Neels Hofmeyr
76d8103bfb
I would like to use the IP addresses also for OsmoBSC processes, so it is more than clear now that 'nitb_iface' was the wrong naming choice. The only distinction we may need in the future is public versus loopback interface. To add that, we may add a trait to the 'ip_address' resource like: ip_address: - addr: 10.42.42.1 type: public - addr: 127.0.0.1 type: loopback This way we can substitute public vs loopback addresses flexibly (e.g. using scenarios). Change-Id: I3ad583ae7a33f7a7bb56fe78a125f73c56a0e860 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
debug | ||
sms |