Set flag lchan->activate.immediate_assignment_sent to true when sending, and
omit a reject after that.
lchan->activate gets completely zeroed in lchan_reset(), which sets that flag
back to false whenever an lchan becomes inactive.
Related: OS#3709
Change-Id: I9ad094d272254d7aee9b0a676201d4ed8cd727ca
Add following commands showing only TRX with appropriate RSL link
status:
* show trx connected
* show trx disconnected
This simplifies troubleshooting of complex setup with multiple BTS with
several TRX each.
Change-Id: I48866ce311a3e2c63235f60a497efe97bbd05a4a
This way only formated output is pinted to stdout when using -G and can
be used by other tools (osmo-gsm-tester) to get a json dictionary with interesting
information.
Related: OS#3624
Change-Id: I257bfc8d82b49a3641be6b6777e472ecf561a21e
Add LCLS variant where the loop is closed on BTS level instead of
MGW. The main difference is the handling of connection-related
messages (we use IPA RSL instead of MGCP), the configuration and
correlation logic remains the same.
Change-Id: I7e8379f31037f2c48da69a01919701919a3066a2
Related: OS#3659
In preparation for upcoming LCLS changes we have to split IPA RSL MDCX
generation into separate function with the ability to set destination
explicitly instead of just using the value from lchan which will be used
in follow-up patches.
Change-Id: Iffe2f4f10e841fc36965cce02b4e5f017a5ae6c8
Related: OS#3659
Same type of message parsing is already implemented in code, no need to
keep them.
Related: OS#3624
Change-Id: I715bd9582f9289b5674aaa8d8de1164ebef2fd11
This signal can be used for tools willing to request and parse Attribute Response
and do something with the information. ipaccess-config tool will use
this signal in later patch Change-Id Ida416a969a3309868d6f4e50f34b34f224c32dd6.
Related: OS#3624
Change-Id: I9a121bbfe1b96904d4e16845abc90bb6ef20d2c9
Before libosmocore Change-Id I780d452dcebce385469e32ef2fd844df6033393a,
it avoids stating arfcn 886-954 are compatible when operating under
DC1800. After that Change-Id, avoids aborting the program due to
unexpected behaviour.
Related: OS#3063
Depends: libosmocore Change-Id I780d452dcebce385469e32ef2fd844df6033393a
Change-Id: Ibf5d5ab50b6fc6597244eeedcd27d2ce245278a3
Some nanoBTS firmwares (if not all) are known to not work properly with
SI2ter. If BSC enables SI2ter through RSL, SI3 bit announcing SI2ter
available will be forwarded by nanoBTS to MS, but will still only send
SI2 message instead of expected SI2ter during TC=5 (see GSM 05.02 sec 6.3.4 "Mapping
of BCCH data"). As a result, some MS won't allow registering to the
network.
To avoid this kind of scenario, enable force-combined-si by default on
nanoBTS while still allowing to overwrite the feature through VTY. Other
BTS models are kept with force-combined-si disabled by default as
usually, since they seems to be working fine when SI2ter is enabled.
Related: OS#3063
Change-Id: Ide6e8967de0eedc9e2bcaf4414aaa537b009d72d
3GPP TS 04.08 V7.21.0, section "9.1.34 System information type 2ter"
states:
"""
This message has a L2 pseudo length of 18. This message may be sent
by the network with either a L2 pseudo length of 18 or some other
value. A mobile station that does not ignore this message shall not
discard the message due to a received L2 pseudo length different
from 18.
"""
Change-Id: I45cb217ebdf89b82b0f37f38eef7a1e3a651f541
3GPP TS 04.08 V7.21.0, section "9.1.33 System information type 2bis"
states: "This message has a L2 pseudo length of 21.".
Change-Id: I623c64c446c0973e939e9f1cba0a4d4d2f4f7237
In commit 65c62e5033 a call
to unlink() was erroneously moved up. Since then unlink()
has been called with an uninitialized path variable. The
problem went unnoticed because the return value of unlink()
was never checked.
Ensure that unlink() is called with an initialized argument and
verify success of the unlink() operation if the socket exists.
Related: CID#188836
Change-Id: Ia0c873da305cbb47aef0562f61ec21057363f294
Fixes: 65c62e5033
Before closing or breaking the loop in LCLS we do preliminary
checks. To facilitate adding new LCLS modes it's restructured as
follows:
* move check into dedicated static function
* explicitly check for MGW mode in endpoint check
* check for mode mismatch
Change-Id: I32ba232ad802625d97a0ad9d0511edc6ac7f251c
Related: OS#3659
Coverity points out that abis_nm_rcvmsg_sw() contains a switch
statement with suspicious looking missing break statements.
It is unclear to me if the code intends to process some
types of messages in more than one state, or of all messages
which affect a particular state already appear in the state's
corresponding switch block.
Can someone else tell what is supposed to happen here?
If this code is falling through intentionally, I will suggest
a patch adding /* fallthrough */ comments for clarity.
Change-Id: I1ea4221fadf30074156e9d17d94a5cb065242584
Related: CID#57703
Related: CID#57704
When a gscon wants to send a BSSMAP Clear Request, it makes no sense to do it
conditionally depending on the current conn state. Just send it: don't call
gscon_sigtran_send(), directly go for osmo_bsc_sigtran_send().
In particular, if an incoming inter-BSC handover ends in failure, the gscon
state is still ST_INIT, but if the MSC fails to give us a Clear Command, we may
want to ask with a BSSMAP Clear Request.
Change-Id: I39fae24260a4bb7a6af704ebe760f93fff566536
Otherwise any use of functions in gsm_timers_vty.c will fail because
g_vty_T_defs is never set (so it is NULL).
Change-Id: Ieeb27fdb06c965fa6b70aeb0f3b3f5169b1f2012
Check the return value of gsm48_multirate_config() in function
lchan_set_single_amr_mode(). This prevents an invalid AMR mode
from being configured for a logical channel.
Because the VTY parsier limits the AMR mode range to 0-7 this
is just a theoretical issue. However, this fact is beyond the
understanding of a static code analyzer, and the absence of
error handling was indeed setting a bad example.
Change-Id: I61153a44e8b7a38332bf38718397be9b339d5f25
Related: CID#188940
complete_layer3 returns true if everything succeeded, false otherwise.
However, its caller bsc_compl_l3 returns unix style (0 sucess,
negative error).
This commit has no real effect since only caller of bsc_compl_l3 never
checks return code, but will check it in the future.
Change-Id: I722696c3f6402288b51d6fcf51f478b3b0c9f0f0
In default example network, there's no cells with those arfcn.
Furthermore, having those seem to prevent some MS to register against
nanoBTS configured by a BSC using those lines.
Related: OS#3063
Change-Id: Iebe972da3a8442b6ded6d7f9e61a03b9144a843c
The 'show lchan' command already shows details about timeslot
state, indicating whether a channel is currently being switched
to a different channel type.
However, this information was not shown by 'show timeslot' yet.
There are TTCN3 BSC tests which use 'show timeslot' and are
seeing sporadic failures when 'show timeout' is invoked during a
channel type transition. With this change, VTY sessions recorded
in pcap files for these tests will contain information about the
current channel type transition state.
Change-Id: Ib854945756fb54c0e1c7d4212ea7b8746eec0db5
Related: OS#3690
conn->fi should actually never be NULL, they are allocated and discarded
simultaneously. So check its null from the start and remove some conditions
below, to remove the coverity warning.
Related: CID 189671
Change-Id: I62354aa998832131c86535f39a29294000114adc
Put all lchan release related flags and settings in a sub-struct named
'release' to better indicate what those fields are for. There is no functional
change.
Change-Id: Icfddc6010e5d7c309f1a7ed3526b5b635ffeaf11
If an lchan is being released and had a SACCH active, there is no reason to
omit the Deact SACCH message ever. All of the callers that passed
do_deact_sacch = false did so for no good reason.
Drop the do_deact_sacch flag everywhere and, when the lchan type matches and
SAPI[0] is still active, simply always send a Deact SACCH message.
The do_deact_sacch flag was carried over from legacy code, by me, mainly
because I never really understood why it was there. I do hope I'm correct now,
asserting that having this flag makes no sense.
Change-Id: Id3301df059582da2377ef82feae554e94fa42035
In the case where there is a release in error and we skip immediately to the RF
Release state, send all of Deact SACCH, RR Release messages and also signal the
lchan_rtp_fsm as appropriate.
Move that code to static lchan_do_release() and call from both
lchan_fsm_wait_rll_rtp_released_onenter() in the normal case, as well as
lchan_release() when skipping that.
When releasing in error, but we're already in LCHAN_ST_WAIT_RLL_RTP_RELEASED,
those messages have already been sent and we can skip them.
Change-Id: I648a9826ce56b611359f81462ca03e4ab4c736aa
After commit [1], the code makes sure to disassociate lchan and conn before
invoking the lchan release. However, we only send RR Release if a conn is
present, which clearly is nonsense after [1].
[1] commit 8b818a01b0
"subscr conn: properly forget lchan before release"
Change-Id: I4fd582b41ba4599af704d670af83651d2450b1db
Manage sending of RR Release via a flag, set during invoking lchan release.
Add do_rr_release arg to lchan_release(), gscon_release_lchans(). In
lchan_fsm.c, send RR Release only if do_rr_release was passed true; do not care
whether a conn is still associated (because it won't ever be since [1]).
That way we can intelligently decide what release process makes sense (whether
the lchan terminates the subscriber connection or whether the connection goes
on at another lchan), and still disassociate lchan and conn early.
BTW, this problem wasn't caught by the stock OsmoBSC TTCN3 tests, because the
f_expect_chan_rel() don't care whether an RR Release happens or not. This is
being fixed by Ibc64058f1e214bea585f4e8dcb66f3df8ead3845.
So far this patch should fix BSC_Tests_LCLS.TC_lcls_connect_clear.
Related: OS#3413
Change-Id: I666b3b4f45706d898d664d380bd0fd2b018be358
When reading the log of OS#3686, I wished for explicit logging of when exactly
an lchan disassociates from a conn. Here is the debug logging I would have
liked to see.
I'm not sure whether we really need to merge this patch...
Change-Id: I97558b899e7f2578ba98287e7352dc072d02ce44
lchan_fsm_wait_rf_release_ack_onenter() calls gscon_forget_lchan(). At the
point where the conn has no lchan, the lchan must not have a conn. Make sure
that conn is NULL after gscon_forget_lchan().
I hope this fixes OS#3686, it is the only situation I could find where the
disassociation is potentially one-sided.
I get the feeling that this should be hardcoded in gscon_forget_lchan(), but I
dimly remember other situations that are less trivial, where it doesn't
necessarily make sense to forget reciprocically. So only fixing this one now.
Related: OS#3686
Change-Id: If0c6e495e419b9dbb44443c3fc3f54dd4b714aa5
Right below this call, we invoke lchan_reset(), and the first thing it does is
gscon_forget_lchan(). Drop this redundant invocation.
Change-Id: I503efceb6d34c8df0cdfef3dfc83fa1e61271c47
See following specs for related information:
* 3GPP TS 52.021 §8.11.3 Get Attribute Response
* 3GPP TS 52.021 §9.4.64 Get Attribute Response Info
Related: OS#3624
Change-Id: Ie61d70bc28427d5d879638516a36f590ce98bdc7
Spec compliant format is defined in:
* 3GPP TS 52.021 §8.11.3 "Get Attribute Response"
* 3GPP TS 52.021 §9.4.64 "Get Attribute Response Info".
On nanoBTS, however, reported attribute list is provided directly inside/after
the foh header instead of being enveloped inside the Get Attributes Response Info.
Furthermore, The Get Attributes Response Info can still appear and be at any position
in the reported attribute list, and it only contains the unreported
attribute ID list inside.
Change-Id: I81a613d53bddf432a79fa5cb0bf9d847b4bdee37
nanoBTS actually supports regular formatting. There are a few differences
with spec though:
* The attributes are listed directly in the message instead of being inside
the Get Attributes Response Info after the unsupported attribute ID list.
* The Get Attributes Response Info can be at any position in the
attribute list, and it only contains the unsupported attribute ID list.
As a result, parsing is currently split into 3 main parts or functions:
* Parsing regular (per spec) Get Attributes Response Info attr and get a
pointer to the list of attributes.
* A function that parses the list of attributes, called directly in case
of nanoBTS, and called by the former parser of Get Attributes Response
Info for regular (per spec) OML endpoints.
* A function to parse the unsupported attribute ID list, also used in the
first function to get a pointer to the list of attributes.
Related: OS#3624
Change-Id: I52e9f177c14fec1ec3f5c4ddb244594409008357
* Allow sending Get Attributes message in abis_nm_get_attr.
* Don't try to decode Get Attribute Response Info for nanoBTS, since it
uses a different formatting than the one defined in specs.
Related: OS#3624
Change-Id: I53d01e73791cf5450aa34b1ac8f051730e3a70f9
nanoBTS uses same format for the attribute list from Attribute Response
Info, but without using the later as an evelope. By splitting we can
later reuse the code handling the Attribute list.
While at it, take the chance to remove functions parse_attr_resp_info_*
which expect TLVs following an specific order, which is not mandatory.
Related: OS#3624
Change-Id: Iec7a6e4d27639d0e5adc0d9a01cd3c3e7a46f558
In future commits, nanoBTS support will be added, which implements its
own format not exactly equal to specs Attribute Response Info.
Related: OS#3624
Change-Id: I346dacc58faac70e6d224ca49484f9211cb8a046
Neels Hofmeyr
Martin Hauke
Pau Espin