the list.
The patch ensures that non-duplicate subnets are appended to the end of the
list rather than as the second element, which if there had been a second
element previously, the memory for it was effectively leaked.
It also allows /32 "subnets", even though arguably the hosts file should be
used instead, but now the test in read_subnets_file() matches the assert in
subnet_entry_set().
Bug: 11247
Change-Id: I54bf1cbb34edfcf410aa634043a377c27091df51
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8802
Petri-Dish: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot <buildbot-no-reply@wireshark.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
The 'then' statement is equivalent to the 'else' statement.
Change-Id: I9e39afed3520cd4dffee52d5e57830817a8c4399
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8846
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Mathieson <martin.r.mathieson@googlemail.com>
The 'si' pointer was utilized before it was verified against nullptr.
Change-Id: I92faf43160698a548531dceb557cf4153d15d03f
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8845
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
Split StatsTreeDialog into StatsTreeDialog and TapParameterDialog (its
base class). This more closely matches the GTK+ UI and paves the way for
more statistics dialogs.
Change-Id: I2630385534e829d99724673ade372fcb33200d07
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8842
Petri-Dish: Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>
Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot <buildbot-no-reply@wireshark.org>
Reviewed-by: Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>
This reverts commit da1766e987.
I should have set CR-2 because I was working on the following update: According to RFC 5661, a zero attribute mask is acceptable if type FATTR4_BITMAP_ONLY is passed to dissect_nfs4_fattrs(). In addition I found guint8 vars 'num_bitmaps', and 'count' are declared as guint8 but being passed into 32-bit fields of proto_tree_add_uint() and tvb_ensure_bytes_exist().I will push a new patch for review.
Change-Id: I95e55af7fef17d0554f9741aa426feeeb95e2c21
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8843
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
`dissected_length` can come from the packet in some paths, meaning it can be 0
or negative and we need to check for underflows and other such problems
Bug: 11255
Change-Id: Iba55ec1824a391ec1c717bfea5b65cc6610fc081
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8839
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@gmail.com>
Petri-Dish: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot <buildbot-no-reply@wireshark.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Huus <eapache@gmail.com>
Observe that tcp_flags_to_str_first_letter is a copy of tcp_flags_to_str
with the flags[][4] variables copied and the loop variables inverted.
This misses the FIN bit, and runs past the flags buffer.
Behavior change: for consistency, move the reserved bits to the front
and print reserved bits individually. Old output / new output:
NCEUAPRSRRR
RRRNCEUAPRSF
Tested with this pcap with all flag bits set (0x0fff). hexdump:
d4c3b2a1020004000000000000000000ff7f000065000000b6b77455f3ac
06002800000028000000450000280001000040067ccd7f0000017f000001
0014005000000000000000005fff2000907f0000
Change-Id: I70e070808d1f0f9cd60eaf4f2b3f4ac6e3cfaada
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8826
Petri-Dish: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot <buildbot-no-reply@wireshark.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
The Device ID of the OEM part may additionally be offered using OEM Device ID
Change-Id: Ic51cc4c05a41a8d18f265fb1abab739d1e82e28a
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8832
Reviewed-by: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@gmail.com>
Petri-Dish: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot <buildbot-no-reply@wireshark.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
pointer truncation from 'const guint16 *' to 'unsigned long'.
Even if we only require GLIB 2.16 this will fix the Windows build as we do
have a newer Glib on Windows.
Change-Id: Ie0644536783e8b298de59094fec240e249c9b27f
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8833
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
make a separate Value_string.
Change-Id: I79cb3b9d7261f8fba97f1938464d38c218282cb5
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8834
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
First, search for packages with the version number without the period (bug
11219).
Second, don't look for Lua 5.3 because we don't work with it. If what we find
(without pkg-config's help) is Lua 5.3, disable Lua support (bug 10881).
Cmake support by Peter Wu (originally Ie73e5b53640f10432881a9671c0a605f7f027ed8):
Note the check for "lua<=5.2.99" instead of "lua<5.3" since cmake does not
support the latter syntax. Tested with lua5.2, lua5.1 and lua (5.3) installed.
Bug: 11219
Ping-Bug: 10881
Change-Id: I382d07ca00eafc6111cd4e9faa2b66f6b8f95b6e
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8783
Petri-Dish: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot <buildbot-no-reply@wireshark.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@gmail.com>
This avoids assertions when the field is added with proto_tree_add_string*()
(some of which show up in the fuzzed capture in bug 11254).
Ping-Bug: 11254
Change-Id: Iaf02f59443da0cf279d65eed049122d4dfaf7bcd
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8829
Reviewed-by: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@gmail.com>
"file" dissectors are now rid of proto_tree_add_text.
Change-Id: I4e0f7248135e6ce194fcafde47e538db84b964aa
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8828
Reviewed-by: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
Petri-Dish: Michael Mann <mmann78@netscape.net>
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
dissector_add_uint_range walks through ranges and then does not need the
range anymore. Discovered with `tshark -G fields` and GCC 5.1 + ASAN.
Change-Id: I76f98a6ccee6dbbecc1efb847c358bd6d010e1dc
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8825
Reviewed-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
Petri-Dish: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
Tested-by: Petri Dish Buildbot <buildbot-no-reply@wireshark.org>
Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
The buildbot printed "expr: syntax error", presumably from this, but
that oh-so-descriptive error message doesn't indicate what the problem
is, and just about any string should be valid as the left-hand operand
of the : operator.
Change-Id: I1140522357b8df07e4183bf0eb8c5fa9fbe275e4
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8827
Reviewed-by: Guy Harris <guy@alum.mit.edu>
The variable is assigned values twice successively. Perhaps this is a mistake.
Change-Id: I3b567626c6046be8898db70580e98b339c0c8c2a
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8819
Reviewed-by: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte@gmail.com>
Consider reviewing the expression of the 'A = B == C' kind. The expression is calculated as following: 'A = (B == C)'.
Change-Id: I162a2d081a70cb39b326d3aa2dc4108f49962169
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8821
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
The variable 'ii' is being used for this loop and for the outer loop.
Change-Id: I3e6e0e390a646fac62fd46ebf9dcdc56070f7609
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8820
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
Be advised that compiler may delete this cycle or make it infinity. Use volatile variable(s) or synchronization primitives to avoid this.
Change-Id: I39104ec09f4c12994d62ed23e7a0cc00829b1255
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8818
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
Range intersections are possible within conditional expressions. Example: if (A > 0 && A < 5) { ... } else if (A > 3 && A < 9) { ... }.
E-GSM and R-GSM EARFCNs are overlapping, as seen in 3GPP TS 05.05.
Change-Id: I5b9be53ba85109a674b05ae16cd729557cec6318
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8817
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
It's odd to compare 0 or 1 with a value of 1: ((entries > 1)) == 1.
Change-Id: I6261389dddbbd7e60e98b8c351150d491f9cbddb
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8810
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
Consider inspecting the '1 << shift' expression. Bit shifting of the 32-bit value with a subsequent expansion to the 64-bit type.
Change-Id: I9939f3c471fcbbb033bbd5f846b9e09e8b8fd125
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8808
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
A call of the 'memcpy' function will lead to the '& tmp_key' buffer becoming out of range.
Change-Id: I615a6c3e0dab8cfc2d240b6b39cff387e0689f35
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8796
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
Otherwise it could throw an exception if captured length < reported length
Change-Id: Ia9eb2778dbfebc1865a0040020a62ba20882b482
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8804
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
the pinfo parameter is not unused btw
Change-Id: Id038979cb64e858aa0b7b44ca8c6e3d4b7d2d05e
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8798
Reviewed-by: Martin Kaiser <wireshark@kaiser.cx>
Change-Id: Idc6fc8fb21ee2e096e92e590c9b27c8363fced4f
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8797
Reviewed-by: Martin Kaiser <wireshark@kaiser.cx>
Yes, there is a mistake !
Change-Id: I6c6c67300c0e05d3ede00be27f675cc8b15bb439
Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8794
Reviewed-by: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin@gmail.com>
Graham Bloice