Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pau Espin b5a8614933 Add support for authentication VTY param in msc and bsc
Change-Id: Ie1eb76149d4b006631050f8a1e532fbdbdad6a7f
2017-08-23 17:40:29 +02:00
Pau Espin ca126b1d82 Allow tests to select network encryption
Change-Id: I273eee44c095690d0c2e3994befa97edc42496ac
2017-08-23 12:55:30 +00:00
Pau Espin 2d16f6fd2c Add support for SMPP testing
As defined in [1], the different related actors are implemented in this
commit: ESME and SMSC.

SMSC: In Osmocom, the SMSC is currently implemented inside the NITB or
the MSC. A new Smsc abstract class is created to shared code between the
NITB and the MSC, and also makes it easier for later when the SMSC is
splitted. ESMEs can be dynamically added to its configuration in a
similar way to how the BTSs are added.

ESME: A new class Esme is created which can be used by tests to control
an ESME to interact with the SMSC. The ESME functionalities are
implemented using python-smpplib. Required version of this library is at
least 43cc6f819ec76b2c0a9d36d1d439308634716227, which contains support
for python 3 and some required features to poll the socket.

This commit already contains a few tests which checks different
features and tests the API. Extending tested features or scenarios can be
later done quite easily.

The tests are not enabled by default right now, because there are several
of them in a suite and the ip_address resources are not freed after every
tests which ends up in the suite failing due to missing reserved
resources. All the tests run alone work though. When the issue is fixed
they can then be added to the default list of tests to be run.

[1] http://opensmpp.org/specs/SMPP_v3_4_Issue1_2.pdf

Change-Id: I14ca3cb009d6d646a449ca99b0200da12085c0da
2017-06-18 08:48:09 +00:00
Pau Espin d091233934 Use a subdir of run_dir for each test
Processes created have the scope of the test, so we should store
everything in a per-suite_run/per-test directory, otherwise everything
is stored in the same trial run_dir directory and it's really messy.

Change-Id: I06be2dd21710e14c1337d13b1fe6c2f68f037957
2017-06-17 16:10:04 +00:00
Neels Hofmeyr 1a7a3f0e43 fix and refactor logging: drop 'with', simplify
With the recent fix of the junit report related issues, another issue arose:
the 'with log.Origin' was changed to disallow __enter__ing an object twice to
fix problems, now still code would fail because it tries to do 'with' on the
same object twice. The only reason is to ensure that logging is associated with
a given object. Instead of complicating even more, implement differently.

Refactor logging to simplify use: drop the 'with Origin' style completely, and
instead use the python stack to determine which objects are created by which,
and which object to associate a log statement with.

The new way: we rely on the convention that each class instance has a local
'self' referencing the object instance. If we need to find an origin as a new
object's parent, or to associate a log message with, we traverse each stack
frame, fetching the first local 'self' object that is a log.Origin class
instance.

How to use:

Simply call log.log() anywhere, and it finds an Origin object to log for, from
the stack. Alternatively call self.log() for any Origin() object to skip the
lookup.

Create classes as child class of log.Origin and make sure to call
super().__init__(category, name). This constructor will magically find a parent
Origin on the stack.

When an exception happens, we first escalate the exception up through call
scopes to where ever it is handled by log.log_exn(). This then finds an Origin
object in the traceback's stack frames, no need to nest in 'with' scopes.

Hence the 'with log.Origin' now "happens implicitly", we can write pure natural
python code, no more hassles with scope ordering.

Furthermore, any frame can place additional logging information in a frame by
calling log.ctx(). This is automatically inserted in the ancestry associated
with a log statement / exception.

Change-Id: I5f9b53150f2bb6fa9d63ce27f0806f0ca6a45e90
2017-06-13 13:32:01 +02:00
Pau Espin 0e57aadd28 ofono_client: Implement network registration during connect()
A new mcc_mnc parameter is now optionally passed to connect() in order
to manually register to a specific network with a given MCC+MNC pair.
If no parameter is passed (or None), then the modem will be instructed
to attempt an automatic registration with any available network which
permits it.

We get the MCC+MNC parameter from the MSC/NITB and we pass it to the
modem object at connect time as shown in the modified tests. Two new
simple tests to check network registration is working are added in this
commit.

Ofono modems seem to be automatically registering at some point after
they are set Online=true, and we were actually using that 'feature'
before this patch. Thus, it is possible that a modem quickly becomes
registered, and we then check so before starting the scan+registration
process, which can take a few seconds.

The scanning method can take a few seconds to complete. To avoid
blocking in the dbus ofono Scan() method, this commit adds some code to
make use of glib/gdbus async methods, which are not yet supported
directly by pydbus. This way, we can continue polling while waiting for
the scan process to complete and we can register several modems in
parallel. When scan completes, a callback is run which attempts to
register. If no MCC+MNC was passed, as we just finished scanning the
modem should have enough fresh operator information to take good and
quick decisions on where to connect. If we have an MCC+MNC, then we check
the operator list received by Scan() method. If operator with desired
MCC+MNC is there, we register with it. If it's not there, we start
scanning() again asynchronously hoping the operator will show up in next
scan.

As scanning() and registration is done in the background, tests are
expected to call connect(), and then later on wait for the modem to
register by waiting/polling the method "modem.is_connected()". Tests
first check for the modem being connected and after with MSC
subscriber_attached(). The order is intentional because the later has to
poll through network and adds unneeded garbage to the pcap files bein
recorded.

Change-Id: I8d9eb47eac1044550d3885adb55105c304b0c15c
2017-06-12 15:34:21 +02:00
Neels Hofmeyr 7b02ed0f4b osmo-msc: configure HLR address
In db59bcf9fc we added a configured GSUP server
address for the osmo-hlr, but the osmo-msc is still trying to connect to
127.0.0.1.

In the same way as for mgcpgw, add conf_for_msc() to OsmoHLR, and use that to
configure the HLR's address in osmo-msc.cfg.

Related: OS#2320
Change-Id: I005aa160c679fc92b248abd762888959bd5b2c55
2017-06-08 23:26:51 +02:00
Harald Welte 2720534f27 Re-License under GPLv3-or-later instead of AGPLv3-or-later
The "Affero" nature makes sense for the Osmocom network components like
BSC, SGSN, etc. as they are typically operated to provide a network
service.

For testing, this doesn't make so much sense as it is difficult to
imagine people creating a business out of offering to run test cases on
an end-to-end Osmocom GSM network.  So let's drop the 'Affero' here.

All code is so far developed by sysmocom staff, so as Managing Director
of sysmocom I can effect such a license change unilaterally.

Change-Id: I8959c2d605854ffdc21cb29c0fe0e715685c4c05
2017-06-03 14:23:51 +00:00
Neels Hofmeyr 798e592fd6 MSC+BSC: add test api to run OsmoMSC and OsmoBSC with AoIP
Change-Id: I5842e8f1cba8e8e6bedfc08540efcafe207159cb
2017-05-29 00:19:45 +02:00