2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
/* OpenBSC SMPP 3.4 interface, SMSC-side implementation */
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-17 16:25:14 +00:00
|
|
|
/* (C) 2012-2022 by Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2013-07-13 14:35:32 +00:00
|
|
|
* All Rights Reserved
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2013-07-13 14:35:32 +00:00
|
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by
|
|
|
|
|
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
|
|
|
|
|
* (at your option) any later version.
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2013-07-13 14:35:32 +00:00
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
|
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
|
|
|
* GNU Affero General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License
|
|
|
|
|
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <unistd.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <string.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stdint.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <errno.h>
|
2022-05-17 16:25:14 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <time.h>
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <smpp34.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <smpp34_structs.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <smpp34_params.h>
|
2019-04-09 22:33:46 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <smpp34_heap.h>
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/core/utils.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/core/msgb.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/core/logging.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/core/talloc.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_04_11.h>
|
2013-03-13 14:29:27 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/gsm/protocol/smpp34_osmocom.h>
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-09-04 13:04:35 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/msc/gsm_subscriber.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/msc/debug.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/msc/db.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/msc/gsm_04_11.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/msc/gsm_data.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/msc/signal.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/msc/transaction.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/msc/gsm_subscriber.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/msc/vlr.h>
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/msc/msc_a.h>
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "smpp_smsc.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
|
|
|
#define VSUB_USE_SMPP "SMPP"
|
|
|
|
|
#define VSUB_USE_SMPP_CMD "SMPP-cmd"
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-09 22:33:46 +00:00
|
|
|
/* talloc integration for libsmpp34 */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct smsc *g_smsc;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void *smpp34_talloc_malloc(size_t sz)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
return talloc_size(g_smsc, sz);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void *smpp34_talloc_realloc(void *ptr, size_t sz)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
return talloc_realloc_size(g_smsc, ptr, sz);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void smpp34_talloc_free(void *ptr)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
talloc_free(ptr);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const struct smpp34_memory_functions smpp34_talloc = {
|
|
|
|
|
.malloc_fun = smpp34_talloc_malloc,
|
|
|
|
|
.realloc_fun = smpp34_talloc_realloc,
|
|
|
|
|
.free_fun = smpp34_talloc_free,
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
/*! \brief find vlr_subscr for a given SMPP NPI/TON/Address */
|
|
|
|
|
static struct vlr_subscr *subscr_by_dst(struct gsm_network *net,
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t npi, uint8_t ton,
|
|
|
|
|
const char *addr)
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
struct vlr_subscr *vsub = NULL;
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (npi) {
|
|
|
|
|
case NPI_Land_Mobile_E212:
|
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
|
|
|
vsub = vlr_subscr_find_by_imsi(net->vlr, addr, VSUB_USE_SMPP);
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
case NPI_ISDN_E163_E164:
|
|
|
|
|
case NPI_Private:
|
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
|
|
|
vsub = vlr_subscr_find_by_msisdn(net->vlr, addr, VSUB_USE_SMPP);
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
|
LOGP(DSMPP, LOGL_NOTICE, "Unsupported NPI: %u\n", npi);
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
log_set_context(LOG_CTX_VLR_SUBSCR, vsub);
|
|
|
|
|
return vsub;
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-11 10:02:12 +00:00
|
|
|
static int smpp34_submit_tlv_msg_payload(const struct tlv_t *t,
|
|
|
|
|
const struct submit_sm_t *submit,
|
|
|
|
|
const uint8_t **sms_msg,
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned int *sms_msg_len)
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2017-08-11 10:02:12 +00:00
|
|
|
if (submit->sm_length) {
|
|
|
|
|
LOGP(DLSMS, LOGL_ERROR,
|
|
|
|
|
"SMPP cannot have payload in TLV _and_ in the header\n");
|
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-08-11 10:02:12 +00:00
|
|
|
*sms_msg = t->value.octet;
|
|
|
|
|
*sms_msg_len = t->length;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-08 19:11:05 +00:00
|
|
|
/*! \brief convert from submit_sm_t to gsm_sms */
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
static int submit_to_sms(struct gsm_sms **psms, struct gsm_network *net,
|
|
|
|
|
const struct submit_sm_t *submit)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2022-05-17 16:25:14 +00:00
|
|
|
time_t t_now = time(NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
time_t t_validity_absolute;
|
2017-08-11 10:02:12 +00:00
|
|
|
const uint8_t *sms_msg = NULL;
|
2017-08-14 19:18:41 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned int sms_msg_len = 0;
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
struct vlr_subscr *dest;
|
2017-08-11 10:02:12 +00:00
|
|
|
uint16_t msg_ref = 0;
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gsm_sms *sms;
|
|
|
|
|
struct tlv_t *t;
|
2013-05-28 18:37:07 +00:00
|
|
|
int mode;
|
2018-01-30 11:15:40 +00:00
|
|
|
int can_store_sms = ((submit->esm_class & SMPP34_MSG_MODE_MASK) != 2); /* != forward mode */
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dest = subscr_by_dst(net, submit->dest_addr_npi,
|
|
|
|
|
submit->dest_addr_ton,
|
|
|
|
|
(const char *)submit->destination_addr);
|
2018-01-30 11:15:40 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!dest && !can_store_sms) {
|
2012-11-24 10:13:19 +00:00
|
|
|
LOGP(DLSMS, LOGL_NOTICE, "SMPP SUBMIT-SM for unknown subscriber: "
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
"%s (NPI=%u)\n", submit->destination_addr,
|
|
|
|
|
submit->dest_addr_npi);
|
|
|
|
|
return ESME_RINVDSTADR;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-11 10:02:12 +00:00
|
|
|
smpp34_tlv_for_each(t, submit->tlv) {
|
|
|
|
|
switch (t->tag) {
|
|
|
|
|
case TLVID_message_payload:
|
|
|
|
|
if (smpp34_submit_tlv_msg_payload(t, submit, &sms_msg,
|
|
|
|
|
&sms_msg_len) < 0) {
|
2018-01-30 11:15:40 +00:00
|
|
|
if (dest)
|
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
|
|
|
vlr_subscr_put(dest, VSUB_USE_SMPP);
|
2017-08-11 10:02:12 +00:00
|
|
|
return ESME_ROPTPARNOTALLWD;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
case TLVID_user_message_reference:
|
2017-08-18 10:26:23 +00:00
|
|
|
msg_ref = t->value.val16;
|
2017-08-11 10:02:12 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!sms_msg) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (submit->sm_length > 0 && submit->sm_length < 255) {
|
|
|
|
|
sms_msg = submit->short_message;
|
|
|
|
|
sms_msg_len = submit->sm_length;
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
LOGP(DLSMS, LOGL_ERROR,
|
|
|
|
|
"SMPP neither message payload nor valid sm_length.\n");
|
2019-04-15 11:46:44 +00:00
|
|
|
if (dest)
|
|
|
|
|
vlr_subscr_put(dest, VSUB_USE_SMPP);
|
2017-08-11 10:02:12 +00:00
|
|
|
return ESME_RINVPARLEN;
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sms = sms_alloc();
|
2012-11-08 18:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->source = SMS_SOURCE_SMPP;
|
|
|
|
|
sms->smpp.sequence_nr = submit->sequence_number;
|
2017-08-07 13:01:18 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->status_rep_req = submit->registered_delivery;
|
2017-08-11 10:02:12 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->msg_ref = msg_ref;
|
2012-11-23 22:35:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* fill in the destination address */
|
2012-11-09 18:48:48 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->receiver = dest;
|
2019-04-15 11:46:44 +00:00
|
|
|
if (dest) {
|
|
|
|
|
/* Replace use count from above subscr_by_dst (VSUB_USE_SMPP) by the sms->receiver use count
|
|
|
|
|
* (VSUB_USE_SMS_RECEIVER) */
|
|
|
|
|
vlr_subscr_get(sms->receiver, VSUB_USE_SMS_RECEIVER);
|
|
|
|
|
vlr_subscr_put(dest, VSUB_USE_SMPP);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-11-23 22:35:01 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->dst.ton = submit->dest_addr_ton;
|
|
|
|
|
sms->dst.npi = submit->dest_addr_npi;
|
2018-01-30 11:15:40 +00:00
|
|
|
if (dest)
|
2018-02-05 11:57:06 +00:00
|
|
|
OSMO_STRLCPY_ARRAY(sms->dst.addr, dest->msisdn);
|
2018-01-30 11:15:40 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
2018-02-05 11:57:06 +00:00
|
|
|
OSMO_STRLCPY_ARRAY(sms->dst.addr,
|
|
|
|
|
(const char *)submit->destination_addr);
|
2012-11-23 22:35:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* fill in the source address */
|
|
|
|
|
sms->src.ton = submit->source_addr_ton;
|
|
|
|
|
sms->src.npi = submit->source_addr_npi;
|
2018-02-05 11:57:06 +00:00
|
|
|
OSMO_STRLCPY_ARRAY(sms->src.addr, (char *)submit->source_addr);
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-11 11:10:48 +00:00
|
|
|
if (submit->esm_class == SMPP34_DELIVERY_ACK)
|
2017-08-07 13:01:40 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->is_report = true;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-11 11:10:48 +00:00
|
|
|
if (submit->esm_class & SMPP34_UDHI_IND)
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->ud_hdr_ind = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-11 11:10:48 +00:00
|
|
|
if (submit->esm_class & SMPP34_REPLY_PATH) {
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->reply_path_req = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
#warning Implement reply path
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-08 21:15:04 +00:00
|
|
|
if (submit->data_coding == 0x00 || /* SMSC default */
|
2013-05-28 18:37:07 +00:00
|
|
|
submit->data_coding == 0x01) { /* GSM default alphabet */
|
|
|
|
|
sms->data_coding_scheme = GSM338_DCS_1111_7BIT;
|
|
|
|
|
mode = MODE_7BIT;
|
|
|
|
|
} else if ((submit->data_coding & 0xFC) == 0xF0) { /* 03.38 DCS default */
|
|
|
|
|
/* pass DCS 1:1 through from SMPP to GSM */
|
|
|
|
|
sms->data_coding_scheme = submit->data_coding;
|
|
|
|
|
mode = MODE_7BIT;
|
|
|
|
|
} else if (submit->data_coding == 0x02 ||
|
|
|
|
|
submit->data_coding == 0x04) {
|
|
|
|
|
/* 8-bit binary */
|
|
|
|
|
sms->data_coding_scheme = GSM338_DCS_1111_8BIT_DATA;
|
|
|
|
|
mode = MODE_8BIT;
|
|
|
|
|
} else if ((submit->data_coding & 0xFC) == 0xF4) { /* 03.38 DCS 8bit */
|
|
|
|
|
/* pass DCS 1:1 through from SMPP to GSM */
|
|
|
|
|
sms->data_coding_scheme = submit->data_coding;
|
|
|
|
|
mode = MODE_8BIT;
|
2014-02-21 12:21:03 +00:00
|
|
|
} else if (submit->data_coding == 0x08) {
|
2013-05-28 18:37:07 +00:00
|
|
|
/* UCS-2 */
|
|
|
|
|
sms->data_coding_scheme = (2 << 2);
|
|
|
|
|
mode = MODE_8BIT;
|
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
sms_free(sms);
|
|
|
|
|
LOGP(DLSMS, LOGL_ERROR, "SMPP Unknown Data Coding 0x%02x\n",
|
|
|
|
|
submit->data_coding);
|
|
|
|
|
return ESME_RUNKNOWNERR;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 18:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
if (mode == MODE_7BIT) {
|
2012-11-24 00:37:39 +00:00
|
|
|
uint8_t ud_len = 0, padbits = 0;
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->data_coding_scheme = GSM338_DCS_1111_7BIT;
|
2012-11-09 18:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
if (sms->ud_hdr_ind) {
|
|
|
|
|
ud_len = *sms_msg + 1;
|
|
|
|
|
printf("copying %u bytes user data...\n", ud_len);
|
|
|
|
|
memcpy(sms->user_data, sms_msg,
|
|
|
|
|
OSMO_MIN(ud_len, sizeof(sms->user_data)));
|
|
|
|
|
sms_msg += ud_len;
|
|
|
|
|
sms_msg_len -= ud_len;
|
2012-11-24 00:37:39 +00:00
|
|
|
padbits = 7 - (ud_len % 7);
|
2012-11-09 18:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-02-05 19:08:00 +00:00
|
|
|
gsm_septet_pack(sms->user_data+ud_len, sms_msg, sms_msg_len, padbits);
|
2012-11-24 00:37:39 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->user_data_len = (ud_len*8 + padbits)/7 + sms_msg_len;/* SEPTETS */
|
|
|
|
|
/* FIXME: sms->text */
|
2013-05-28 18:37:07 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
memcpy(sms->user_data, sms_msg, sms_msg_len);
|
|
|
|
|
sms->user_data_len = sms_msg_len;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-05-17 16:25:14 +00:00
|
|
|
t_validity_absolute = smpp_parse_time_format((const char *) submit->validity_period, &t_now);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!t_validity_absolute)
|
2022-05-17 16:56:55 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->validity_minutes = net->sms_queue_cfg->default_validity_mins;
|
2022-05-17 16:25:14 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
|
sms->validity_minutes = (t_validity_absolute - t_now) / 60;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
*psms = sms;
|
|
|
|
|
return ESME_ROK;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-08 19:11:05 +00:00
|
|
|
/*! \brief handle incoming libsmpp34 ssubmit_sm_t from remote ESME */
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
int handle_smpp_submit(struct osmo_esme *esme, struct submit_sm_t *submit,
|
|
|
|
|
struct submit_sm_resp_t *submit_r)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
struct gsm_sms *sms;
|
2013-01-20 16:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gsm_network *net = esme->smsc->priv;
|
|
|
|
|
struct sms_signal_data sig;
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
int rc = -1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-01-20 16:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
rc = submit_to_sms(&sms, net, submit);
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
if (rc != ESME_ROK) {
|
|
|
|
|
submit_r->command_status = rc;
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-11-08 19:11:05 +00:00
|
|
|
smpp_esme_get(esme);
|
2012-11-08 18:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->smpp.esme = esme;
|
2012-11-08 21:15:04 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->protocol_id = submit->protocol_id;
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-11 11:10:48 +00:00
|
|
|
switch (submit->esm_class & SMPP34_MSG_MODE_MASK) {
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
case 0: /* default */
|
|
|
|
|
case 1: /* datagram */
|
|
|
|
|
case 3: /* store-and-forward */
|
|
|
|
|
rc = db_sms_store(sms);
|
2013-01-20 16:21:31 +00:00
|
|
|
sms_free(sms);
|
|
|
|
|
sms = NULL;
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
if (rc < 0) {
|
2012-11-24 10:13:19 +00:00
|
|
|
LOGP(DLSMS, LOGL_ERROR, "SMPP SUBMIT-SM: Unable to "
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
"store SMS in database\n");
|
|
|
|
|
submit_r->command_status = ESME_RSYSERR;
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
strcpy((char *)submit_r->message_id, "msg_id_not_implemented");
|
2012-11-24 10:13:19 +00:00
|
|
|
LOGP(DLSMS, LOGL_INFO, "SMPP SUBMIT-SM: Stored in DB\n");
|
2013-01-20 16:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(&sig, 0, sizeof(sig));
|
|
|
|
|
osmo_signal_dispatch(SS_SMS, S_SMS_SUBMITTED, &sig);
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
rc = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
case 2: /* forward (i.e. transaction) mode */
|
2012-11-24 10:13:19 +00:00
|
|
|
LOGP(DLSMS, LOGL_DEBUG, "SMPP SUBMIT-SM: Forwarding in "
|
2012-11-09 18:43:50 +00:00
|
|
|
"real time (Transaction/Forward mode)\n");
|
2012-11-08 18:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
sms->smpp.transaction_mode = 1;
|
2018-11-22 08:42:39 +00:00
|
|
|
gsm411_send_sms(net, sms->receiver, sms);
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
rc = 1; /* don't send any response yet */
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return rc;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
static void alert_all_esme(struct smsc *smsc, struct vlr_subscr *vsub,
|
2013-07-30 15:45:01 +00:00
|
|
|
uint8_t smpp_avail_status)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
struct osmo_esme *esme;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
llist_for_each_entry(esme, &smsc->esme_list, list) {
|
|
|
|
|
/* we currently send an alert notification to each ESME that is
|
2019-11-14 16:49:08 +00:00
|
|
|
* connected, and do not require a (non-existent) delivery
|
2019-01-17 00:01:59 +00:00
|
|
|
* pending flag to be set before. */
|
2019-01-17 00:07:53 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!esme->bind_flags) {
|
|
|
|
|
LOGP(DSMPP, LOGL_DEBUG,
|
|
|
|
|
"ESME is not (yet) bound, skipping alert\n");
|
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-08-23 21:30:12 +00:00
|
|
|
if (esme->acl && !esme->acl->alert_notifications) {
|
2019-01-17 00:01:59 +00:00
|
|
|
LOGP(DSMPP, LOGL_DEBUG,
|
|
|
|
|
"[%s] is not set to receive Alert Notifications\n",
|
|
|
|
|
esme->system_id);
|
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-07-30 15:45:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if (esme->acl && esme->acl->deliver_src_imsi) {
|
|
|
|
|
smpp_tx_alert(esme, TON_Subscriber_Number,
|
|
|
|
|
NPI_Land_Mobile_E212,
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
vsub->imsi, smpp_avail_status);
|
2013-07-30 15:45:01 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
smpp_tx_alert(esme, TON_Network_Specific,
|
|
|
|
|
NPI_ISDN_E163_E164,
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
vsub->msisdn, smpp_avail_status);
|
2013-07-30 15:45:01 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-08 19:11:05 +00:00
|
|
|
/*! \brief signal handler for status of attempted SMS deliveries */
|
2012-11-08 18:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
static int smpp_sms_cb(unsigned int subsys, unsigned int signal,
|
|
|
|
|
void *handler_data, void *signal_data)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
struct sms_signal_data *sig_sms = signal_data;
|
|
|
|
|
struct gsm_sms *sms = sig_sms->sms;
|
2013-07-30 15:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
struct smsc *smsc = handler_data;
|
2012-11-08 18:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
int rc = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!sms)
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (sms->source != SMS_SOURCE_SMPP)
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (signal) {
|
2013-07-30 14:30:24 +00:00
|
|
|
case S_SMS_MEM_EXCEEDED:
|
|
|
|
|
/* fall-through: There is no ESME_Rxxx result code to
|
|
|
|
|
* indicate a MEMORY EXCEEDED in transaction mode back
|
|
|
|
|
* to the ESME */
|
2012-11-08 18:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
case S_SMS_UNKNOWN_ERROR:
|
|
|
|
|
if (sms->smpp.transaction_mode) {
|
2019-11-14 16:49:08 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Send back the SUBMIT-SM response with appropriate error */
|
2012-11-24 10:13:19 +00:00
|
|
|
LOGP(DLSMS, LOGL_INFO, "SMPP SUBMIT-SM: Error\n");
|
2012-11-08 18:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
rc = smpp_tx_submit_r(sms->smpp.esme,
|
|
|
|
|
sms->smpp.sequence_nr,
|
|
|
|
|
ESME_RDELIVERYFAILURE,
|
|
|
|
|
sms->smpp.msg_id);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
case S_SMS_DELIVERED:
|
|
|
|
|
/* SMS layer tells us the delivery has been completed */
|
|
|
|
|
if (sms->smpp.transaction_mode) {
|
|
|
|
|
/* Send back the SUBMIT-SM response */
|
2012-11-24 10:13:19 +00:00
|
|
|
LOGP(DLSMS, LOGL_INFO, "SMPP SUBMIT-SM: Success\n");
|
2012-11-08 18:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
rc = smpp_tx_submit_r(sms->smpp.esme,
|
|
|
|
|
sms->smpp.sequence_nr,
|
|
|
|
|
ESME_ROK, sms->smpp.msg_id);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2013-07-30 15:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
case S_SMS_SMMA:
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!sig_sms->trans || !sig_sms->trans->vsub) {
|
2013-07-30 15:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
/* SMMA without a subscriber? strange... */
|
|
|
|
|
LOGP(DLSMS, LOGL_NOTICE, "SMMA without subscriber?\n");
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* There's no real 1:1 match for SMMA in SMPP. However,
|
|
|
|
|
* an ALERT NOTIFICATION seems to be the most logical
|
|
|
|
|
* choice */
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
alert_all_esme(smsc, sig_sms->trans->vsub, 0);
|
2013-07-30 15:39:18 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2012-11-08 18:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return rc;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-09 11:51:44 +00:00
|
|
|
/*! \brief signal handler for subscriber related signals */
|
|
|
|
|
static int smpp_subscr_cb(unsigned int subsys, unsigned int signal,
|
|
|
|
|
void *handler_data, void *signal_data)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
struct vlr_subscr *vsub = signal_data;
|
2012-11-09 11:51:44 +00:00
|
|
|
struct smsc *smsc = handler_data;
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t smpp_avail_status;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* determine the smpp_avail_status depending on attach/detach */
|
|
|
|
|
switch (signal) {
|
|
|
|
|
case S_SUBSCR_ATTACHED:
|
|
|
|
|
smpp_avail_status = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
case S_SUBSCR_DETACHED:
|
|
|
|
|
smpp_avail_status = 2;
|
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
alert_all_esme(smsc, vsub, smpp_avail_status);
|
2012-11-09 11:51:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-24 00:37:39 +00:00
|
|
|
/* GSM 03.38 6.2.1 Character expanding (no decode!) */
|
|
|
|
|
static int gsm_7bit_expand(char *text, const uint8_t *user_data, uint8_t septet_l, uint8_t ud_hdr_ind)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
int i = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
int shift = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t c;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* skip the user data header */
|
|
|
|
|
if (ud_hdr_ind) {
|
|
|
|
|
/* get user data header length + 1 (for the 'user data header length'-field) */
|
|
|
|
|
shift = ((user_data[0] + 1) * 8) / 7;
|
|
|
|
|
if ((((user_data[0] + 1) * 8) % 7) != 0)
|
|
|
|
|
shift++;
|
|
|
|
|
septet_l = septet_l - shift;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < septet_l; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
c =
|
|
|
|
|
((user_data[((i + shift) * 7 + 7) >> 3] <<
|
|
|
|
|
(7 - (((i + shift) * 7 + 7) & 7))) |
|
|
|
|
|
(user_data[((i + shift) * 7) >> 3] >>
|
|
|
|
|
(((i + shift) * 7) & 7))) & 0x7f;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*(text++) = c;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*text = '\0';
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return i;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-13 14:29:27 +00:00
|
|
|
/* FIXME: libsmpp34 helpers, they should be part of libsmpp34! */
|
|
|
|
|
void append_tlv(tlv_t **req_tlv, uint16_t tag,
|
|
|
|
|
const uint8_t *data, uint16_t len)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
tlv_t tlv;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(&tlv, 0, sizeof(tlv));
|
|
|
|
|
tlv.tag = tag;
|
|
|
|
|
tlv.length = len;
|
|
|
|
|
memcpy(tlv.value.octet, data, tlv.length);
|
|
|
|
|
build_tlv(req_tlv, &tlv);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
void append_tlv_u8(tlv_t **req_tlv, uint16_t tag, uint8_t val)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
tlv_t tlv;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(&tlv, 0, sizeof(tlv));
|
|
|
|
|
tlv.tag = tag;
|
|
|
|
|
tlv.length = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
tlv.value.val08 = val;
|
|
|
|
|
build_tlv(req_tlv, &tlv);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
void append_tlv_u16(tlv_t **req_tlv, uint16_t tag, uint16_t val)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
tlv_t tlv;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(&tlv, 0, sizeof(tlv));
|
|
|
|
|
tlv.tag = tag;
|
|
|
|
|
tlv.length = 2;
|
2017-08-18 10:26:23 +00:00
|
|
|
tlv.value.val16 = val;
|
2013-03-13 14:29:27 +00:00
|
|
|
build_tlv(req_tlv, &tlv);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
mscsplit: various preparations to separate MSC from BSC
Disable large parts of the code that depend on BSC presence. The code sections
disabled by #if BEFORE_MSCSPLIT shall be modified or dropped in the course of
adding the A-interface.
Don't set msg->lchan nor msg->dst.
Don't use lchan in libmsc.
Decouple lac from bts.
Prepare entry/exit point for MSC -> BSC and MSC -> RNC communication:
Add msc_ifaces.[hc], a_iface.c, with a general msc_tx_dtap() to redirect to
different interfaces depending on the actual subscriber connection.
While iu_tx() is going to be functional fairly soon, the a_tx() is going to be
just a dummy for some time (see comment).
Add Iu specific fields in gsm_subscriber_connection: the UE connection pointer
and an indicator for the Integrity Protection status on Iu (to be fully
implemented in later commits).
Add lac member to gsm_subscriber_connection, to allow decoupling from
bts->location_area_code. The conn->lac will actually be set in iu.c in an
upcoming commit ("add iucs.[hc]").
move to libcommon-cs: gsm48_extract_mi(), gsm48_paging_extract_mi().
libmsc: duplicate gsm0808 / gsm48 functions (towards BSC).
In osmo-nitb, libmsc would directly call the functions on the BSC level, not
always via the bsc_api. When separating libmsc from libbsc, some functions are
missing from the linkage.
Hence duplicate these functions to libmsc, add an msc_ prefix for clarity, also
add a _tx to gsm0808_cipher_mode():
* add msc_gsm0808_tx_cipher_mode() (dummy/stub)
* add msc_gsm48_tx_mm_serv_ack()
* add msc_gsm48_tx_mm_serv_rej()
Call these from libmsc instead of
* gsm0808_cipher_mode()
* gsm48_tx_mm_serv_ack()
* gsm48_tx_mm_serv_rej()
Also add a comment related to msc_gsm0808_tx_cipher_mode() in two places.
Remove internal RTP streaming code; OsmoNITB supported that, but for OsmoMSC,
this will be done with an external MGCP gateway.
Remove LCHAN_MODIFY from internal MNCC state machine.
Temporarily disable all paging to be able to link libmsc without libbsc.
Skip the paging part of channel_test because the paging is now disabled.
Employ fake paging shims in order for msc_vlr_tests to still work.
msc_compl_l3(): publish in .h, tweak return value. Use new libmsc enum values
for return val, to avoid dependency on libbsc headers. Make callable from
other scopes: publish in osmo_msc.h and remove 'static' in osmo_msc.c
add gsm_encr to subscr_conn
move subscr_request to gsm_subscriber.h
subscr_request_channel() -> subscr_request_conn()
move to libmsc: osmo_stats_vty_add_cmds()
gsm_04_08: remove apply_codec_restrictions()
gsm0408_test: use NULL for root ctx
move to libbsc: gsm_bts_neighbor()
move to libbsc: lchan_next_meas_rep()
move vty config for t3212 to network level (periodic lu)
remove unneccessary linking from some tests
remove handle_abisip_signal()
abis_rsl.c: don't use libvlr from libbsc
gsm_subscriber_connection: put the LAC here, so that it is available without
accessing conn->bts. In bsc_api.c, place this lac in conn for the sake of
transition: Iu and A will use this new field to pass the LAC around, but in a
completely separate OsmoBSC this is not actually needed. It can be removed
again from osmo-bsc.git when the time has come.
Siemens MRPCI: completely drop sending the MRPCI messages for now, they shall
be added in osmo-bsc once the A-Interface code has settled. See OS#2389.
Related: OS#1845 OS#2257 OS#2389
Change-Id: Id3705236350d5f69e447046b0a764bbabc3d493c
2017-05-08 13:12:20 +00:00
|
|
|
#if BEFORE_MSCSPLIT
|
|
|
|
|
/* We currently have no lchan information. Re-add after A-interface, see OS#2390. */
|
2013-03-13 14:29:27 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Append the Osmocom vendor-specific additional TLVs to a SMPP msg */
|
|
|
|
|
static void append_osmo_tlvs(tlv_t **req_tlv, const struct gsm_lchan *lchan)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
int idx = calc_initial_idx(ARRAY_SIZE(lchan->meas_rep),
|
|
|
|
|
lchan->meas_rep_idx, 1);
|
|
|
|
|
const struct gsm_meas_rep *mr = &lchan->meas_rep[idx];
|
|
|
|
|
const struct gsm_meas_rep_unidir *ul_meas = &mr->ul;
|
|
|
|
|
const struct gsm_meas_rep_unidir *dl_meas = &mr->dl;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Osmocom vendor-specific SMPP34 extensions */
|
|
|
|
|
append_tlv_u16(req_tlv, TLVID_osmo_arfcn, lchan->ts->trx->arfcn);
|
|
|
|
|
if (mr->flags & MEAS_REP_F_MS_L1) {
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t ms_dbm;
|
|
|
|
|
append_tlv_u8(req_tlv, TLVID_osmo_ta, mr->ms_l1.ta);
|
|
|
|
|
ms_dbm = ms_pwr_dbm(lchan->ts->trx->bts->band, mr->ms_l1.pwr);
|
|
|
|
|
append_tlv_u8(req_tlv, TLVID_osmo_ms_l1_txpwr, ms_dbm);
|
2017-04-20 11:07:58 +00:00
|
|
|
} else if (mr->flags & MEAS_REP_F_MS_TO) /* Save Timing Offset field = MS Timing Offset + 63 */
|
|
|
|
|
append_tlv_u8(req_tlv, TLVID_osmo_ta, mr->ms_timing_offset + 63);
|
2013-03-13 14:29:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
append_tlv_u16(req_tlv, TLVID_osmo_rxlev_ul,
|
|
|
|
|
rxlev2dbm(ul_meas->full.rx_lev));
|
|
|
|
|
append_tlv_u8(req_tlv, TLVID_osmo_rxqual_ul, ul_meas->full.rx_qual);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (mr->flags & MEAS_REP_F_DL_VALID) {
|
|
|
|
|
append_tlv_u16(req_tlv, TLVID_osmo_rxlev_dl,
|
|
|
|
|
rxlev2dbm(dl_meas->full.rx_lev));
|
|
|
|
|
append_tlv_u8(req_tlv, TLVID_osmo_rxqual_dl,
|
|
|
|
|
dl_meas->full.rx_qual);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
if (lchan->conn && lchan->conn->vsub) {
|
|
|
|
|
struct vlr_subscr *vsub = lchan->conn->vsub;
|
|
|
|
|
size_t imei_len = strlen(vsub->imei);
|
2013-03-13 14:29:27 +00:00
|
|
|
if (imei_len)
|
|
|
|
|
append_tlv(req_tlv, TLVID_osmo_imei,
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
(uint8_t *)vsub->imei, imei_len+1);
|
2013-03-13 14:29:27 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
mscsplit: various preparations to separate MSC from BSC
Disable large parts of the code that depend on BSC presence. The code sections
disabled by #if BEFORE_MSCSPLIT shall be modified or dropped in the course of
adding the A-interface.
Don't set msg->lchan nor msg->dst.
Don't use lchan in libmsc.
Decouple lac from bts.
Prepare entry/exit point for MSC -> BSC and MSC -> RNC communication:
Add msc_ifaces.[hc], a_iface.c, with a general msc_tx_dtap() to redirect to
different interfaces depending on the actual subscriber connection.
While iu_tx() is going to be functional fairly soon, the a_tx() is going to be
just a dummy for some time (see comment).
Add Iu specific fields in gsm_subscriber_connection: the UE connection pointer
and an indicator for the Integrity Protection status on Iu (to be fully
implemented in later commits).
Add lac member to gsm_subscriber_connection, to allow decoupling from
bts->location_area_code. The conn->lac will actually be set in iu.c in an
upcoming commit ("add iucs.[hc]").
move to libcommon-cs: gsm48_extract_mi(), gsm48_paging_extract_mi().
libmsc: duplicate gsm0808 / gsm48 functions (towards BSC).
In osmo-nitb, libmsc would directly call the functions on the BSC level, not
always via the bsc_api. When separating libmsc from libbsc, some functions are
missing from the linkage.
Hence duplicate these functions to libmsc, add an msc_ prefix for clarity, also
add a _tx to gsm0808_cipher_mode():
* add msc_gsm0808_tx_cipher_mode() (dummy/stub)
* add msc_gsm48_tx_mm_serv_ack()
* add msc_gsm48_tx_mm_serv_rej()
Call these from libmsc instead of
* gsm0808_cipher_mode()
* gsm48_tx_mm_serv_ack()
* gsm48_tx_mm_serv_rej()
Also add a comment related to msc_gsm0808_tx_cipher_mode() in two places.
Remove internal RTP streaming code; OsmoNITB supported that, but for OsmoMSC,
this will be done with an external MGCP gateway.
Remove LCHAN_MODIFY from internal MNCC state machine.
Temporarily disable all paging to be able to link libmsc without libbsc.
Skip the paging part of channel_test because the paging is now disabled.
Employ fake paging shims in order for msc_vlr_tests to still work.
msc_compl_l3(): publish in .h, tweak return value. Use new libmsc enum values
for return val, to avoid dependency on libbsc headers. Make callable from
other scopes: publish in osmo_msc.h and remove 'static' in osmo_msc.c
add gsm_encr to subscr_conn
move subscr_request to gsm_subscriber.h
subscr_request_channel() -> subscr_request_conn()
move to libmsc: osmo_stats_vty_add_cmds()
gsm_04_08: remove apply_codec_restrictions()
gsm0408_test: use NULL for root ctx
move to libbsc: gsm_bts_neighbor()
move to libbsc: lchan_next_meas_rep()
move vty config for t3212 to network level (periodic lu)
remove unneccessary linking from some tests
remove handle_abisip_signal()
abis_rsl.c: don't use libvlr from libbsc
gsm_subscriber_connection: put the LAC here, so that it is available without
accessing conn->bts. In bsc_api.c, place this lac in conn for the sake of
transition: Iu and A will use this new field to pass the LAC around, but in a
completely separate OsmoBSC this is not actually needed. It can be removed
again from osmo-bsc.git when the time has come.
Siemens MRPCI: completely drop sending the MRPCI messages for now, they shall
be added in osmo-bsc once the A-Interface code has settled. See OS#2389.
Related: OS#1845 OS#2257 OS#2389
Change-Id: Id3705236350d5f69e447046b0a764bbabc3d493c
2017-05-08 13:12:20 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2013-03-13 14:29:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-13 21:38:52 +00:00
|
|
|
struct {
|
|
|
|
|
uint32_t smpp_status_code;
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t gsm411_cause;
|
|
|
|
|
} smpp_to_gsm411_err_array[] = {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Seems like most phones don't care about the failure cause,
|
|
|
|
|
* although some will display a different notification for
|
|
|
|
|
* GSM411_RP_CAUSE_MO_NUM_UNASSIGNED
|
|
|
|
|
* Some provoke a display of "Try again later"
|
|
|
|
|
* while others a more definitive "Message sending failed"
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{ ESME_RSYSERR, GSM411_RP_CAUSE_MO_DEST_OUT_OF_ORDER },
|
|
|
|
|
{ ESME_RINVDSTADR, GSM411_RP_CAUSE_MO_NUM_UNASSIGNED },
|
|
|
|
|
{ ESME_RMSGQFUL, GSM411_RP_CAUSE_MO_CONGESTION },
|
|
|
|
|
{ ESME_RINVSRCADR, GSM411_RP_CAUSE_MO_SMS_REJECTED },
|
|
|
|
|
{ ESME_RINVMSGID, GSM411_RP_CAUSE_INV_TRANS_REF }
|
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int smpp_to_gsm411_err(uint32_t smpp_status_code, int *gsm411_cause)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(smpp_to_gsm411_err_array); i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (smpp_to_gsm411_err_array[i].smpp_status_code != smpp_status_code)
|
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
*gsm411_cause = smpp_to_gsm411_err_array[i].gsm411_cause;
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
static void smpp_cmd_free(struct osmo_smpp_cmd *cmd)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
osmo_timer_del(&cmd->response_timer);
|
|
|
|
|
llist_del(&cmd->list);
|
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
|
|
|
vlr_subscr_put(cmd->vsub, VSUB_USE_SMPP_CMD);
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
talloc_free(cmd);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void smpp_cmd_flush_pending(struct osmo_esme *esme)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
struct osmo_smpp_cmd *cmd, *next;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
llist_for_each_entry_safe(cmd, next, &esme->smpp_cmd_list, list)
|
|
|
|
|
smpp_cmd_free(cmd);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void smpp_cmd_ack(struct osmo_smpp_cmd *cmd)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
struct msc_a *msc_a;
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gsm_trans *trans;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-07 13:01:30 +00:00
|
|
|
if (cmd->is_report)
|
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
msc_a = msc_a_for_vsub(cmd->vsub, true);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!msc_a) {
|
|
|
|
|
LOGP(DSMPP, LOGL_ERROR, "No connection to subscriber %s\n", vlr_subscr_name(cmd->vsub));
|
2017-08-07 13:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
trans = trans_find_by_id(msc_a, TRANS_SMS, cmd->gsm411_trans_id);
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!trans) {
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
LOG_MSC_A_CAT(msc_a, DSMPP, LOGL_ERROR, "GSM transaction %u is gone\n", cmd->gsm411_trans_id);
|
2017-08-07 13:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-07 13:01:10 +00:00
|
|
|
gsm411_send_rp_ack(trans, cmd->gsm411_msg_ref);
|
2017-08-07 13:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
out:
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
smpp_cmd_free(cmd);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-13 21:38:52 +00:00
|
|
|
void smpp_cmd_err(struct osmo_smpp_cmd *cmd, uint32_t status)
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
struct msc_a *msc_a;
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gsm_trans *trans;
|
2017-05-13 21:38:52 +00:00
|
|
|
int gsm411_cause;
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-07 13:01:30 +00:00
|
|
|
if (cmd->is_report)
|
|
|
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
|
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
msc_a = msc_a_for_vsub(cmd->vsub, true);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!msc_a) {
|
|
|
|
|
LOGP(DSMPP, LOGL_ERROR, "No connection to subscriber %s\n", vlr_subscr_name(cmd->vsub));
|
2017-08-07 13:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
trans = trans_find_by_id(msc_a, TRANS_SMS, cmd->gsm411_trans_id);
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!trans) {
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
LOG_MSC_A_CAT(msc_a, DSMPP, LOGL_ERROR, "GSM transaction %u is gone\n",
|
|
|
|
|
cmd->gsm411_trans_id);
|
2017-08-07 13:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
goto out;
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-13 21:38:52 +00:00
|
|
|
if (smpp_to_gsm411_err(status, &gsm411_cause) < 0)
|
|
|
|
|
gsm411_cause = GSM411_RP_CAUSE_MO_NET_OUT_OF_ORDER;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-07 13:01:10 +00:00
|
|
|
gsm411_send_rp_error(trans, cmd->gsm411_msg_ref, gsm411_cause);
|
2017-08-07 13:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
out:
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
smpp_cmd_free(cmd);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void smpp_deliver_sm_cb(void *data)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2017-05-13 21:38:52 +00:00
|
|
|
smpp_cmd_err(data, ESME_RSYSERR);
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int smpp_cmd_enqueue(struct osmo_esme *esme,
|
2016-06-19 16:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
struct vlr_subscr *vsub, struct gsm_sms *sms,
|
2017-08-07 13:01:10 +00:00
|
|
|
uint32_t sequence_number)
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
struct osmo_smpp_cmd *cmd;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cmd = talloc_zero(esme, struct osmo_smpp_cmd);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!cmd)
|
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cmd->sequence_nr = sequence_number;
|
2017-08-07 13:01:30 +00:00
|
|
|
cmd->is_report = sms->is_report;
|
2017-08-07 13:01:10 +00:00
|
|
|
cmd->gsm411_msg_ref = sms->gsm411.msg_ref;
|
|
|
|
|
cmd->gsm411_trans_id = sms->gsm411.transaction_id;
|
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
|
|
|
vlr_subscr_get(vsub, VSUB_USE_SMPP_CMD);
|
|
|
|
|
cmd->vsub = vsub;
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* FIXME: No predefined value for this response_timer as specified by
|
|
|
|
|
* SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2. Make this configurable? Don't forget
|
|
|
|
|
* lchan keeps busy until we get a reply to this SMPP command. Too high
|
|
|
|
|
* value may exhaust resources.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2017-05-08 18:57:52 +00:00
|
|
|
osmo_timer_setup(&cmd->response_timer, smpp_deliver_sm_cb, cmd);
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
osmo_timer_schedule(&cmd->response_timer, 5, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
llist_add_tail(&cmd->list, &esme->smpp_cmd_list);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct osmo_smpp_cmd *smpp_cmd_find_by_seqnum(struct osmo_esme *esme,
|
|
|
|
|
uint32_t sequence_nr)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
struct osmo_smpp_cmd *cmd;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
llist_for_each_entry(cmd, &esme->smpp_cmd_list, list) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (cmd->sequence_nr == sequence_nr)
|
|
|
|
|
return cmd;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-13 14:29:27 +00:00
|
|
|
static int deliver_to_esme(struct osmo_esme *esme, struct gsm_sms *sms,
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
struct msc_a *msc_a)
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
struct deliver_sm_t deliver;
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
int mode, ret;
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
uint8_t dcs;
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
struct vlr_subscr *vsub = msc_a_vsub(msc_a);
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(&deliver, 0, sizeof(deliver));
|
|
|
|
|
deliver.command_length = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
deliver.command_id = DELIVER_SM;
|
|
|
|
|
deliver.command_status = ESME_ROK;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strcpy((char *)deliver.service_type, "CMT");
|
|
|
|
|
if (esme->acl && esme->acl->deliver_src_imsi) {
|
|
|
|
|
deliver.source_addr_ton = TON_Subscriber_Number;
|
|
|
|
|
deliver.source_addr_npi = NPI_Land_Mobile_E212;
|
|
|
|
|
snprintf((char *)deliver.source_addr,
|
|
|
|
|
sizeof(deliver.source_addr), "%s",
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
vsub->imsi);
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
|
deliver.source_addr_ton = TON_Network_Specific;
|
|
|
|
|
deliver.source_addr_npi = NPI_ISDN_E163_E164;
|
|
|
|
|
snprintf((char *)deliver.source_addr,
|
|
|
|
|
sizeof(deliver.source_addr), "%s",
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
vsub->msisdn);
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-23 22:35:01 +00:00
|
|
|
deliver.dest_addr_ton = sms->dst.ton;
|
|
|
|
|
deliver.dest_addr_npi = sms->dst.npi;
|
|
|
|
|
memcpy(deliver.destination_addr, sms->dst.addr,
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
sizeof(deliver.destination_addr));
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-07 13:01:30 +00:00
|
|
|
if (sms->is_report)
|
2017-08-11 11:10:48 +00:00
|
|
|
deliver.esm_class = SMPP34_DELIVERY_RECEIPT;
|
2017-08-07 13:01:30 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
2017-08-11 11:10:48 +00:00
|
|
|
deliver.esm_class = SMPP34_DATAGRAM_MODE;
|
2017-08-07 13:01:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
if (sms->ud_hdr_ind)
|
2017-08-11 11:10:48 +00:00
|
|
|
deliver.esm_class |= SMPP34_UDHI_IND;
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
if (sms->reply_path_req)
|
2017-08-11 11:10:48 +00:00
|
|
|
deliver.esm_class |= SMPP34_REPLY_PATH;
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deliver.protocol_id = sms->protocol_id;
|
|
|
|
|
deliver.priority_flag = 0;
|
2017-08-07 13:01:15 +00:00
|
|
|
if (sms->status_rep_req)
|
2017-08-11 12:36:01 +00:00
|
|
|
deliver.registered_delivery = SMPP34_DELIVERY_RECEIPT_ON;
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-05-28 18:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Figure out SMPP DCS from TP-DCS */
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
dcs = sms->data_coding_scheme;
|
2013-07-13 15:09:56 +00:00
|
|
|
if (smpp_determine_scheme(dcs, &deliver.data_coding, &mode) == -1)
|
2013-05-28 18:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Transparently pass on DCS via SMPP if requested */
|
2013-07-14 06:54:07 +00:00
|
|
|
if (esme->acl && esme->acl->dcs_transparent)
|
2013-05-28 18:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
deliver.data_coding = dcs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (mode == MODE_7BIT) {
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
uint8_t *dst = deliver.short_message;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* SMPP has this strange notion of putting 7bit SMS in
|
|
|
|
|
* an octet-aligned mode */
|
|
|
|
|
if (sms->ud_hdr_ind) {
|
2012-11-24 00:37:39 +00:00
|
|
|
/* length (bytes) of UDH inside UD */
|
|
|
|
|
uint8_t udh_len = sms->user_data[0] + 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* copy over the UDH */
|
|
|
|
|
memcpy(dst, sms->user_data, udh_len);
|
|
|
|
|
dst += udh_len;
|
|
|
|
|
deliver.sm_length = udh_len;
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2012-11-24 00:37:39 +00:00
|
|
|
/* add decoded text */
|
|
|
|
|
deliver.sm_length += gsm_7bit_expand((char *)dst, sms->user_data, sms->user_data_len, sms->ud_hdr_ind);
|
2013-05-28 18:58:02 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
deliver.sm_length = sms->user_data_len;
|
|
|
|
|
memcpy(deliver.short_message, sms->user_data, deliver.sm_length);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
mscsplit: various preparations to separate MSC from BSC
Disable large parts of the code that depend on BSC presence. The code sections
disabled by #if BEFORE_MSCSPLIT shall be modified or dropped in the course of
adding the A-interface.
Don't set msg->lchan nor msg->dst.
Don't use lchan in libmsc.
Decouple lac from bts.
Prepare entry/exit point for MSC -> BSC and MSC -> RNC communication:
Add msc_ifaces.[hc], a_iface.c, with a general msc_tx_dtap() to redirect to
different interfaces depending on the actual subscriber connection.
While iu_tx() is going to be functional fairly soon, the a_tx() is going to be
just a dummy for some time (see comment).
Add Iu specific fields in gsm_subscriber_connection: the UE connection pointer
and an indicator for the Integrity Protection status on Iu (to be fully
implemented in later commits).
Add lac member to gsm_subscriber_connection, to allow decoupling from
bts->location_area_code. The conn->lac will actually be set in iu.c in an
upcoming commit ("add iucs.[hc]").
move to libcommon-cs: gsm48_extract_mi(), gsm48_paging_extract_mi().
libmsc: duplicate gsm0808 / gsm48 functions (towards BSC).
In osmo-nitb, libmsc would directly call the functions on the BSC level, not
always via the bsc_api. When separating libmsc from libbsc, some functions are
missing from the linkage.
Hence duplicate these functions to libmsc, add an msc_ prefix for clarity, also
add a _tx to gsm0808_cipher_mode():
* add msc_gsm0808_tx_cipher_mode() (dummy/stub)
* add msc_gsm48_tx_mm_serv_ack()
* add msc_gsm48_tx_mm_serv_rej()
Call these from libmsc instead of
* gsm0808_cipher_mode()
* gsm48_tx_mm_serv_ack()
* gsm48_tx_mm_serv_rej()
Also add a comment related to msc_gsm0808_tx_cipher_mode() in two places.
Remove internal RTP streaming code; OsmoNITB supported that, but for OsmoMSC,
this will be done with an external MGCP gateway.
Remove LCHAN_MODIFY from internal MNCC state machine.
Temporarily disable all paging to be able to link libmsc without libbsc.
Skip the paging part of channel_test because the paging is now disabled.
Employ fake paging shims in order for msc_vlr_tests to still work.
msc_compl_l3(): publish in .h, tweak return value. Use new libmsc enum values
for return val, to avoid dependency on libbsc headers. Make callable from
other scopes: publish in osmo_msc.h and remove 'static' in osmo_msc.c
add gsm_encr to subscr_conn
move subscr_request to gsm_subscriber.h
subscr_request_channel() -> subscr_request_conn()
move to libmsc: osmo_stats_vty_add_cmds()
gsm_04_08: remove apply_codec_restrictions()
gsm0408_test: use NULL for root ctx
move to libbsc: gsm_bts_neighbor()
move to libbsc: lchan_next_meas_rep()
move vty config for t3212 to network level (periodic lu)
remove unneccessary linking from some tests
remove handle_abisip_signal()
abis_rsl.c: don't use libvlr from libbsc
gsm_subscriber_connection: put the LAC here, so that it is available without
accessing conn->bts. In bsc_api.c, place this lac in conn for the sake of
transition: Iu and A will use this new field to pass the LAC around, but in a
completely separate OsmoBSC this is not actually needed. It can be removed
again from osmo-bsc.git when the time has come.
Siemens MRPCI: completely drop sending the MRPCI messages for now, they shall
be added in osmo-bsc once the A-Interface code has settled. See OS#2389.
Related: OS#1845 OS#2257 OS#2389
Change-Id: Id3705236350d5f69e447046b0a764bbabc3d493c
2017-05-08 13:12:20 +00:00
|
|
|
#if BEFORE_MSCSPLIT
|
|
|
|
|
/* We currently have no lchan information. Re-add after A-interface, see OS#2390. */
|
2015-02-08 08:21:04 +00:00
|
|
|
if (esme->acl && esme->acl->osmocom_ext && conn->lchan)
|
2013-03-13 14:29:27 +00:00
|
|
|
append_osmo_tlvs(&deliver.tlv, conn->lchan);
|
mscsplit: various preparations to separate MSC from BSC
Disable large parts of the code that depend on BSC presence. The code sections
disabled by #if BEFORE_MSCSPLIT shall be modified or dropped in the course of
adding the A-interface.
Don't set msg->lchan nor msg->dst.
Don't use lchan in libmsc.
Decouple lac from bts.
Prepare entry/exit point for MSC -> BSC and MSC -> RNC communication:
Add msc_ifaces.[hc], a_iface.c, with a general msc_tx_dtap() to redirect to
different interfaces depending on the actual subscriber connection.
While iu_tx() is going to be functional fairly soon, the a_tx() is going to be
just a dummy for some time (see comment).
Add Iu specific fields in gsm_subscriber_connection: the UE connection pointer
and an indicator for the Integrity Protection status on Iu (to be fully
implemented in later commits).
Add lac member to gsm_subscriber_connection, to allow decoupling from
bts->location_area_code. The conn->lac will actually be set in iu.c in an
upcoming commit ("add iucs.[hc]").
move to libcommon-cs: gsm48_extract_mi(), gsm48_paging_extract_mi().
libmsc: duplicate gsm0808 / gsm48 functions (towards BSC).
In osmo-nitb, libmsc would directly call the functions on the BSC level, not
always via the bsc_api. When separating libmsc from libbsc, some functions are
missing from the linkage.
Hence duplicate these functions to libmsc, add an msc_ prefix for clarity, also
add a _tx to gsm0808_cipher_mode():
* add msc_gsm0808_tx_cipher_mode() (dummy/stub)
* add msc_gsm48_tx_mm_serv_ack()
* add msc_gsm48_tx_mm_serv_rej()
Call these from libmsc instead of
* gsm0808_cipher_mode()
* gsm48_tx_mm_serv_ack()
* gsm48_tx_mm_serv_rej()
Also add a comment related to msc_gsm0808_tx_cipher_mode() in two places.
Remove internal RTP streaming code; OsmoNITB supported that, but for OsmoMSC,
this will be done with an external MGCP gateway.
Remove LCHAN_MODIFY from internal MNCC state machine.
Temporarily disable all paging to be able to link libmsc without libbsc.
Skip the paging part of channel_test because the paging is now disabled.
Employ fake paging shims in order for msc_vlr_tests to still work.
msc_compl_l3(): publish in .h, tweak return value. Use new libmsc enum values
for return val, to avoid dependency on libbsc headers. Make callable from
other scopes: publish in osmo_msc.h and remove 'static' in osmo_msc.c
add gsm_encr to subscr_conn
move subscr_request to gsm_subscriber.h
subscr_request_channel() -> subscr_request_conn()
move to libmsc: osmo_stats_vty_add_cmds()
gsm_04_08: remove apply_codec_restrictions()
gsm0408_test: use NULL for root ctx
move to libbsc: gsm_bts_neighbor()
move to libbsc: lchan_next_meas_rep()
move vty config for t3212 to network level (periodic lu)
remove unneccessary linking from some tests
remove handle_abisip_signal()
abis_rsl.c: don't use libvlr from libbsc
gsm_subscriber_connection: put the LAC here, so that it is available without
accessing conn->bts. In bsc_api.c, place this lac in conn for the sake of
transition: Iu and A will use this new field to pass the LAC around, but in a
completely separate OsmoBSC this is not actually needed. It can be removed
again from osmo-bsc.git when the time has come.
Siemens MRPCI: completely drop sending the MRPCI messages for now, they shall
be added in osmo-bsc once the A-Interface code has settled. See OS#2389.
Related: OS#1845 OS#2257 OS#2389
Change-Id: Id3705236350d5f69e447046b0a764bbabc3d493c
2017-05-08 13:12:20 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2013-03-13 14:29:27 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-07 13:01:30 +00:00
|
|
|
append_tlv_u16(&deliver.tlv, TLVID_user_message_reference,
|
|
|
|
|
sms->msg_ref);
|
|
|
|
|
|
libmsc: send RP-ACK to MS after ESME sends SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP
Hold on with the GSM 04.11 RP-ACK/RP-ERROR that we send to the MS until
we get a confirmation from the ESME, via SMPP DELIVER-SM-RESP, that we
can route this sms somewhere we can reach indeed.
After this change, the conversation looks like this:
MS GSM 03.40 SMSC SMPP 3.4 ESME
| | |
| SMS-SUBMIT | |
|------------------->| |
| | DELIVER-SM |
| |---------------->|
| | |
| | DELIVER-SM-RESP |
| |<----------------|
| GSM 04.11 RP-ACK | |
|<-------------------| |
| | |
Before this patch, the RP-ACK was sent back straight forward to the MS,
no matter if the sms can be route by the ESME or not. Thus, the user
ends up getting a misleading "message delivered" in their phone screen,
when the message may just be unroutable by the ESME hence silently
dropped.
If we get no reply from the ESME, there is a hardcoded timer that will
expire to send back an RP-ERROR to the MS indicating that network is
out-of-order. Currently this timer is arbitrarily set to 5 seconds. I
found no specific good default value on the SMPP 3.4 specs, section 7.2,
where the response_timer is described. There must be a place that
describes a better default value for this. We could also expose this
timer through VTY for configurability reasons, to be done later.
Given all this needs to happen asyncronously, ie. block the SMSC, this
patch extends the gsm_sms structure with two new fields to annotate
useful information to send the RP-ACK/RP-ERROR back to the MS of origin.
These new fields are:
* the GSM 04.07 transaction id, to look up for the gsm_trans object.
* the GSM 04.11 message reference so the MS of origin can correlate this
response to its original request.
Tested here using python-libsmpp script that replies with
DELIVER_SM_RESP and status code 0x0b (Invalid Destination). I can see
here on my motorola C155 that message cannot be delivered. I have tested
with the success status code in the SMPP DELIVER_SM_RESP too.
Change-Id: I0d5bd5693fed6d4f4bd2951711c7888712507bfd
2017-05-04 16:44:22 +00:00
|
|
|
ret = smpp_tx_deliver(esme, &deliver);
|
|
|
|
|
if (ret < 0)
|
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-15 09:00:24 +00:00
|
|
|
OSMO_ASSERT(!sms->smpp.esme);
|
|
|
|
|
smpp_esme_get(esme);
|
|
|
|
|
sms->smpp.esme = esme;
|
|
|
|
|
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
return smpp_cmd_enqueue(esme, vsub, sms,
|
2017-08-07 13:01:10 +00:00
|
|
|
deliver.sequence_number);
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-20 21:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
static struct smsc *g_smsc;
|
|
|
|
|
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
bool smpp_route_smpp_first()
|
2015-07-06 14:41:30 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
return (bool)(g_smsc->smpp_first);
|
2015-07-06 14:41:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
int smpp_try_deliver(struct gsm_sms *sms, struct msc_a *msc_a)
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
struct osmo_esme *esme;
|
|
|
|
|
struct osmo_smpp_addr dst;
|
2017-07-05 09:46:55 +00:00
|
|
|
int rc;
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(&dst, 0, sizeof(dst));
|
2012-11-23 22:35:01 +00:00
|
|
|
dst.ton = sms->dst.ton;
|
|
|
|
|
dst.npi = sms->dst.npi;
|
|
|
|
|
memcpy(dst.addr, sms->dst.addr, sizeof(dst.addr));
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-05 09:46:55 +00:00
|
|
|
rc = smpp_route(g_smsc, &dst, &esme);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!rc)
|
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover
3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles:
- MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers,
- MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN.
- MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover.
After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while
the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management.
MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared
for, not yet implemented.
Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC
roles.
Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications:
- all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc
instance,
- messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface
(GSUP),
- no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary.
This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I
apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no
sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge
amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if
each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we
are stuck with this code bomb.
The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring:
* separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn
struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has
been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber
reference.
The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub
lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however
use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens.
Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local
ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM
implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a
struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the
msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP.
* New SCCP implementation for RAN access
To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the
individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation
used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of
separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in
such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code,
hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling.
sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN
connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific
details.
* RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP)
The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring:
make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic.
ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics,
from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra
pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations:
- managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c,
- classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs,
- recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to
matching RAN peers.
* RAN RESET now also for RANAP
ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also
supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide
proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO)
* RAN de-/encoding abstraction
The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP
implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on
distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A
role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to
decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between
BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding.
ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for:
- receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and
MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP
or RANAP;
- sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages
that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the
BSC/RNC and MS/UE.
The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and
ran_msg_iu.c.
In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths
for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place.
Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified.
Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always
remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics
from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN.
* MGW and RTP stream management
So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between
GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP
streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented
implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct
FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated
from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose.
Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN
and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and
receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting
the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The
caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP
stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from
one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP
peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each
transition.
The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an
overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far
from trivial:
- an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for
configuring them by talking to the MGW;
- an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's
connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices;
- a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice
call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers.
BSC MGW PBX
CI CI
[MGW-endpoint]
[--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--]
[----------------call_leg----------------]
* Use counts
Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this
purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a
globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use
in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count
API.
* FSM Timeouts
Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY
implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the
correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore.
Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore)
Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore)
Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore)
Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp)
I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw)
Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw)
I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw)
Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
|
|
|
rc = deliver_to_esme(esme, sms, msc_a);
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-07-05 09:46:55 +00:00
|
|
|
return rc;
|
2012-11-23 18:02:37 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-11-20 21:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
struct smsc *smsc_from_vty(struct vty *v)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
/* FIXME: this is ugly */
|
|
|
|
|
return g_smsc;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
smpp: refactor initialization, add bind address
Make the SMPP bind address configurable (used to be harcoded as "0.0.0.0").
Add VTY command
smpp
local-tcp A.B.C.D <1-65535>
while keeping the old command 'local-tcp-port <1-65535>'. Both the old and the
new command immediately change the SMPP listening address and port.
Add a LOGL_NOTICE log when the SMPP listening address and/or port change.
However, to be useful, this patch has to go somewhat further: refactor the
initialization procedure, because it was impossible to run the VTY commands
without an already established connection.
The SMPP initialization procedure was weird. It would first open a connection
on the default port, and a subsequent VTY port reconfiguration while reading
the config file would try to re-establish a connection on a different port. If
that failed, smpp would switch back to the default port instead of failing the
program launch as the user would expect. If anything else ran on port 2775,
SMPP would thus refuse to launch despite the config file having a different
port: the first bind would always happen on 0.0.0.0:2775. Change that.
In the VTY commands, merely store address and port if no fd is established yet.
Introduce several SMPP initialization stages:
* allocate struct and initialize pointers,
* then read config file without immediately starting to listen,
* and once the main program is ready, start listening.
After that, the VTY command behaves as before: try to re-establish the old
connection if the newly supplied address and port don't work out. I'm not
actually sure why this switch-back behavior is needed, but fair enough.
In detail, replace the function
smpp_smsc_init()
with the various steps
smpp_smsc_alloc_init() -- prepare struct for VTY commands
smpp_smsc_conf() -- set addr an port only, for reading the config file
smpp_smsc_start() -- establish a first connection, for main()
smpp_smsc_restart() -- switch running connection, for telnet VTY
smpp_smsc_stop() -- tear down connection, used by _start() twice
And replace
smpp_openbsc_init()
smpp_openbsc_set_net()
with
smpp_openbsc_alloc_init()
smpp_openbsc_start()
I'd have picked function names like "_bind"/"_unbind", but in the SMPP protocol
there is also a bind/unbind process, so instead I chose the names "_start",
"_restart" and "_stop".
The smsc struct used to be talloc'd outside of smpp_smsc_init(). Since the smsc
code internally uses talloc anyway and employs the smsc struct as talloc
context, I decided to enforce talloc allocation within smpp_smsc_alloc_init().
Be stricter about osmo_signal_register_handler() return codes.
2016-02-24 18:15:39 +00:00
|
|
|
/*! \brief Allocate the OpenBSC SMPP interface struct and init VTY. */
|
|
|
|
|
int smpp_openbsc_alloc_init(void *ctx)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
g_smsc = smpp_smsc_alloc_init(ctx);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!g_smsc) {
|
|
|
|
|
LOGP(DSMPP, LOGL_FATAL, "Cannot allocate smsc struct\n");
|
|
|
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-04-09 22:33:46 +00:00
|
|
|
smpp34_set_memory_functions(&smpp34_talloc);
|
smpp: refactor initialization, add bind address
Make the SMPP bind address configurable (used to be harcoded as "0.0.0.0").
Add VTY command
smpp
local-tcp A.B.C.D <1-65535>
while keeping the old command 'local-tcp-port <1-65535>'. Both the old and the
new command immediately change the SMPP listening address and port.
Add a LOGL_NOTICE log when the SMPP listening address and/or port change.
However, to be useful, this patch has to go somewhat further: refactor the
initialization procedure, because it was impossible to run the VTY commands
without an already established connection.
The SMPP initialization procedure was weird. It would first open a connection
on the default port, and a subsequent VTY port reconfiguration while reading
the config file would try to re-establish a connection on a different port. If
that failed, smpp would switch back to the default port instead of failing the
program launch as the user would expect. If anything else ran on port 2775,
SMPP would thus refuse to launch despite the config file having a different
port: the first bind would always happen on 0.0.0.0:2775. Change that.
In the VTY commands, merely store address and port if no fd is established yet.
Introduce several SMPP initialization stages:
* allocate struct and initialize pointers,
* then read config file without immediately starting to listen,
* and once the main program is ready, start listening.
After that, the VTY command behaves as before: try to re-establish the old
connection if the newly supplied address and port don't work out. I'm not
actually sure why this switch-back behavior is needed, but fair enough.
In detail, replace the function
smpp_smsc_init()
with the various steps
smpp_smsc_alloc_init() -- prepare struct for VTY commands
smpp_smsc_conf() -- set addr an port only, for reading the config file
smpp_smsc_start() -- establish a first connection, for main()
smpp_smsc_restart() -- switch running connection, for telnet VTY
smpp_smsc_stop() -- tear down connection, used by _start() twice
And replace
smpp_openbsc_init()
smpp_openbsc_set_net()
with
smpp_openbsc_alloc_init()
smpp_openbsc_start()
I'd have picked function names like "_bind"/"_unbind", but in the SMPP protocol
there is also a bind/unbind process, so instead I chose the names "_start",
"_restart" and "_stop".
The smsc struct used to be talloc'd outside of smpp_smsc_init(). Since the smsc
code internally uses talloc anyway and employs the smsc struct as talloc
context, I decided to enforce talloc allocation within smpp_smsc_alloc_init().
Be stricter about osmo_signal_register_handler() return codes.
2016-02-24 18:15:39 +00:00
|
|
|
return smpp_vty_init();
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*! \brief Launch the OpenBSC SMPP interface with the parameters set from VTY.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
int smpp_openbsc_start(struct gsm_network *net)
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
int rc;
|
smpp: refactor initialization, add bind address
Make the SMPP bind address configurable (used to be harcoded as "0.0.0.0").
Add VTY command
smpp
local-tcp A.B.C.D <1-65535>
while keeping the old command 'local-tcp-port <1-65535>'. Both the old and the
new command immediately change the SMPP listening address and port.
Add a LOGL_NOTICE log when the SMPP listening address and/or port change.
However, to be useful, this patch has to go somewhat further: refactor the
initialization procedure, because it was impossible to run the VTY commands
without an already established connection.
The SMPP initialization procedure was weird. It would first open a connection
on the default port, and a subsequent VTY port reconfiguration while reading
the config file would try to re-establish a connection on a different port. If
that failed, smpp would switch back to the default port instead of failing the
program launch as the user would expect. If anything else ran on port 2775,
SMPP would thus refuse to launch despite the config file having a different
port: the first bind would always happen on 0.0.0.0:2775. Change that.
In the VTY commands, merely store address and port if no fd is established yet.
Introduce several SMPP initialization stages:
* allocate struct and initialize pointers,
* then read config file without immediately starting to listen,
* and once the main program is ready, start listening.
After that, the VTY command behaves as before: try to re-establish the old
connection if the newly supplied address and port don't work out. I'm not
actually sure why this switch-back behavior is needed, but fair enough.
In detail, replace the function
smpp_smsc_init()
with the various steps
smpp_smsc_alloc_init() -- prepare struct for VTY commands
smpp_smsc_conf() -- set addr an port only, for reading the config file
smpp_smsc_start() -- establish a first connection, for main()
smpp_smsc_restart() -- switch running connection, for telnet VTY
smpp_smsc_stop() -- tear down connection, used by _start() twice
And replace
smpp_openbsc_init()
smpp_openbsc_set_net()
with
smpp_openbsc_alloc_init()
smpp_openbsc_start()
I'd have picked function names like "_bind"/"_unbind", but in the SMPP protocol
there is also a bind/unbind process, so instead I chose the names "_start",
"_restart" and "_stop".
The smsc struct used to be talloc'd outside of smpp_smsc_init(). Since the smsc
code internally uses talloc anyway and employs the smsc struct as talloc
context, I decided to enforce talloc allocation within smpp_smsc_alloc_init().
Be stricter about osmo_signal_register_handler() return codes.
2016-02-24 18:15:39 +00:00
|
|
|
g_smsc->priv = net;
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
smpp: refactor initialization, add bind address
Make the SMPP bind address configurable (used to be harcoded as "0.0.0.0").
Add VTY command
smpp
local-tcp A.B.C.D <1-65535>
while keeping the old command 'local-tcp-port <1-65535>'. Both the old and the
new command immediately change the SMPP listening address and port.
Add a LOGL_NOTICE log when the SMPP listening address and/or port change.
However, to be useful, this patch has to go somewhat further: refactor the
initialization procedure, because it was impossible to run the VTY commands
without an already established connection.
The SMPP initialization procedure was weird. It would first open a connection
on the default port, and a subsequent VTY port reconfiguration while reading
the config file would try to re-establish a connection on a different port. If
that failed, smpp would switch back to the default port instead of failing the
program launch as the user would expect. If anything else ran on port 2775,
SMPP would thus refuse to launch despite the config file having a different
port: the first bind would always happen on 0.0.0.0:2775. Change that.
In the VTY commands, merely store address and port if no fd is established yet.
Introduce several SMPP initialization stages:
* allocate struct and initialize pointers,
* then read config file without immediately starting to listen,
* and once the main program is ready, start listening.
After that, the VTY command behaves as before: try to re-establish the old
connection if the newly supplied address and port don't work out. I'm not
actually sure why this switch-back behavior is needed, but fair enough.
In detail, replace the function
smpp_smsc_init()
with the various steps
smpp_smsc_alloc_init() -- prepare struct for VTY commands
smpp_smsc_conf() -- set addr an port only, for reading the config file
smpp_smsc_start() -- establish a first connection, for main()
smpp_smsc_restart() -- switch running connection, for telnet VTY
smpp_smsc_stop() -- tear down connection, used by _start() twice
And replace
smpp_openbsc_init()
smpp_openbsc_set_net()
with
smpp_openbsc_alloc_init()
smpp_openbsc_start()
I'd have picked function names like "_bind"/"_unbind", but in the SMPP protocol
there is also a bind/unbind process, so instead I chose the names "_start",
"_restart" and "_stop".
The smsc struct used to be talloc'd outside of smpp_smsc_init(). Since the smsc
code internally uses talloc anyway and employs the smsc struct as talloc
context, I decided to enforce talloc allocation within smpp_smsc_alloc_init().
Be stricter about osmo_signal_register_handler() return codes.
2016-02-24 18:15:39 +00:00
|
|
|
/* If a VTY configuration has taken place, the values have been stored
|
|
|
|
|
* in the smsc struct. Otherwise, use the defaults (NULL -> any, 0 ->
|
|
|
|
|
* default SMPP port, see smpp_smsc_bind()). */
|
|
|
|
|
rc = smpp_smsc_start(g_smsc, g_smsc->bind_addr, g_smsc->listen_port);
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
if (rc < 0)
|
smpp: refactor initialization, add bind address
Make the SMPP bind address configurable (used to be harcoded as "0.0.0.0").
Add VTY command
smpp
local-tcp A.B.C.D <1-65535>
while keeping the old command 'local-tcp-port <1-65535>'. Both the old and the
new command immediately change the SMPP listening address and port.
Add a LOGL_NOTICE log when the SMPP listening address and/or port change.
However, to be useful, this patch has to go somewhat further: refactor the
initialization procedure, because it was impossible to run the VTY commands
without an already established connection.
The SMPP initialization procedure was weird. It would first open a connection
on the default port, and a subsequent VTY port reconfiguration while reading
the config file would try to re-establish a connection on a different port. If
that failed, smpp would switch back to the default port instead of failing the
program launch as the user would expect. If anything else ran on port 2775,
SMPP would thus refuse to launch despite the config file having a different
port: the first bind would always happen on 0.0.0.0:2775. Change that.
In the VTY commands, merely store address and port if no fd is established yet.
Introduce several SMPP initialization stages:
* allocate struct and initialize pointers,
* then read config file without immediately starting to listen,
* and once the main program is ready, start listening.
After that, the VTY command behaves as before: try to re-establish the old
connection if the newly supplied address and port don't work out. I'm not
actually sure why this switch-back behavior is needed, but fair enough.
In detail, replace the function
smpp_smsc_init()
with the various steps
smpp_smsc_alloc_init() -- prepare struct for VTY commands
smpp_smsc_conf() -- set addr an port only, for reading the config file
smpp_smsc_start() -- establish a first connection, for main()
smpp_smsc_restart() -- switch running connection, for telnet VTY
smpp_smsc_stop() -- tear down connection, used by _start() twice
And replace
smpp_openbsc_init()
smpp_openbsc_set_net()
with
smpp_openbsc_alloc_init()
smpp_openbsc_start()
I'd have picked function names like "_bind"/"_unbind", but in the SMPP protocol
there is also a bind/unbind process, so instead I chose the names "_start",
"_restart" and "_stop".
The smsc struct used to be talloc'd outside of smpp_smsc_init(). Since the smsc
code internally uses talloc anyway and employs the smsc struct as talloc
context, I decided to enforce talloc allocation within smpp_smsc_alloc_init().
Be stricter about osmo_signal_register_handler() return codes.
2016-02-24 18:15:39 +00:00
|
|
|
return rc;
|
2012-11-08 18:44:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
smpp: refactor initialization, add bind address
Make the SMPP bind address configurable (used to be harcoded as "0.0.0.0").
Add VTY command
smpp
local-tcp A.B.C.D <1-65535>
while keeping the old command 'local-tcp-port <1-65535>'. Both the old and the
new command immediately change the SMPP listening address and port.
Add a LOGL_NOTICE log when the SMPP listening address and/or port change.
However, to be useful, this patch has to go somewhat further: refactor the
initialization procedure, because it was impossible to run the VTY commands
without an already established connection.
The SMPP initialization procedure was weird. It would first open a connection
on the default port, and a subsequent VTY port reconfiguration while reading
the config file would try to re-establish a connection on a different port. If
that failed, smpp would switch back to the default port instead of failing the
program launch as the user would expect. If anything else ran on port 2775,
SMPP would thus refuse to launch despite the config file having a different
port: the first bind would always happen on 0.0.0.0:2775. Change that.
In the VTY commands, merely store address and port if no fd is established yet.
Introduce several SMPP initialization stages:
* allocate struct and initialize pointers,
* then read config file without immediately starting to listen,
* and once the main program is ready, start listening.
After that, the VTY command behaves as before: try to re-establish the old
connection if the newly supplied address and port don't work out. I'm not
actually sure why this switch-back behavior is needed, but fair enough.
In detail, replace the function
smpp_smsc_init()
with the various steps
smpp_smsc_alloc_init() -- prepare struct for VTY commands
smpp_smsc_conf() -- set addr an port only, for reading the config file
smpp_smsc_start() -- establish a first connection, for main()
smpp_smsc_restart() -- switch running connection, for telnet VTY
smpp_smsc_stop() -- tear down connection, used by _start() twice
And replace
smpp_openbsc_init()
smpp_openbsc_set_net()
with
smpp_openbsc_alloc_init()
smpp_openbsc_start()
I'd have picked function names like "_bind"/"_unbind", but in the SMPP protocol
there is also a bind/unbind process, so instead I chose the names "_start",
"_restart" and "_stop".
The smsc struct used to be talloc'd outside of smpp_smsc_init(). Since the smsc
code internally uses talloc anyway and employs the smsc struct as talloc
context, I decided to enforce talloc allocation within smpp_smsc_alloc_init().
Be stricter about osmo_signal_register_handler() return codes.
2016-02-24 18:15:39 +00:00
|
|
|
rc = osmo_signal_register_handler(SS_SMS, smpp_sms_cb, g_smsc);
|
|
|
|
|
if (rc < 0)
|
|
|
|
|
return rc;
|
|
|
|
|
rc = osmo_signal_register_handler(SS_SUBSCR, smpp_subscr_cb, g_smsc);
|
|
|
|
|
if (rc < 0)
|
|
|
|
|
return rc;
|
2012-11-20 21:22:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
smpp: refactor initialization, add bind address
Make the SMPP bind address configurable (used to be harcoded as "0.0.0.0").
Add VTY command
smpp
local-tcp A.B.C.D <1-65535>
while keeping the old command 'local-tcp-port <1-65535>'. Both the old and the
new command immediately change the SMPP listening address and port.
Add a LOGL_NOTICE log when the SMPP listening address and/or port change.
However, to be useful, this patch has to go somewhat further: refactor the
initialization procedure, because it was impossible to run the VTY commands
without an already established connection.
The SMPP initialization procedure was weird. It would first open a connection
on the default port, and a subsequent VTY port reconfiguration while reading
the config file would try to re-establish a connection on a different port. If
that failed, smpp would switch back to the default port instead of failing the
program launch as the user would expect. If anything else ran on port 2775,
SMPP would thus refuse to launch despite the config file having a different
port: the first bind would always happen on 0.0.0.0:2775. Change that.
In the VTY commands, merely store address and port if no fd is established yet.
Introduce several SMPP initialization stages:
* allocate struct and initialize pointers,
* then read config file without immediately starting to listen,
* and once the main program is ready, start listening.
After that, the VTY command behaves as before: try to re-establish the old
connection if the newly supplied address and port don't work out. I'm not
actually sure why this switch-back behavior is needed, but fair enough.
In detail, replace the function
smpp_smsc_init()
with the various steps
smpp_smsc_alloc_init() -- prepare struct for VTY commands
smpp_smsc_conf() -- set addr an port only, for reading the config file
smpp_smsc_start() -- establish a first connection, for main()
smpp_smsc_restart() -- switch running connection, for telnet VTY
smpp_smsc_stop() -- tear down connection, used by _start() twice
And replace
smpp_openbsc_init()
smpp_openbsc_set_net()
with
smpp_openbsc_alloc_init()
smpp_openbsc_start()
I'd have picked function names like "_bind"/"_unbind", but in the SMPP protocol
there is also a bind/unbind process, so instead I chose the names "_start",
"_restart" and "_stop".
The smsc struct used to be talloc'd outside of smpp_smsc_init(). Since the smsc
code internally uses talloc anyway and employs the smsc struct as talloc
context, I decided to enforce talloc allocation within smpp_smsc_alloc_init().
Be stricter about osmo_signal_register_handler() return codes.
2016-02-24 18:15:39 +00:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2012-11-08 15:14:37 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2013-03-13 14:05:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
