Let's use the port part of the struct mgcp_rtp_end->addr field instead
of keeping it separate. This makes it easier passing around and
using/checking the RTP remote address + port, and avoids confusion
having to check stuff outside of the address, with its port part
potentially unset.
Change-Id: I294eb5d85fae79bf62d36eb9e818426e187d442c
There's no need to separate between BSS and CN side nowadays, the
different types are used nowehere. This separation dates from
osmo-bsc-nat code days.
Change-Id: I65effeddf033eb1955553e8d659c593b4e67f7bc
Since libosmocore.git Change-Id
I5cb740702805693cc7f0a550e2e093f9bfdd507c, the IuUP stack can send INIT
event more than once, it sends one each time an IuUP Initialization
message is received.
This is done since potentially a peer could send an Initialization
message at any time with a different subflow size configuration. So
ideally we should update all osmo-mgw state regarding codecs, and
forward the Init starting the procedure on the other conn of the
endpoint.
However, this scenario is most probably not going to happen right now
and it would be a lot of work to implement and test,
and subsequent INITs we received will almost surely come from
retransmissions of the initial Initialization message, which means
content will not really change.
Hence, it makes sense to simply drop the receive message (the IuUP stack
already takes care of re-ACKing it) and let the endpoint state continue
with its ongoing procedures.
Related: SYS#4705
Change-Id: Ib97bc6f57d265622e24a776b96f0a82c25d33d39
The initially merged IuUP API and implementation in libosmocore assumed
that RFCI with ID was always in the position of its ID inside the list
of RFCIs. This was the case for messages sent by ip.access nano3g as well
as our own osmocom implementation. However it was noticed that other nodes
from other vendors actually use other order, as allowed by the IuUP message
format.
Hence, we need to break the assumption and provide explicit ID
information in the list.
NOTICE: This commit implies an API change when using libosmogsm.
However, the previous API was never available in any libosmogsm release,
and only available in both libosmogsm and osmo-mgw master, so we are
only breaking compatibility between different master versions, which is
acceptable.
Related: SYS#5969
Depends: libosmocore.git Change-Id Ib21cee2e30bf83dff4e167f79541796007af9845
Change-Id: I40ebf36ad37f5196751caf2297a340e538ad28bc
Pau Espin