2015-03-19 10:22:38 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2015 by Sysmocom s.f.m.c. GmbH
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
|
|
|
|
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
|
|
|
|
|
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
|
|
|
|
|
* of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
|
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
|
|
|
* GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2021-03-11 16:01:25 +00:00
|
|
|
#pragma once
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef __cplusplus
|
2017-12-22 13:20:05 +00:00
|
|
|
extern "C" {
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2017-12-22 13:20:05 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <osmocom/gsm/gsm_utils.h>
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef __cplusplus
|
2017-12-22 13:20:05 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-03-11 13:04:52 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <time.h>
|
Add new PDCH UL Controller, drop SBAllocator class
Right now we handle different types of UL allocations in different
classes like PollAllocator and SBAllocator, and they usually don't take
into account the other one in most cases. Furthermore, those objects are
usually per-BTS object, instead of per PDCH object.
This is a first step towards having a unified per-PDCH controller which
takes care of controlling what is scheduled and hence expected on the
uplink. Each PDCH has a UL Controller which keeps track of all reserved
uplink frame, be it SB, RRBP poll or USF assigned, all under the same
API.
As a first step, only the SBA part is fully implemented and used (being
it the easiest part to replace); TBF poll+usf will come in follow-up
patches later on. As a result, the SBAllocator per-BTS class dissappears
but some of its code is refactored/reused to provide more features to the
gprs_rlcmac_sba object, which is also further integrated into the new UL
Controller.
Related: OS#5020
Change-Id: I84b24beea4a1aa2c1528f41435f77bd16df2b947
2021-03-08 13:57:58 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <stdint.h>
|
2017-12-22 13:20:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-10 11:19:04 +00:00
|
|
|
#define FN_UNSET 0xFFFFFFFF
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline int msecs_to_frames(int msecs) {
|
2015-03-19 10:22:38 +00:00
|
|
|
return (msecs * (1024 * 1000 / 4615)) / 1024;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-03-20 11:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline uint32_t next_fn(uint32_t fn, uint32_t offset)
|
2017-05-16 14:10:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
return (fn + offset) % GSM_MAX_FN;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline void csecs_to_timespec(unsigned csecs, struct timespec *ts) {
|
2020-03-11 13:04:52 +00:00
|
|
|
ts->tv_sec = csecs / 100;
|
|
|
|
|
ts->tv_nsec = (csecs % 100) * 10000000;
|
2015-03-20 11:02:42 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-01-19 14:48:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Add new PDCH UL Controller, drop SBAllocator class
Right now we handle different types of UL allocations in different
classes like PollAllocator and SBAllocator, and they usually don't take
into account the other one in most cases. Furthermore, those objects are
usually per-BTS object, instead of per PDCH object.
This is a first step towards having a unified per-PDCH controller which
takes care of controlling what is scheduled and hence expected on the
uplink. Each PDCH has a UL Controller which keeps track of all reserved
uplink frame, be it SB, RRBP poll or USF assigned, all under the same
API.
As a first step, only the SBA part is fully implemented and used (being
it the easiest part to replace); TBF poll+usf will come in follow-up
patches later on. As a result, the SBAllocator per-BTS class dissappears
but some of its code is refactored/reused to provide more features to the
gprs_rlcmac_sba object, which is also further integrated into the new UL
Controller.
Related: OS#5020
Change-Id: I84b24beea4a1aa2c1528f41435f77bd16df2b947
2021-03-08 13:57:58 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline uint32_t rts_next_fn(uint32_t rts_fn, uint8_t block_nr)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
uint32_t fn = rts_fn + 4;
|
|
|
|
|
if ((block_nr % 3) == 2)
|
|
|
|
|
fn++;
|
|
|
|
|
fn = fn % GSM_MAX_FN;
|
|
|
|
|
return fn;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-10 11:19:04 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline unsigned fn2bn(unsigned fn)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
return (fn % 52) / 4;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-29 11:49:43 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline bool fn_valid(uint32_t fn)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
uint32_t f = fn % 13;
|
|
|
|
|
return f == 0 || f == 4 || f == 8;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-10 11:19:04 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline unsigned fn_next_block(unsigned fn)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned bn = fn2bn(fn) + 1;
|
|
|
|
|
fn = fn - (fn % 52);
|
|
|
|
|
fn += bn * 4 + bn / 3;
|
|
|
|
|
return fn % GSM_MAX_FN;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef __cplusplus
|
2016-01-19 14:48:03 +00:00
|
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
|
|
|
inline unsigned int pcu_bitcount(T x)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned int count = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
for (count = 0; x; count += 1)
|
|
|
|
|
x &= x - 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return count;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2016-01-19 14:48:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline uint8_t pcu_lsb(uint8_t x)
|
2016-01-19 14:48:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
return x & -x;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
Convert GprsMS and helpers classes to C
As we integrate osmo-pcu more and more with libosmocore features, it
becomes really hard to use them since libosmocore relies heavily on C
specific compilation features, which are not available in old C++
compilers (such as designated initializers for complex types in FSMs).
GprsMs is right now a quite simple object since initial design of
osmo-pcu made it optional and most of the logic was placed and stored
duplicated in TBF objects. However, that's changing as we introduce more
features, with the GprsMS class getting more weight. Hence, let's move
it now to be a C struct in order to be able to easily use libosmocore
features there, such as FSMs.
Some helper classes which GprsMs uses are also mostly move to C since
they are mostly structs with methods, so there's no point in having
duplicated APIs for C++ and C for such simple cases.
For some more complex classes, like (ul_,dl_)tbf, C API bindings are
added where needed so that GprsMs can use functionalitites from that
class. Most of those APIs can be kept afterwards and drop the C++ ones
since they provide no benefit in general.
Change-Id: I0b50e3367aaad9dcada76da97b438e452c8b230c
2020-12-16 14:59:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Used to store a C++ class in a llist used by C code */
|
|
|
|
|
struct llist_item {
|
|
|
|
|
struct llist_head list; /* item used by llist */
|
|
|
|
|
void *entry;
|
|
|
|
|
};
|