current fragment pushes us past the reassembled size: it may be that the
current fragment is a duplicate/retransmission and will be ignored.
Also, if we detect a conflict between a previous and the current fragment,
flag the current (conflicting) fragment as FD_OVERLAPCONFLICT. Do *not* flag
the fragment that got us into the reassembly routine (probably the final
fragment): it is not (may not be) the guilty fragment.
Clean up some spacing.
Also add reassembly tests for duplicate/retransmitted fragments.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=36131
Specifically: free all dynamically allocated memory after each test (or
at program completion).
Also: add some debug functions (conditionally enabled) to print information
about the fragment_table and reassembled_table fd-chains.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=35172
the data source does not need to be allocated if (!tree).
Rev 30158 took the if (!tree) check out indicating that the check was invalid.
So: (since packet_add_new_data_source() now only calls add_new_data_source()),
remove packet_add_new_data_source().
svn path=/trunk/; revision=34717
compiling again.
fragment_add_seq_check(), fragment_add_seq_802_11(), and fragment_add_seq_next()
all call fragment_add_seq_check_work() so make their prototypes match each other
in const-ness. This fixes a warning when compiling reassemble_test.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=32933
1) The tvb + name (aka. data_source) is only used when the protocol tree is visible
The current implementation of add_new_data_source() doesn't take this into account and simply allocates a data_source regardless. This is what packet_add_new_data_source() tries to rectify.
A couple of dissectors have already been switched over to the new packet_add_new_data_source(). Many are still missing. Help appreciated!
svn path=/trunk/; revision=29427
01_reassemble_test.patch
------------------------
I didn't want to do anything without some unit tests, so here they are.
This allows a standalone binary, epan/reassemble_test, to be built; this can be run from the commandline and should end up printing out "success"
if all goes well.
NOTE the changes to makefile.am NOT checked in currently.
Incidentally: is it possible to get the buildbot to run things like this, exntest and tvbtest?
02_reassemble_refactor.patch
----------------------------
fragment_add_seq, fragment_add_dcerpc_dg and fragment_add_seq_check_work were all pretty much carbon-copies of each other. This patch factors out the common parts of the routines into a new routine, fragment_add_seq_key().
03_reassemble_partial_reassembly.patch
---------------------------------------
This makes fragment_set_partial_reassembly() work for datagrams assembled with fragment_add_seq(). The patch itself is actually quite small, but it adds another unit test which is reasonably lengthy.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=20888
Jeff Morriss