cellular-infrastructure
/
osmo-msc
mirror of https://gerrit.osmocom.org/osmo-msc
9
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
osmo-msc/tests/msc_vlr/msc_vlr_test_ms_timeout.err

875 lines
74 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DLMGCP MGCP client: using endpoint domain '@mgw'
use osmo_init_logging2() with proper talloc ctx Since the logging allocations now also show up in the root context report, some tests need adjusted talloc checks. In msc_vlr_tests, also output the number of talloc blocks before tests are started to show that the number didn't change after the tests. Change-Id: Iae07ae60230c7bab28e52b5df97fa3844778158e
2018-03-30 21:04:04 +00:00
full talloc report on 'msgb' (total 0 bytes in 1 blocks)
add rudimentary NRI support for MSC pooling This patch served for a manual testing counterpart for osmo-bsc to implement MSC pooling. This enables a basic MSC pooling setup, but for a production setup, osmo-msc would still lack various features related to unloading subscribers to another MSC as explained in 3GPP TS 23.236. Change-Id: Iafe0878a0a2c8669080d757b34a398ea75fced36
2020-05-26 22:04:26 +00:00
talloc_total_blocks(tall_bsc_ctx) == 20
use osmo_init_logging2() with proper talloc ctx Since the logging allocations now also show up in the root context report, some tests need adjusted talloc checks. In msc_vlr_tests, also output the number of talloc blocks before tests are started to show that the number didn't change after the tests. Change-Id: Iae07ae60230c7bab28e52b5df97fa3844778158e
2018-03-30 21:04:04 +00:00
msc_vlr_tests: revert IMSI parameter and test nr output Three recently merged commits take the msc_vlr_tests in a wrong direction. The IMSI is usually encoded in the hex streams. The rationale behind hex streams is that it is a) easily copied from a wireshark trace and b) exactly the bytes as sent by an actual phone. It is hard to parameterize the IMSI because we would have to employ our encoding functions, which I intentionally want to keep out of the loop here. The test number should not appear in the normal test output, so that adding a test or changing their order does not affect expected output for following tests. The nr is simply for manual invocation, only seen when invoked with -v. Revert - "VLR tests: always print test parameters" b0a4314911140b1599cccfc8171fcdab4cd9bfab. - "Expand VLR tests" d5feadeee8dd24f991df2892d6bcf0be8b0cf707. - "Move IMSI into test parameters" 093300d141c300651954473d73138b72de04d931. Change-Id: Ie1b49237746751021da88f6f07bbb9f780d077c9
2018-03-01 23:40:58 +00:00
===== test_ms_timeout_lu_auth_resp
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
- Total time passed: 0.000000 s
- Location Update request causes a GSUP Send Auth Info request to HLR
use osmo_rat_type from libosmocore Replace locally defined enum ran_type with libosmocore's new enum osmo_rat_type, and value_string ran_type_names with osmo_rat_type_names. The string representations change, which has cosmetic effects on the test suite expectations. Depends: I659687aef7a4d67ca372a39fef31dee07aed7631 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I2c78c265dc99df581e1b00e563d6912c7ffdb36b
2018-12-25 23:40:18 +00:00
MSC <--GERAN-A-- MS: GSM48_MT_MM_LOC_UPD_REQUEST
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
new conn
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: Allocated
DMSC msc_a{MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Allocated
DMSC msc_a{MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: is child of msub_fsm
DMSC msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3
DMSC dummy_msc_i{0}: Allocated
DMSC dummy_msc_i{0}: is child of msub_fsm
DREF msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (rx_from_ms)
DBSSAP msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: RAN decode: COMPL_L3
DRLL msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Dispatching 04.08 message: MM GSM48_MT_MM_LOC_UPD_REQUEST
DMM msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: LOCATION UPDATING REQUEST: MI=IMSI-901700000004620 LU-type=IMSI-ATTACH
DMM msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: USIM: old LAI: 001-868-1
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + mm_rx_loc_upd_req: now used by 2 (rx_from_ms,mm_rx_loc_upd_req)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + lu: now used by 3 (rx_from_ms,mm_rx_loc_upd_req,lu)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: Allocated
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: is child of msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: rev=GSM net=GERAN Auth (no Ciph)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: Received Event VLR_ULA_E_UPDATE_LA
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr unknown + _lu_fsm_associate_vsub: now used by 1 (_lu_fsm_associate_vsub)
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
DVLR set IMSI on subscriber; IMSI=901700000004620 id=901700000004620
DVLR New subscr, IMSI: 901700000004620
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + active-conn: now used by 2 (_lu_fsm_associate_vsub,active-conn)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_COMPLETE_LAYER_3_OK
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - _lu_fsm_associate_vsub: now used by 1 (active-conn)
vlr: optionally send IMEI early to HLR When 'check-imei-rqd 1 early' is set in the config, send the IMEI to the HLR before doing the location update with the HLR. The OsmoHLR documentation referenced in the code will be added in osmo-hlr.git's Change-Id I2dd4a56f7b8be8b5d0e6fc32e04459e5e278d0a9. Related: OS#2542 Change-Id: I88283cad23793b475445d814ff49db534cb41244
2019-05-06 11:09:55 +00:00
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: vlr_loc_upd_node1_pre()
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: vlr_loc_upd_node1()
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: state_chg to VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: Allocated
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: is child of vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: Received Event VLR_AUTH_E_START
gsup: indicate CN-Domain in SendAuthInfo Requests In order for osmo-hlr to be able to 100% guarantee distinct INDs for CS and PS, set CN-Domain = CS in all SendAuthInfo Requests. In Milenage auth, it is highly desirable that osmo-hlr guarantees use of distinct INDs for CS and PS domains. If an MSC and SGSN attached at the same time use the same IND bucket to generate Milenage SQN, that collision would rapidly waste SQNs and load osmo-hlr with requesting new auth tuples on each CS/PS Complete-Layer3. So far, osmo-msc did not indicate the CN domain in the GSUP SendAuthInfo Request, which was neither required nor evaluated. The CN-Domain is only sent for the UpdateLocation Request that usually follows later. Related: OS#4318 Change-Id: I22f44068268e62801cadbf6542efaf153423cd65
2019-12-12 00:31:04 +00:00
GSUP --> HLR: OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_SEND_AUTH_INFO_REQUEST: 08010809710000004026f02801020a0101
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: state_chg to VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH_WAIT_AI
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: - mm_rx_loc_upd_req: now used by 2 (rx_from_ms,lu)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: - rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (lu)
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- from HLR, rx _SEND_AUTH_INFO_RESULT; VLR sends Auth Req to MS
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_SEND_AUTH_INFO_RESULT: 0a010809710000004026f003222010585df1ae287f6e273dce07090d61320b21042d8b2c3e220861855fb81fc2a8000a0101
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 2 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH_WAIT_AI}: Received Event VLR_AUTH_E_HLR_SAI_ACK
refactor log ctx for vlr_subscr and ran_conn ran_conn_get_conn_id(): instead of a talloc allocated string, return a static buffer in ran_conn_get_conn_id(). So far this function had no callers. Refactor ran_conn_update_id() API: during early L3-Complete, when no subscriber is associated yet, update the FSM Id by the MI type seen in the L3 Complete message: ran_conn_update_id_from_mi(). Later on set the vsub and re-update. Call vlr.ops->subscr_update when the TMSI is updated, so that log context includes the TMSI from then on. Enrich context for vlr_subscr_name and ran_conn fi name. Include all available information in vlr_subscr_name(); instead of either IMSI or MSISDN or TMSI, print all of them when present. Instead of a short log, rather have more valuable context. A context info would now look like: Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000014706:MSISDN-2023:TMSI-0x08BDE4EC:GERAN-A-3:PAGING_RESP) It does get quite long, but ensures easy correlation of any BSSAP / IuCS messages with log output, especially if multiple subscribers are busy at the same time. Print TMSI and TMSInew in uppercase hexadecimal, which is the typical representation in the telecom world. When showing the RAN conn id GERAN_A-00000017 becomes GERAN-A-23 - We usually write the conn_id in decimal. - Leading zeros are clutter and might suggest hexadecimal format. - 'GERAN-A' and 'UTRAN-Iu' are the strings defined by osmo_rat_type_name(). Depends: I7798c3ef983c2e333b2b9cbffef6f366f370bd81 (libosmocore) Depends: Ica25919758ef6cba8348da199b0ae7e0ba628798 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I66a68ce2eb8957a35855a3743d91a86299900834
2019-01-03 01:32:14 +00:00
DVLR SUBSCR(IMSI-901700000004620) Received 1 auth tuples
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH_WAIT_AI}: state_chg to VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: got auth tuple: use_count=1 key_seq=0 -- will use GSM AKA (is_r99=no, at->vec.auth_types=0x1)
- sending GSM Auth Request for IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU: tuple use_count=1 key_seq=0 auth_types=0x1 and...
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
- ...rand=585df1ae287f6e273dce07090d61320b
- ...expecting sres=2d8b2c3e
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 1 (active-conn)
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_SEND_AUTH_INFO_RESULT: vlr_gsupc_read_cb() returns 0
auth_request_sent == 1
lu_result_sent == 0
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
- MS fails to send an Authentication Response
- At first, we're still waiting
- Total time passed: 0.000423 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 1.000658 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 2.000893 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 3.001128 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 4.001363 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 5.001598 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: Timeout of X1
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_CN_CLOSE
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: - lu: now used by 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_UNUSED
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_RELEASING
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Releasing: msc_a use is 0 (-)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 2 (active-conn,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 3 (active-conn,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter,vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm)
- sending LU Reject for IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU, cause 22
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH}: state_chg to VLR_ULA_S_DONE
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_CN_CLOSE
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Event MSC_A_EV_CN_CLOSE not permitted
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 2 (active-conn,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: + wait-Clear-Complete: now used by 1 (wait-Clear-Complete)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: RAN encode: CLEAR_COMMAND on GERAN-A
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Received Event MSC_I_EV_FROM_A_FORWARD_ACCESS_SIGNALLING_REQUEST
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 1 (active-conn)
rename gsm_subscriber_connection to ran_conn In preparation for inter-BSC and inter-MSC handover, we need to separate the subscriber management logic from the actual RAN connections. What better time to finally rename gsm_subscriber_connection. * Name choice: In 2G, this is a connection to the BSS, but even though 3GPP TS commonly talk of "BSS-A" and "BSS-B" when explaining handover, it's not good to call it "bss_conn": in 3G a BSS is called RNS, IIUC. The overall term for 2G (GERAN) and 3G (UTRAN) is RAN: Radio Access Network. * Rationale: A subscriber in the MSC so far has only one RAN connection, but e.g. for inter-BSC handover, a second one needs to be created to handover to. Most of the items in the former gsm_subscriber_connection are actually related to the RAN, with only a few MM and RTP related items. So, as a first step, just rename it to ran_conn, to cosmetically prepare for moving the not strictly RAN related items away later. Also: - Rename some functions from msc_subscr_conn_* to ran_conn_* - Rename "Subscr_Conn" FSM instance name to "RAN_conn" - Rename SUBSCR_CONN_* to RAN_CONN_* Change-Id: Ic595f7a558d3553c067f77dc67543ab59659707a
2018-11-29 21:37:51 +00:00
- RAN_CONN_TIMEOUT has passed, conn is gone.
properly receive BSSMAP Clear Complete and Iu Release Complete When sending a BSSMAP Clear or Iu Release, do not immediately discard the conn, but wait until a BSSMAP Clear Complete / Iu Release Complete has been received. Hence we will no longer show in the log that an incoming Release/Clear Complete belongs to an unknown subscriber, but will still be around to properly log the release. Related: OS#3122 Change-Id: Ie4c6aaba3866d6e5b98004e8870a215e8cf8ffc1
2018-04-01 18:55:54 +00:00
bssap_clear_sent == 1
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: RAN decode: CLEAR_COMPLETE
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: - wait-Clear-Complete: now used by 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_UNUSED
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_RELEASED
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Released: msc_a use is 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Terminating (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU))
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: Terminating in cascade, depth 3 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU))
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: Removing from parent vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: Removing from parent msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: fsm_lu_cleanup called with cause OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Removing from parent msub_fsm
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: max total use count was 3
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: Received Event MSUB_EV_ROLE_TERMINATED
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620) MSC-A terminated
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620) 1 MSC-I still active
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: state_chg to terminating
DMSC msub_fsm{terminating}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU))
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Terminating in cascade, depth 3 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU))
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Removing from parent msub_fsm
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620) Free
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - active-conn: now used by 0 (-)
DVLR freeing VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 (max total use count was 3)
DMSC msub_fsm{terminating}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Deallocated, including all deferred deallocations
- msub gone
llist_count(&msub_list) == 0
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 2
msc_vlr_tests: revert IMSI parameter and test nr output Three recently merged commits take the msc_vlr_tests in a wrong direction. The IMSI is usually encoded in the hex streams. The rationale behind hex streams is that it is a) easily copied from a wireshark trace and b) exactly the bytes as sent by an actual phone. It is hard to parameterize the IMSI because we would have to employ our encoding functions, which I intentionally want to keep out of the loop here. The test number should not appear in the normal test output, so that adding a test or changing their order does not affect expected output for following tests. The nr is simply for manual invocation, only seen when invoked with -v. Revert - "VLR tests: always print test parameters" b0a4314911140b1599cccfc8171fcdab4cd9bfab. - "Expand VLR tests" d5feadeee8dd24f991df2892d6bcf0be8b0cf707. - "Move IMSI into test parameters" 093300d141c300651954473d73138b72de04d931. Change-Id: Ie1b49237746751021da88f6f07bbb9f780d077c9
2018-03-01 23:40:58 +00:00
===== test_ms_timeout_lu_auth_resp: SUCCESS
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
full talloc report on 'msgb' (total 0 bytes in 1 blocks)
add rudimentary NRI support for MSC pooling This patch served for a manual testing counterpart for osmo-bsc to implement MSC pooling. This enables a basic MSC pooling setup, but for a production setup, osmo-msc would still lack various features related to unloading subscribers to another MSC as explained in 3GPP TS 23.236. Change-Id: Iafe0878a0a2c8669080d757b34a398ea75fced36
2020-05-26 22:04:26 +00:00
talloc_total_blocks(tall_bsc_ctx) == 20
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
msc_vlr_tests: revert IMSI parameter and test nr output Three recently merged commits take the msc_vlr_tests in a wrong direction. The IMSI is usually encoded in the hex streams. The rationale behind hex streams is that it is a) easily copied from a wireshark trace and b) exactly the bytes as sent by an actual phone. It is hard to parameterize the IMSI because we would have to employ our encoding functions, which I intentionally want to keep out of the loop here. The test number should not appear in the normal test output, so that adding a test or changing their order does not affect expected output for following tests. The nr is simply for manual invocation, only seen when invoked with -v. Revert - "VLR tests: always print test parameters" b0a4314911140b1599cccfc8171fcdab4cd9bfab. - "Expand VLR tests" d5feadeee8dd24f991df2892d6bcf0be8b0cf707. - "Move IMSI into test parameters" 093300d141c300651954473d73138b72de04d931. Change-Id: Ie1b49237746751021da88f6f07bbb9f780d077c9
2018-03-01 23:40:58 +00:00
===== test_ms_timeout_cm_auth_resp
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
- Total time passed: 0.000000 s
- Location Update request causes a GSUP Send Auth Info request to HLR
use osmo_rat_type from libosmocore Replace locally defined enum ran_type with libosmocore's new enum osmo_rat_type, and value_string ran_type_names with osmo_rat_type_names. The string representations change, which has cosmetic effects on the test suite expectations. Depends: I659687aef7a4d67ca372a39fef31dee07aed7631 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I2c78c265dc99df581e1b00e563d6912c7ffdb36b
2018-12-25 23:40:18 +00:00
MSC <--GERAN-A-- MS: GSM48_MT_MM_LOC_UPD_REQUEST
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
new conn
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: Allocated
DMSC msc_a{MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Allocated
DMSC msc_a{MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: is child of msub_fsm
DMSC msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3
DMSC dummy_msc_i{0}: Allocated
DMSC dummy_msc_i{0}: is child of msub_fsm
DREF msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (rx_from_ms)
DBSSAP msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: RAN decode: COMPL_L3
DRLL msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Dispatching 04.08 message: MM GSM48_MT_MM_LOC_UPD_REQUEST
DMM msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: LOCATION UPDATING REQUEST: MI=IMSI-901700000004620 LU-type=IMSI-ATTACH
DMM msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: USIM: old LAI: 001-868-1
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + mm_rx_loc_upd_req: now used by 2 (rx_from_ms,mm_rx_loc_upd_req)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + lu: now used by 3 (rx_from_ms,mm_rx_loc_upd_req,lu)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: Allocated
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: is child of msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: rev=GSM net=GERAN Auth (no Ciph)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: Received Event VLR_ULA_E_UPDATE_LA
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr unknown + _lu_fsm_associate_vsub: now used by 1 (_lu_fsm_associate_vsub)
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
DVLR set IMSI on subscriber; IMSI=901700000004620 id=901700000004620
DVLR New subscr, IMSI: 901700000004620
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + active-conn: now used by 2 (_lu_fsm_associate_vsub,active-conn)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_COMPLETE_LAYER_3_OK
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - _lu_fsm_associate_vsub: now used by 1 (active-conn)
vlr: optionally send IMEI early to HLR When 'check-imei-rqd 1 early' is set in the config, send the IMEI to the HLR before doing the location update with the HLR. The OsmoHLR documentation referenced in the code will be added in osmo-hlr.git's Change-Id I2dd4a56f7b8be8b5d0e6fc32e04459e5e278d0a9. Related: OS#2542 Change-Id: I88283cad23793b475445d814ff49db534cb41244
2019-05-06 11:09:55 +00:00
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: vlr_loc_upd_node1_pre()
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: vlr_loc_upd_node1()
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: state_chg to VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: Allocated
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: is child of vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: Received Event VLR_AUTH_E_START
gsup: indicate CN-Domain in SendAuthInfo Requests In order for osmo-hlr to be able to 100% guarantee distinct INDs for CS and PS, set CN-Domain = CS in all SendAuthInfo Requests. In Milenage auth, it is highly desirable that osmo-hlr guarantees use of distinct INDs for CS and PS domains. If an MSC and SGSN attached at the same time use the same IND bucket to generate Milenage SQN, that collision would rapidly waste SQNs and load osmo-hlr with requesting new auth tuples on each CS/PS Complete-Layer3. So far, osmo-msc did not indicate the CN domain in the GSUP SendAuthInfo Request, which was neither required nor evaluated. The CN-Domain is only sent for the UpdateLocation Request that usually follows later. Related: OS#4318 Change-Id: I22f44068268e62801cadbf6542efaf153423cd65
2019-12-12 00:31:04 +00:00
GSUP --> HLR: OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_SEND_AUTH_INFO_REQUEST: 08010809710000004026f02801020a0101
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: state_chg to VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH_WAIT_AI
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: - mm_rx_loc_upd_req: now used by 2 (rx_from_ms,lu)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: - rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (lu)
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- from HLR, rx _SEND_AUTH_INFO_RESULT; VLR sends Auth Req to MS
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_SEND_AUTH_INFO_RESULT: 0a010809710000004026f003222010585df1ae287f6e273dce07090d61320b21042d8b2c3e220861855fb81fc2a8000322201012aca96fb4ffdea5c985cbafa9b6e18b210420bde240220807fa7502e07e1c0003222010e7c03ba7cf0e2fde82b2dc4d63077d422104a29514ae2208e2b234f80788640003222010fa8f20b781b5881329d4fea26b1a3c5121045afc8d7222082392f14f709ae000032220100fd4cc8dbe8715d1f439e304edfd68dc2104bc8d1c5b2208da7cdd6bfe2d70000a0101
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 2 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH_WAIT_AI}: Received Event VLR_AUTH_E_HLR_SAI_ACK
refactor log ctx for vlr_subscr and ran_conn ran_conn_get_conn_id(): instead of a talloc allocated string, return a static buffer in ran_conn_get_conn_id(). So far this function had no callers. Refactor ran_conn_update_id() API: during early L3-Complete, when no subscriber is associated yet, update the FSM Id by the MI type seen in the L3 Complete message: ran_conn_update_id_from_mi(). Later on set the vsub and re-update. Call vlr.ops->subscr_update when the TMSI is updated, so that log context includes the TMSI from then on. Enrich context for vlr_subscr_name and ran_conn fi name. Include all available information in vlr_subscr_name(); instead of either IMSI or MSISDN or TMSI, print all of them when present. Instead of a short log, rather have more valuable context. A context info would now look like: Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000014706:MSISDN-2023:TMSI-0x08BDE4EC:GERAN-A-3:PAGING_RESP) It does get quite long, but ensures easy correlation of any BSSAP / IuCS messages with log output, especially if multiple subscribers are busy at the same time. Print TMSI and TMSInew in uppercase hexadecimal, which is the typical representation in the telecom world. When showing the RAN conn id GERAN_A-00000017 becomes GERAN-A-23 - We usually write the conn_id in decimal. - Leading zeros are clutter and might suggest hexadecimal format. - 'GERAN-A' and 'UTRAN-Iu' are the strings defined by osmo_rat_type_name(). Depends: I7798c3ef983c2e333b2b9cbffef6f366f370bd81 (libosmocore) Depends: Ica25919758ef6cba8348da199b0ae7e0ba628798 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I66a68ce2eb8957a35855a3743d91a86299900834
2019-01-03 01:32:14 +00:00
DVLR SUBSCR(IMSI-901700000004620) Received 5 auth tuples
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH_WAIT_AI}: state_chg to VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: got auth tuple: use_count=1 key_seq=0 -- will use GSM AKA (is_r99=no, at->vec.auth_types=0x1)
- sending GSM Auth Request for IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU: tuple use_count=1 key_seq=0 auth_types=0x1 and...
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
- ...rand=585df1ae287f6e273dce07090d61320b
- ...expecting sres=2d8b2c3e
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 1 (active-conn)
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_SEND_AUTH_INFO_RESULT: vlr_gsupc_read_cb() returns 0
auth_request_sent == 1
lu_result_sent == 0
- MS sends Authen Response, VLR accepts and sends GSUP LU Req to HLR
use osmo_rat_type from libosmocore Replace locally defined enum ran_type with libosmocore's new enum osmo_rat_type, and value_string ran_type_names with osmo_rat_type_names. The string representations change, which has cosmetic effects on the test suite expectations. Depends: I659687aef7a4d67ca372a39fef31dee07aed7631 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I2c78c265dc99df581e1b00e563d6912c7ffdb36b
2018-12-25 23:40:18 +00:00
MSC <--GERAN-A-- MS: GSM48_MT_MM_AUTH_RESP
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: + rx_from_ms: now used by 2 (lu,rx_from_ms)
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: RAN decode: DTAP
DRLL msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: Dispatching 04.08 message: MM GSM48_MT_MM_AUTH_RESP
DMM msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: MM GSM AUTHENTICATION RESPONSE (sres = 2d8b2c3e)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: Received Event VLR_AUTH_E_MS_AUTH_RESP
refactor log ctx for vlr_subscr and ran_conn ran_conn_get_conn_id(): instead of a talloc allocated string, return a static buffer in ran_conn_get_conn_id(). So far this function had no callers. Refactor ran_conn_update_id() API: during early L3-Complete, when no subscriber is associated yet, update the FSM Id by the MI type seen in the L3 Complete message: ran_conn_update_id_from_mi(). Later on set the vsub and re-update. Call vlr.ops->subscr_update when the TMSI is updated, so that log context includes the TMSI from then on. Enrich context for vlr_subscr_name and ran_conn fi name. Include all available information in vlr_subscr_name(); instead of either IMSI or MSISDN or TMSI, print all of them when present. Instead of a short log, rather have more valuable context. A context info would now look like: Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000014706:MSISDN-2023:TMSI-0x08BDE4EC:GERAN-A-3:PAGING_RESP) It does get quite long, but ensures easy correlation of any BSSAP / IuCS messages with log output, especially if multiple subscribers are busy at the same time. Print TMSI and TMSInew in uppercase hexadecimal, which is the typical representation in the telecom world. When showing the RAN conn id GERAN_A-00000017 becomes GERAN-A-23 - We usually write the conn_id in decimal. - Leading zeros are clutter and might suggest hexadecimal format. - 'GERAN-A' and 'UTRAN-Iu' are the strings defined by osmo_rat_type_name(). Depends: I7798c3ef983c2e333b2b9cbffef6f366f370bd81 (libosmocore) Depends: Ica25919758ef6cba8348da199b0ae7e0ba628798 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I66a68ce2eb8957a35855a3743d91a86299900834
2019-01-03 01:32:14 +00:00
DVLR SUBSCR(IMSI-901700000004620) AUTH on GERAN received SRES/RES: 2d8b2c3e (4 bytes)
DVLR SUBSCR(IMSI-901700000004620) AUTH established GSM security context
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: Authentication terminating with result PASSED
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: state_chg to VLR_SUB_AS_AUTHENTICATED
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_AUTHENTICATED}: Terminating (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_AUTHENTICATED}: Removing from parent vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH}: Received Event VLR_ULA_E_AUTH_RES
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH}: vlr_loc_upd_post_auth()
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH}: vlr_loc_upd_post_ciph()
Send "BSSMAP CommonID" to tell BSC about the IMSI We're already sending the RANAP CommonID message to the RNC, let's do the same using BSSMAP CommonId towards the BSC. This way the BSC knows about the IMSI of the served subscriber, which is very useful for logging/debugging. Change-Id: I2552736477663adb250c55728093500e8ae83ebb Closes: OS#2969 Depends: libosmocore.git I353adc1aa72377f7d4b3336d2ff47791fb73d62c
2020-06-21 20:15:53 +00:00
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: RAN encode: COMMON_ID on GERAN-A
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Received Event MSC_I_EV_FROM_A_FORWARD_ACCESS_SIGNALLING_REQUEST
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH}: vlr_loc_upd_node_4()
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH}: state_chg to VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_HLR_UPD
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_INIT}: Allocated
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_INIT}: is child of vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_INIT}: Received Event UPD_HLR_VLR_E_START
GSUP --> HLR: OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_UPDATE_LOCATION_REQUEST: 04010809710000004026f02801020a0101
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_INIT}: state_chg to UPD_HLR_VLR_S_WAIT_FOR_DATA
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_AUTHENTICATED}: Deallocated
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: - rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (lu)
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- HLR sends _INSERT_DATA_REQUEST, VLR responds with _INSERT_DATA_RESULT
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_INSERT_DATA_REQUEST: 10010809710000004026f00804036470f10a0101
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 2 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx)
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
DVLR IMSI:901700000004620 has MSISDN:46071
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DVLR SUBSCR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) VLR: update for IMSI=901700000004620 (MSISDN=46071)
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
GSUP --> HLR: OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_INSERT_DATA_RESULT: 12010809710000004026f00a0101
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 1 (active-conn)
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_INSERT_DATA_REQUEST: vlr_gsupc_read_cb() returns 0
lu_result_sent == 0
- HLR also sends GSUP _UPDATE_LOCATION_RESULT
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_UPDATE_LOCATION_RESULT: 06010809710000004026f00a0101
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 2 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_HLR_UPD}: Received Event VLR_ULA_E_HLR_LU_RES
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_WAIT_FOR_DATA}: Received Event UPD_HLR_VLR_E_UPD_LOC_ACK
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_WAIT_FOR_DATA}: state_chg to UPD_HLR_VLR_S_DONE
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_DONE}: Terminating (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR)
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_DONE}: Removing from parent vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_HLR_UPD}: Received Event VLR_ULA_E_UPD_HLR_COMPL
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_HLR_UPD}: state_chg to VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_LU_COMPL
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_INIT}: Allocated
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_INIT}: is child of vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_INIT}: Received Event LU_COMPL_VLR_E_START
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_INIT}: state_chg to LU_COMPL_VLR_S_WAIT_SUB_PRES
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_WAIT_SUB_PRES}: Received Event LU_COMPL_VLR_E_SUB_PRES_COMPL
- sending LU Accept for IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + attached: now used by 3 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx,attached)
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_WAIT_SUB_PRES}: state_chg to LU_COMPL_VLR_S_DONE
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_LU_COMPL}: Received Event VLR_ULA_E_LU_COMPL_SUCCESS
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_DONE}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU))
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_DONE}: Removing from parent vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_DONE}: Deferring: will deallocate with upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_LU_COMPL}: state_chg to VLR_ULA_S_DONE
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_AUTHENTICATED
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_AUTHENTICATED
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTHENTICATED}: - lu: now used by 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTHENTICATED}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_UNUSED
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTHENTICATED}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_RELEASING
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Releasing: msc_a use is 0 (-)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 4 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx,attached,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 5 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx,attached,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter,vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 4 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx,attached,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: + wait-Clear-Complete: now used by 1 (wait-Clear-Complete)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: RAN encode: CLEAR_COMMAND on GERAN-A
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Received Event MSC_I_EV_FROM_A_FORWARD_ACCESS_SIGNALLING_REQUEST
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 3 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx,attached)
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_DONE}: Deallocated, including all deferred deallocations
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 2 (active-conn,attached)
properly receive BSSMAP Clear Complete and Iu Release Complete When sending a BSSMAP Clear or Iu Release, do not immediately discard the conn, but wait until a BSSMAP Clear Complete / Iu Release Complete has been received. Hence we will no longer show in the log that an incoming Release/Clear Complete belongs to an unknown subscriber, but will still be around to properly log the release. Related: OS#3122 Change-Id: Ie4c6aaba3866d6e5b98004e8870a215e8cf8ffc1
2018-04-01 18:55:54 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_UPDATE_LOCATION_RESULT: vlr_gsupc_read_cb() returns 0
bssap_clear_sent == 1
- LU was successful, and the conn has already been closed
lu_result_sent == 1
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: RAN decode: CLEAR_COMPLETE
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: - wait-Clear-Complete: now used by 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_UNUSED
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_RELEASED
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Released: msc_a use is 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Terminating (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU))
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: Removing from parent msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: fsm_lu_cleanup called with cause OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Removing from parent msub_fsm
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: max total use count was 3
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: Received Event MSUB_EV_ROLE_TERMINATED
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) MSC-A terminated
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) 1 MSC-I still active
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: state_chg to terminating
DMSC msub_fsm{terminating}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU))
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Terminating in cascade, depth 3 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU))
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Removing from parent msub_fsm
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) Free
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - active-conn: now used by 1 (attached)
DMSC msub_fsm{terminating}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Deallocated, including all deferred deallocations
- msub gone
llist_count(&msub_list) == 0
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
- after a while, a new conn sends a CM Service Request. VLR responds with Auth Req, 2nd auth vector
use osmo_rat_type from libosmocore Replace locally defined enum ran_type with libosmocore's new enum osmo_rat_type, and value_string ran_type_names with osmo_rat_type_names. The string representations change, which has cosmetic effects on the test suite expectations. Depends: I659687aef7a4d67ca372a39fef31dee07aed7631 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I2c78c265dc99df581e1b00e563d6912c7ffdb36b
2018-12-25 23:40:18 +00:00
MSC <--GERAN-A-- MS: GSM48_MT_MM_CM_SERV_REQ
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
new conn
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: Allocated
DMSC msc_a{MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Allocated
DMSC msc_a{MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: is child of msub_fsm
DMSC msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3
DMSC dummy_msc_i{0}: Allocated
DMSC dummy_msc_i{0}: is child of msub_fsm
DREF msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (rx_from_ms)
DBSSAP msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: RAN decode: COMPL_L3
DRLL msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Dispatching 04.08 message: MM GSM48_MT_MM_CM_SERV_REQ
DMM msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Rx CM SERVICE REQUEST cm_service_type=Short-Messaging-Service
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + cm_service_sms: now used by 2 (rx_from_ms,cm_service_sms)
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_INIT}: Allocated
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_INIT}: is child of msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ)
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_INIT}: rev=GSM net=GERAN Auth (no Ciph)
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_INIT}: Received Event PR_ARQ_E_START
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + proc_arq_vlr_fn_init: now used by 2 (attached,proc_arq_vlr_fn_init)
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + active-conn: now used by 3 (attached,proc_arq_vlr_fn_init,active-conn)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_COMPLETE_LAYER_3_OK
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_INIT}: proc_arq_vlr_fn_post_imsi()
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_INIT}: state_chg to PR_ARQ_S_WAIT_AUTH
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: Allocated
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: is child of Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: Received Event VLR_AUTH_E_START
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: state_chg to VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: got auth tuple: use_count=1 key_seq=1 -- will use GSM AKA (is_r99=no, at->vec.auth_types=0x1)
- sending GSM Auth Request for IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ: tuple use_count=1 key_seq=1 auth_types=0x1 and...
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
- ...rand=12aca96fb4ffdea5c985cbafa9b6e18b
- ...expecting sres=20bde240
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - proc_arq_vlr_fn_init: now used by 2 (attached,active-conn)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: - rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (cm_service_sms)
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
cm_service_result_sent == 0
auth_request_sent == 1
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
- MS fails to send an Authentication Response
- At first, we're still waiting
- Total time passed: 0.000423 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
cm_service_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 1.000658 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
cm_service_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 2.000893 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
cm_service_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 3.001128 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
cm_service_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 4.001363 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
cm_service_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 5.001598 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: Timeout of X1
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_CN_CLOSE
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_RELEASING
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Releasing: msc_a use is 1 (cm_service_sms)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 3 (attached,active-conn,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 4 (attached,active-conn,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter,vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm)
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_WAIT_AUTH}: Cancel: OSMO_FSM_TERM_ERROR
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_WAIT_AUTH}: proc_arq_fsm_done(CONGESTION)
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_WAIT_AUTH}: state_chg to PR_ARQ_S_DONE
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_DONE}: Process Access Request result: CONGESTION
- sending CM Service Reject (Short-Messaging-Service) for IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ, cause: CONGESTION
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_CN_CLOSE
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Event MSC_A_EV_CN_CLOSE not permitted
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 3 (attached,active-conn,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Releasing: canceling still pending use: cm_service_sms (1)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: - cm_service_sms: now used by 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_UNUSED
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: + wait-Clear-Complete: now used by 1 (wait-Clear-Complete)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: RAN encode: CLEAR_COMMAND on GERAN-A
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){0}: Received Event MSC_I_EV_FROM_A_FORWARD_ACCESS_SIGNALLING_REQUEST
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 2 (attached,active-conn)
rename gsm_subscriber_connection to ran_conn In preparation for inter-BSC and inter-MSC handover, we need to separate the subscriber management logic from the actual RAN connections. What better time to finally rename gsm_subscriber_connection. * Name choice: In 2G, this is a connection to the BSS, but even though 3GPP TS commonly talk of "BSS-A" and "BSS-B" when explaining handover, it's not good to call it "bss_conn": in 3G a BSS is called RNS, IIUC. The overall term for 2G (GERAN) and 3G (UTRAN) is RAN: Radio Access Network. * Rationale: A subscriber in the MSC so far has only one RAN connection, but e.g. for inter-BSC handover, a second one needs to be created to handover to. Most of the items in the former gsm_subscriber_connection are actually related to the RAN, with only a few MM and RTP related items. So, as a first step, just rename it to ran_conn, to cosmetically prepare for moving the not strictly RAN related items away later. Also: - Rename some functions from msc_subscr_conn_* to ran_conn_* - Rename "Subscr_Conn" FSM instance name to "RAN_conn" - Rename SUBSCR_CONN_* to RAN_CONN_* Change-Id: Ic595f7a558d3553c067f77dc67543ab59659707a
2018-11-29 21:37:51 +00:00
- RAN_CONN_TIMEOUT has passed, conn is gone.
properly receive BSSMAP Clear Complete and Iu Release Complete When sending a BSSMAP Clear or Iu Release, do not immediately discard the conn, but wait until a BSSMAP Clear Complete / Iu Release Complete has been received. Hence we will no longer show in the log that an incoming Release/Clear Complete belongs to an unknown subscriber, but will still be around to properly log the release. Related: OS#3122 Change-Id: Ie4c6aaba3866d6e5b98004e8870a215e8cf8ffc1
2018-04-01 18:55:54 +00:00
bssap_clear_sent == 1
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: RAN decode: CLEAR_COMPLETE
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: - wait-Clear-Complete: now used by 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_UNUSED
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_RELEASED
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Released: msc_a use is 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Terminating (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR)
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_DONE}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ))
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: Terminating in cascade, depth 3 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ))
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: Removing from parent Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ)
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_DONE}: Removing from parent msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ)
DVLR Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){PR_ARQ_S_DONE}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Removing from parent msub_fsm
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: max total use count was 2
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: Received Event MSUB_EV_ROLE_TERMINATED
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) MSC-A terminated
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) 1 MSC-I still active
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: state_chg to terminating
DMSC msub_fsm{terminating}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ))
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){0}: Terminating in cascade, depth 3 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ))
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){0}: Removing from parent msub_fsm
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){0}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ)
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) Free
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - active-conn: now used by 1 (attached)
DMSC msub_fsm{terminating}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:CM_SERVICE_REQ){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Deallocated, including all deferred deallocations
- msub gone
llist_count(&msub_list) == 0
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
cm_service_result_sent == 2
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR freeing VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 (max total use count was 5)
msc_vlr_tests: revert IMSI parameter and test nr output Three recently merged commits take the msc_vlr_tests in a wrong direction. The IMSI is usually encoded in the hex streams. The rationale behind hex streams is that it is a) easily copied from a wireshark trace and b) exactly the bytes as sent by an actual phone. It is hard to parameterize the IMSI because we would have to employ our encoding functions, which I intentionally want to keep out of the loop here. The test number should not appear in the normal test output, so that adding a test or changing their order does not affect expected output for following tests. The nr is simply for manual invocation, only seen when invoked with -v. Revert - "VLR tests: always print test parameters" b0a4314911140b1599cccfc8171fcdab4cd9bfab. - "Expand VLR tests" d5feadeee8dd24f991df2892d6bcf0be8b0cf707. - "Move IMSI into test parameters" 093300d141c300651954473d73138b72de04d931. Change-Id: Ie1b49237746751021da88f6f07bbb9f780d077c9
2018-03-01 23:40:58 +00:00
===== test_ms_timeout_cm_auth_resp: SUCCESS
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
full talloc report on 'msgb' (total 0 bytes in 1 blocks)
add rudimentary NRI support for MSC pooling This patch served for a manual testing counterpart for osmo-bsc to implement MSC pooling. This enables a basic MSC pooling setup, but for a production setup, osmo-msc would still lack various features related to unloading subscribers to another MSC as explained in 3GPP TS 23.236. Change-Id: Iafe0878a0a2c8669080d757b34a398ea75fced36
2020-05-26 22:04:26 +00:00
talloc_total_blocks(tall_bsc_ctx) == 20
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
msc_vlr_tests: revert IMSI parameter and test nr output Three recently merged commits take the msc_vlr_tests in a wrong direction. The IMSI is usually encoded in the hex streams. The rationale behind hex streams is that it is a) easily copied from a wireshark trace and b) exactly the bytes as sent by an actual phone. It is hard to parameterize the IMSI because we would have to employ our encoding functions, which I intentionally want to keep out of the loop here. The test number should not appear in the normal test output, so that adding a test or changing their order does not affect expected output for following tests. The nr is simply for manual invocation, only seen when invoked with -v. Revert - "VLR tests: always print test parameters" b0a4314911140b1599cccfc8171fcdab4cd9bfab. - "Expand VLR tests" d5feadeee8dd24f991df2892d6bcf0be8b0cf707. - "Move IMSI into test parameters" 093300d141c300651954473d73138b72de04d931. Change-Id: Ie1b49237746751021da88f6f07bbb9f780d077c9
2018-03-01 23:40:58 +00:00
===== test_ms_timeout_paging
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
- Total time passed: 0.000000 s
- Location Update request causes a GSUP LU request to HLR
use osmo_rat_type from libosmocore Replace locally defined enum ran_type with libosmocore's new enum osmo_rat_type, and value_string ran_type_names with osmo_rat_type_names. The string representations change, which has cosmetic effects on the test suite expectations. Depends: I659687aef7a4d67ca372a39fef31dee07aed7631 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I2c78c265dc99df581e1b00e563d6912c7ffdb36b
2018-12-25 23:40:18 +00:00
MSC <--GERAN-A-- MS: GSM48_MT_MM_LOC_UPD_REQUEST
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
new conn
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: Allocated
DMSC msc_a{MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Allocated
DMSC msc_a{MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: is child of msub_fsm
DMSC msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3
DMSC dummy_msc_i{0}: Allocated
DMSC dummy_msc_i{0}: is child of msub_fsm
DREF msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (rx_from_ms)
DBSSAP msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: RAN decode: COMPL_L3
DRLL msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Dispatching 04.08 message: MM GSM48_MT_MM_LOC_UPD_REQUEST
DMM msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: LOCATION UPDATING REQUEST: MI=IMSI-901700000004620 LU-type=IMSI-ATTACH
DMM msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: USIM: old LAI: 001-868-1
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + mm_rx_loc_upd_req: now used by 2 (rx_from_ms,mm_rx_loc_upd_req)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + lu: now used by 3 (rx_from_ms,mm_rx_loc_upd_req,lu)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: Allocated
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: is child of msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: rev=GSM net=GERAN (no Auth)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: Received Event VLR_ULA_E_UPDATE_LA
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr unknown + _lu_fsm_associate_vsub: now used by 1 (_lu_fsm_associate_vsub)
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
DVLR set IMSI on subscriber; IMSI=901700000004620 id=901700000004620
DVLR New subscr, IMSI: 901700000004620
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + active-conn: now used by 2 (_lu_fsm_associate_vsub,active-conn)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_COMPLETE_LAYER_3_OK
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - _lu_fsm_associate_vsub: now used by 1 (active-conn)
vlr: optionally send IMEI early to HLR When 'check-imei-rqd 1 early' is set in the config, send the IMEI to the HLR before doing the location update with the HLR. The OsmoHLR documentation referenced in the code will be added in osmo-hlr.git's Change-Id I2dd4a56f7b8be8b5d0e6fc32e04459e5e278d0a9. Related: OS#2542 Change-Id: I88283cad23793b475445d814ff49db534cb41244
2019-05-06 11:09:55 +00:00
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: vlr_loc_upd_node1_pre()
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: vlr_loc_upd_node1()
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: vlr_loc_upd_post_auth()
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: vlr_loc_upd_post_ciph()
Send "BSSMAP CommonID" to tell BSC about the IMSI We're already sending the RANAP CommonID message to the RNC, let's do the same using BSSMAP CommonId towards the BSC. This way the BSC knows about the IMSI of the served subscriber, which is very useful for logging/debugging. Change-Id: I2552736477663adb250c55728093500e8ae83ebb Closes: OS#2969 Depends: libosmocore.git I353adc1aa72377f7d4b3336d2ff47791fb73d62c
2020-06-21 20:15:53 +00:00
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: RAN encode: COMMON_ID on GERAN-A
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Received Event MSC_I_EV_FROM_A_FORWARD_ACCESS_SIGNALLING_REQUEST
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: vlr_loc_upd_node_4()
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: state_chg to VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_HLR_UPD
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_INIT}: Allocated
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_INIT}: is child of vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_INIT}: Received Event UPD_HLR_VLR_E_START
GSUP --> HLR: OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_UPDATE_LOCATION_REQUEST: 04010809710000004026f02801020a0101
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_INIT}: state_chg to UPD_HLR_VLR_S_WAIT_FOR_DATA
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: - mm_rx_loc_upd_req: now used by 2 (rx_from_ms,lu)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: - rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (lu)
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- HLR sends _INSERT_DATA_REQUEST, VLR responds with _INSERT_DATA_RESULT
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_INSERT_DATA_REQUEST: 10010809710000004026f00804036470f10a0101
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 2 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx)
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
DVLR IMSI:901700000004620 has MSISDN:46071
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DVLR SUBSCR(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) VLR: update for IMSI=901700000004620 (MSISDN=46071)
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
GSUP --> HLR: OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_INSERT_DATA_RESULT: 12010809710000004026f00a0101
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 1 (active-conn)
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_INSERT_DATA_REQUEST: vlr_gsupc_read_cb() returns 0
lu_result_sent == 0
- HLR also sends GSUP _UPDATE_LOCATION_RESULT
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_UPDATE_LOCATION_RESULT: 06010809710000004026f00a0101
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 2 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_HLR_UPD}: Received Event VLR_ULA_E_HLR_LU_RES
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_WAIT_FOR_DATA}: Received Event UPD_HLR_VLR_E_UPD_LOC_ACK
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_WAIT_FOR_DATA}: state_chg to UPD_HLR_VLR_S_DONE
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_DONE}: Terminating (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR)
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_DONE}: Removing from parent vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_HLR_UPD}: Received Event VLR_ULA_E_UPD_HLR_COMPL
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_HLR_UPD}: state_chg to VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_LU_COMPL
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_INIT}: Allocated
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_INIT}: is child of vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_INIT}: Received Event LU_COMPL_VLR_E_START
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_INIT}: state_chg to LU_COMPL_VLR_S_WAIT_SUB_PRES
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_WAIT_SUB_PRES}: Received Event LU_COMPL_VLR_E_SUB_PRES_COMPL
- sending LU Accept for IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + attached: now used by 3 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx,attached)
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_WAIT_SUB_PRES}: state_chg to LU_COMPL_VLR_S_DONE
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_LU_COMPL}: Received Event VLR_ULA_E_LU_COMPL_SUCCESS
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_DONE}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU))
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_DONE}: Removing from parent vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR lu_compl_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){LU_COMPL_VLR_S_DONE}: Deferring: will deallocate with upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_LU_COMPL}: state_chg to VLR_ULA_S_DONE
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_AUTHENTICATED
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_AUTHENTICATED
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTHENTICATED}: - lu: now used by 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTHENTICATED}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_UNUSED
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTHENTICATED}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_RELEASING
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Releasing: msc_a use is 0 (-)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 4 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx,attached,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 5 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx,attached,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter,vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 4 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx,attached,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: + wait-Clear-Complete: now used by 1 (wait-Clear-Complete)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: RAN encode: CLEAR_COMMAND on GERAN-A
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Received Event MSC_I_EV_FROM_A_FORWARD_ACCESS_SIGNALLING_REQUEST
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 3 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx,attached)
DVLR upd_hlr_vlr_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){UPD_HLR_VLR_S_DONE}: Deallocated, including all deferred deallocations
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 2 (active-conn,attached)
properly receive BSSMAP Clear Complete and Iu Release Complete When sending a BSSMAP Clear or Iu Release, do not immediately discard the conn, but wait until a BSSMAP Clear Complete / Iu Release Complete has been received. Hence we will no longer show in the log that an incoming Release/Clear Complete belongs to an unknown subscriber, but will still be around to properly log the release. Related: OS#3122 Change-Id: Ie4c6aaba3866d6e5b98004e8870a215e8cf8ffc1
2018-04-01 18:55:54 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_UPDATE_LOCATION_RESULT: vlr_gsupc_read_cb() returns 0
- LU was successful, and the conn has already been closed
lu_result_sent == 1
bssap_clear_sent == 1
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: RAN decode: CLEAR_COMPLETE
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: - wait-Clear-Complete: now used by 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_UNUSED
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_RELEASED
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Released: msc_a use is 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Terminating (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU))
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: Removing from parent msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: fsm_lu_cleanup called with cause OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Removing from parent msub_fsm
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: max total use count was 3
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: Received Event MSUB_EV_ROLE_TERMINATED
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) MSC-A terminated
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) 1 MSC-I still active
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: state_chg to terminating
DMSC msub_fsm{terminating}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU))
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Terminating in cascade, depth 3 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU))
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Removing from parent msub_fsm
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) Free
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - active-conn: now used by 1 (attached)
DMSC msub_fsm{terminating}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Deallocated, including all deferred deallocations
- msub gone
llist_count(&msub_list) == 0
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
- an SMS is sent, MS is paged
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + test_ms_timeout_paging: now used by 2 (attached,test_ms_timeout_paging)
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
llist_count(&vsub->cs.requests) == 0
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + SMS-receiver: now used by 3 (attached,test_ms_timeout_paging,SMS-receiver)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + SMS: now used by 4 (attached,test_ms_timeout_paging,SMS-receiver,SMS)
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000001 tid-0) New transaction
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMC(0) instance created for network
DLSMS SMR(0) instance created for network.
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000001 tid-0) Going to send a MT SMS
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMR(0) message SM-RL-DATA_REQ received in state IDLE
DLSMS SMR(0) TX SMS RP-DATA
DLSMS SMR(0) new RP state IDLE -> WAIT_FOR_RP_ACK
DLSMS SMC(0) message MNSMS-EST-REQ received in state IDLE
DLSMS SMC(0) new CP state IDLE -> MM_CONN_PENDING
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000001 tid-0) Initiating Paging due to MMSMS_EST_REQ
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DPAG Paging: IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 for MT-SMS: Starting paging
paging request (SIGNALLING_LOW_PRIO) to IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 on GERAN-A
strcmp(paging_expecting_imsi, vsub->imsi) == 0
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + Paging: now used by 5 (attached,test_ms_timeout_paging,SMS-receiver,SMS,Paging)
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
llist_count(&vsub->cs.requests) == 1
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - test_ms_timeout_paging: now used by 4 (attached,SMS-receiver,SMS,Paging)
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
paging_sent == 1
- time passes and no paging result is received
- Total time passed: 9.000000 s
- the paging timeout has not yet expired
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + test_ms_timeout_paging: now used by 5 (attached,SMS-receiver,SMS,Paging,test_ms_timeout_paging)
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
vsub->cs.is_paging == 1
- another request is added to the list but does not cause another paging
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + SMS-receiver: now used by 6 (attached,2*SMS-receiver,SMS,Paging,test_ms_timeout_paging)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + SMS: now used by 7 (attached,2*SMS-receiver,2*SMS,Paging,test_ms_timeout_paging)
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000002 tid-1) New transaction
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMC(0) instance created for network
DLSMS SMR(0) instance created for network.
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000002 tid-1) Going to send a MT SMS
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMR(0) message SM-RL-DATA_REQ received in state IDLE
DLSMS SMR(0) TX SMS RP-DATA
DLSMS SMR(0) new RP state IDLE -> WAIT_FOR_RP_ACK
DLSMS SMC(0) message MNSMS-EST-REQ received in state IDLE
DLSMS SMC(0) new CP state IDLE -> MM_CONN_PENDING
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000002 tid-1) Initiating Paging due to MMSMS_EST_REQ
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DPAG Paging: IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 for MT-SMS: Already paging, not starting another request
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
llist_count(&vsub->cs.requests) == 2
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - test_ms_timeout_paging: now used by 6 (attached,2*SMS-receiver,2*SMS,Paging)
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
paging_sent == 0
- the paging timeout expires, the paging as well as the requests are canceled
- Total time passed: 11.000000 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DPAG Paging: IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 for MT-SMS: Paging Response action (expired)
DPAG Paging: IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 for MT-SMS: Removing Paging Request
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000001 tid-0) mmsms_paging_cb(expired)
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMC(0) message MMSMS-REL-IND received in state MM_CONN_PENDING
DLSMS SMC(0) MM layer is released
DLSMS SMC(0) new CP state MM_CONN_PENDING -> IDLE
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000001 tid-0) MNSMS-ERROR-IND, no cause
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMR(0) message MNSMS-ERROR-IND received in state WAIT_FOR_RP_ACK
DLSMS SMR(0) TX SMS MNSMS-ERROR-IND
DLSMS SMR(0) new RP state WAIT_FOR_RP_ACK -> IDLE
DLSMS SMR(0) TX: MNSMS-REL-REQ
DLSMS SMC(0) message MNSMS-REL-REQ received in state IDLE
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - SMS-receiver: now used by 5 (attached,SMS-receiver,2*SMS,Paging)
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000001 tid-0) Freeing transaction
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMR(0) clearing SMR instance
DLSMS SMC(0) clearing instance
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - SMS: now used by 4 (attached,SMS-receiver,SMS,Paging)
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DPAG Paging: IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 for MT-SMS: Paging Response action (expired)
DPAG Paging: IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 for MT-SMS: Removing Paging Request
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000002 tid-1) mmsms_paging_cb(expired)
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMC(0) message MMSMS-REL-IND received in state MM_CONN_PENDING
DLSMS SMC(0) MM layer is released
DLSMS SMC(0) new CP state MM_CONN_PENDING -> IDLE
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000002 tid-1) MNSMS-ERROR-IND, no cause
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMR(0) message MNSMS-ERROR-IND received in state WAIT_FOR_RP_ACK
DLSMS SMR(0) TX SMS MNSMS-ERROR-IND
DLSMS SMR(0) new RP state WAIT_FOR_RP_ACK -> IDLE
DLSMS SMR(0) TX: MNSMS-REL-REQ
DLSMS SMC(0) message MNSMS-REL-REQ received in state IDLE
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - SMS-receiver: now used by 3 (attached,SMS,Paging)
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000002 tid-1) Freeing transaction
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMR(0) clearing SMR instance
DLSMS SMC(0) clearing instance
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - SMS: now used by 2 (attached,Paging)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - Paging: now used by 1 (attached)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + test_ms_timeout_paging: now used by 2 (attached,test_ms_timeout_paging)
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
vsub->cs.is_paging == 0
llist_count(&vsub->cs.requests) == 0
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
fix: properly cancel all Paging on IMSI Detach It's not clear cut which code is responsible for canceling pending requests, since the requests list is kept in vlr_subscr, but sending out Paging does certainly not belong in the VLR. Place the requests cleanup in gsm_04_08.c. Add to test_ms_timeout_paging() in msc_vlr_test_ms_timeout.c to verify that a pending paging is canceled on IMSI Detach. Change-Id: Ib8874a9d92f02b0826525b55518332f6899688fd
2017-12-15 02:48:48 +00:00
- Now that the timeout has expired, another Paging is sent on request
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + SMS-receiver: now used by 3 (attached,test_ms_timeout_paging,SMS-receiver)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + SMS: now used by 4 (attached,test_ms_timeout_paging,SMS-receiver,SMS)
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000003 tid-0) New transaction
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMC(0) instance created for network
DLSMS SMR(0) instance created for network.
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000003 tid-0) Going to send a MT SMS
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMR(0) message SM-RL-DATA_REQ received in state IDLE
DLSMS SMR(0) TX SMS RP-DATA
DLSMS SMR(0) new RP state IDLE -> WAIT_FOR_RP_ACK
DLSMS SMC(0) message MNSMS-EST-REQ received in state IDLE
DLSMS SMC(0) new CP state IDLE -> MM_CONN_PENDING
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000003 tid-0) Initiating Paging due to MMSMS_EST_REQ
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DPAG Paging: IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 for MT-SMS: Starting paging
paging request (SIGNALLING_LOW_PRIO) to IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 on GERAN-A
strcmp(paging_expecting_imsi, vsub->imsi) == 0
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + Paging: now used by 5 (attached,test_ms_timeout_paging,SMS-receiver,SMS,Paging)
fix: properly cancel all Paging on IMSI Detach It's not clear cut which code is responsible for canceling pending requests, since the requests list is kept in vlr_subscr, but sending out Paging does certainly not belong in the VLR. Place the requests cleanup in gsm_04_08.c. Add to test_ms_timeout_paging() in msc_vlr_test_ms_timeout.c to verify that a pending paging is canceled on IMSI Detach. Change-Id: Ib8874a9d92f02b0826525b55518332f6899688fd
2017-12-15 02:48:48 +00:00
llist_count(&vsub->cs.requests) == 1
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - test_ms_timeout_paging: now used by 4 (attached,SMS-receiver,SMS,Paging)
fix: properly cancel all Paging on IMSI Detach It's not clear cut which code is responsible for canceling pending requests, since the requests list is kept in vlr_subscr, but sending out Paging does certainly not belong in the VLR. Place the requests cleanup in gsm_04_08.c. Add to test_ms_timeout_paging() in msc_vlr_test_ms_timeout.c to verify that a pending paging is canceled on IMSI Detach. Change-Id: Ib8874a9d92f02b0826525b55518332f6899688fd
2017-12-15 02:48:48 +00:00
paging_sent == 1
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
fix: properly cancel all Paging on IMSI Detach It's not clear cut which code is responsible for canceling pending requests, since the requests list is kept in vlr_subscr, but sending out Paging does certainly not belong in the VLR. Place the requests cleanup in gsm_04_08.c. Add to test_ms_timeout_paging() in msc_vlr_test_ms_timeout.c to verify that a pending paging is canceled on IMSI Detach. Change-Id: Ib8874a9d92f02b0826525b55518332f6899688fd
2017-12-15 02:48:48 +00:00
- subscriber detaches, pagings are canceled
use osmo_rat_type from libosmocore Replace locally defined enum ran_type with libosmocore's new enum osmo_rat_type, and value_string ran_type_names with osmo_rat_type_names. The string representations change, which has cosmetic effects on the test suite expectations. Depends: I659687aef7a4d67ca372a39fef31dee07aed7631 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I2c78c265dc99df581e1b00e563d6912c7ffdb36b
2018-12-25 23:40:18 +00:00
MSC <--GERAN-A-- MS: GSM48_MT_MM_IMSI_DETACH_IND
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
new conn
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: Allocated
DMSC msc_a{MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Allocated
DMSC msc_a{MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: is child of msub_fsm
DMSC msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3
DMSC dummy_msc_i{0}: Allocated
DMSC dummy_msc_i{0}: is child of msub_fsm
DREF msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (rx_from_ms)
DBSSAP msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: RAN decode: COMPL_L3
DRLL msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Dispatching 04.08 message: MM GSM48_MT_MM_IMSI_DETACH_IND
use new osmo_mobile_identity API everywhere Depends: Ic3f969e739654c1e8c387aedeeba5cce07fe2307 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Idfc8e576e10756aeaacf5569f6178068313eb7ea
2020-05-29 01:27:50 +00:00
DMM IMSI DETACH INDICATION: IMSI-901700000004620
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + gsm48_rx_mm_imsi_detach_ind: now used by 5 (attached,SMS-receiver,SMS,Paging,gsm48_rx_mm_imsi_detach_ind)
refactor log ctx for vlr_subscr and ran_conn ran_conn_get_conn_id(): instead of a talloc allocated string, return a static buffer in ran_conn_get_conn_id(). So far this function had no callers. Refactor ran_conn_update_id() API: during early L3-Complete, when no subscriber is associated yet, update the FSM Id by the MI type seen in the L3 Complete message: ran_conn_update_id_from_mi(). Later on set the vsub and re-update. Call vlr.ops->subscr_update when the TMSI is updated, so that log context includes the TMSI from then on. Enrich context for vlr_subscr_name and ran_conn fi name. Include all available information in vlr_subscr_name(); instead of either IMSI or MSISDN or TMSI, print all of them when present. Instead of a short log, rather have more valuable context. A context info would now look like: Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000014706:MSISDN-2023:TMSI-0x08BDE4EC:GERAN-A-3:PAGING_RESP) It does get quite long, but ensures easy correlation of any BSSAP / IuCS messages with log output, especially if multiple subscribers are busy at the same time. Print TMSI and TMSInew in uppercase hexadecimal, which is the typical representation in the telecom world. When showing the RAN conn id GERAN_A-00000017 becomes GERAN-A-23 - We usually write the conn_id in decimal. - Leading zeros are clutter and might suggest hexadecimal format. - 'GERAN-A' and 'UTRAN-Iu' are the strings defined by osmo_rat_type_name(). Depends: I7798c3ef983c2e333b2b9cbffef6f366f370bd81 (libosmocore) Depends: Ica25919758ef6cba8348da199b0ae7e0ba628798 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I66a68ce2eb8957a35855a3743d91a86299900834
2019-01-03 01:32:14 +00:00
DMM IMSI DETACH for IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + active-conn: now used by 6 (attached,SMS-receiver,SMS,Paging,gsm48_rx_mm_imsi_detach_ind,active-conn)
DPAG Paging: IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 for MT-SMS: Paging Response action (expired)
DPAG Paging: IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 for MT-SMS: Removing Paging Request
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000003 tid-0) mmsms_paging_cb(expired)
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMC(0) message MMSMS-REL-IND received in state MM_CONN_PENDING
DLSMS SMC(0) MM layer is released
DLSMS SMC(0) new CP state MM_CONN_PENDING -> IDLE
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000003 tid-0) MNSMS-ERROR-IND, no cause
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMR(0) message MNSMS-ERROR-IND received in state WAIT_FOR_RP_ACK
DLSMS SMR(0) TX SMS MNSMS-ERROR-IND
DLSMS SMR(0) new RP state WAIT_FOR_RP_ACK -> IDLE
DLSMS SMR(0) TX: MNSMS-REL-REQ
DLSMS SMC(0) message MNSMS-REL-REQ received in state IDLE
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - SMS-receiver: now used by 5 (attached,SMS,Paging,gsm48_rx_mm_imsi_detach_ind,active-conn)
add LOG_TRANS, proper context for all transactions Change-Id: I2e60964d7a3c06d051debd1c707051a0eb3101ba
2019-02-28 04:50:06 +00:00
DLSMS trans(SMS IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 callref-0x40000003 tid-0) Freeing transaction
Enable SMS-related log in VLR tests The likely reason why it was disabled is due to paging_cb_mmsms_est_req() logging pointers which results in unstable log output. Fixing this allows us to track SMS-related regressions properly. Change-Id: I44ae817d9edb73d182ff33ff5a2fd942e224e344
2019-01-16 11:47:39 +00:00
DLSMS SMR(0) clearing SMR instance
DLSMS SMC(0) clearing instance
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - SMS: now used by 4 (attached,Paging,gsm48_rx_mm_imsi_detach_ind,active-conn)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - Paging: now used by 3 (attached,gsm48_rx_mm_imsi_detach_ind,active-conn)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 4 (attached,gsm48_rx_mm_imsi_detach_ind,active-conn,vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 3 (attached,gsm48_rx_mm_imsi_detach_ind,active-conn)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - attached: now used by 2 (gsm48_rx_mm_imsi_detach_ind,active-conn)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - gsm48_rx_mm_imsi_detach_ind: now used by 1 (active-conn)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_CN_CLOSE
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_RELEASING
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Releasing: msc_a use is 1 (rx_from_ms)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 2 (active-conn,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 + vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 3 (active-conn,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter,vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 2 (active-conn,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: + wait-Clear-Complete: now used by 2 (rx_from_ms,wait-Clear-Complete)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: RAN encode: CLEAR_COMMAND on GERAN-A
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){0}: Received Event MSC_I_EV_FROM_A_FORWARD_ACCESS_SIGNALLING_REQUEST
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 1 (active-conn)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: - rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (wait-Clear-Complete)
properly receive BSSMAP Clear Complete and Iu Release Complete When sending a BSSMAP Clear or Iu Release, do not immediately discard the conn, but wait until a BSSMAP Clear Complete / Iu Release Complete has been received. Hence we will no longer show in the log that an incoming Release/Clear Complete belongs to an unknown subscriber, but will still be around to properly log the release. Related: OS#3122 Change-Id: Ie4c6aaba3866d6e5b98004e8870a215e8cf8ffc1
2018-04-01 18:55:54 +00:00
bssap_clear_sent == 1
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: RAN decode: CLEAR_COMPLETE
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: - wait-Clear-Complete: now used by 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_UNUSED
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_RELEASED
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Released: msc_a use is 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Terminating (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Removing from parent msub_fsm
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: max total use count was 2
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: Received Event MSUB_EV_ROLE_TERMINATED
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) MSC-A terminated
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) 1 MSC-I still active
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: state_chg to terminating
DMSC msub_fsm{terminating}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE))
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){0}: Terminating in cascade, depth 3 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE))
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){0}: Removing from parent msub_fsm
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){0}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE)
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071) Free
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 - active-conn: now used by 0 (-)
DVLR freeing VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071 (max total use count was 7)
DMSC msub_fsm{terminating}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:MSISDN-46071:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Deallocated, including all deferred deallocations
- msub gone
llist_count(&msub_list) == 0
msc_vlr_tests: revert IMSI parameter and test nr output Three recently merged commits take the msc_vlr_tests in a wrong direction. The IMSI is usually encoded in the hex streams. The rationale behind hex streams is that it is a) easily copied from a wireshark trace and b) exactly the bytes as sent by an actual phone. It is hard to parameterize the IMSI because we would have to employ our encoding functions, which I intentionally want to keep out of the loop here. The test number should not appear in the normal test output, so that adding a test or changing their order does not affect expected output for following tests. The nr is simply for manual invocation, only seen when invoked with -v. Revert - "VLR tests: always print test parameters" b0a4314911140b1599cccfc8171fcdab4cd9bfab. - "Expand VLR tests" d5feadeee8dd24f991df2892d6bcf0be8b0cf707. - "Move IMSI into test parameters" 093300d141c300651954473d73138b72de04d931. Change-Id: Ie1b49237746751021da88f6f07bbb9f780d077c9
2018-03-01 23:40:58 +00:00
===== test_ms_timeout_paging: SUCCESS
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
full talloc report on 'msgb' (total 0 bytes in 1 blocks)
add rudimentary NRI support for MSC pooling This patch served for a manual testing counterpart for osmo-bsc to implement MSC pooling. This enables a basic MSC pooling setup, but for a production setup, osmo-msc would still lack various features related to unloading subscribers to another MSC as explained in 3GPP TS 23.236. Change-Id: Iafe0878a0a2c8669080d757b34a398ea75fced36
2020-05-26 22:04:26 +00:00
talloc_total_blocks(tall_bsc_ctx) == 20
fix paging: add timeout to discard unsuccessful paging Currently, if there is no reply from the BSS / RNC, a subscriber will remain as "already paged" forever, and is never going to be paged again. Even on IMSI Detach, the pending request will keep a ref count on the vlr_subscr. Add a paging timeout, as gsm_network->paging_timeout and in the VTY on the 'msc' node as 'paging timeout (default|<1-65535>'. (There is a 'network' / 'T3113' in OsmoBSC, but to not confuse the two, give this a different name.) Add test_ms_timeout_paging() test to verify the timeout works. I hit this while testing Paging across multiple hNodeB, when a UE lost connection to the hNodeB. I noticed that no matter how long I wait, no Paging is sent out anymore, and found this embarrassing issue. Good grief... The choice of 10 seconds is taken from https://osmocom.org/issues/2756 Change-Id: I2db6f1e2ad341cf9c2cc7a21ec2fca0bae5b2db5
2017-12-15 02:02:27 +00:00
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
===== test_classmark_update_timeout
- Total time passed: 0.000000 s
- Location Update request causes a GSUP Send Auth Info request to HLR
use osmo_rat_type from libosmocore Replace locally defined enum ran_type with libosmocore's new enum osmo_rat_type, and value_string ran_type_names with osmo_rat_type_names. The string representations change, which has cosmetic effects on the test suite expectations. Depends: I659687aef7a4d67ca372a39fef31dee07aed7631 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I2c78c265dc99df581e1b00e563d6912c7ffdb36b
2018-12-25 23:40:18 +00:00
MSC <--GERAN-A-- MS: GSM48_MT_MM_LOC_UPD_REQUEST
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
new conn
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: Allocated
DMSC msc_a{MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Allocated
DMSC msc_a{MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: is child of msub_fsm
DMSC msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3
DMSC dummy_msc_i{0}: Allocated
DMSC dummy_msc_i{0}: is child of msub_fsm
DREF msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (rx_from_ms)
DBSSAP msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: RAN decode: COMPL_L3
DRLL msc_a(unknown:GERAN-A:NONE){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Dispatching 04.08 message: MM GSM48_MT_MM_LOC_UPD_REQUEST
DMM msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: LOCATION UPDATING REQUEST: MI=IMSI-901700000004620 LU-type=IMSI-ATTACH
DMM msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: USIM: old LAI: 001-868-1
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + mm_rx_loc_upd_req: now used by 2 (rx_from_ms,mm_rx_loc_upd_req)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: + lu: now used by 3 (rx_from_ms,mm_rx_loc_upd_req,lu)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: Allocated
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: is child of msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: rev=GSM net=GERAN Auth+Ciph
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: Received Event VLR_ULA_E_UPDATE_LA
vlr_subscr: use osmo_use_count Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Change-Id: Ib06d030e8464abe415ff597d462ed40eeddef475
2019-02-19 01:36:35 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr unknown + _lu_fsm_associate_vsub: now used by 1 (_lu_fsm_associate_vsub)
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
DVLR set IMSI on subscriber; IMSI=901700000004620 id=901700000004620
DVLR New subscr, IMSI: 901700000004620
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + active-conn: now used by 2 (_lu_fsm_associate_vsub,active-conn)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_COMPLETE_LAYER_3_OK
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_VALIDATE_L3}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - _lu_fsm_associate_vsub: now used by 1 (active-conn)
vlr: optionally send IMEI early to HLR When 'check-imei-rqd 1 early' is set in the config, send the IMEI to the HLR before doing the location update with the HLR. The OsmoHLR documentation referenced in the code will be added in osmo-hlr.git's Change-Id I2dd4a56f7b8be8b5d0e6fc32e04459e5e278d0a9. Related: OS#2542 Change-Id: I88283cad23793b475445d814ff49db534cb41244
2019-05-06 11:09:55 +00:00
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: vlr_loc_upd_node1_pre()
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: vlr_loc_upd_node1()
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_IDLE}: state_chg to VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: Allocated
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: is child of vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: Received Event VLR_AUTH_E_START
gsup: indicate CN-Domain in SendAuthInfo Requests In order for osmo-hlr to be able to 100% guarantee distinct INDs for CS and PS, set CN-Domain = CS in all SendAuthInfo Requests. In Milenage auth, it is highly desirable that osmo-hlr guarantees use of distinct INDs for CS and PS domains. If an MSC and SGSN attached at the same time use the same IND bucket to generate Milenage SQN, that collision would rapidly waste SQNs and load osmo-hlr with requesting new auth tuples on each CS/PS Complete-Layer3. So far, osmo-msc did not indicate the CN domain in the GSUP SendAuthInfo Request, which was neither required nor evaluated. The CN-Domain is only sent for the UpdateLocation Request that usually follows later. Related: OS#4318 Change-Id: I22f44068268e62801cadbf6542efaf153423cd65
2019-12-12 00:31:04 +00:00
GSUP --> HLR: OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_SEND_AUTH_INFO_REQUEST: 08010809710000004026f02801020a0101
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH}: state_chg to VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH_WAIT_AI
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: - mm_rx_loc_upd_req: now used by 2 (rx_from_ms,lu)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: - rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (lu)
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- from HLR, rx _SEND_AUTH_INFO_RESULT; VLR sends Auth Req to MS
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_SEND_AUTH_INFO_RESULT: 0a010809710000004026f003222010585df1ae287f6e273dce07090d61320b21042d8b2c3e220861855fb81fc2a8000a0101
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 2 (active-conn,vlr_gsup_rx)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH_WAIT_AI}: Received Event VLR_AUTH_E_HLR_SAI_ACK
refactor log ctx for vlr_subscr and ran_conn ran_conn_get_conn_id(): instead of a talloc allocated string, return a static buffer in ran_conn_get_conn_id(). So far this function had no callers. Refactor ran_conn_update_id() API: during early L3-Complete, when no subscriber is associated yet, update the FSM Id by the MI type seen in the L3 Complete message: ran_conn_update_id_from_mi(). Later on set the vsub and re-update. Call vlr.ops->subscr_update when the TMSI is updated, so that log context includes the TMSI from then on. Enrich context for vlr_subscr_name and ran_conn fi name. Include all available information in vlr_subscr_name(); instead of either IMSI or MSISDN or TMSI, print all of them when present. Instead of a short log, rather have more valuable context. A context info would now look like: Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000014706:MSISDN-2023:TMSI-0x08BDE4EC:GERAN-A-3:PAGING_RESP) It does get quite long, but ensures easy correlation of any BSSAP / IuCS messages with log output, especially if multiple subscribers are busy at the same time. Print TMSI and TMSInew in uppercase hexadecimal, which is the typical representation in the telecom world. When showing the RAN conn id GERAN_A-00000017 becomes GERAN-A-23 - We usually write the conn_id in decimal. - Leading zeros are clutter and might suggest hexadecimal format. - 'GERAN-A' and 'UTRAN-Iu' are the strings defined by osmo_rat_type_name(). Depends: I7798c3ef983c2e333b2b9cbffef6f366f370bd81 (libosmocore) Depends: Ica25919758ef6cba8348da199b0ae7e0ba628798 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I66a68ce2eb8957a35855a3743d91a86299900834
2019-01-03 01:32:14 +00:00
DVLR SUBSCR(IMSI-901700000004620) Received 1 auth tuples
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_NEEDS_AUTH_WAIT_AI}: state_chg to VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: got auth tuple: use_count=1 key_seq=0 -- will use GSM AKA (is_r99=no, at->vec.auth_types=0x1)
- sending GSM Auth Request for IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU: tuple use_count=1 key_seq=0 auth_types=0x1 and...
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
- ...rand=585df1ae287f6e273dce07090d61320b
- ...expecting sres=2d8b2c3e
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - vlr_gsup_rx: now used by 1 (active-conn)
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
<-- GSUP rx OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_SEND_AUTH_INFO_RESULT: vlr_gsupc_read_cb() returns 0
lu_result_sent == 0
auth_request_sent == 1
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
- MS sends Authen Response, VLR accepts and wants to send Ciphering Mode Command to MS -- but needs Classmark 2 to determine whether A5/3 is supported
use osmo_rat_type from libosmocore Replace locally defined enum ran_type with libosmocore's new enum osmo_rat_type, and value_string ran_type_names with osmo_rat_type_names. The string representations change, which has cosmetic effects on the test suite expectations. Depends: I659687aef7a4d67ca372a39fef31dee07aed7631 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I2c78c265dc99df581e1b00e563d6912c7ffdb36b
2018-12-25 23:40:18 +00:00
MSC <--GERAN-A-- MS: GSM48_MT_MM_AUTH_RESP
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: + rx_from_ms: now used by 2 (lu,rx_from_ms)
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: RAN decode: DTAP
DRLL msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: Dispatching 04.08 message: MM GSM48_MT_MM_AUTH_RESP
DMM msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: MM GSM AUTHENTICATION RESPONSE (sres = 2d8b2c3e)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: Received Event VLR_AUTH_E_MS_AUTH_RESP
refactor log ctx for vlr_subscr and ran_conn ran_conn_get_conn_id(): instead of a talloc allocated string, return a static buffer in ran_conn_get_conn_id(). So far this function had no callers. Refactor ran_conn_update_id() API: during early L3-Complete, when no subscriber is associated yet, update the FSM Id by the MI type seen in the L3 Complete message: ran_conn_update_id_from_mi(). Later on set the vsub and re-update. Call vlr.ops->subscr_update when the TMSI is updated, so that log context includes the TMSI from then on. Enrich context for vlr_subscr_name and ran_conn fi name. Include all available information in vlr_subscr_name(); instead of either IMSI or MSISDN or TMSI, print all of them when present. Instead of a short log, rather have more valuable context. A context info would now look like: Process_Access_Request_VLR(IMSI-901700000014706:MSISDN-2023:TMSI-0x08BDE4EC:GERAN-A-3:PAGING_RESP) It does get quite long, but ensures easy correlation of any BSSAP / IuCS messages with log output, especially if multiple subscribers are busy at the same time. Print TMSI and TMSInew in uppercase hexadecimal, which is the typical representation in the telecom world. When showing the RAN conn id GERAN_A-00000017 becomes GERAN-A-23 - We usually write the conn_id in decimal. - Leading zeros are clutter and might suggest hexadecimal format. - 'GERAN-A' and 'UTRAN-Iu' are the strings defined by osmo_rat_type_name(). Depends: I7798c3ef983c2e333b2b9cbffef6f366f370bd81 (libosmocore) Depends: Ica25919758ef6cba8348da199b0ae7e0ba628798 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I66a68ce2eb8957a35855a3743d91a86299900834
2019-01-03 01:32:14 +00:00
DVLR SUBSCR(IMSI-901700000004620) AUTH on GERAN received SRES/RES: 2d8b2c3e (4 bytes)
DVLR SUBSCR(IMSI-901700000004620) AUTH established GSM security context
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: Authentication terminating with result PASSED
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_WAIT_RESP}: state_chg to VLR_SUB_AS_AUTHENTICATED
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_AUTHENTICATED}: Terminating (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR)
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_AUTHENTICATED}: Removing from parent vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH}: Received Event VLR_ULA_E_AUTH_RES
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH}: vlr_loc_upd_post_auth()
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH}: Set Ciphering Mode
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: For A5/3, we still need Classmark 2
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: RAN encode: CLASSMARK_REQUEST on GERAN-A
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Received Event MSC_I_EV_FROM_A_FORWARD_ACCESS_SIGNALLING_REQUEST
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_AUTH_CIPH}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_AUTH}: state_chg to VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_CIPH
DVLR VLR_Authenticate(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_SUB_AS_AUTHENTICATED}: Deallocated
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE}: - rx_from_ms: now used by 1 (lu)
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
- But the BSSMAP Classmark Update never arrives
- At first, we're still waiting
- Total time passed: 0.000423 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 1.000658 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 2.000893 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 3.001128 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 4.001363 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
llist_count(&msub_list) == 1
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 0
- Total time passed: 5.001598 s
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE}: Timeout of X1
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_CN_CLOSE
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE}: - lu: now used by 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_UNUSED
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE}: Event MSC_A_EV_UNUSED not permitted
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_RELEASING
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Releasing: msc_a use is 0 (-)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 2 (active-conn,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 + vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 3 (active-conn,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter,vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm)
- sending LU Reject for IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU, cause 22
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_WAIT_CIPH}: state_chg to VLR_ULA_S_DONE
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_CN_CLOSE
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Event MSC_A_EV_CN_CLOSE not permitted
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - vlr_subscr_cancel_attach_fsm: now used by 2 (active-conn,msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter)
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: + wait-Clear-Complete: now used by 1 (wait-Clear-Complete)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: RAN encode: CLEAR_COMMAND on GERAN-A
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Received Event MSC_I_EV_FROM_A_FORWARD_ACCESS_SIGNALLING_REQUEST
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - msc_a_fsm_releasing_onenter: now used by 1 (active-conn)
rename gsm_subscriber_connection to ran_conn In preparation for inter-BSC and inter-MSC handover, we need to separate the subscriber management logic from the actual RAN connections. What better time to finally rename gsm_subscriber_connection. * Name choice: In 2G, this is a connection to the BSS, but even though 3GPP TS commonly talk of "BSS-A" and "BSS-B" when explaining handover, it's not good to call it "bss_conn": in 3G a BSS is called RNS, IIUC. The overall term for 2G (GERAN) and 3G (UTRAN) is RAN: Radio Access Network. * Rationale: A subscriber in the MSC so far has only one RAN connection, but e.g. for inter-BSC handover, a second one needs to be created to handover to. Most of the items in the former gsm_subscriber_connection are actually related to the RAN, with only a few MM and RTP related items. So, as a first step, just rename it to ran_conn, to cosmetically prepare for moving the not strictly RAN related items away later. Also: - Rename some functions from msc_subscr_conn_* to ran_conn_* - Rename "Subscr_Conn" FSM instance name to "RAN_conn" - Rename SUBSCR_CONN_* to RAN_CONN_* Change-Id: Ic595f7a558d3553c067f77dc67543ab59659707a
2018-11-29 21:37:51 +00:00
- RAN_CONN_TIMEOUT has passed, conn is gone.
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
bssap_clear_sent == 1
large refactoring: support inter-BSC and inter-MSC Handover 3GPP TS 49.008 '4.3 Roles of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T' defines distinct roles: - MSC-A is responsible for managing subscribers, - MSC-I is the gateway to the RAN. - MSC-T is a second transitory gateway to another RAN during Handover. After inter-MSC Handover, the MSC-I is handled by a remote MSC instance, while the original MSC-A retains the responsibility of subscriber management. MSC-T exists in this patch but is not yet used, since Handover is only prepared for, not yet implemented. Facilitate Inter-MSC and inter-BSC Handover by the same internal split of MSC roles. Compared to inter-MSC Handover, mere inter-BSC has the obvious simplifications: - all of MSC-A, MSC-I and MSC-T roles will be served by the same osmo-msc instance, - messages between MSC-A and MSC-{I,T} don't need to be routed via E-interface (GSUP), - no call routing between MSC-A and -I via MNCC necessary. This is the largest code bomb I have submitted, ever. Out of principle, I apologize to everyone trying to read this as a whole. Unfortunately, I see no sense in trying to split this patch into smaller bits. It would be a huge amount of work to introduce these changes in separate chunks, especially if each should in turn be useful and pass all test suites. So, unfortunately, we are stuck with this code bomb. The following are some details and rationale for this rather huge refactoring: * separate MSC subscriber management from ran_conn struct ran_conn is reduced from the pivotal subscriber management entity it has been so far to a mere storage for an SCCP connection ID and an MSC subscriber reference. The new pivotal subscriber management entity is struct msc_a -- struct msub lists the msc_a, msc_i, msc_t roles, the vast majority of code paths however use msc_a, since MSC-A is where all the interesting stuff happens. Before handover, msc_i is an FSM implementation that encodes to the local ran_conn. After inter-MSC Handover, msc_i is a compatible but different FSM implementation that instead forwards via/from GSUP. Same goes for the msc_a struct: if osmo-msc is the MSC-I "RAN proxy" for a remote MSC-A role, the msc_a->fi is an FSM implementation that merely forwards via/from GSUP. * New SCCP implementation for RAN access To be able to forward BSSAP and RANAP messages via the GSUP interface, the individual message layers need to be cleanly separated. The IuCS implementation used until now (iu_client from libosmo-ranap) did not provide this level of separation, and needed a complete rewrite. It was trivial to implement this in such a way that both BSSAP and RANAP can be handled by the same SCCP code, hence the new SCCP-RAN layer also replaces BSSAP handling. sccp_ran.h: struct sccp_ran_inst provides an abstract handler for incoming RAN connections. A set of callback functions provides implementation specific details. * RAN Abstraction (BSSAP vs. RANAP) The common SCCP implementation did set the theme for the remaining refactoring: make all other MSC code paths entirely RAN-implementation-agnostic. ran_infra.c provides data structures that list RAN implementation specifics, from logging to RAN de-/encoding to SCCP callbacks and timers. A ran_infra pointer hence allows complete abstraction of RAN implementations: - managing connected RAN peers (BSC, RNC) in ran_peer.c, - classifying and de-/encoding RAN PDUs, - recording connected LACs and cell IDs and sending out Paging requests to matching RAN peers. * RAN RESET now also for RANAP ran_peer.c absorbs the reset_fsm from a_reset.c; in consequence, RANAP also supports proper RESET semantics now. Hence osmo-hnbgw now also needs to provide proper RESET handling, which it so far duly ignores. (TODO) * RAN de-/encoding abstraction The RAN abstraction mentioned above serves not only to separate RANAP and BSSAP implementations transparently, but also to be able to optionally handle RAN on distinct levels. Before Handover, all RAN messages are handled by the MSC-A role. However, after an inter-MSC Handover, a standalone MSC-I will need to decode RAN PDUs, at least in order to manage Assignment of RTP streams between BSS/RNC and MNCC call forwarding. ran_msg.h provides a common API with abstraction for: - receiving events from RAN, i.e. passing RAN decode from the BSC/RNC and MS/UE: struct ran_dec_msg represents RAN messages decoded from either BSSMAP or RANAP; - sending RAN events: ran_enc_msg is the counterpart to compose RAN messages that should be encoded to either BSSMAP or RANAP and passed down to the BSC/RNC and MS/UE. The RAN-specific implementations are completely contained by ran_msg_a.c and ran_msg_iu.c. In particular, Assignment and Ciphering have so far been distinct code paths for BSSAP and RANAP, with switch(via_ran){...} statements all over the place. Using RAN_DEC_* and RAN_ENC_* abstractions, these are now completely unified. Note that SGs does not qualify for RAN abstraction: the SGs interface always remains with the MSC-A role, and SGs messages follow quite distinct semantics from the fairly similar GERAN and UTRAN. * MGW and RTP stream management So far, managing MGW endpoints via MGCP was tightly glued in-between GSM-04.08-CC on the one and MNCC on the other side. Prepare for switching RTP streams between different RAN peers by moving to object-oriented implementations: implement struct call_leg and struct rtp_stream with distinct FSMs each. For MGW communication, use the osmo_mgcpc_ep API that has originated from osmo-bsc and recently moved to libosmo-mgcp-client for this purpose. Instead of implementing a sequence of events with code duplication for the RAN and CN sides, the idea is to manage each RTP stream separately by firing and receiving events as soon as codecs and RTP ports are negotiated, and letting the individual FSMs take care of the MGW management "asynchronously". The caller provides event IDs and an FSM instance that should be notified of RTP stream setup progress. Hence it becomes possible to reconnect RTP streams from one GSM-04.08-CC to another (inter-BSC Handover) or between CC and MNCC RTP peers (inter-MSC Handover) without duplicating the MGCP code for each transition. The number of FSM implementations used for MGCP handling may seem a bit of an overkill. But in fact, the number of perspectives on RTP forwarding are far from trivial: - an MGW endpoint is an entity with N connections, and MGCP "sessions" for configuring them by talking to the MGW; - an RTP stream is a remote peer connected to one of the endpoint's connections, which is asynchronously notified of codec and RTP port choices; - a call leg is the higher level view on either an MT or MO side of a voice call, a combination of two RTP streams to forward between two remote peers. BSC MGW PBX CI CI [MGW-endpoint] [--rtp_stream--] [--rtp_stream--] [----------------call_leg----------------] * Use counts Introduce using the new osmo_use_count API added to libosmocore for this purpose. Each use token has a distinct name in the logging, which can be a globally constant name or ad-hoc, like the local __func__ string constant. Use in the new struct msc_a, as well as change vlr_subscr to the new osmo_use_count API. * FSM Timeouts Introduce using the new osmo_tdef API, which provides a common VTY implementation for all timer numbers, and FSM state transitions with the correct timeout. Originated in osmo-bsc, recently moved to libosmocore. Depends: Ife31e6798b4e728a23913179e346552a7dd338c0 (libosmocore) Ib9af67b100c4583342a2103669732dab2e577b04 (libosmocore) Id617265337f09dfb6ddfe111ef5e578cd3dc9f63 (libosmocore) Ie9e2add7bbfae651c04e230d62e37cebeb91b0f5 (libosmo-sccp) I26be5c4b06a680f25f19797407ab56a5a4880ddc (osmo-mgw) Ida0e59f9a1f2dd18efea0a51680a67b69f141efa (osmo-mgw) I9a3effd38e72841529df6c135c077116981dea36 (osmo-mgw) Change-Id: I27e4988e0371808b512c757d2b52ada1615067bd
2018-12-07 13:47:34 +00:00
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: RAN decode: CLEAR_COMPLETE
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: - wait-Clear-Complete: now used by 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: Received Event MSC_A_EV_UNUSED
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASING}: state_chg to MSC_A_ST_RELEASED
DBSSAP msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Released: msc_a use is 0 (-)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Terminating (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU))
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: Removing from parent msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: fsm_lu_cleanup called with cause OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT
DVLR vlr_lu_fsm(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){VLR_ULA_S_DONE}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Removing from parent msub_fsm
DREF msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: max total use count was 3
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: Received Event MSUB_EV_ROLE_TERMINATED
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620) MSC-A terminated
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620) 1 MSC-I still active
DMSC msub_fsm{active}: state_chg to terminating
DMSC msub_fsm{terminating}: Terminating in cascade, depth 2 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU))
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Terminating in cascade, depth 3 (cause = OSMO_FSM_TERM_PARENT, caused by: msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU))
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Removing from parent msub_fsm
DMSC dummy_msc_i(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){0}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DMSC msub(IMSI-901700000004620) Free
DREF VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 - active-conn: now used by 0 (-)
DVLR freeing VLR subscr IMSI-901700000004620 (max total use count was 3)
DMSC msub_fsm{terminating}: Deferring: will deallocate with msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU)
DMSC msc_a(IMSI-901700000004620:GERAN-A:LU){MSC_A_ST_RELEASED}: Deallocated, including all deferred deallocations
- msub gone
llist_count(&msub_list) == 0
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
lu_result_sent == 2
===== test_classmark_update_timeout: SUCCESS
full talloc report on 'msgb' (total 0 bytes in 1 blocks)
add rudimentary NRI support for MSC pooling This patch served for a manual testing counterpart for osmo-bsc to implement MSC pooling. This enables a basic MSC pooling setup, but for a production setup, osmo-msc would still lack various features related to unloading subscribers to another MSC as explained in 3GPP TS 23.236. Change-Id: Iafe0878a0a2c8669080d757b34a398ea75fced36
2020-05-26 22:04:26 +00:00
talloc_total_blocks(tall_bsc_ctx) == 20
A5/n Ciph: request Classmark Update if missing When the VLR requests a Ciphering Mode with vlr_ops.set_ciph_mode(), and if we need a ciph algo flag from a Classmark information that is not yet known (usually CM 2 during LU), send a BSSMAP Classmark Request to get it. To manage the intermission of the Classmark Request, add - msc_classmark_request_then_cipher_mode_cmd(), - state SUBSCR_CONN_S_WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE, - event SUBSCR_CONN_E_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. From state AUTH_CIPH, switch to state WAIT_CLASSMARK_UPDATE. Once the BSSMAP Classmark Response, is received, switch back to SUBSCR_CONN_S_AUTH_CIPH and re-initiate Ciphering Mode. To be able to re-enter the Ciphering Mode algo decision, factor it out into msc_geran_set_cipher_mode(). Rationale: In the following commit, essentially we stopped supporting A5/3 ciphering: commit 71330720b6efdda2fcfd3e9c0cb45f89e32e5670 "MSC: Intersect configured A5 algorithms with MS-supported ones" Change-Id: Id124923ee52a357cb7d3e04d33f585214774f3a3 A5/3 was no longer supported because from that commit on, we strictly checked the MS-supported ciphers, but we did not have Classmark 2 available during Location Updating. This patch changes that: when Classmark 2 is missing, actively request it by a BSSMAP Classmark Request; continue Ciphering only after the Response. Always request missing Classmark, even if a lesser cipher were configured available. If the Classmark Update response fails to come in, cause an attach failure. Instead, we could attempt to use a lesser cipher that is also enabled. That is left as a future feature, should that become relevant. I think it's unlikely. Technically, we could now end up requesting a Classmark Updating both during LU (vlr_lu_fsm) and CM Service/Paging Response (proc_arq_fsm), but in practice the only time we lack a Classmark is: during Location Updating with A5/3 enabled. A5/1 support is indicated in CM1 which is always available, and A5/3 support is indicated in CM2, which is always available during CM Service Request as well as Paging Response. So this patch has practical relevance only for Location Updating. For networks that permit only A5/3, this patch fixes Location Updating. For networks that support A5/3 and A5/1, so far we always used A5/1 during LU, and after this patch we request CM2 and likely use A5/3 instead. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, verify that requesting Classmark 2 for A5/3 works during LU. Also verify that the lack of a Classmark Response results in attach failure. In msc_vlr_test_gsm_ciph, a hacky unit test fakes a situation where a CM2 is missing during proc_arq_fsm and proves that that code path works, even though the practical relevance is currently zero. It would only become interesting if ciphering algorithms A5/4 and higher became relevant, because support of those would be indicated in Classmark 3, which would always require a Classmark Request. Related: OS#3043 Depends: I4a2e1d3923e33912579c4180aa1ff8e8f5abb7e7 (libosmocore) Change-Id: I73c7cb6a86624695bd9c0f59abb72e2fdc655131
2018-09-13 01:23:07 +00:00
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00
full talloc report on 'msgb' (total 0 bytes in 1 blocks)
add rudimentary NRI support for MSC pooling This patch served for a manual testing counterpart for osmo-bsc to implement MSC pooling. This enables a basic MSC pooling setup, but for a production setup, osmo-msc would still lack various features related to unloading subscribers to another MSC as explained in 3GPP TS 23.236. Change-Id: Iafe0878a0a2c8669080d757b34a398ea75fced36
2020-05-26 22:04:26 +00:00
talloc_total_blocks(tall_bsc_ctx) == 20
Add msc_vlr test suite for MSC+VLR end-to-end tests Change-Id: If0e7cf20b9d1eac12126955b2f5f02bd8f1192cd
2017-01-25 14:04:16 +00:00