As it turns out, we do occasionally need it.
Bug:10115
Change-Id: Ifec79e4d2470bbc09f15674534d01418a6571a0d
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/1688
Reviewed-by: Evan Huus <eapache@gmail.com>
- manually inline wmem_block_fast_add_to_block_list, it was only two lines and
only called twice, so the function boilerplate was outweighing the abstraction
- change free_all to release all but one block to the OS immediately, making gc
a no-op; the alloc logic doesn't reuse later blocks anyways, so this was
effectively a leak
Change-Id: I033fbb2f3d87e58c7346cba10f2c710eaaa49e9f
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/1499
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
Double linked list was required by jumbo allocation.
No support for jumbo -> no need for double linked list -> have only 'next' pointer in header.
Change-Id: I48a0f468ebba9db3a63548d8e7307b6424c759ed
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/1495
Reviewed-by: Evan Huus <eapache@gmail.com>
For packet-scope allocation, there's no need to support realloc(), free()
cause memory will be garbage collected after packet dissection.
(and this allocator is much faster than full block allocator).
Change-Id: I73fdf708c3077f48f55bdcc71f4fa859e4ac2335
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/1428
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
Evan Huus