Update patch set 2

Patch Set 2:

(1 comment)

Patch-set: 2
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1000010 \u003c1000010@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"fixeria replied on the change"}

454a60d7269278cecefad41db8c17c624661d331

@@ -46,6 +46,30 @@
       },
       "revId": "454a60d7269278cecefad41db8c17c624661d331",
       "serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
+    },
+    {
+      "unresolved": true,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "e6672579_6bb423ed",
+        "filename": "src/tbf.h",
+        "patchSetId": 1
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 260,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 1000010
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2022-11-18T15:32:21Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "But this is one is the main tbf_fsm, right? Both ul_ass_fsm and dl_ass_fsm are supplementary ones, AFAICS. IMO, it\u0027s even more confusing now: you have \u0027state_fi\u0027 and \u0027state_fsm\u0027.\n\nAnd why the internal fsm data (i.e. tbf_ul_ass_fsm_ctx, tbf_ul_ass_fsm_ctx, and tbf_fsm_ctx) is available here? Shouldn\u0027t it be dynamically allocated and assigned to fi-\u003epriv?",
+      "parentUuid": "eec627d2_f4417d81",
+      "range": {
+        "startLine": 260,
+        "startChar": 23,
+        "endLine": 260,
+        "endChar": 31
+      },
+      "revId": "454a60d7269278cecefad41db8c17c624661d331",
+      "serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
     }
   ]
 }