cellular-infrastructure
/
osmo-bsc
mirror of https://gerrit.osmocom.org/osmo-bsc
9
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Cosmetic: lchan_fsm: drop obsolete comment 

Neels wrote:
> i guess we can drop this comment now, it is a remnant from separating
> osmo-nitb -> osmo-bsc + osmo-ms

Change-Id: I2ce4d691715c1ea5c7c7896693a03b0aefbdb5b9
This commit is contained in:
Oliver Smith 2022-11-22 17:17:30 +01:00 committed by osmith
parent 27cb5d3e24
commit adb55f1fe0
1 changed files with 0 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
src/osmo-bsc/lchan_fsm.c
View File

@ -1530,16 +1530,6 @@ static void lchan_fsm_borken(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi, uint32_t event, void *dat
lchan->release.rsl_error_cause = RSL_ERR_INTERWORKING;
lchan->release.rr_cause = bsc_gsm48_rr_cause_from_rsl_cause(lchan->release.rsl_error_cause);
lchan_fsm_state_chg(LCHAN_ST_WAIT_AFTER_ERROR);
/* TODO: we used to do this only for sysmobts:
int do_free = is_osmobts(ts->trx->bts);
LOGP(DRSL, LOGL_NOTICE,
"%s CHAN REL ACK for broken channel. %s.\n",
gsm_lchan_name(lchan),
do_free ? "Releasing it" : "Keeping it broken");
if (do_free)
do_lchan_free(lchan);
* Clarify the reason. If a BTS sends a RF Chan Rel ACK, we can consider it released,
* independently from the BTS model, right?? */
return;
case LCHAN_EV_RTP_RELEASED: