si: Add a config option to disable SI2ter/SI2bis/SI5ter/SI5bis messages

The iPhone5 (US) appears to have some issues with the SIs generated,
or the nanoBTS is not sending them correctly.

Add a configurable hack to put all bands into the SI2/SI5 message.
It is enabled by the bts VTY command 'force-combined-si'.

This is a quick change without much reflection and watching for side
effects. I have verfied that a network with ARFCN 134 and neighbors
ARFCN 130 and 512 do not get generate the SI2ter and announce everything
inside the SI2.

This patch is conceptually based on 'si: Add a hack to disable
SI2ter/SI2bis/SI5ter/SI5bis messages' (692daaf2d2).

Ticket: OW#1062
Sponsored-by: On-Waves ehf
This commit is contained in:
Jacob Erlbeck 2014-01-16 11:02:14 +01:00
parent 976493b427
commit 8f8e5bf9c8
4 changed files with 51 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -676,6 +676,9 @@ struct gsm_bts {
int num_trx;
struct llist_head trx_list;
/* SI compatibility hacks */
int force_combined_si;
#ifdef ROLE_BSC
/* Abis NM queue */
struct llist_head abis_queue;

View File

@ -645,6 +645,9 @@ static void config_write_bts_single(struct vty *vty, struct gsm_bts *bts)
if (bts->excl_from_rf_lock)
vty_out(vty, " rf-lock-exclude%s", VTY_NEWLINE);
vty_out(vty, " %sforce-combined-si%s",
bts->force_combined_si ? "" : "no ", VTY_NEWLINE);
config_write_bts_model(vty, bts);
}
@ -2667,6 +2670,28 @@ DEFUN(cfg_bts_no_excl_rf_lock,
return CMD_SUCCESS;
}
#define FORCE_COMB_SI_STR "Force the generation of a single SI (no ter/bis)\n"
DEFUN(cfg_bts_force_comb_si,
cfg_bts_force_comb_si_cmd,
"force-combined-si",
FORCE_COMB_SI_STR)
{
struct gsm_bts *bts = vty->index;
bts->force_combined_si = 1;
return CMD_SUCCESS;
}
DEFUN(cfg_bts_no_force_comb_si,
cfg_bts_no_force_comb_si_cmd,
"no force-combined-si",
NO_STR FORCE_COMB_SI_STR)
{
struct gsm_bts *bts = vty->index;
bts->force_combined_si = 0;
return CMD_SUCCESS;
}
static void _get_codec_from_arg(struct vty *vty, int argc, const char *argv[])
{
struct gsm_bts *bts = vty->index;
@ -3331,6 +3356,8 @@ int bsc_vty_init(const struct log_info *cat)
install_element(BTS_NODE, &cfg_bts_si5_neigh_cmd);
install_element(BTS_NODE, &cfg_bts_excl_rf_lock_cmd);
install_element(BTS_NODE, &cfg_bts_no_excl_rf_lock_cmd);
install_element(BTS_NODE, &cfg_bts_force_comb_si_cmd);
install_element(BTS_NODE, &cfg_bts_no_force_comb_si_cmd);
install_element(BTS_NODE, &cfg_bts_codec0_cmd);
install_element(BTS_NODE, &cfg_bts_codec1_cmd);
install_element(BTS_NODE, &cfg_bts_codec2_cmd);

View File

@ -70,8 +70,11 @@ static int is_dcs_net(const struct gsm_bts *bts)
static int use_arfcn(const struct gsm_bts *bts, const int bis, const int ter,
const int pgsm, const int arfcn)
{
if (bts->force_combined_si)
return !bis && !ter;
if (!bis && !ter && band_compatible(bts, arfcn))
return 1;
/* Correct but somehow broken with either the nanoBTS or the iPhone5 */
if (bis && pgsm && band_compatible(bts, arfcn) && (arfcn < 1 || arfcn > 124))
return 1;
if (ter && !band_compatible(bts, arfcn))

View File

@ -173,6 +173,24 @@ class TestVTYNITB(TestVTYGenericBSC):
self.assertEquals(res.find('periodic location update 60'), -1)
self.assert_(res.find('no periodic location update') > 0)
def testEnableDisableSiHacks(self):
self.vty.enable()
self.vty.command("configure terminal")
self.vty.command("network")
self.vty.command("bts 0")
# Enable periodic lu..
self.vty.verify("force-combined-si", [''])
res = self.vty.command("write terminal")
self.assert_(res.find(' force-combined-si') > 0)
self.assertEquals(res.find('no force-combined-si'), -1)
# Now disable it..
self.vty.verify("no force-combined-si", [''])
res = self.vty.command("write terminal")
self.assertEquals(res.find(' force-combined-si'), -1)
self.assert_(res.find('no force-combined-si') > 0)
def testRachAccessControlClass(self):
self.vty.enable()
self.vty.command("configure terminal")