cellular-infrastructure
/
osmo-pcu
mirror of https://gerrit.osmocom.org/osmo-pcu
9
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
osmo-pcu/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err

152 lines
8.8 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

TbfTest: Make logging more verbose Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2014-06-11 16:33:14 +00:00
********** TBF starts here **********
Allocating DL TBF: TFI=0 TRX=0 MS_CLASS=0
Slot Allocation (Algorithm A) for class 0
- Skipping TS 0, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 1, because not enabled
- Assign downlink TS=2
- Setting Control TS 2
tbf: Include TBF state in tbf_name output Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2014-08-15 16:11:57 +00:00
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=NULL) changing tlli from TLLI=0x00000000 TLLI=0x00002342 ul_changed=0
TbfTest: Make logging more verbose Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2014-06-11 16:33:14 +00:00
********** TBF starts here **********
Allocating UL TBF: TFI=0 TRX=0 MS_CLASS=0
Slot Allocation (Algorithm A) for class 0
- Skipping TS 0, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 1, because not enabled
- Assign uplink TS=2 USF=0
- Setting Control TS 2
tbf: Include TBF state in tbf_name output Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2014-08-15 16:11:57 +00:00
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=UL STATE=NULL) changing tlli from TLLI=0x00000000 TLLI=0x00002342 ul_changed=0
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00002342 DIR=DL STATE=NULL) changing tlli from TLLI=0x00002342 TLLI=0x00004232 ul_changed=1
tests/tbf: Test for final ack issue Ticket: SYS#382 Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2014-08-15 16:19:41 +00:00
Searching for first unallocated TFI: TRX=0 first TS=4
Found TFI=0.
********** TBF starts here **********
Allocating DL TBF: TFI=0 TRX=0 MS_CLASS=45
Slot Allocation (Algorithm A) for class 45
- Skipping TS 0, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 1, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 2, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 3, because not enabled
- Assign downlink TS=4
- Setting Control TS 4
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=NULL) changes state from NULL to FLOW
tests/tbf: Use correct function to enqueue llc data The test called the llc enqueue() function directly which didn't take care of prepending the tv values for the timeout to the data. Now the test uses dl_tbf.append() which takes care of prepending the tv values. With this patch make distcheck on jenkins should no longer fail with "Discarding LLC PDU because lifetime limit reached." messages.
2014-09-19 09:57:21 +00:00
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) append
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) append
tests/tbf: Test for final ack issue Ticket: SYS#382 Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2014-08-15 16:19:41 +00:00
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) start Packet Downlink Assignment (PACCH)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++ TX : Packet Downlink Assignment +++++++++++++++++++++++++
------------------------- TX : Packet Downlink Assignment -------------------------
Scheduling control message at RTS for TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) (TRX=0, TS=4)
Sending data request: trx=0 ts=4 sapi=5 arfcn=0 fn=0 block=0 data=4f 08 20 00 44 02 00 02 08 04 00 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b
Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 (TRX=0, TS=4)
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) downlink (V(A)==0 .. V(S)==0)
- Sending new block at BSN 0
-- Chunk with length 0 is less than remaining space (20): add length header to to delimit LLC frame
Complete DL frame for TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW)len=0
tests/tbf: Use correct function to enqueue llc data The test called the llc enqueue() function directly which didn't take care of prepending the tv values for the timeout to the data. Now the test uses dl_tbf.append() which takes care of prepending the tv values. With this patch make distcheck on jenkins should no longer fail with "Discarding LLC PDU because lifetime limit reached." messages.
2014-09-19 09:57:21 +00:00
- Dequeue next LLC for TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) (len=200)
-- Chunk with length 200 larger than space (19) left in block: copy only remaining space, and we are done
tests/tbf: Commit TbfTest.err *with* whitespace "errors" Otherwise the diff and hence the test will fail...
2014-09-19 10:01:39 +00:00
data block: 07 00 00 03 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12
Sending data request: trx=0 ts=4 sapi=5 arfcn=0 fn=1 block=0 data=07 00 00 03 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12
tests/tbf: Test for final ack issue Ticket: SYS#382 Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2014-08-15 16:19:41 +00:00
Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 (TRX=0, TS=4)
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) downlink (V(A)==0 .. V(S)==1)
- Sending new block at BSN 1
tests/tbf: Use correct function to enqueue llc data The test called the llc enqueue() function directly which didn't take care of prepending the tv values for the timeout to the data. Now the test uses dl_tbf.append() which takes care of prepending the tv values. With this patch make distcheck on jenkins should no longer fail with "Discarding LLC PDU because lifetime limit reached." messages.
2014-09-19 09:57:21 +00:00
-- Chunk with length 181 larger than space (20) left in block: copy only remaining space, and we are done
tests/tbf: Commit TbfTest.err *with* whitespace "errors" Otherwise the diff and hence the test will fail...
2014-09-19 10:01:39 +00:00
data block: 07 00 03 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Sending data request: trx=0 ts=4 sapi=5 arfcn=0 fn=2 block=0 data=07 00 03 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
tests/tbf: Test for final ack issue Ticket: SYS#382 Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2014-08-15 16:19:41 +00:00
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) downlink acknowledge
- Final ACK received.
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) changes state from FLOW to WAIT RELEASE
Searching for first unallocated TFI: TRX=0 first TS=4
Found TFI=1.
********** TBF starts here **********
Allocating DL TBF: TFI=1 TRX=0 MS_CLASS=45
Slot Allocation (Algorithm A) for class 45
- Skipping TS 0, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 1, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 2, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 3, because not enabled
- Assign downlink TS=4
- Setting Control TS 4
********** TBF update **********
Slot Allocation (Algorithm A) for class 45
- Skipping TS 0, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 1, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 2, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 3, because not enabled
- Assign downlink TS=4
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE) Trigger dowlink assignment on PACCH, because another LLC PDU has arrived in between
Send dowlink assignment on PACCH, because TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE) exists
tbf: Fix dangling m_new_tbf pointer Currently if a 'new' TBF is freed before the 'old' one (where old_tbf->m_new_tbf == new_tbf), the old_tbf->m_new_tbf is not cleared and can be accessed later on. This can lead to inconsistencies or segmentation faults. This commit adds m_old_tbf which points back from new_tbf to old_pdf. m_new_tbf and m_old_tbf are either both set to NULL or one is the reverse pointer of the other (tbf->m_new_tbf->m_old_tbf == tbf and tbf->m_old_tbf->m_new_tbf == tbf). It extends set_new_tbf and tbf_free to update the pointee accordingly. The TBF test is extended to check this invariant at several places. Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2015-02-23 14:10:20 +00:00
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE) m_new_tbf is already assigned to TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE), overwriting the old value with TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE)
tests/tbf: Test for final ack issue Ticket: SYS#382 Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2014-08-15 16:19:41 +00:00
TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=NULL) changes state from NULL to ASSIGN
TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN) starting timer 0.
DL packet loss of IMSI= / TLLI=0x00000000: 0%
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE) free
tbf: Fix dangling m_new_tbf pointer Currently if a 'new' TBF is freed before the 'old' one (where old_tbf->m_new_tbf == new_tbf), the old_tbf->m_new_tbf is not cleared and can be accessed later on. This can lead to inconsistencies or segmentation faults. This commit adds m_old_tbf which points back from new_tbf to old_pdf. m_new_tbf and m_old_tbf are either both set to NULL or one is the reverse pointer of the other (tbf->m_new_tbf->m_old_tbf == tbf and tbf->m_old_tbf->m_new_tbf == tbf). It extends set_new_tbf and tbf_free to update the pointee accordingly. The TBF test is extended to check this invariant at several places. Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2015-02-23 14:10:20 +00:00
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE) New TBF TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE) still exists, detaching
tests/tbf: Test for final ack issue Ticket: SYS#382 Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2014-08-15 16:19:41 +00:00
********** TBF ends here **********
TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN) free
TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN) stopping timer 0.
********** TBF ends here **********
tbf/test: Modify test to create a dangling TBF pointer When new_tbf is freed before dl_tbf in test_tbf_final_ack, dl_tbf still contains a pointer to it in m_new_tbf. This patch changes the test to accept a test mode parameter and runs it twice which a different order of tbf_free in each run. Consistency checks are added, to check for a danglilng m_new_tbf pointer in both cases. Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2015-02-23 13:26:59 +00:00
Searching for first unallocated TFI: TRX=0 first TS=4
Found TFI=0.
********** TBF starts here **********
Allocating DL TBF: TFI=0 TRX=0 MS_CLASS=45
Slot Allocation (Algorithm A) for class 45
- Skipping TS 0, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 1, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 2, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 3, because not enabled
- Assign downlink TS=4
- Setting Control TS 4
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=NULL) changes state from NULL to FLOW
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) append
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) append
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) start Packet Downlink Assignment (PACCH)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++ TX : Packet Downlink Assignment +++++++++++++++++++++++++
------------------------- TX : Packet Downlink Assignment -------------------------
Scheduling control message at RTS for TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) (TRX=0, TS=4)
Sending data request: trx=0 ts=4 sapi=5 arfcn=0 fn=0 block=0 data=4f 08 20 00 44 02 00 02 08 04 00 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b 2b
Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 (TRX=0, TS=4)
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) downlink (V(A)==0 .. V(S)==0)
- Sending new block at BSN 0
-- Chunk with length 0 is less than remaining space (20): add length header to to delimit LLC frame
Complete DL frame for TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW)len=0
- Dequeue next LLC for TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) (len=200)
-- Chunk with length 200 larger than space (19) left in block: copy only remaining space, and we are done
data block: 07 00 00 03 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12
Sending data request: trx=0 ts=4 sapi=5 arfcn=0 fn=1 block=0 data=07 00 00 03 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 0a 0b 0c 0d 0e 0f 10 11 12
Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 (TRX=0, TS=4)
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) downlink (V(A)==0 .. V(S)==1)
- Sending new block at BSN 1
-- Chunk with length 181 larger than space (20) left in block: copy only remaining space, and we are done
data block: 07 00 03 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Sending data request: trx=0 ts=4 sapi=5 arfcn=0 fn=2 block=0 data=07 00 03 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) downlink acknowledge
- Final ACK received.
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) changes state from FLOW to WAIT RELEASE
Searching for first unallocated TFI: TRX=0 first TS=4
Found TFI=1.
********** TBF starts here **********
Allocating DL TBF: TFI=1 TRX=0 MS_CLASS=45
Slot Allocation (Algorithm A) for class 45
- Skipping TS 0, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 1, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 2, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 3, because not enabled
- Assign downlink TS=4
- Setting Control TS 4
********** TBF update **********
Slot Allocation (Algorithm A) for class 45
- Skipping TS 0, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 1, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 2, because not enabled
- Skipping TS 3, because not enabled
- Assign downlink TS=4
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE) Trigger dowlink assignment on PACCH, because another LLC PDU has arrived in between
Send dowlink assignment on PACCH, because TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE) exists
tbf: Fix dangling m_new_tbf pointer Currently if a 'new' TBF is freed before the 'old' one (where old_tbf->m_new_tbf == new_tbf), the old_tbf->m_new_tbf is not cleared and can be accessed later on. This can lead to inconsistencies or segmentation faults. This commit adds m_old_tbf which points back from new_tbf to old_pdf. m_new_tbf and m_old_tbf are either both set to NULL or one is the reverse pointer of the other (tbf->m_new_tbf->m_old_tbf == tbf and tbf->m_old_tbf->m_new_tbf == tbf). It extends set_new_tbf and tbf_free to update the pointee accordingly. The TBF test is extended to check this invariant at several places. Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2015-02-23 14:10:20 +00:00
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE) m_new_tbf is already assigned to TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE), overwriting the old value with TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE)
tbf/test: Modify test to create a dangling TBF pointer When new_tbf is freed before dl_tbf in test_tbf_final_ack, dl_tbf still contains a pointer to it in m_new_tbf. This patch changes the test to accept a test mode parameter and runs it twice which a different order of tbf_free in each run. Consistency checks are added, to check for a danglilng m_new_tbf pointer in both cases. Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2015-02-23 13:26:59 +00:00
TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=NULL) changes state from NULL to ASSIGN
TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN) starting timer 0.
TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN) free
TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN) stopping timer 0.
tbf: Fix dangling m_new_tbf pointer Currently if a 'new' TBF is freed before the 'old' one (where old_tbf->m_new_tbf == new_tbf), the old_tbf->m_new_tbf is not cleared and can be accessed later on. This can lead to inconsistencies or segmentation faults. This commit adds m_old_tbf which points back from new_tbf to old_pdf. m_new_tbf and m_old_tbf are either both set to NULL or one is the reverse pointer of the other (tbf->m_new_tbf->m_old_tbf == tbf and tbf->m_old_tbf->m_new_tbf == tbf). It extends set_new_tbf and tbf_free to update the pointee accordingly. The TBF test is extended to check this invariant at several places. Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2015-02-23 14:10:20 +00:00
TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN) Old TBF TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN) still exists, detaching
tbf/test: Modify test to create a dangling TBF pointer When new_tbf is freed before dl_tbf in test_tbf_final_ack, dl_tbf still contains a pointer to it in m_new_tbf. This patch changes the test to accept a test mode parameter and runs it twice which a different order of tbf_free in each run. Consistency checks are added, to check for a danglilng m_new_tbf pointer in both cases. Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
2015-02-23 13:26:59 +00:00
********** TBF ends here **********
DL packet loss of IMSI= / TLLI=0x00000000: 0%
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0x00000000 DIR=DL STATE=WAIT RELEASE) free
********** TBF ends here **********