generate the name of the boldface font from the Roman font; if the two
fonts don't have the same widths, the display will look weird when a
field is selected, and it's a bit of a pain for the user to have to
select *two* fonts.
On UNIX/X, default to
"-*-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-*-" rather than to
"-*-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1" - some
Linux distributions appear to lack the Lucida typewriter font.
Add a "gui.font_name" preference to the preferences file, specifying the
normal-weight font to use. Have it settable from the "GUI" tab in the
Preferences dialog box - the "Font..." button, when clicked, pops up a
font selection dialog box.
If we either can't open the selected font or the boldfaced version of
the font, default to "6x13" and "6x13bold" as fallbacks - the former
will probably be "fixed", and the latter would be "fixedbold" if X
actually created such an alias, but it doesn't so we use "6x13bold"
instead.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=2304
- add <stdarg.h> or <varargs.h> in snprintf.h
and remove those inclusions in the other #ifdef NEED_SNPRINTF_H codes
- remove the check of multiple inclusions in source (.c) code
(there is a bit loss of _cpp_ performance, but I prefer the gain of
code reading and maintenance; and nowadays, disk caches and VM are
correctly optimized ;-).
- protect all (well almost) header files against multiple inclusions
- add header (i.e. GPL license) in some include files
- reorganize a bit the way header files are included:
First:
#include <system_include_files>
#include <external_package_include_files (e.g. gtk, glib etc.)>
Then
#include "ethereal_include_files"
with the correct HAVE_XXX or NEED_XXX protections.
- add some HAVE_XXX checks before including some system header files
- add the same HAVE_XXX in wiretap as in ethereal
Please forgive me, if I break something (I've only compiled and regression
tested on Linux).
svn path=/trunk/; revision=2254
I did this:
First, Havoc Pennington, in "GTK+/Gnome Application Development", in
Appendix seciton A.3.88, recommends using GtkCTree instead of GtkTree
because GtkCtree is faster, and GtkTree has limitation on its total row
height: since it must fit inside a GdkWindow, it is limited to 32,768
pixels of height. GtkTree is more flexible with regards to the types of
widgets that can be placed in the tree, but since we deal only with text,
that doesn't matter, at least for now.
Secondly, a GtkTree doesn't allow arrow-key navigation (at least as far
as I could tell). It always bothered me that the up and down arrow keys
worked in the packet list and in the hex dump, but no in the protocol tree.
GtkCTree does allow arrow-key navigation. In fact, GtkCTree is a subclass
of GtkCList (the packet list widget), so they behave a lot alike.
I went ahead and fixed the selection bar which has been bothering Richard
for a long time now. :) In the GUI preferences dialogue, you can now set
both the packet list selection bar and the protocol tree selection bar
to either "browse" or "select" mode. "browse" mode is what you're used to:
the arrow keys move an outline of the selection bar, but do not change
the selection. "select" mode does change the selection when the arrow keys
are pressed. The default behavior is set to "select", which seems more
natural for a first-time user.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=1393
option right now is the placement of the vertical scrollbars in the 3 panes.
(it's one decision; you can't have the placement of the vertical scrollbar
in the packet list pane different than the placement in the protocol tree
pane, for example).
I did this because I find it convenient to have the vertical scrollbars
on the *left* side of the text. My mouse cursor is usually expanding and
collapsing the protocol tree widgets, and once the protocol tree changes
size, I usually have to scroll. I'd rather move my mouse cursor just a few
pixels over to find the vertical scrollbar.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=1351
Guy Harris