osmo-bsc/tests/handover/test_balance_congestion_tch...

54 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext

# Balance congestion across cells and across TCH/F and TCH/H.
network
handover2 min-free-slots tch/f 3
handover2 min-free-slots tch/h 3
create-bts trx-count 1 timeslots c+s4 TCH/F TCH/F TCH/F TCH/F TCH/H TCH/H TCH/H
# both TCH/H and TCH/F have one lchan = 33% above congestion, nothing happens
set-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/F TCH/F - - TCH/HH TCH/HH -
meas-rep lchan * * * * rxlev 10 rxqual 0 ta 0
congestion-check
expect-no-chan
# TCH/F = +1 = 33%, TCH/H = +2 = 66% above congestion.
# Moving a TCH/H to TCH/F would just reverse the situation to F=+2=66%. Nothing happens.
set-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/F TCH/F - - TCH/HH TCH/HH TCH/H-
meas-rep lchan * * * * rxlev 10 rxqual 0 ta 0
congestion-check
expect-no-chan
# F=+1=33% H=+3=100%. Balance to F=+2=66% (which is < 100%) and H=+2=66%
set-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/F TCH/F - - TCH/HH TCH/HH TCH/HH
meas-rep lchan * * * * rxlev 10 rxqual 0 ta 0
congestion-check
expect-as from lchan 0 0 5 0 to lchan 0 0 3 0
# Now similar load percentages, just with different min-free-slots settings for tch/f vs tch/h.
network
handover2 min-free-slots tch/f 3
handover2 min-free-slots tch/h 5
# TCH/F has 1/3 = 33%, TCH/H has 1/5 = 20% overload.
# Moving one to TCH/H would mean 40% overload on TCH/H, which is above the current TCH/F of 33%.
# Nothing happens.
set-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/F TCH/F - - TCH/HH - -
meas-rep lchan * * * * rxlev 20 rxqual 0 ta 0
congestion-check
expect-no-chan
# TCH/F = +1 = 33%, TCH/H = +2 = 40% above congestion. Moving a TCH/H to TCH/F would result
# in F=+2=66%>40%. Nothing happens.
set-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/F TCH/F - - TCH/HH TCH/H- -
meas-rep lchan * * * * rxlev 20 rxqual 0 ta 0
congestion-check
expect-no-chan
# F=+1=33% H=+4=80%. Balance to F=+2=66%<80% and H=+3=60%
set-ts-use trx 0 0 states * TCH/F TCH/F - - TCH/HH TCH/HH TCH/H-
meas-rep lchan * * * * rxlev 20 rxqual 0 ta 0
congestion-check
expect-as from lchan 0 0 5 0 to lchan 0 0 3 0