A NITB is a BSC + MSC, and if a BTS talks to a NITB, it talks to the BSC part
of the NITB. Hence it makes more sense to name certain things 'bsc' instead of
'nitb', to prepare for a separate BSC process appearing soon.
Change-Id: I6a0343b9243b166d4053cc44f523543f1245d772
My current distribution ships a newer libcrypto and libssl which are not
ABI compatible with the ones generated by Jenkins. I had to copy those
libraries locally and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH to be able to run binaries
compiled coming from the jenkins slave. Without this patch I am not
able to run it because it is overwriting the previous variable.
Change-Id: Id9b16d13d343616cbf87b9da8a99e3fae48da6bd
Clearly separate the kinds of BTS hardware the GSM tester knows ('type') from
the NITB's bts/type config item ('osmobsc_bts_type' -- not 'osmonitb_...' to
stay in tune with future developments: it is the libbsc that needs this).
For BTS hardware kinds, use the full name of the binary for osmo driven models:
osmo-bts-sysmo, osmo-bts-trx, osmo-bts-octphy.
Change-Id: I1aa9b48e74013a93f9db1a34730f17717fb3b36c
I know that these commit messages aren't very good, but the code is not stable
yet, so I'm not bothering with details.
Change-Id: I2d5e5f4a5407725d71093cbd71ef97b271eb8197
Neels Hofmeyr
Neels Hofmeyr
Pau Espin