I would like to use the IP addresses also for OsmoBSC processes, so it is more
than clear now that 'nitb_iface' was the wrong naming choice.
The only distinction we may need in the future is public versus loopback
interface. To add that, we may add a trait to the 'ip_address' resource
like:
ip_address:
- addr: 10.42.42.1
type: public
- addr: 127.0.0.1
type: loopback
This way we can substitute public vs loopback addresses flexibly (e.g. using
scenarios).
Change-Id: I3ad583ae7a33f7a7bb56fe78a125f73c56a0e860
Neels Hofmeyr
Pau Espin
Neels Hofmeyr