Otherwise 127.0.0.1 was being used and we want all interfaces for a
specific osmo-bsc instance to use the same IP
Change-Id: I38dccac6707bf55f0abcf96e3a9d7d8ec765a156
Before this, the network opened up by osmo-bts-trx would be invisible through
the attenuation of the osmo-gsm-tester hardware, because tx-attenuation would
apparently default to 50, meaning maximum attenuation.
Change-Id: I1c026b5691033127eef766d82566c39cc070e14a
I would like to use the IP addresses also for OsmoBSC processes, so it is more
than clear now that 'nitb_iface' was the wrong naming choice.
The only distinction we may need in the future is public versus loopback
interface. To add that, we may add a trait to the 'ip_address' resource
like:
ip_address:
- addr: 10.42.42.1
type: public
- addr: 127.0.0.1
type: loopback
This way we can substitute public vs loopback addresses flexibly (e.g. using
scenarios).
Change-Id: I3ad583ae7a33f7a7bb56fe78a125f73c56a0e860
We're not currently paying attention to the octphy in osmo-gsm-tester. So
instead of maintaining dead code, remove the bts_octphy.py; we can re-add when
the octphy is implemented properly.
Change-Id: Ia5d5750d440ae7019634b51fa1efe7bbb2a1d1e2
Clearly separate the kinds of BTS hardware the GSM tester knows ('type') from
the NITB's bts/type config item ('osmobsc_bts_type' -- not 'osmonitb_...' to
stay in tune with future developments: it is the libbsc that needs this).
For BTS hardware kinds, use the full name of the binary for osmo driven models:
osmo-bts-sysmo, osmo-bts-trx, osmo-bts-octphy.
Change-Id: I1aa9b48e74013a93f9db1a34730f17717fb3b36c
The original osmo-gsm-tester was an internal development at sysmocom, mostly by
D. Laszlo Sitzer <dlsitzer@sysmocom.de>, of which this public osmo-gsm-tester
is a refactoring / rewrite.
This imports an early state of the refactoring and is not functional yet. Bits
from the earlier osmo-gsm-tester will be added as needed. The earlier commit
history is not imported.
Pau Espin
Neels Hofmeyr
Neels Hofmeyr