pcep: Added rfc 7334 support.
Updated PCEP-ERROR Object Error Types and Values base on Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers 2016-08-09 version Change-Id: Ife0b49119a2b634279e33ab8f699a5dc57ecb34b Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/17957 Reviewed-by: Anders Broman <a.broman58@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Simon Zhong
Anders Broman
parent
1e532f2f6f
commit
f72f937623
|
|
@ -53,7 +53,11 @@
|
|||
* (c) Copyright 2015 Francesco Fondelli <francesco.fondelli[AT]gmail.com>
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Added support of "Conveying Vendor-Specific Constraints in the
|
||||
* Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (RFC 7470)"
|
||||
* Path Computation Element Communication Protocol" (RFC 7470)
|
||||
* Completed support of RFC 6006
|
||||
* Added support of "PCE-Based Computation Procedure to Compute Shortest
|
||||
Constrained Point-to-Multipoint (P2MP) Inter-Domain Traffic Engineering
|
||||
Label Switched Paths" (RFC 7334)
|
||||
* (c) Copyright 2016 Simon Zhong <szhong[AT]juniper.net>
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -199,7 +203,8 @@ void proto_reg_handoff_pcep(void);
|
|||
#define PCEP_RP_E 0x000800
|
||||
#define PCEP_RP_N 0x001000
|
||||
#define PCEP_RP_F 0x002000
|
||||
#define PCEP_RP_RESERVED 0xFFC000
|
||||
#define PCEP_RP_C 0x004000 /* RFC 7334 */
|
||||
#define PCEP_RP_RESERVED 0xFF8000
|
||||
|
||||
/*Mask for the flags of NO PATH Object*/
|
||||
#define PCEP_NO_PATH_C 0x8000
|
||||
|
|
@ -311,6 +316,7 @@ static gint hf_pcep_rp_flags_m = -1;
|
|||
static gint hf_pcep_rp_flags_e = -1;
|
||||
static gint hf_pcep_rp_flags_n = -1;
|
||||
static gint hf_pcep_rp_flags_f = -1;
|
||||
static gint hf_pcep_rp_flags_c = -1;
|
||||
static gint hf_pcep_rp_flags_reserved = -1;
|
||||
static gint hf_pcep_no_path_flags_c = -1;
|
||||
static gint hf_pcep_metric_flags_c = -1;
|
||||
|
|
@ -1115,7 +1121,17 @@ static const value_string pcep_error_value_6_vals[] = {
|
|||
|
||||
/*Error values for error type 10*/
|
||||
static const value_string pcep_error_value_10_vals[] = {
|
||||
{1, "Reception of an object with P flag not set although the P-flag must be set"},
|
||||
{1, "Reception of an object with P flag not set although the P-flag must be set"},
|
||||
{2, "Bad label value"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing */
|
||||
{3, "Unsupported number of Segment ERO subobjects"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing */
|
||||
{4, "Bad label format"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing */
|
||||
{5, "Non-identical ERO subobjects"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing */
|
||||
{6, "Both SID and NAI are absent in ERO subobject"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing */
|
||||
{7, "Both SID and NAI are absent in RRO subobject"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing */
|
||||
{8, "SYMBOLIC-PATH-NAME TLV missing"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing */
|
||||
{9, "Default MSD is specified for the PCEP session"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing */
|
||||
{10, "Non-identical RRO subjects"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing */
|
||||
{11, "Malformed object"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing */
|
||||
{0, NULL}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1164,20 +1180,22 @@ static const value_string pcep_error_value_18_vals[] = {
|
|||
|
||||
/*Error values for error type 19*/
|
||||
static const value_string pcep_error_value_19_vals[] = {
|
||||
{1, "Attempted LSP Update Request for a non-delegated LSP. The PCEP-ERROR Object is followed by the LSP Object that identifies the LSP"},
|
||||
{2, "Attempted LSP Update Request if active stateful PCE capability was not advertised"},
|
||||
{3, "Attempted LSP Update Request for an LSP identified by an unknown PLSP-ID"},
|
||||
{4, "A PCE indicates to a PCC that it has exceeded the resource limit allocated for its state, and thus it cannot accept and process its LSP State Report message"},
|
||||
{5, "Attempted LSP State Report if active stateful PCE capability was not advertised"},
|
||||
{6, "PCE-initiated LSP limit reached"},
|
||||
{7, "Delegation for PCE-initiated LSP cannot be revoked"},
|
||||
{8, "Non-zero PLSP-ID in LSP initiation request"},
|
||||
{1, "Attempted LSP Update Request for a non-delegated LSP. The PCEP-ERROR Object is followed by the LSP Object that identifies the LSP"},
|
||||
{2, "Attempted LSP Update Request if active stateful PCE capability was not advertised"},
|
||||
{3, "Attempted LSP Update Request for an LSP identified by an unknown PLSP-ID"},
|
||||
{4, "A PCE indicates to a PCC that it has exceeded the resource limit allocated for its state, and thus it cannot accept and process its LSP State Report message"},
|
||||
{5, "Attempted LSP State Report if active stateful PCE capability was not advertised"},
|
||||
{6, "PCE-initiated LSP limit reached"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp */
|
||||
{7, "Delegation for PCE-initiated LSP cannot be revoked"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp */
|
||||
{8, "Non-zero PLSP-ID in LSP initiation request"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp */
|
||||
{9, "LSP is not PCE-initiated"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp */
|
||||
{10, "PCE-initiated operation-frequency limit reached"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp */
|
||||
{0, NULL}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*Error values for error type 20*/
|
||||
static const value_string pcep_error_value_20_vals[] = {
|
||||
{1, "A PCE indicates to a PCC that it cannot process (an otherwise valid) LSP State Report. The PCEP-ERROR Object is followed by the LSP Object that identifies the LSP"},
|
||||
{1, "A PCE indicates to a PCC that it cannot process (an otherwise valid) LSP State Report. The PCEP-ERROR Object is followed by the LSP Object that identifies the LSP"},
|
||||
{2, "LSP Database version mismatch."},
|
||||
{3, "The LSP-DB-VERSION TLV Missing when state synchronization avoidance is enabled."},
|
||||
{4, "Attempt to trigger a synchronization when the TRIGGERED-SYNC capability has not been advertised."},
|
||||
|
|
@ -1196,15 +1214,16 @@ static const value_string pcep_error_value_21_vals[] = {
|
|||
|
||||
/*Error values for error type 23*/
|
||||
static const value_string pcep_error_value_23_vals[] = {
|
||||
{1, "SYMBOLIC-PATH-NAME in use"},
|
||||
{1, "SYMBOLIC-PATH-NAME in use"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp */
|
||||
{2, "Speaker identity included for an LSP that is not PCE-initiated"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp */
|
||||
{0, NULL}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*Error values for error type 24*/
|
||||
static const value_string pcep_error_value_24_vals[] = {
|
||||
{1, "Unacceptable instantiation parameters"},
|
||||
{2, "Internal error"},
|
||||
{3, "RSVP signaling error"},
|
||||
{1, "Unacceptable instantiation parameters"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp */
|
||||
{2, "Internal error"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp */
|
||||
{3, "Signaling error"}, /* draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp */
|
||||
{0, NULL}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1982,6 +2001,7 @@ dissect_pcep_rp_obj(proto_tree *pcep_object_tree, packet_info *pinfo,
|
|||
pcep_rp_obj_flags = proto_item_add_subtree(ti, ett_pcep_obj_request_parameters);
|
||||
|
||||
proto_tree_add_item(pcep_rp_obj_flags, hf_pcep_rp_flags_reserved, tvb, offset2+1, 3, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
|
||||
proto_tree_add_item(pcep_rp_obj_flags, hf_pcep_rp_flags_c, tvb, offset2+1, 3, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
|
||||
proto_tree_add_item(pcep_rp_obj_flags, hf_pcep_rp_flags_f, tvb, offset2+1, 3, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
|
||||
proto_tree_add_item(pcep_rp_obj_flags, hf_pcep_rp_flags_n, tvb, offset2+1, 3, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
|
||||
proto_tree_add_item(pcep_rp_obj_flags, hf_pcep_rp_flags_e, tvb, offset2+1, 3, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
|
||||
|
|
@ -3923,6 +3943,11 @@ proto_register_pcep(void)
|
|||
FT_BOOLEAN, 24, TFS(&tfs_set_notset), PCEP_RP_F,
|
||||
NULL, HFILL }
|
||||
},
|
||||
{ &hf_pcep_rp_flags_c,
|
||||
{ "(C) Core-tree computation", "pcep.rp.flags.c",
|
||||
FT_BOOLEAN, 24, TFS(&tfs_set_notset), PCEP_RP_C,
|
||||
NULL, HFILL }
|
||||
},
|
||||
{ &hf_PCEPF_OBJ_NO_PATH,
|
||||
{ "NO-PATH object", "pcep.obj.nopath",
|
||||
FT_NONE, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0x0,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue