manuals/gbproxy: Move pooling to separate chapter
Change-Id: Ie2ad652c8261ce56cb2ed1a6f16a81486ccdf063 Related: SYS#5115, SYS#5005
This commit is contained in:
parent
ae303b40fc
commit
852ebadd44
|
@ -39,27 +39,3 @@ sgsn 101 <1>
|
|||
<1> Each SGSN is identified by its NSEI (same as in the NS configuration)
|
||||
<2> An SGSN can optionally have a name. If none is set a default name will be used.
|
||||
|
||||
=== SGSN pool support
|
||||
|
||||
In a SGSN pool, osmo-gbproxy is facing the problem of dividing the downlink
|
||||
capacity of a cell towards the SGSN. The BSS advertises the per-BVC capacity
|
||||
by means of the BSSGP FLOW-CONTROL-BVC messages, but as there are multiple
|
||||
SGSN in a pool, they all have to share / divide that total capacity.
|
||||
|
||||
By default, osmo-gbproxy advertises the full capacity to _each_ of the SGSN
|
||||
pool members, which results in significant over-provisioning and can lead to
|
||||
overload situations.
|
||||
|
||||
The administrator can configure the _percentage_ of the overall BSS-advertised
|
||||
capacity that shall be reported to each pool member SGSN using the
|
||||
`pool bvc-flow-control-ratio <1-100>` configuration command.
|
||||
|
||||
A setting of 100 means that each pool member is informed of 100% of the
|
||||
BSS side capacity.
|
||||
|
||||
A setting of 25 means that each pool member is informed of 25% of the
|
||||
BSS side capacity. This would make most sense in a set-up with four
|
||||
SGSN of equal share.
|
||||
|
||||
More complex capacity division schemes are so far not supported by
|
||||
osmo-gbproxy.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -192,3 +192,28 @@ To re-enable an SGSN for attaching new subscribers:
|
|||
sgsn nsei 1
|
||||
allow-attach
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
==== Traffic allocation
|
||||
|
||||
In a SGSN pool, osmo-gbproxy is facing the problem of dividing the downlink
|
||||
capacity of a cell towards the SGSN. The BSS advertises the per-BVC capacity
|
||||
by means of the BSSGP FLOW-CONTROL-BVC messages, but as there are multiple
|
||||
SGSN in a pool, they all have to share / divide that total capacity.
|
||||
|
||||
By default, osmo-gbproxy advertises the full capacity to _each_ of the SGSN
|
||||
pool members, which results in significant over-provisioning and can lead to
|
||||
overload situations.
|
||||
|
||||
The administrator can configure the _percentage_ of the overall BSS-advertised
|
||||
capacity that shall be reported to each pool member SGSN using the
|
||||
`pool bvc-flow-control-ratio <1-100>` configuration command.
|
||||
|
||||
A setting of 100 means that each pool member is informed of 100% of the
|
||||
BSS side capacity.
|
||||
|
||||
A setting of 25 means that each pool member is informed of 25% of the
|
||||
BSS side capacity. This would make most sense in a set-up with four
|
||||
SGSN of equal share.
|
||||
|
||||
More complex capacity division schemes are so far not supported by
|
||||
osmo-gbproxy.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue