Cosmetic: lchan_fsm: drop obsolete comment
Neels wrote: > i guess we can drop this comment now, it is a remnant from separating > osmo-nitb -> osmo-bsc + osmo-ms Change-Id: I2ce4d691715c1ea5c7c7896693a03b0aefbdb5b9
This commit is contained in:
parent
27cb5d3e24
commit
adb55f1fe0
|
@ -1530,16 +1530,6 @@ static void lchan_fsm_borken(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi, uint32_t event, void *dat
|
||||||
lchan->release.rsl_error_cause = RSL_ERR_INTERWORKING;
|
lchan->release.rsl_error_cause = RSL_ERR_INTERWORKING;
|
||||||
lchan->release.rr_cause = bsc_gsm48_rr_cause_from_rsl_cause(lchan->release.rsl_error_cause);
|
lchan->release.rr_cause = bsc_gsm48_rr_cause_from_rsl_cause(lchan->release.rsl_error_cause);
|
||||||
lchan_fsm_state_chg(LCHAN_ST_WAIT_AFTER_ERROR);
|
lchan_fsm_state_chg(LCHAN_ST_WAIT_AFTER_ERROR);
|
||||||
/* TODO: we used to do this only for sysmobts:
|
|
||||||
int do_free = is_osmobts(ts->trx->bts);
|
|
||||||
LOGP(DRSL, LOGL_NOTICE,
|
|
||||||
"%s CHAN REL ACK for broken channel. %s.\n",
|
|
||||||
gsm_lchan_name(lchan),
|
|
||||||
do_free ? "Releasing it" : "Keeping it broken");
|
|
||||||
if (do_free)
|
|
||||||
do_lchan_free(lchan);
|
|
||||||
* Clarify the reason. If a BTS sends a RF Chan Rel ACK, we can consider it released,
|
|
||||||
* independently from the BTS model, right?? */
|
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
case LCHAN_EV_RTP_RELEASED:
|
case LCHAN_EV_RTP_RELEASED:
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue