In the very least, a change like this requires discussion on the list.
The naming convention is goofy and it causes a massive merge problem. Something
like this _must_ be presented on the list first so people can provide input
and cope with it.
This reverts commit 99a0949b72.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
The parameter is always zero except when registering the three internal
io regions (ROM, unassigned, notdirty). Remove the parameter to reduce
the API's power, thus facilitating future change.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
We have both IRQ sinks and GPIO inputs. These are in principle exactly
the same thing, so remove the former.
Signed-off-by: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Found while cleaning up compiler warnings: GIC_*_LEVEL macros strongly
suggest that gic_irq_state.level is intended to be per-CPU and not just
a single, global bit. I'm unable to test the effect, but it seems to be
the most reasonable fix for the apparent brokenness.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/qemu/trunk@6765 c046a42c-6fe2-441c-8c8c-71466251a162
Anthony Liguori