encoding: Fix comment description of S/P field
Those fields were ment to be 0 (non-valid), just the comments were copied over from somewhere else, and they are misleading. Change-Id: Ic95853e115f60c65f7f11187d49d6e870d08c7bb
This commit is contained in:
parent
79784d0249
commit
4668dc6f07
|
@ -1739,7 +1739,7 @@ void write_packet_neighbour_cell_data(RlcMacDownlink_t *block,
|
|||
|
||||
block->PAYLOAD_TYPE = 0x1; // RLC/MAC control block that does not include the optional octets of the RLC/MAC control header
|
||||
block->RRBP = 0; // 0: N+13
|
||||
block->SP = 0; // RRBP field is valid
|
||||
block->SP = 0; // RRBP field is not valid
|
||||
block->USF = 0x0; // Uplink state flag
|
||||
|
||||
block->u.Packet_Neighbour_Cell_Data.MESSAGE_TYPE = MT_PACKET_NEIGHBOUR_CELL_DATA;
|
||||
|
@ -1764,7 +1764,7 @@ void write_packet_cell_change_continue(RlcMacDownlink_t *block,
|
|||
|
||||
block->PAYLOAD_TYPE = 0x1; // RLC/MAC control block that does not include the optional octets of the RLC/MAC control header
|
||||
block->RRBP = 0; // 0: N+13
|
||||
block->SP = 0; // RRBP field is valid
|
||||
block->SP = 0; // RRBP field is not valid
|
||||
block->USF = 0x0; // Uplink state flag
|
||||
|
||||
block->u.Packet_Cell_Change_Continue.MESSAGE_TYPE = MT_PACKET_CELL_CHANGE_CONTINUE;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue