We do include this IE in result and error messages, but somehow
not in the request messages. For the sake of consistency, let's
ensure that the Source Name IE is present in all SMS related PDUs.
This additionally brings osmo-msc in sync with ttcn3-msc-test, which
was modified to expect the Source Name IE in all receive templates,
and makes the following testcases pass [again]:
* MSC_Tests.TC_gsup_mo_sms
* MSC_Tests.TC_gsup_mo_smma
* MSC_Tests.TC_gsup_mo_mt_sms_rp_mr
Change-Id: I65f5e3b7a0688e258979bb2679598659881a4321
Related: osmo-ttcn3-hacks.git Ic24d3082fe3dce08e43e8f3ecb6d6132503c55c6
Related: OS#6135
For MO-forwardSM and MT-forwardSM request messages, OsmoHLR applies
routing based on the SMSC address for MO or based on the IMSI for MT.
However, reply messages following these requests are routed passively
based on the destination_name IE. This passive message routing path
requires the source_name IE to be set as well - implement this
source_name setting.
Related: OS#6135
Change-Id: I0b7f4760bdce8a38d43d3860086c6dfb7b390701
When OsmoMSC is used with OsmoHLR rather than a GSUP-to-MAP gateway,
MT-forwardSM.req GSUP messages delivering MT SMS will be coming from
a separate SMSC relayed via OsmoHLR, rather than from OsmoHLR itself.
When we reply to these messages, in order for these replies to reach
the MT-sending SMSC via OsmoHLR, we need to save source_name from
the request and regurgitate it into destination_name in our response
messages. Implement this logic.
Related: OS#6135
Change-Id: I436e333035b8f6e27f86a49fe293ea48ea07a013
We shall not include additional BCD length octet into the value part
of SM-RP-OA (Originating Address) IE. Instead, there should be
ToA/NPI header (1 octet).
Since we do not get ToN/NPI fields from the VLR/HLR, let's assume
the following default values:
1... .... = Extension: No extension
.001 .... = Type of number: International (1)
.... 0001 = Numbering plan: ISDN/telephone (E.164/E.163) (1)
Change-Id: I0f32e2af0ed2d2fea6addf45efbdfee120c2425d
TTCN-3 test case: Ib467eeca6439bc6cce72293fbb5bb48f6d233db9
Related: OS#4324
This change is similar to I5540556b1c75f6873883e46b78656f31fc1ef186.
In gsm411_gsup_rx() we do call vlr_subscr_find_by_imsi(), which
increases subscriber's reference count by one using the function
name as the token. However, we never release this token, so the
reference count grows on every received GSUP FORWARD-SM message.
Change-Id: Ic729beb5f94cbbfbb251bc9ab66a5e7b799286c0
According to 3GPP TS 29.002, section 7.6.8.7, MMS (More Messages to Send)
is an optional IE of MT-ForwardSM-Req message which is used by SMSC to
indicate that there are more (multi-part) MT SMS messages to be sent.
The MSC needs to use this indication in order to decide whether to
keep the RAN connection with a given subscriber open.
Related Change-Id: (TTCN) I6308586a70c4fb3254c519330a61a9667372149f
Change-Id: Ic46b04913b2e8cc5d11a39426dcc1bfe11f1d31e
Related: OS#3587
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
An earlier code state used the conn to lookup the transaction, but this is now
done by vsub. Hence the conn lookup is not used and not needed.
conn is no longer used since 36c44b2100,
change-Id I093f36d63e671e50e54fc6236e97a777cc6da77b,
"transaction: change arguments of trans_find_by_sm_rp_mr()"
Change-Id: Ia878d70138c883cb1a1d983516aff83efa6488ce
The need to pass a pointer to RAN connection in order to find
a transaction limits possible use cases of trans_find_by_sm_rp_mr(),
e.g. when we need to find a transaction, but RAN connection is not
established yet.
Moreover, the pointer to RAN connection was only used to obtain
pointers to gsm_network and vlr_subscr, so we can just
pass them directly.
Change-Id: I093f36d63e671e50e54fc6236e97a777cc6da77b
Vadim Yanitskiy
Mychaela N. Falconia