM kept in same state (hence scheduler retyring every
time):
"""
DTBF tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:306 UL_ASS_TBF(DL-TFI_0){SEND_ASS}: Received Event CREATE_RLCMAC_MSG
DTBF tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:95 TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf80bd801 DIR=DL STATE=RELEASING EGPRS) We have a schedule for uplink assignment, but there is no uplink TBF
DTBF tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:97 UL_ASS_TBF(DL-TFI_0){SEND_ASS}: transition to state NONE not permitted!
DTBF tbf_ul_ass_fsm.c:306 UL_ASS_TBF(DL-TFI_0){SEND_ASS}: Received Event CREATE_RLCMAC_MSG
"""
Change-Id: I91d74f70a9106ccbf0c137b6e713877f9ea8f59d
Make use of the separate GPRS counters added in previous patch
I0c0a1121b4ae5f031782e7e63a0c28eb0b6c8b42 to shorten
has_gprs_only_tb_attached.
Related: SYS#4878
Change-Id: I1dd7df2c740ea604f07c65bebcb7c0051aebf9ae
Same was already done for PDTCH in previous commits. Let's now apply
same bits to PTCCH.
Related: SYS#4919
Change-Id: If6617964e67fc35eeee1791b06e13bf63ac88f73
We also want to avoid sending idle blocs in TRX0 to the BTS, so that the
BTS can be aware of blocks being idle and then submitting dummy blokcs
by itself applying required BCCH Carrier power reduction.
Related: SYS#4919
Change-Id: Idd58d2a09c3947098b960cfcb5cd1b7b7bca3d84
Add stats needed for performance measurements in
3GPP TS 52.402 § B.2.1.54-55.
Split m_num_tbfs to count GPRS and EGPRS TBFs separately. Move the code
that updates m_num_tbfs and sets the PDCH_OCCUPIED stats to a separate
function, as it's mostly the same in the TBF attach and detach.
Related: SYS#4878
Change-Id: I0c0a1121b4ae5f031782e7e63a0c28eb0b6c8b42
We already have a similar function for Neighbor Address Resolution.
This way we keep as much as possible internal state related logic into
the nacc_fsm.c file.
Change-Id: I7378939825cc3ec3280f76bc51233c0a172d8a27
While NACC was initially developed, it became clear there was need for
a way to interact PCU<->BSC in order resolve ARFCN+BSIC into CGI-PS
for later RIM usage.
Hence, this resolution was first (until today) implemented using an out
of bands RPC system using the CTRL interface, which required specific
config to be written and matches in osmo-pcu and osmo-bsc VTY (ip+port
of the CTRL interface to use).
However, this has several shortcomings:
* As explained above, specific configuration is required
* Since recently, we do support BSC redundancy in osmo-bts. Hence the BTS
may switch to a BSC other than first one. If that happened, that'd mean
the CTRL interface would still point to the initially configured one,
which may not be the same currently serving the PCU.
During recent development of ANR related features, a similar need for
PCU<->BSC was required, but this time it was decided to extend the IPA
multiplex of the Abis OML connection to pass PCUIF messages,
transparently forwarded to each side by the BTS.
This has the advantage that connection PCU<->BTS is handled by BTS and
both sides send messages transparently.
Let's switch by default to using this new interface, while still
maintaing the old way for a while (announcing them as deprecated) to
avoid breaking existing deployments until they are upgraded to new
versions of osmo-pcu and osmo-bsc.
Related: SYS#4971
Change-Id: I6ad33c7ab10202840cf804dea9ba595978d0e920
Count available PDCHs (3GPP TS 52.402 § B.2.1.38) as well as occupied
PDCHs (§ B.2.1.42-44).
Related: SYS#4878
Change-Id: I74760a68ee055510a79e80854ec7bf1521669119
When a PDCH TS becomes disabled (eg due to dyn TS being used for a
call), we are currently freeing all attached PDCHs in order to avoid
further use of it. However, pdch_free_all_tbf() was only freeing TBFs
attached to the PDCH, that is, TBFs having a valid TFI assigned.
There are some cases where temporary dummy TBFs are created which have
no TFI assigned, such as when creating an ImmAssReject. Let's take those
into account too, and make sure they are freed.
Related: OS#5226
Change-Id: Ibfe78448ebdedc8b049c80664711e166d910f9b7
These messages are expected under some circumstances, such as when
direct phy is used and a chan is disabled (eg. dyn TS). This happens
because PCU asks for chan de-activation through PCUIF while at the same
time marking the PDCH locally as disabled. Hence, in the time the BTS
manages to disable it on the lower layers, the phy still sends us
RTS indications.
Let's keep it under NOTICE to avoid clogging the logs in production
setups which are usually using global level of NOTICE or ERROR.
Related: OS#5222
Change-Id: Iab9e1590b504bf05dc693e27550b30db0dffcbc7
It seems there may be a race conditon where lower layers (direct PCU)
send UL blocks to us while the PDCH was already disabled (due to a call
entering on a dynamic TS).
As the PDCH is disabled, the ULC is NULL and shouldn't be used before
being enabled again.
Related: OS#5222
Change-Id: I4b8931f0cc7cfc787a1cc35196295402524b15c3
When setting a POLL, it will always happen on PACCH, so all the CCCH
part makes no sense there. Let's drop it and move the logging of each
case to the caller, where logging file+line is more useful.
Change-Id: I242f97fd6f927131ac64c1a7c9c3812b6389de04
Method is renamed since it clearly relates to getting DL ACK/NACK, no
CTRL ACK.
use same methods in both scheduler and internal use since they are
expectd to be run in the same code path by the scheduler. This way we
make sure the same conditions apply and it's clearer when looking at
the code.
Change-Id: Ib0e9b9547f5292b95064bab2dc182fdf659f0518
There's no real use in having those 2 methods separately, and only adds
complexity. Let's merge it to have 1 TBF code path handling DL ACK/NACK.
Change-Id: I546d2e46bda96a2f551b28673464e57831c71828
There are 2 methods "rcvd_dl_ack()" in osmo-pcu code. One is used by
osmo-pcu itself, and the other is only used in tests.
Changing the tests to use the same method as osmo-pcu allows removing
the second one, and with it, a lot of code and complexity out of
osmo-pcu.
Change-Id: I14d9312cb61534dc97fca83141b9c0cd933c9206
The side effect is that the timer is enabled for other scenarios where a
PACCH assignment happens, like an Assignment Reject or Ul Assignment
(that's why there's more lines showing up now in TbfTest.err).
Change-Id: Ib8ab2f7397ad05c6fcd5dd74af55a1e2c56e1463
The flag is only used to print some non interesting stuff, let's drop it
in order to simplify code. We can add later whatever we want in the new
shiny FSM.
Change-Id: I13f92f058c219f230d57b3c00b8ae1d187603813
The flag is only used to print some uninteresting stuff, let's drop it
in order to simplify code. We can add later whatever we want in the new
shiny FSM.
Change-Id: I20aa7f83cc4f32de129e64c74a91745b983a7b16
We never use the std:string anyway, we always call .c_str() to log using
osmocom logging system.
Furthermore, we'll need to use it from C code soon (next commit).
Change-Id: I3ad66f9f3f4d55d11da3a3b8b38656ae2dd50603
We are freeing the object immediately afterwards anyway, so no need to
pretend it went through the normal state release.
Leaving current state as it is actually provides more information on
what was the status/state at the time the TBF had to be freed.
Change-Id: I3016caaccc2c43e1e300f3c6042d69f8adcd9d69
Having that code in a separate function is confusing and adds code
complexity since it looks like an entry point to start feeing a TBF, but
it simply some (not yet really useful) set of instructions to be called
one 1 code path in tbf_free.
Let's move it there, this way it becomes clear tbf_free() is THE place
to be (if you want to get rid of a TBF).
Change-Id: I30febf4d21a0bfab37524c07598bbb0dd32f7f65
This way we clean up tbf_free entry point, and leave memory freeing for
later on at the end when talloc_free is called.
Change-Id: I1c45e3296e565725bcbbca391d9518772fffa89d
Function is already called by gprs_rlcmac_received_lost(), so next call
following it will be sum=0 and return EINVAL.
Change-Id: I015ba16d18fdd6e2441ec3c256b5ac88771d7a8b
It's fine to always attemt dropping the timer since it's set up in the
constructor.
This also drps the double function call abort()+cleanup() which is
confusing.
Change-Id: Ia2aaa43bd8faacf09fe4b36b11b38022bea7a59c
PdchUlcTest output changes because the original state NULL is not
expected when transactioning to RELEASING upon MAX N310* being hit. In
any case, none of those events should happen in NULL state, but we
don't really care about TBF states there so we are fine with whatever
the state is.
Related: OS#2709
Change-Id: I516b8d989a0d705e5664f8aeaf7d108e0105aa16
While at it, method maybe_start_new_window is renamed to
rcvd_dl_final_ack to make more sense out of the code.
Related: OS#2709
Change-Id: Iebd650c1036ef2d5132789778be7117ce3391c01
At some point later in time the state_flags will most probably be split
into different variables, one ending up in a different FSM. It is moved
so far to the exsiting FSM from the C++ class since it's easier to
access it from C and C++ code, and anyway that kind of information
belongs to the FSM.
Related: OS#2709
Change-Id: I3c62e9e83965cb28065338733f182863e54d7474
Pau Espin
Daniel Willmann
Oliver Smith