Hopefully that name makes it clear what the routiner's purpose is, and
will encourage people to use it rather than using dissector_add_uint()
with a bogus integer value.
Change-Id: Ic5be456d0ad40b176aab01712ab7b13aed5de2a8
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/2483
Reviewed-by: Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu>
(Using sed : sed -i '/^ \* \$Id\$/,+1 d')
Fix manually some typo (in export_object_dicom.c and crc16-plain.c)
Change-Id: I4c1ae68d1c4afeace8cb195b53c715cf9e1227a8
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/497
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
- when the text parameter is constant col_add_str() and col_set_str() are equivalent but col_set_str() is faster.
- same for replace col_append_fstr and col_append_str
- remove col_clear() when it's redundant:
+ before a col_set/col_add if the dissector can't throw an exception.
- replace col_append() after a col_clear() with faster col_add... or col_set
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9344
svn path=/trunk/; revision=52948
Be consistent in short name of protocols
Use prefix "BT " in short name for all Bluetooth dissectors. A reason
for that is protocol names start by "bt", Bluetooth dissectors can
be easy identificated, also DecodeBy looks better (sorted).
Please be note that "SDP" is reserved for different dissector, so using
"BT SDP" is good choice.
Also fix two naming mistakes.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8304
svn path=/trunk/; revision=48389
Guy Harris