2015-05-06 16:30:48 +00:00
|
|
|
/* gprs_ms.h
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2015-2020 by Sysmocom s.f.m.c. GmbH
|
2015-05-06 16:30:48 +00:00
|
|
|
* Author: Jacob Erlbeck <jerlbeck@sysmocom.de>
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
|
|
|
|
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
|
|
|
|
|
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
|
|
|
|
|
* of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
|
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
|
|
|
* GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
|
|
|
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
|
|
|
|
|
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#pragma once
|
|
|
|
|
|
llc: Use CoDel to drop packages from the LLC queue
Currently packets are only dropped if they have reached their maximum
life time. This leads to LLC queues being constantly filled under
load, increasing the latency up to the maximum life time. This kind
of bufferbloat hinders TCP's congestion avoidance algorithms. To keep
the queues short, the CoDel active queue management algorithm can be
used.
This commit changes to llc_dequeue method to apply the CoDel
algorithm to selectively drop LLC frames before they passed to the
TBF layer to be encoded in BSNs. This feature is currently disabled
by default.
The CoDel state is managed per MS since the LLC queues are also kept
in the MS objects.
Note that there is still some buffering in the TBF objects, in the
worst case (CS4) 3.5kByte + LLC-MTU octets are stored there. The
resulting additional packet delay is not (yet) taken into account for
CoDel.
Also note that configuration changes are applied to new MS objects
only.
The following VTY commands are added to the 'pcu' node:
- queue codel activates CoDel, the interval is selected by
the implementation
- queue codel interval <1-1000>
activates CoDel with a fixed interval given
in centiseconds (10ms-10s)
- no queue codel deactivates CoDel
Which interval value to use is still an open issue. For high speed
links (e.g. Ethernet), CoDel suggests 100ms. For slower links, the
expected RTT is recommended. The current implementation uses a
default value of 2000ms.
Measurements:
Note that the following measurements depend on several other factors,
most notably the interaction with the SGSN's flow control. They are
just examples to give an idea how CoDel might influence some
parameters.
The measurements have been done with a single E71, first with a
running ping only (Idle), then with an additional TCP download
of a 360k file (Busy). The CoDel interval was set to 1s.
- Idle :
ping ~400ms, avg queue delay 0ms, dropped 0
- Busy, No CoDel:
ping ~6s, avg queue delay 4-6s,
dropped 0, scheduled 948, duration 54s
- Busy, CoDel:
ping 500-1500ms, avg queue delay ~600ms,
dropped 77, scheduled 1040, duration 60s
More measurements with two MS downloading in parallel (two
independant measurements per case).
- Busy, No CoDel:
dropped 0, scheduled 1883, duration 121s
dropped 19, scheduled 2003, duration 133s
- Busy, CoDel:
dropped 22, scheduled 1926, duration 116s
dropped 22, scheduled 1955, duration 108s
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2015-07-17 14:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gprs_codel;
|
2015-05-06 16:30:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-28 17:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "llc.h"
|
2015-06-29 12:18:46 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "tbf.h"
|
2020-10-23 20:30:04 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "tbf_ul.h"
|
2019-09-25 15:47:02 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "tbf_dl.h"
|
2015-06-08 09:26:38 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "pcu_l1_if.h"
|
2015-05-28 13:43:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef __cplusplus
|
2015-05-28 13:43:53 +00:00
|
|
|
extern "C" {
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2020-05-18 09:35:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/core/timer.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/core/linuxlist.h>
|
2021-01-11 16:32:18 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/core/rate_ctr.h>
|
2020-06-26 11:09:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_23_003.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/gsm/gsm48.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "coding_scheme.h"
|
Introduce NACC support
A new nacc_fsm is introduced per MS object, with its partner priv
structure struct nacc_fsm_ctx, which exists and is available in the MS
object only during the duration of the NACC procedure.
The NACC context is created on an MS whenever a Pkt Cell Change
Notification is received on Uplink RLCMAC, which asks for neighbor
information of a given ARFCN+BSIC.
First, the target ARFCN+BSIC needs to be translated into a CGI-PS
(RAC+CI) address. That's done by asking the BSC through the Neighbour
Resolution Service available in osmo-bsc using the CTRL interface.
Once the CGI-PS of the target cell is known, PCU starts a RIM RAN-INFO
request against the SGSN (which will route the request as needed), and
wait for a response containing the SI bits from the target cell.
After the SI are received, the scheduler is instructed to eventually
poll a TBF for the MS originating the CCN, so that we can send the SI
encapsulated into multiple Packet Neighbor Cell Data messages on the
downlink.
One all the SI bits are sent, the scheduler is instructed to send a
Packet Cell Change Continue message.
Once the message above has been sent, the FSM autodestroys itself.
Caches are also introduced in this patch which allows for re-using
recently known translations ARFCN+BSIC -> CGI-PS and CGI-PS -> SI_INFO
respectively.
Change-Id: Id35f40d05f3e081f32fddbf1fa34cb338db452ca
2021-01-21 17:46:13 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <gsm_rlcmac.h>
|
2015-05-28 13:43:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-05-06 16:30:48 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <stdint.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stddef.h>
|
2020-08-18 18:26:25 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <inttypes.h>
|
2015-05-06 16:30:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-11 16:32:18 +00:00
|
|
|
enum ms_counter_id {
|
|
|
|
|
MS_CTR_DL_CTRL_MSG_SCHED,
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-14 15:48:38 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gprs_rlcmac_bts;
|
2015-06-30 06:52:54 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gprs_rlcmac_trx;
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
struct GprsMs;
|
2015-06-02 12:06:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gpr_ms_callback {
|
|
|
|
|
void (*ms_idle)(struct GprsMs *);
|
|
|
|
|
void (*ms_active)(struct GprsMs *);
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
2015-05-22 15:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
struct GprsMs {
|
|
|
|
|
struct llist_head list; /* list of all GprsMs */
|
|
|
|
|
struct gpr_ms_callback cb;
|
|
|
|
|
bool app_info_pending;
|
2015-06-02 14:00:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-14 15:48:38 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gprs_rlcmac_bts *bts;
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gprs_rlcmac_ul_tbf *ul_tbf;
|
|
|
|
|
struct gprs_rlcmac_dl_tbf *dl_tbf;
|
|
|
|
|
struct llist_head old_tbfs; /* list of gprs_rlcmac_tbf */
|
2015-06-29 12:05:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
uint32_t tlli;
|
|
|
|
|
uint32_t new_ul_tlli;
|
|
|
|
|
uint32_t new_dl_tlli;
|
2015-05-28 17:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
/* store IMSI for look-up and PCH retransmission */
|
|
|
|
|
char imsi[OSMO_IMSI_BUF_SIZE];
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t ta;
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t ms_class;
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t egprs_ms_class;
|
|
|
|
|
/* current coding scheme */
|
|
|
|
|
enum CodingScheme current_cs_ul;
|
|
|
|
|
enum CodingScheme current_cs_dl;
|
2015-05-28 13:43:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gprs_llc_queue llc_queue;
|
2015-05-06 16:30:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
bool is_idle;
|
|
|
|
|
int ref;
|
|
|
|
|
struct osmo_timer_list timer;
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned delay;
|
2015-05-06 16:30:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
int64_t last_cs_not_low;
|
2015-06-04 10:12:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
struct pcu_l1_meas l1_meas;
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned nack_rate_dl;
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t reserved_dl_slots;
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t reserved_ul_slots;
|
|
|
|
|
struct gprs_rlcmac_trx *current_trx;
|
2015-05-06 16:30:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gprs_codel *codel_state;
|
|
|
|
|
enum mcs_kind mode;
|
2015-05-06 16:30:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-11 16:32:18 +00:00
|
|
|
struct rate_ctr_group *ctrs;
|
Introduce NACC support
A new nacc_fsm is introduced per MS object, with its partner priv
structure struct nacc_fsm_ctx, which exists and is available in the MS
object only during the duration of the NACC procedure.
The NACC context is created on an MS whenever a Pkt Cell Change
Notification is received on Uplink RLCMAC, which asks for neighbor
information of a given ARFCN+BSIC.
First, the target ARFCN+BSIC needs to be translated into a CGI-PS
(RAC+CI) address. That's done by asking the BSC through the Neighbour
Resolution Service available in osmo-bsc using the CTRL interface.
Once the CGI-PS of the target cell is known, PCU starts a RIM RAN-INFO
request against the SGSN (which will route the request as needed), and
wait for a response containing the SI bits from the target cell.
After the SI are received, the scheduler is instructed to eventually
poll a TBF for the MS originating the CCN, so that we can send the SI
encapsulated into multiple Packet Neighbor Cell Data messages on the
downlink.
One all the SI bits are sent, the scheduler is instructed to send a
Packet Cell Change Continue message.
Once the message above has been sent, the FSM autodestroys itself.
Caches are also introduced in this patch which allows for re-using
recently known translations ARFCN+BSIC -> CGI-PS and CGI-PS -> SI_INFO
respectively.
Change-Id: Id35f40d05f3e081f32fddbf1fa34cb338db452ca
2021-01-21 17:46:13 +00:00
|
|
|
struct nacc_fsm_ctx *nacc;
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
2015-05-12 15:54:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-14 15:48:38 +00:00
|
|
|
struct GprsMs *ms_alloc(struct gprs_rlcmac_bts *bts, uint32_t tlli);
|
2015-06-08 09:26:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
int ms_first_common_ts(const struct GprsMs *ms);
|
|
|
|
|
void ms_set_reserved_slots(struct GprsMs *ms, struct gprs_rlcmac_trx *trx,
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t ul_slots, uint8_t dl_slots);
|
|
|
|
|
struct GprsMs *ms_ref(struct GprsMs *ms);
|
|
|
|
|
void ms_unref(struct GprsMs *ms);
|
|
|
|
|
void ms_set_mode(struct GprsMs *ms, enum mcs_kind mode);
|
|
|
|
|
void ms_set_ms_class(struct GprsMs *ms, uint8_t ms_class_);
|
|
|
|
|
void ms_set_egprs_ms_class(struct GprsMs *ms, uint8_t ms_class_);
|
|
|
|
|
void ms_set_ta(struct GprsMs *ms, uint8_t ta_);
|
2015-05-28 13:43:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-25 11:05:32 +00:00
|
|
|
enum CodingScheme ms_current_cs_dl(const struct GprsMs *ms, enum mcs_kind req_mcs_kind);
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
enum CodingScheme ms_max_cs_ul(const struct GprsMs *ms);
|
|
|
|
|
enum CodingScheme ms_max_cs_dl(const struct GprsMs *ms);
|
|
|
|
|
void ms_set_current_cs_dl(struct GprsMs *ms, enum CodingScheme scheme);
|
2019-09-05 15:13:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
void ms_update_error_rate(struct GprsMs *ms, struct gprs_rlcmac_tbf *tbf, int error_rate);
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t ms_current_pacch_slots(const struct GprsMs *ms);
|
2015-05-21 09:07:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
void ms_merge_and_clear_ms(struct GprsMs *ms, struct GprsMs *old_ms);
|
2015-06-02 14:00:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
void ms_attach_tbf(struct GprsMs *ms, struct gprs_rlcmac_tbf *tbf);
|
|
|
|
|
void ms_detach_tbf(struct GprsMs *ms, struct gprs_rlcmac_tbf *tbf);
|
2015-05-21 09:07:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
void ms_set_tlli(struct GprsMs *ms, uint32_t tlli);
|
|
|
|
|
bool ms_confirm_tlli(struct GprsMs *ms, uint32_t tlli);
|
|
|
|
|
void ms_set_imsi(struct GprsMs *ms, const char *imsi);
|
2015-06-04 15:46:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
void ms_update_l1_meas(struct GprsMs *ms, const struct pcu_l1_meas *meas);
|
2015-06-08 09:26:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gprs_rlcmac_tbf *ms_tbf(const struct GprsMs *ms, enum gprs_rlcmac_tbf_direction dir);
|
|
|
|
|
static inline struct gprs_rlcmac_ul_tbf *ms_ul_tbf(const struct GprsMs *ms) {return ms->ul_tbf;}
|
|
|
|
|
static inline struct gprs_rlcmac_dl_tbf *ms_dl_tbf(const struct GprsMs *ms) {return ms->dl_tbf;}
|
llc: Use CoDel to drop packages from the LLC queue
Currently packets are only dropped if they have reached their maximum
life time. This leads to LLC queues being constantly filled under
load, increasing the latency up to the maximum life time. This kind
of bufferbloat hinders TCP's congestion avoidance algorithms. To keep
the queues short, the CoDel active queue management algorithm can be
used.
This commit changes to llc_dequeue method to apply the CoDel
algorithm to selectively drop LLC frames before they passed to the
TBF layer to be encoded in BSNs. This feature is currently disabled
by default.
The CoDel state is managed per MS since the LLC queues are also kept
in the MS objects.
Note that there is still some buffering in the TBF objects, in the
worst case (CS4) 3.5kByte + LLC-MTU octets are stored there. The
resulting additional packet delay is not (yet) taken into account for
CoDel.
Also note that configuration changes are applied to new MS objects
only.
The following VTY commands are added to the 'pcu' node:
- queue codel activates CoDel, the interval is selected by
the implementation
- queue codel interval <1-1000>
activates CoDel with a fixed interval given
in centiseconds (10ms-10s)
- no queue codel deactivates CoDel
Which interval value to use is still an open issue. For high speed
links (e.g. Ethernet), CoDel suggests 100ms. For slower links, the
expected RTT is recommended. The current implementation uses a
default value of 2000ms.
Measurements:
Note that the following measurements depend on several other factors,
most notably the interaction with the SGSN's flow control. They are
just examples to give an idea how CoDel might influence some
parameters.
The measurements have been done with a single E71, first with a
running ping only (Idle), then with an additional TCP download
of a 360k file (Busy). The CoDel interval was set to 1s.
- Idle :
ping ~400ms, avg queue delay 0ms, dropped 0
- Busy, No CoDel:
ping ~6s, avg queue delay 4-6s,
dropped 0, scheduled 948, duration 54s
- Busy, CoDel:
ping 500-1500ms, avg queue delay ~600ms,
dropped 77, scheduled 1040, duration 60s
More measurements with two MS downloading in parallel (two
independant measurements per case).
- Busy, No CoDel:
dropped 0, scheduled 1883, duration 121s
dropped 19, scheduled 2003, duration 133s
- Busy, CoDel:
dropped 22, scheduled 1926, duration 116s
dropped 22, scheduled 1955, duration 108s
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2015-07-17 14:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-12-16 07:27:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
void ms_set_callback(struct GprsMs *ms, struct gpr_ms_callback *cb);
|
2015-05-15 13:50:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Introduce NACC support
A new nacc_fsm is introduced per MS object, with its partner priv
structure struct nacc_fsm_ctx, which exists and is available in the MS
object only during the duration of the NACC procedure.
The NACC context is created on an MS whenever a Pkt Cell Change
Notification is received on Uplink RLCMAC, which asks for neighbor
information of a given ARFCN+BSIC.
First, the target ARFCN+BSIC needs to be translated into a CGI-PS
(RAC+CI) address. That's done by asking the BSC through the Neighbour
Resolution Service available in osmo-bsc using the CTRL interface.
Once the CGI-PS of the target cell is known, PCU starts a RIM RAN-INFO
request against the SGSN (which will route the request as needed), and
wait for a response containing the SI bits from the target cell.
After the SI are received, the scheduler is instructed to eventually
poll a TBF for the MS originating the CCN, so that we can send the SI
encapsulated into multiple Packet Neighbor Cell Data messages on the
downlink.
One all the SI bits are sent, the scheduler is instructed to send a
Packet Cell Change Continue message.
Once the message above has been sent, the FSM autodestroys itself.
Caches are also introduced in this patch which allows for re-using
recently known translations ARFCN+BSIC -> CGI-PS and CGI-PS -> SI_INFO
respectively.
Change-Id: Id35f40d05f3e081f32fddbf1fa34cb338db452ca
2021-01-21 17:46:13 +00:00
|
|
|
int ms_nacc_start(struct GprsMs *ms, Packet_Cell_Change_Notification_t *notif);
|
|
|
|
|
bool ms_nacc_rts(const struct GprsMs *ms);
|
2021-02-01 13:52:48 +00:00
|
|
|
struct msgb *ms_nacc_create_rlcmac_msg(struct GprsMs *ms, struct gprs_rlcmac_tbf *tbf, uint32_t fn, uint8_t ts);
|
Introduce NACC support
A new nacc_fsm is introduced per MS object, with its partner priv
structure struct nacc_fsm_ctx, which exists and is available in the MS
object only during the duration of the NACC procedure.
The NACC context is created on an MS whenever a Pkt Cell Change
Notification is received on Uplink RLCMAC, which asks for neighbor
information of a given ARFCN+BSIC.
First, the target ARFCN+BSIC needs to be translated into a CGI-PS
(RAC+CI) address. That's done by asking the BSC through the Neighbour
Resolution Service available in osmo-bsc using the CTRL interface.
Once the CGI-PS of the target cell is known, PCU starts a RIM RAN-INFO
request against the SGSN (which will route the request as needed), and
wait for a response containing the SI bits from the target cell.
After the SI are received, the scheduler is instructed to eventually
poll a TBF for the MS originating the CCN, so that we can send the SI
encapsulated into multiple Packet Neighbor Cell Data messages on the
downlink.
One all the SI bits are sent, the scheduler is instructed to send a
Packet Cell Change Continue message.
Once the message above has been sent, the FSM autodestroys itself.
Caches are also introduced in this patch which allows for re-using
recently known translations ARFCN+BSIC -> CGI-PS and CGI-PS -> SI_INFO
respectively.
Change-Id: Id35f40d05f3e081f32fddbf1fa34cb338db452ca
2021-01-21 17:46:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline bool ms_is_idle(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-08-21 13:24:02 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return !ms->ul_tbf && !ms->dl_tbf && !ms->ref && llist_empty(&ms->old_tbfs);
|
2015-08-21 13:24:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline struct gprs_llc_queue *ms_llc_queue(struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-09-01 09:38:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return &ms->llc_queue;
|
2015-09-01 09:38:40 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline bool ms_need_dl_tbf(struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-05-15 13:50:43 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
if (ms_dl_tbf(ms) != NULL &&
|
2021-05-14 10:50:46 +00:00
|
|
|
tbf_state((const struct gprs_rlcmac_tbf *)ms_dl_tbf(ms)) != TBF_ST_WAIT_RELEASE)
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
TLLI 0x00000000 is a valid TLLI, use 0xffffffff instead
The assumption that TLLI 0x00000000 is invalid and can be used
as the initializer is wrong. Similar to TMSI, 0x00000000 is a
perfectly valid value, while 0xffffffff is reserved - use it.
According to 3GPP TS 23.003, section 2.4, a TMSI/P-TMSI with
all 32 bits equal to 1 is special and shall not be allocated by
the network. The reason is that it must be stored on the SIM,
where 'ff'O represents the erased state. According to section
2.6 of the same document, a local/foreign TLLI is derived from
P-TMSI, so the same rule applies to TLLI.
I manually checked and corrected all occurances of 'tlli' in the
code. The test expectations have been adjusted with this command:
$ find tests/ -name "*.err" | xargs sed -i "s/0x00000000/0xffffffff/g"
so there should be no behavior change. The only exception is
the 'TypesTest', where TLLI 0xffffffff is being encoded and
expected in the hexdump, so I regenerated the test output.
Change-Id: Ie89fab75ecc1d8b5e238d3ff214ea7ac830b68b5
Related: OS#4844
2020-11-08 06:27:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return llc_queue_size(ms_llc_queue(ms)) > 0;
|
2015-05-15 13:50:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline uint32_t ms_tlli(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-05-15 13:50:43 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
if (ms->new_ul_tlli != GSM_RESERVED_TMSI)
|
|
|
|
|
return ms->new_ul_tlli;
|
|
|
|
|
if (ms->tlli != GSM_RESERVED_TMSI)
|
|
|
|
|
return ms->tlli;
|
2015-05-21 09:07:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return ms->new_dl_tlli;
|
2015-05-21 09:07:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-22 15:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline bool ms_check_tlli(struct GprsMs *ms, uint32_t tlli)
|
2015-05-22 15:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return tlli != GSM_RESERVED_TMSI &&
|
|
|
|
|
(tlli == ms->tlli || tlli == ms->new_ul_tlli || tlli == ms->new_dl_tlli);
|
2015-05-22 15:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-28 13:43:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline const char *ms_imsi(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-06-02 10:33:30 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return ms->imsi;
|
2015-06-02 10:33:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline uint8_t ms_ta(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-09-28 15:55:32 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return ms->ta;
|
2015-09-28 15:55:32 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline uint8_t ms_ms_class(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-06-02 14:00:41 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return ms->ms_class;
|
2015-06-02 14:00:41 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline uint8_t ms_egprs_ms_class(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2016-01-05 14:33:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return ms->egprs_ms_class;
|
2016-01-05 14:33:03 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline enum CodingScheme ms_current_cs_ul(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-05-28 13:43:53 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return ms->current_cs_ul;
|
2015-05-28 13:43:53 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-05-28 17:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline enum mcs_kind ms_mode(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-05-28 17:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return ms->mode;
|
2015-05-28 17:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline void ms_set_timeout(struct GprsMs *ms, unsigned secs)
|
2015-05-28 17:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
ms->delay = secs;
|
2015-05-28 17:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline struct gprs_codel *ms_codel_state(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
llc: Use CoDel to drop packages from the LLC queue
Currently packets are only dropped if they have reached their maximum
life time. This leads to LLC queues being constantly filled under
load, increasing the latency up to the maximum life time. This kind
of bufferbloat hinders TCP's congestion avoidance algorithms. To keep
the queues short, the CoDel active queue management algorithm can be
used.
This commit changes to llc_dequeue method to apply the CoDel
algorithm to selectively drop LLC frames before they passed to the
TBF layer to be encoded in BSNs. This feature is currently disabled
by default.
The CoDel state is managed per MS since the LLC queues are also kept
in the MS objects.
Note that there is still some buffering in the TBF objects, in the
worst case (CS4) 3.5kByte + LLC-MTU octets are stored there. The
resulting additional packet delay is not (yet) taken into account for
CoDel.
Also note that configuration changes are applied to new MS objects
only.
The following VTY commands are added to the 'pcu' node:
- queue codel activates CoDel, the interval is selected by
the implementation
- queue codel interval <1-1000>
activates CoDel with a fixed interval given
in centiseconds (10ms-10s)
- no queue codel deactivates CoDel
Which interval value to use is still an open issue. For high speed
links (e.g. Ethernet), CoDel suggests 100ms. For slower links, the
expected RTT is recommended. The current implementation uses a
default value of 2000ms.
Measurements:
Note that the following measurements depend on several other factors,
most notably the interaction with the SGSN's flow control. They are
just examples to give an idea how CoDel might influence some
parameters.
The measurements have been done with a single E71, first with a
running ping only (Idle), then with an additional TCP download
of a 360k file (Busy). The CoDel interval was set to 1s.
- Idle :
ping ~400ms, avg queue delay 0ms, dropped 0
- Busy, No CoDel:
ping ~6s, avg queue delay 4-6s,
dropped 0, scheduled 948, duration 54s
- Busy, CoDel:
ping 500-1500ms, avg queue delay ~600ms,
dropped 77, scheduled 1040, duration 60s
More measurements with two MS downloading in parallel (two
independant measurements per case).
- Busy, No CoDel:
dropped 0, scheduled 1883, duration 121s
dropped 19, scheduled 2003, duration 133s
- Busy, CoDel:
dropped 22, scheduled 1926, duration 116s
dropped 22, scheduled 1955, duration 108s
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2015-07-17 14:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return ms->codel_state;
|
llc: Use CoDel to drop packages from the LLC queue
Currently packets are only dropped if they have reached their maximum
life time. This leads to LLC queues being constantly filled under
load, increasing the latency up to the maximum life time. This kind
of bufferbloat hinders TCP's congestion avoidance algorithms. To keep
the queues short, the CoDel active queue management algorithm can be
used.
This commit changes to llc_dequeue method to apply the CoDel
algorithm to selectively drop LLC frames before they passed to the
TBF layer to be encoded in BSNs. This feature is currently disabled
by default.
The CoDel state is managed per MS since the LLC queues are also kept
in the MS objects.
Note that there is still some buffering in the TBF objects, in the
worst case (CS4) 3.5kByte + LLC-MTU octets are stored there. The
resulting additional packet delay is not (yet) taken into account for
CoDel.
Also note that configuration changes are applied to new MS objects
only.
The following VTY commands are added to the 'pcu' node:
- queue codel activates CoDel, the interval is selected by
the implementation
- queue codel interval <1-1000>
activates CoDel with a fixed interval given
in centiseconds (10ms-10s)
- no queue codel deactivates CoDel
Which interval value to use is still an open issue. For high speed
links (e.g. Ethernet), CoDel suggests 100ms. For slower links, the
expected RTT is recommended. The current implementation uses a
default value of 2000ms.
Measurements:
Note that the following measurements depend on several other factors,
most notably the interaction with the SGSN's flow control. They are
just examples to give an idea how CoDel might influence some
parameters.
The measurements have been done with a single E71, first with a
running ping only (Idle), then with an additional TCP download
of a 360k file (Busy). The CoDel interval was set to 1s.
- Idle :
ping ~400ms, avg queue delay 0ms, dropped 0
- Busy, No CoDel:
ping ~6s, avg queue delay 4-6s,
dropped 0, scheduled 948, duration 54s
- Busy, CoDel:
ping 500-1500ms, avg queue delay ~600ms,
dropped 77, scheduled 1040, duration 60s
More measurements with two MS downloading in parallel (two
independant measurements per case).
- Busy, No CoDel:
dropped 0, scheduled 1883, duration 121s
dropped 19, scheduled 2003, duration 133s
- Busy, CoDel:
dropped 22, scheduled 1926, duration 116s
dropped 22, scheduled 1955, duration 108s
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2015-07-17 14:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline unsigned ms_nack_rate_dl(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-06-12 14:01:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return ms->nack_rate_dl;
|
2015-06-12 14:01:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline uint8_t ms_reserved_dl_slots(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-06-30 06:52:54 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return ms->reserved_dl_slots;
|
2015-06-30 06:52:54 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline uint8_t ms_reserved_ul_slots(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-06-30 06:52:54 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return ms->reserved_ul_slots;
|
2015-06-30 06:52:54 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline struct gprs_rlcmac_trx *ms_current_trx(const struct GprsMs *ms)
|
2015-06-30 06:52:54 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
return ms->current_trx;
|
2015-06-30 06:52:54 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-08-18 18:26:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define LOGPMS(ms, category, level, fmt, args...) \
|
|
|
|
|
LOGP(category, level, "MS(TLLI=0x%08x, IMSI=%s, TA=%" PRIu8 ", %" PRIu8 "/%" PRIu8 ",%s%s) " fmt, \
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
ms_tlli(ms), ms_imsi(ms), ms_ta(ms), ms_ms_class(ms), ms_egprs_ms_class(ms), \
|
|
|
|
|
ms_ul_tbf(ms) ? " UL": "", \
|
|
|
|
|
ms_dl_tbf(ms) ? " DL": "", \
|
2020-08-18 18:26:25 +00:00
|
|
|
## args)
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef __cplusplus
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
