Since b7ef6884f9, the state is updated
before triggering the signal S_NM_STATECHG, so the warning does no
longer hold true.
Change-Id: I7b7dd30b4fcdc92febca42e3e6a75e6f98e184ff
There's no need to use pointers there, it is only asking for errors from
code handling the data structe from the signal by attempting to change
them. Even for mem size point of view it doesn't make sense, since it's
3 byte vs a 4 byte pointer.
Furthermore, this is a preparation for new commit, where the NM object
current state will be updated before emitting the signal. This patch
eases a lot the follow up mentioned patch.
Change-Id: I9b648dfd8392b7b40bfe2b38f3345017481f5129
This makes sure code accessing those fields is not changing its values,
since it would make no sense to change those. Follow up commit will make
convert those pointers to be full structs instead, as there's no need to
have pointers there.
Change-Id: I9979e62eac861e25bbe2161ab187ddb2b40fd097
Its name is totally misleading, since they seem to be related to
GetAttributes messages rather than SetAttributes.
Change-Id: I306cb407dbd9b98e301b5d93046bdadcb466b82b
Pau Espin
Vadim Yanitskiy