We don't usually put space before in-place increment or decrement. Let's
make code look similar to other Osmocom projects.
Change-Id: I5962431ad16c97e412939dc1b8949f6361a5c26e
in the current implementation we still use osmo-bsc_mgcp, which
has many problems and is also obsoleted by osmo-mgw.
integrate osmo-mgw and re-implement the current switching using
an osmo fsm.
Depends: osmo-mgw Iab6a6038e7610c62f34e642cd49c93d11151252c
Depends: osmo-iuh I3c1a0455c5f25cae41ee19229d6daf299e023062
Closes: OS#2605
Change-Id: Ieea9630358b3963261fa1993cf1f3b563ff23538
conn_id is modeled as int, but should be uint32_t.
- change conn_id from int to uint32_t
Change-Id: Ibf14d7c9a547c4eeb873975e7dcddef223e7df46
Related: OS#2769
Using following semantic patch:
@@ expression A, B, C; @@
- osmo_strlcpy(A, B, sizeof(A));
+ OSMO_STRLCPY_ARRAY(A, B);
Which was applied using following command:
spatch --dir src -I src --sp-file strlcpy.spatch --in-place --recursive-includes
All the calls to osmo_strlcpy() which use destination buffer obtained
via sizeof() were replaced with the corresponding wrapper macro.
Change-Id: I67b482dedfa11237ac21894fc5930039e12434ab
Related: OS#2864
According to TS 24.007 Section 11.2.3.2.3, it is possible that uplink L3
messages are duplicated in some scenarios, particularly during
assignment/handover procedure.
To avoid L3 entities from seeing duplicated messages, there's a modulo-2
or modulo-4 message sequence counter, based on which the MSC can detect
and suppress such duplicate messages.
It appears that even our unit tests were wrong in that regard so far.
Rather than manually adjusting each and every message, let's make sure
that the sequence number generation always increments as expected, and
that during matching of incoming messages, sequence numbers are masked
out.
Note: the tests will only pass from libosmocore Change-Id
Iec875a77f5458322dfbef174f5abfc0e8c09d464 onwards, due to
gsm48_hdr_msg_type() being broken in earlier versions.
Change-Id: Id15e399ab7e1b05dcd426b292886fa19d36082b1
Closes: #2908
Make the submit_to_sms() funcion aware of the message mode. If the
message does not require real-time "transactional/forward mode" we
can store it in the SMS database even if subscriber B cannot be
found in the VLR at this point in time.
This should should make the esme_ms_sms_storeforward test in
osmo-gsm-tester pass (a tweak to this test's expectations will
be needed as well, because the test currently assumes that an
invalid phone number for subscriber B will fail immediately,
rather than cause the message to eventually expire).
Change-Id: Ic3d78919568ad9252b4d19c3ddab5068d1c52db2
Related: OS#2354
This leads to faster recovery in case of link loss.
It also makes the TTCN-3 test suite run much faster, as each test case
will inherently terminate the GSUP connection.
Change-Id: I16821a26f2c6ff4d0a76926c9212127ab6f6fedf
There's no point of ever asking a MS to perform ciphering using an
algorithm it advertises no support for. Let's hence use CLASSMARK
information to figure out the intersection between MSC policy (VTY
command) and MS-reported CLASSMARK.
Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3
So far, the administrator had to pick one particular cipher which
would then be used throughout all subscribers/phones. This is a bit
impractical, as e.g. not all phones support A5/3. Extend the VTY
command syntax in a backwards-compatible way to permit for multiple
ciphers.
NOTE: Like the previous code, OsmoMSC does *not yet check* whether
the configured cipher is compatible with the MS capabilities as
reported in CLASSMARK! The network hence might choose an algorithm
not supported by the phone. Fixing this is subject to another patch.
Closes: OS#2460
Change-Id: I79a4e2892eb5fbecc3d84e11dceffb7149db264b
The VLR code seems to have the assumption that there is one particular
algorithm to be used, as opposed to one of a set of algorithms.
What's missing is basically to decide when/where to pick the best
algorithm within the capabilities of the phone (classmark) and the
network configuration (net->a5_encryption_mask). So far, libvlr has no
notion of classmark. Rather, libmsc has.
Why does the VLR care about the particular algorithm at all? The VLR
should probably simply decide if it should use encryption or not, and if
so, the MSC will figure which algorithm to use.
Change-Id: I5ed80ca2086560a5975a758ec568a034a9a8ab89
Delete expired SMS whenever we are done processing an SMS-related signal.
In order to minimize additional latency only one SMS is removed at a time.
Change-Id: I56cbe716e52b679c4b94f6cbb4a171306975be2e
Related: OS#2354
Accept any SMS and store it in the database, even if the receiver of
the message cannot be determined when the message arrives at the MSC.
This fixes https://osmocom.org/issues/2354 ("SMSC: Store&Forward not
working for subscribed but unregistered MS").
Change-Id: I833c3abd290d2bc5fceec7457e3933c9600e6c24
Depends: Icd6093b7b5d8db84b19a0aa47c68182566113ee2
Depends: I56cbe716e52b679c4b94f6cbb4a171306975be2e
Depends: Icf786f9b1efabfe7407fb6414ec0d326d8f7244a
Related: OS#2354
We already delete SMS which have been sent successfully. However, there
are plans to accept SMS for any subscriber in order to fix the problem
described in https://osmocom.org/issues/2354 ("SMSC: Store&Forward not
working for subscribed but unregistered MS").
This means we may end up storing SMS which never get sent, e.g. because
the B subscriber doesn't actually exist. This could lead to a higher
degree of SMS database growth over time, and therefore we need a way
to keep database size under control.
As a first step, introduce a DB function which removes an expired SMS,
and add a VTY command which removes all expired SMS from the DB.
Later commits will build upon this to remove expired SMS automatically.
The SMS expiry time period is currently hard-coded to 2 weeks.
We could make this configurable in the future if desired.
Change-Id: Icd6093b7b5d8db84b19a0aa47c68182566113ee2
Related: OS#2354
osmo-msc still had large amounts of dead code that came along from
openbsc.git. This commit removes a lot of it, mostly stuff relevant
only to the BSC side of things (or even GPRS).
Change-Id: I247def85da2dc3ec461389fb74414a0d964e7e3c
Related: OS#2528
There's nothing GPRS related left in osmo-msc, and hence no reason
why we should build osmo-ggsn as a build dependency.
Change-Id: I096f63e471dc8fdbd42a78f67d433f61b830615b
We don't have BSC or GPRS related logging filters here.
This is a leftover from the NITB->MSC split
Change-Id: I05f991d1f5b7f89545521a73d79619bee4111094
According to TS 44.008 Section 3.2.1.31, the "Layer 3 Message Contents"
IE of the BSSMAP Cipher Mode Complete is optional. The BSC may hence
inlcude that IE or not include it.
Without this patch, OsmoMSC is crashing if that IE was missing:
<000a> a_iface_bssap.c:699 Rx BSC DT: 00 03 55 2c 02
<000a> a_iface_bssap.c:629 Rx MSC DT1 BSSMAP CIPHER MODE COMPLETE
<001f> a_iface_bssap.c:91 Found A subscriber for conn_id 1
<000a> a_iface_bssap.c:415 BSC sends cipher mode complete (conn_id=1)
==5611== Invalid read of size 8
==5611== at 0x128D0F: msc_cipher_mode_compl (osmo_msc.c:159)
==5611== by 0x114F62: bssmap_rx_ciph_compl.isra.8 (a_iface_bssap.c:432)
==5611== by 0x113267: sccp_sap_up (a_iface.c:520)
Change-Id: I722f9b468b157b3736918f090daaa9489a6028ee
Closes: OS#2871
Even if we're not implementing CM re-establishment, we should give
the MS a clear indication that we don't do and follow the related
procedures of TS 24.008 by sending CM SERVICE REJECT.
Closes: OS#2869
Change-Id: I1c0473647295456fd635b8df6079ee48695dcf2e
In I8de7c01f9ea1d66c384e57449c4140186f5ce6c5, libosmocore introduced
shorter names in gsm48_pdisc_names, which has implications on the
expected test output
Change-Id: I4421872a0d609dd50a6b911b928aa5e111d1ad24
Measurement reporting (and the relate feed) are functions of the BSC,
not the MSC. This code should never have been inherited from OsmoNITB
to OsmoMSC in the first place, let's remove it.
Change-Id: I0d57ac214e574e267fa9752daf76566197b9aa64
When we receive a CM Service Request, OsmoMSC should eventually verify
what kind of service it is the phone requests, and whether we support
that service.
Change-Id: I499730d760dc9ac7f599e09959c6eac4452f2eab
Closes: OS#2668
OsmoMSC rejects an Emergency Call with IMEI as mobile identity with
"semantically incorrect message" which is clearly wrong. According to TS
24.008 4.5.1.5 we should reject with cause 5 "IMEI not accepted"
Found with TTCN-3 test case MSC_Tests.TC_emerg_call_imei
Change-Id: I2f7ab0e32b914a112c0b17c523d149ccd0299099
Closes: #2866
MNCC has a MNCC_F_EMERGENCY flag to indicate that the mncc.emergency
field is present. However, OsmoMSC never sets this flag.
Change-Id: I0ebd8f88e483172988f4a0cb0636b4160688d8ad
Closes: OS#2865
An emergency call should be logged different from a normal call,
and we also increase the log level from INFO to NOTICE in such a
situation.
Change-Id: I83f3b8bd0aeda70f03aa7b8d264a9008d10d5687
There appears to have been no input validation whatsoever on MNCC
messages. Hence it was very easy for an external MNCC handler to
crash OsmoMSC, such as in OS#2853
Change-Id: Idaf3b8e409c84564b1eb26d01a19c605f89b14f4
Closes: OS#2853
Quote the argument to sqlite's datetime(). Otherwise, the timestamp
stored in the database reads back as a negative value for some reason.
Before:
1032 validity_timestamp = dbi_result_get_datetime(result, "valid_until");
(gdb) p validity_timestamp
$2 = -1516814654
After:
1032 validity_timestamp = dbi_result_get_datetime(result, "valid_until");
(gdb) p validity_timestamp
$2 = 1516814654
Change-Id: Icf786f9b1efabfe7407fb6414ec0d326d8f7244a
As the include file gsm_data.h is generic (does not depend on osmo-iuh0s
iu_client.h), rab_assign_addr_enc is declared as "int" instead of "enum ranap_nsap_addr_enc".
osmo-msc/src/libmsc/msc_vty.c: In function ‘msc_vty_init’:
osmo-msc/src/libmsc/msc_vty.c:212:30: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘ranap_iu_vty_init’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
ranap_iu_vty_init(MSC_NODE, &msc_network->iu.rab_assign_addr_enc);
^
Change-Id: I1b63ee350911bdf772a2324fff55035275a455c4
Compute a validity timestamp based on SMS validity time.
Store the computed value in the database and recompute the validity
time when an SMS is read from the database.
Change-Id: Id27c250d3a64cd109416450e8ca155b18a8b9568
Currently the SMS database keeps accumulating entries for each SMS.
These entries are never deleted automatically. With this change, we
start deleting SMS which have successfully been sent to subscriber B.
Change-Id: I3749855fe25d9d4e37ec96b0c2bffbc692b66a78
If we cannot open a connection to the sqlite3 database, show the name of the
database we failed to access, and also hint at the fact that a likely reason
for the problem is a missing sqlite3 driver for libdbi.
Change-Id: If1c0026e882984b4358ce116ec4a7ad40340517c
There is no any significant reason to define static function
'send_own_number' after the code that calls it.
Change-Id: I7f76f278c09489dccd96921610e8d06efa679ff2
This change removes a few USSD specific declarations, which are
not actually used now, and probably accidentally migrated from
legacy OpenBSC.
Change-Id: Id57a24b92790d3ce0f9c7343d060f511e2b979c7
Max
Philipp Maier
Harald Welte
Pau Espin