the .qm file in sync
Change-Id: I588f5ff7386bac13c8ce0bba82fee4807c490682
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/4509
Reviewed-by: Martin Kaiser <wireshark@kaiser.cx>
another update of the Japanese translation
the translation is fairly complete now, only some recently added items
are missing
Change-Id: Iacd4ee2da7a83681b6119c5d02a40156b441065b
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/4507
Reviewed-by: Martin Kaiser <wireshark@kaiser.cx>
this fixed the line numbers, marked some items as obsolete and added new
items
corrected some minor problems
Promiscious Mode was changed to Monitor Mode, update the translation
accordingly
Change-Id: I63b3ef0fb3488d941d6d1170b911026281f94a0a
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/3994
Reviewed-by: Martin Kaiser <wireshark@kaiser.cx>
Tested-by: Martin Kaiser <wireshark@kaiser.cx>
japanese language update
Change-Id: I92a68f389a7ac1e07eb11c970d5e37c31fde22c1
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/3993
Reviewed-by: Martin Kaiser <wireshark@kaiser.cx>
Tested-by: Martin Kaiser <wireshark@kaiser.cx>
Make sure the Qt UI is named "Wireshark" and its executable is named
"wireshark" or "wireshark.exe". Make sure the GTK+ UI is named
"Wireshark 1" or "Wireshark (GTK+)" depending on how much the target
audience is likely to care about UI toolkits. Make sure the GTK+
executable is named "wireshark-gtk" or "wireshark-gtk.exe".
It looks like moving to Qt 5.3 (g978faf3) broke the PortableApps
package. It's likely even more broken now.
Autotools out-of-tree builds also broke on Ubuntu 12.02 (automake
1.11.3) at some point. The first attempt to compile in ui/qt returns
"error: source_file.cpp: No such file or directory". The second attempt
works. Out-of-tree builds work fine on Ubuntu 14.04 (automake 1.14.1).
Tested:
- Nmake builds
- NSIS packaging
- CMake builds (Windows, OS X)
- Autotools build and distcheck
- RPM packaging
To do:
- Test Debian packaging
- Fix PortableApps
Change-Id: I66429870e05fd2d6fc901942477959ed6164fce2
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/3919
Reviewed-by: Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>