osmo-bsc/tests/handover/handover_test.c

1694 lines
49 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* (C) 2013 by Andreas Eversberg <jolly@eversberg.eu>
* All Rights Reserved
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <osmocom/core/application.h>
#include <osmocom/core/select.h>
#include <osmocom/core/talloc.h>
#include <osmocom/mgcp_client/mgcp_client_fsm.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/abis_rsl.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/debug.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/bsc_subscriber.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/chan_alloc.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/handover_decision.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/system_information.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/handover_cfg.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/handover_decision_2.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/common_bsc.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/bss.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/bsc_api.h>
#include <osmocom/bsc/osmo_bsc.h>
introduce an osmo_fsm for gsm_subscriber_connection In the current implementation of osmo-bsc, the subscriber connection is not handled (very) statefully. However, there is some state keeping in the code that handles the mgcp connection, but there are still to much loose ends which allow odd situations to happen, which then lead severe error situations (see also closes tags at the end) This commit adds a number of improvements to fix those problems. - Use an osmo-fsm to control the gsm_subscriber_connection state and make sure that certain operations can only take place at certain states (e.g let connection oriented SCCP traffic only pass when an SCCP connection actually exists. Remove the old osmo_bsc_mgcp.c code. Use the recently developed MGCP client FSM to handle the MGCP connections. Also make sure that stuff that already works does not break. This in particular refers to the internal handover capability and the respective unit-tests. See also OS#2823, OS#2768 and OS#2898 - Fix logic to permit assignment to a signalling channel. (OS#2762) - Introduce T993210 to release lchan + subscr_conn if MSC fails to respond The GSM specs don't have an explicit timer for this, so let's introdcue a custom timer (hence starting with 99). This timeout catches the following situation: * we send a SCCP CR with COMPL_L3_INFO from the MS to the MSC, * the MSC doesn't respond (e.g. SCCP routing failure, program down, ...) The MS is supposed to timeout with T3210, 3220 or 3230. But the BSC shouldn't trust the MS but have some timer on its own. SCCP would have a timer T(conn est), but that one is specified to be 1-2min and hence rather long. See also: OS#2775 - Terminate bsc_subscr_conn_fsm on SCCP N-DISC.ind from MSC If the MSC is disconnecting the SCCP channel, we must terminate the FSM which in turn will release all lchan's and other state. This makes TC_chan_rel_hard_rlsd pass, see also OS#2731 As a side-effect, this fixes TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_refused(), where the MSC is answering with CREF to our CR/COMPL_L3. - Release subscriber connection on RLL RELEASE IND of SAPI0 on main DCCH The subscriber connection isn't really useful for anything after the SAPI0 main signalling link has been released. We could try to re-establish, but our best option is probably simply releasing the subscriber_conn and anything related to it. This will make TC_chan_rel_rll_rel_ind pass, see also OS#2730 This commit has been tested using the BSC_Tests TTCN3 testsuit and the following tests were passed: TC_chan_act_noreply TC_chan_act_ack_noest TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_noreply TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_refused TC_chan_act_nack TC_chan_exhaustion TC_ctrl TC_chan_rel_conn_fail TC_chan_rel_hard_clear TC_chan_rel_hard_rlsd TC_chan_rel_a_reset TC_rll_est_ind_inact_lchan TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sapi1 TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sapi3 TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sacch TC_assignment_cic_only TC_assignment_csd TC_assignment_ctm TC_assignment_fr_a5_0 TC_assignment_fr_a5_1_codec_missing TC_assignment_fr_a5_1 TC_assignment_fr_a5_3 TC_assignment_fr_a5_4 TC_paging_imsi_nochan TC_paging_tmsi_nochan TC_paging_tmsi_any TC_paging_tmsi_sdcch TC_paging_tmsi_tch_f TC_paging_tmsi_tch_hf TC_paging_imsi_nochan_cgi TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac_ci TC_paging_imsi_nochan_ci TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lai TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac TC_paging_imsi_nochan_all TC_paging_imsi_nochan_plmn_lac_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lacs TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lacs_empty TC_paging_imsi_a_reset TC_paging_counter TC_rsl_drop_counter TC_classmark TC_unsol_ass_fail TC_unsol_ass_compl TC_unsol_ho_fail TC_err_82_short_msg TC_ho_int Authors: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> Philipp Maier <pmaier@sysmocom.de> Neels Hofmeyr <neels@hofmeyr.de> Closes: OS#2730 Closes: OS#2731 Closes: OS#2762 Closes: OS#2768 Closes: OS#2775 Closes: OS#2823 Closes: OS#2898 Closes: OS#2936 Change-Id: I68286d26e2014048b054f39ef29c35fef420cc97
2018-01-28 02:04:16 +00:00
#include <osmocom/bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.h>
struct gsm_network *bsc_gsmnet;
introduce an osmo_fsm for gsm_subscriber_connection In the current implementation of osmo-bsc, the subscriber connection is not handled (very) statefully. However, there is some state keeping in the code that handles the mgcp connection, but there are still to much loose ends which allow odd situations to happen, which then lead severe error situations (see also closes tags at the end) This commit adds a number of improvements to fix those problems. - Use an osmo-fsm to control the gsm_subscriber_connection state and make sure that certain operations can only take place at certain states (e.g let connection oriented SCCP traffic only pass when an SCCP connection actually exists. Remove the old osmo_bsc_mgcp.c code. Use the recently developed MGCP client FSM to handle the MGCP connections. Also make sure that stuff that already works does not break. This in particular refers to the internal handover capability and the respective unit-tests. See also OS#2823, OS#2768 and OS#2898 - Fix logic to permit assignment to a signalling channel. (OS#2762) - Introduce T993210 to release lchan + subscr_conn if MSC fails to respond The GSM specs don't have an explicit timer for this, so let's introdcue a custom timer (hence starting with 99). This timeout catches the following situation: * we send a SCCP CR with COMPL_L3_INFO from the MS to the MSC, * the MSC doesn't respond (e.g. SCCP routing failure, program down, ...) The MS is supposed to timeout with T3210, 3220 or 3230. But the BSC shouldn't trust the MS but have some timer on its own. SCCP would have a timer T(conn est), but that one is specified to be 1-2min and hence rather long. See also: OS#2775 - Terminate bsc_subscr_conn_fsm on SCCP N-DISC.ind from MSC If the MSC is disconnecting the SCCP channel, we must terminate the FSM which in turn will release all lchan's and other state. This makes TC_chan_rel_hard_rlsd pass, see also OS#2731 As a side-effect, this fixes TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_refused(), where the MSC is answering with CREF to our CR/COMPL_L3. - Release subscriber connection on RLL RELEASE IND of SAPI0 on main DCCH The subscriber connection isn't really useful for anything after the SAPI0 main signalling link has been released. We could try to re-establish, but our best option is probably simply releasing the subscriber_conn and anything related to it. This will make TC_chan_rel_rll_rel_ind pass, see also OS#2730 This commit has been tested using the BSC_Tests TTCN3 testsuit and the following tests were passed: TC_chan_act_noreply TC_chan_act_ack_noest TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_noreply TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_refused TC_chan_act_nack TC_chan_exhaustion TC_ctrl TC_chan_rel_conn_fail TC_chan_rel_hard_clear TC_chan_rel_hard_rlsd TC_chan_rel_a_reset TC_rll_est_ind_inact_lchan TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sapi1 TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sapi3 TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sacch TC_assignment_cic_only TC_assignment_csd TC_assignment_ctm TC_assignment_fr_a5_0 TC_assignment_fr_a5_1_codec_missing TC_assignment_fr_a5_1 TC_assignment_fr_a5_3 TC_assignment_fr_a5_4 TC_paging_imsi_nochan TC_paging_tmsi_nochan TC_paging_tmsi_any TC_paging_tmsi_sdcch TC_paging_tmsi_tch_f TC_paging_tmsi_tch_hf TC_paging_imsi_nochan_cgi TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac_ci TC_paging_imsi_nochan_ci TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lai TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac TC_paging_imsi_nochan_all TC_paging_imsi_nochan_plmn_lac_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lacs TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lacs_empty TC_paging_imsi_a_reset TC_paging_counter TC_rsl_drop_counter TC_classmark TC_unsol_ass_fail TC_unsol_ass_compl TC_unsol_ho_fail TC_err_82_short_msg TC_ho_int Authors: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> Philipp Maier <pmaier@sysmocom.de> Neels Hofmeyr <neels@hofmeyr.de> Closes: OS#2730 Closes: OS#2731 Closes: OS#2762 Closes: OS#2768 Closes: OS#2775 Closes: OS#2823 Closes: OS#2898 Closes: OS#2936 Change-Id: I68286d26e2014048b054f39ef29c35fef420cc97
2018-01-28 02:04:16 +00:00
/* override, requires '-Wl,--wrap=mgcp_conn_modify'.
* Catch modification of an MGCP connection. */
int __real_mgcp_conn_modify(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi, uint32_t parent_evt, struct mgcp_conn_peer *conn_peer);
int __wrap_mgcp_conn_modify(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi, uint32_t parent_evt, struct mgcp_conn_peer *conn_peer)
{
/* CAUTION HACK:
*
* The pointer fi is misused to pass a reference to GSCON FSM !
*
* This function is called from gscon_fsm_wait_ho_compl() from
* bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c when GSCON_EV_HO_COMPL is dispatched to the
* GSCON FSM. By then, the GSCON FSM has already changed to the state
* ST_WAIT_MDCX_BTS_HO (see gscon_fsm_wait_mdcx_bts_ho()) and waits for
* GSCON_EV_MGW_MDCX_RESP_BTS. The signal GSCON_EV_MGW_MDCX_RESP_BTS
* is sent to this function using the parameter parent_evt. So we
* implicitly know the event that is needed to simulate a successful
* MGW negotiation to the GSCON FSM. All we need to do is to dispatch
* parent_evt back to the GSCON FSM in order to make it think that the
* MGW negotiation is done.
*
* Unfortunately, there is a problem with this test implementation.
* in order to simplfy the test we do not allocate any MGCP Client
* FSM but the GSCON FSM will call this function with the fi pointer
* pointing to the MGCP Client FSM. This means we get a nullpointer
* here and there is no way to distinguish which GSCON FSM called
* the function at all (normally we would know through the parent
* pointer).
*
* To get around this problem we populate the fi pointer with the
* reference to the GSCON FSM itsself, so we can know who called the
* function. This is a misuse of the pointer since it normally would
* hold an MGCP Client FSM instead of a GSCON FSM.
*
* See also note in function create_conn() */
osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(fi, parent_evt, NULL);
return 0;
}
/* override, requires '-Wl,--wrap=mgcp_conn_delete'.
* Catch deletion of an MGCP connection. */
int __real_mgcp_conn_delete(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi);
int __wrap_mgcp_conn_delete(struct osmo_fsm_inst *fi)
{
/* Just do nothing and pretend that everything went well.
* We never have allocatec any MGCP connections. */
return 0;
}
/* measurement report */
uint8_t meas_rep_ba = 0, meas_rep_valid = 1, meas_valid = 1, meas_multi_rep = 0;
uint8_t meas_dl_rxlev = 0, meas_dl_rxqual = 0;
uint8_t meas_ul_rxlev = 0, meas_ul_rxqual = 0;
uint8_t meas_tx_power_ms = 0, meas_tx_power_bs = 0, meas_ta_ms = 0;
uint8_t meas_dtx_ms = 0, meas_dtx_bs = 0, meas_nr = 0;
uint8_t meas_num_nc = 0, meas_rxlev_nc[6], meas_bsic_nc[6], meas_bcch_f_nc[6];
static void gen_meas_rep(struct gsm_lchan *lchan)
{
struct msgb *msg = msgb_alloc_headroom(256, 64, "RSL");
struct abis_rsl_dchan_hdr *dh;
uint8_t chan_nr = gsm_lchan2chan_nr(lchan);
uint8_t ulm[3], l1i[2], *buf;
struct gsm48_hdr *gh;
struct gsm48_meas_res *mr;
dh = (struct abis_rsl_dchan_hdr *) msgb_put(msg, sizeof(*dh));
dh->c.msg_discr = ABIS_RSL_MDISC_DED_CHAN;
dh->c.msg_type = RSL_MT_MEAS_RES;
dh->ie_chan = RSL_IE_CHAN_NR;
dh->chan_nr = chan_nr;
msgb_tv_put(msg, RSL_IE_MEAS_RES_NR, meas_nr++);
ulm[0] = meas_ul_rxlev | (meas_dtx_bs << 7);
ulm[1] = meas_ul_rxlev;
ulm[2] = (meas_ul_rxqual << 3) | meas_ul_rxqual;
msgb_tlv_put(msg, RSL_IE_UPLINK_MEAS, sizeof(ulm), ulm);
msgb_tv_put(msg, RSL_IE_BS_POWER, meas_tx_power_bs);
l1i[0] = 0;
l1i[1] = meas_ta_ms;
msgb_tv_fixed_put(msg, RSL_IE_L1_INFO, sizeof(l1i), l1i);
buf = msgb_put(msg, 3);
buf[0] = RSL_IE_L3_INFO;
buf[1] = (sizeof(*gh) + sizeof(*mr)) >> 8;
buf[2] = (sizeof(*gh) + sizeof(*mr)) & 0xff;
gh = (struct gsm48_hdr *) msgb_put(msg, sizeof(*gh));
mr = (struct gsm48_meas_res *) msgb_put(msg, sizeof(*mr));
gh->proto_discr = GSM48_PDISC_RR;
gh->msg_type = GSM48_MT_RR_MEAS_REP;
/* measurement results */
mr->rxlev_full = meas_dl_rxlev;
mr->rxlev_sub = meas_dl_rxlev;
mr->rxqual_full = meas_dl_rxqual;
mr->rxqual_sub = meas_dl_rxqual;
mr->dtx_used = meas_dtx_ms;
mr->ba_used = meas_rep_ba;
mr->meas_valid = !meas_valid; /* 0 = valid */
if (meas_rep_valid) {
mr->no_nc_n_hi = meas_num_nc >> 2;
mr->no_nc_n_lo = meas_num_nc & 3;
} else {
/* no results for serving cells */
mr->no_nc_n_hi = 1;
mr->no_nc_n_lo = 3;
}
mr->rxlev_nc1 = meas_rxlev_nc[0];
mr->rxlev_nc2_hi = meas_rxlev_nc[1] >> 1;
mr->rxlev_nc2_lo = meas_rxlev_nc[1] & 1;
mr->rxlev_nc3_hi = meas_rxlev_nc[2] >> 2;
mr->rxlev_nc3_lo = meas_rxlev_nc[2] & 3;
mr->rxlev_nc4_hi = meas_rxlev_nc[3] >> 3;
mr->rxlev_nc4_lo = meas_rxlev_nc[3] & 7;
mr->rxlev_nc5_hi = meas_rxlev_nc[4] >> 4;
mr->rxlev_nc5_lo = meas_rxlev_nc[4] & 15;
mr->rxlev_nc6_hi = meas_rxlev_nc[5] >> 5;
mr->rxlev_nc6_lo = meas_rxlev_nc[5] & 31;
mr->bsic_nc1_hi = meas_bsic_nc[0] >> 3;
mr->bsic_nc1_lo = meas_bsic_nc[0] & 7;
mr->bsic_nc2_hi = meas_bsic_nc[1] >> 4;
mr->bsic_nc2_lo = meas_bsic_nc[1] & 15;
mr->bsic_nc3_hi = meas_bsic_nc[2] >> 5;
mr->bsic_nc3_lo = meas_bsic_nc[2] & 31;
mr->bsic_nc4 = meas_bsic_nc[3];
mr->bsic_nc5 = meas_bsic_nc[4];
mr->bsic_nc6 = meas_bsic_nc[5];
mr->bcch_f_nc1 = meas_bcch_f_nc[0];
mr->bcch_f_nc2 = meas_bcch_f_nc[1];
mr->bcch_f_nc3 = meas_bcch_f_nc[2];
mr->bcch_f_nc4 = meas_bcch_f_nc[3];
mr->bcch_f_nc5_hi = meas_bcch_f_nc[4] >> 1;
mr->bcch_f_nc5_lo = meas_bcch_f_nc[4] & 1;
mr->bcch_f_nc6_hi = meas_bcch_f_nc[5] >> 2;
mr->bcch_f_nc6_lo = meas_bcch_f_nc[5] & 3;
msg->dst = lchan->ts->trx->bts->c0->rsl_link;
msg->l2h = (unsigned char *)dh;
msg->l3h = (unsigned char *)gh;
abis_rsl_rcvmsg(msg);
}
static struct gsm_bts *create_bts(int arfcn)
{
struct gsm_bts *bts;
struct e1inp_sign_link *rsl_link;
int i;
bts = gsm_bts_alloc_register(bsc_gsmnet, GSM_BTS_TYPE_OSMOBTS, 0x3f);
if (!bts) {
printf("No resource for bts1\n");
return NULL;
}
bts->location_area_code = 23;
bts->c0->arfcn = arfcn;
bts->codec.efr = 1;
bts->codec.hr = 1;
bts->codec.amr = 1;
rsl_link = talloc_zero(0, struct e1inp_sign_link);
rsl_link->trx = bts->c0;
bts->c0->rsl_link = rsl_link;
bts->c0->mo.nm_state.operational = NM_OPSTATE_ENABLED;
bts->c0->mo.nm_state.availability = NM_AVSTATE_OK;
bts->c0->bb_transc.mo.nm_state.operational = NM_OPSTATE_ENABLED;
bts->c0->bb_transc.mo.nm_state.availability = NM_AVSTATE_OK;
/* 4 full rate and 4 half rate channels */
for (i = 1; i <= 6; i++) {
bts->c0->ts[i].pchan =
(i < 5) ? GSM_PCHAN_TCH_F : GSM_PCHAN_TCH_H;
bts->c0->ts[i].mo.nm_state.operational = NM_OPSTATE_ENABLED;
bts->c0->ts[i].mo.nm_state.availability = NM_AVSTATE_OK;
bts->c0->ts[i].lchan[0].type = GSM_LCHAN_NONE;
bts->c0->ts[i].lchan[0].state = LCHAN_S_NONE;
bts->c0->ts[i].lchan[1].type = GSM_LCHAN_NONE;
bts->c0->ts[i].lchan[1].state = LCHAN_S_NONE;
}
return bts;
}
void create_conn(struct gsm_lchan *lchan)
{
introduce an osmo_fsm for gsm_subscriber_connection In the current implementation of osmo-bsc, the subscriber connection is not handled (very) statefully. However, there is some state keeping in the code that handles the mgcp connection, but there are still to much loose ends which allow odd situations to happen, which then lead severe error situations (see also closes tags at the end) This commit adds a number of improvements to fix those problems. - Use an osmo-fsm to control the gsm_subscriber_connection state and make sure that certain operations can only take place at certain states (e.g let connection oriented SCCP traffic only pass when an SCCP connection actually exists. Remove the old osmo_bsc_mgcp.c code. Use the recently developed MGCP client FSM to handle the MGCP connections. Also make sure that stuff that already works does not break. This in particular refers to the internal handover capability and the respective unit-tests. See also OS#2823, OS#2768 and OS#2898 - Fix logic to permit assignment to a signalling channel. (OS#2762) - Introduce T993210 to release lchan + subscr_conn if MSC fails to respond The GSM specs don't have an explicit timer for this, so let's introdcue a custom timer (hence starting with 99). This timeout catches the following situation: * we send a SCCP CR with COMPL_L3_INFO from the MS to the MSC, * the MSC doesn't respond (e.g. SCCP routing failure, program down, ...) The MS is supposed to timeout with T3210, 3220 or 3230. But the BSC shouldn't trust the MS but have some timer on its own. SCCP would have a timer T(conn est), but that one is specified to be 1-2min and hence rather long. See also: OS#2775 - Terminate bsc_subscr_conn_fsm on SCCP N-DISC.ind from MSC If the MSC is disconnecting the SCCP channel, we must terminate the FSM which in turn will release all lchan's and other state. This makes TC_chan_rel_hard_rlsd pass, see also OS#2731 As a side-effect, this fixes TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_refused(), where the MSC is answering with CREF to our CR/COMPL_L3. - Release subscriber connection on RLL RELEASE IND of SAPI0 on main DCCH The subscriber connection isn't really useful for anything after the SAPI0 main signalling link has been released. We could try to re-establish, but our best option is probably simply releasing the subscriber_conn and anything related to it. This will make TC_chan_rel_rll_rel_ind pass, see also OS#2730 This commit has been tested using the BSC_Tests TTCN3 testsuit and the following tests were passed: TC_chan_act_noreply TC_chan_act_ack_noest TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_noreply TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_refused TC_chan_act_nack TC_chan_exhaustion TC_ctrl TC_chan_rel_conn_fail TC_chan_rel_hard_clear TC_chan_rel_hard_rlsd TC_chan_rel_a_reset TC_rll_est_ind_inact_lchan TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sapi1 TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sapi3 TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sacch TC_assignment_cic_only TC_assignment_csd TC_assignment_ctm TC_assignment_fr_a5_0 TC_assignment_fr_a5_1_codec_missing TC_assignment_fr_a5_1 TC_assignment_fr_a5_3 TC_assignment_fr_a5_4 TC_paging_imsi_nochan TC_paging_tmsi_nochan TC_paging_tmsi_any TC_paging_tmsi_sdcch TC_paging_tmsi_tch_f TC_paging_tmsi_tch_hf TC_paging_imsi_nochan_cgi TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac_ci TC_paging_imsi_nochan_ci TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lai TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac TC_paging_imsi_nochan_all TC_paging_imsi_nochan_plmn_lac_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lacs TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lacs_empty TC_paging_imsi_a_reset TC_paging_counter TC_rsl_drop_counter TC_classmark TC_unsol_ass_fail TC_unsol_ass_compl TC_unsol_ho_fail TC_err_82_short_msg TC_ho_int Authors: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> Philipp Maier <pmaier@sysmocom.de> Neels Hofmeyr <neels@hofmeyr.de> Closes: OS#2730 Closes: OS#2731 Closes: OS#2762 Closes: OS#2768 Closes: OS#2775 Closes: OS#2823 Closes: OS#2898 Closes: OS#2936 Change-Id: I68286d26e2014048b054f39ef29c35fef420cc97
2018-01-28 02:04:16 +00:00
struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn;
conn = bsc_subscr_con_allocate(lchan->ts->trx->bts->network);
/* CAUTION HACK: When __real_mgcp_conn_modify() is called by the GSCON
* FSM, then we need to know the reference to caller FSM (GSCON FSM).
* Unfortunately the function __real_mgcp_conn_modify() is called with
* fi_bts, which is unpopulated in this setup. The real function would
* perform the communication with the MGW and then dispatch a signal
* back to the parent FSM. Since we do not have all that in this setup
* we populate the fi_bts pointer with a reference to the GSCON FSM in
* order to have it available later in __real_mgcp_conn_modify(). */
conn->user_plane.fi_bts = conn->fi;
lchan->conn = conn;
conn->lchan = lchan;
/* kick the FSM from INIT through to the ACTIVE state */
osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(conn->fi, GSCON_EV_A_CONN_REQ, NULL);
osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(conn->fi, GSCON_EV_A_CONN_CFM, NULL);
}
/* create lchan */
struct gsm_lchan *create_lchan(struct gsm_bts *bts, int full_rate, char *codec)
{
struct gsm_lchan *lchan;
lchan = lchan_alloc(bts,
(full_rate) ? GSM_LCHAN_TCH_F : GSM_LCHAN_TCH_H, 0);
if (!lchan) {
printf("No resource for lchan\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
lchan->state = LCHAN_S_ACTIVE;
create_conn(lchan);
if (!strcasecmp(codec, "FR") && full_rate)
lchan->tch_mode = GSM48_CMODE_SPEECH_V1;
else if (!strcasecmp(codec, "HR") && !full_rate)
lchan->tch_mode = GSM48_CMODE_SPEECH_V1;
else if (!strcasecmp(codec, "EFR") && full_rate)
lchan->tch_mode = GSM48_CMODE_SPEECH_EFR;
else if (!strcasecmp(codec, "AMR"))
lchan->tch_mode = GSM48_CMODE_SPEECH_AMR;
else {
printf("Given codec unknown\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
lchan->conn->codec_list = (struct gsm0808_speech_codec_list){
.codec = {
{ .fi=true, .type=GSM0808_SCT_FR1, },
{ .fi=true, .type=GSM0808_SCT_FR2, },
{ .fi=true, .type=GSM0808_SCT_FR3, },
{ .fi=true, .type=GSM0808_SCT_HR1, },
{ .fi=true, .type=GSM0808_SCT_HR3, },
},
.len = 5,
};
lchan->conn->codec_list_present = true;
return lchan;
}
/* parse channel request */
static int got_chan_req = 0;
static struct gsm_lchan *chan_req_lchan = NULL;
static int parse_chan_act(struct gsm_lchan *lchan, uint8_t *data)
{
chan_req_lchan = lchan;
return 0;
}
static int parse_chan_rel(struct gsm_lchan *lchan, uint8_t *data)
{
chan_req_lchan = lchan;
return 0;
}
/* parse handover request */
static int got_ho_req = 0;
static struct gsm_lchan *ho_req_lchan = NULL;
static int parse_ho_command(struct gsm_lchan *lchan, uint8_t *data, int len)
{
struct gsm48_hdr *gh = (struct gsm48_hdr *) data;
struct gsm48_ho_cmd *ho = (struct gsm48_ho_cmd *) gh->data;
int arfcn;
struct gsm_bts *neigh;
switch (gh->msg_type) {
case GSM48_MT_RR_HANDO_CMD:
arfcn = (ho->cell_desc.arfcn_hi << 8) | ho->cell_desc.arfcn_lo;
/* look up trx. since every dummy bts uses different arfcn and
* only one trx, it is simple */
llist_for_each_entry(neigh, &bsc_gsmnet->bts_list, list) {
if (neigh->c0->arfcn != arfcn)
continue;
ho_req_lchan = lchan;
return 0;
}
break;
case GSM48_MT_RR_ASS_CMD:
ho_req_lchan = lchan;
return 0;
break;
default:
fprintf(stderr, "Error, expecting HO or AS command\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
return -1;
}
/* send channel activation ack */
static void send_chan_act_ack(struct gsm_lchan *lchan, int act)
{
struct msgb *msg = msgb_alloc_headroom(256, 64, "RSL");
struct abis_rsl_dchan_hdr *dh;
dh = (struct abis_rsl_dchan_hdr *) msgb_put(msg, sizeof(*dh));
dh->c.msg_discr = ABIS_RSL_MDISC_DED_CHAN;
dh->c.msg_type = (act) ? RSL_MT_CHAN_ACTIV_ACK : RSL_MT_RF_CHAN_REL_ACK;
dh->ie_chan = RSL_IE_CHAN_NR;
dh->chan_nr = gsm_lchan2chan_nr(lchan);
msg->dst = lchan->ts->trx->bts->c0->rsl_link;
msg->l2h = (unsigned char *)dh;
abis_rsl_rcvmsg(msg);
}
/* send handover complete */
static void send_ho_complete(struct gsm_lchan *lchan, bool success)
{
struct msgb *msg = msgb_alloc_headroom(256, 64, "RSL");
struct abis_rsl_rll_hdr *rh;
uint8_t chan_nr = gsm_lchan2chan_nr(lchan);
uint8_t *buf;
struct gsm48_hdr *gh;
struct gsm48_ho_cpl *hc;
rh = (struct abis_rsl_rll_hdr *) msgb_put(msg, sizeof(*rh));
rh->c.msg_discr = ABIS_RSL_MDISC_RLL;
rh->c.msg_type = RSL_MT_DATA_IND;
rh->ie_chan = RSL_IE_CHAN_NR;
rh->chan_nr = chan_nr;
rh->ie_link_id = RSL_IE_LINK_IDENT;
rh->link_id = 0x00;
buf = msgb_put(msg, 3);
buf[0] = RSL_IE_L3_INFO;
buf[1] = (sizeof(*gh) + sizeof(*hc)) >> 8;
buf[2] = (sizeof(*gh) + sizeof(*hc)) & 0xff;
gh = (struct gsm48_hdr *) msgb_put(msg, sizeof(*gh));
hc = (struct gsm48_ho_cpl *) msgb_put(msg, sizeof(*hc));
gh->proto_discr = GSM48_PDISC_RR;
gh->msg_type =
success ? GSM48_MT_RR_HANDO_COMPL : GSM48_MT_RR_HANDO_FAIL;
msg->dst = lchan->ts->trx->bts->c0->rsl_link;
msg->l2h = (unsigned char *)rh;
msg->l3h = (unsigned char *)gh;
abis_rsl_rcvmsg(msg);
}
/* override, requires '-Wl,--wrap=abis_rsl_sendmsg'.
* Catch RSL messages sent towards the BTS. */
int __real_abis_rsl_sendmsg(struct msgb *msg);
int __wrap_abis_rsl_sendmsg(struct msgb *msg)
{
struct abis_rsl_dchan_hdr *dh = (struct abis_rsl_dchan_hdr *) msg->data;
struct e1inp_sign_link *sign_link = msg->dst;
int rc;
struct gsm_lchan *lchan = rsl_lchan_lookup(sign_link->trx, dh->chan_nr, &rc);
if (rc) {
printf("rsl_lchan_lookup() failed\n");
exit(1);
}
switch (dh->c.msg_type) {
case RSL_MT_CHAN_ACTIV:
rc = parse_chan_act(lchan, dh->data);
if (rc == 0)
got_chan_req = 1;
break;
case RSL_MT_RF_CHAN_REL:
rc = parse_chan_rel(lchan, dh->data);
if (rc == 0)
send_chan_act_ack(chan_req_lchan, 0);
break;
case RSL_MT_DATA_REQ:
rc = parse_ho_command(lchan, msg->l3h, msgb_l3len(msg));
if (rc == 0)
got_ho_req = 1;
break;
case RSL_MT_IPAC_CRCX:
break;
default:
printf("unknown rsl message=0x%x\n", dh->c.msg_type);
}
return 0;
}
/* test cases */
static char *test_case_0[] = {
"2",
"Stay in better cell\n\n"
"There are many neighbor cells, but only the current cell is the best\n"
"cell, so no handover is performed\n",
"create-bts", "7",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","0",
"6","0","20","1","21","2","18","3","20","4","23","5","19",
"expect-no-chan",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_1[] = {
"2",
"Handover to best better cell\n\n"
"The best neighbor cell is selected\n",
"create-bts", "7",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "10","0",
"6","0","20","1","21","2","18","3","20","4","23","5","19",
"expect-chan", "5", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_2[] = {
"2",
"Handover and Assignment must be enabled\n\n"
"This test will start with disabled assignment and handover. A\n"
"better neighbor cell (assignment enabled) will not be selected and \n"
"also no assignment from TCH/H to TCH/F to improve quality. There\n"
"will be no handover nor assignment. After enabling assignment on the\n"
"current cell, the MS will assign to TCH/F. After enabling handover\n"
"in the current cell, but disabling in the neighbor cell, handover\n"
"will not be performed, until it is enabled in the neighbor cell too.\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"afs-rxlev-improve", "0", "5",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"as-enable", "0", "0",
"ho-enable", "0", "0",
"meas-rep", "0", "0","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"as-enable", "0", "1",
"meas-rep", "0", "0","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "0", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "5",
"ho-complete",
"ho-enable", "0", "1",
"ho-enable", "1", "0",
"meas-rep", "0", "0","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"ho-enable", "1", "1",
"meas-rep", "0", "0","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_3[] = {
"2",
"Penalty timer must not run\n\n"
"The MS will try to handover to a better cell, but this will fail.\n"
"Even though the cell is still better, handover will not be performed\n"
"due to penalty timer after handover failure\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-failed",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_4[] = {
"2",
"TCH/H keeping with HR codec\n\n"
"The MS is using half rate V1 codec, but the better cell is congested\n"
"at TCH/H slots. As the congestion is removed, the handover takes\n"
"place.\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/H", "4",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "HR",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/H", "3",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "5",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "5",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_5[] = {
"2",
"TCH/F keeping with FR codec\n\n"
"The MS is using full rate V1 codec, but the better cell is congested\n"
"at TCH/F slots. As the congestion is removed, the handover takes\n"
"place.\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "4",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "FR",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "3",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_6[] = {
"2",
"TCH/F keeping with EFR codec\n\n"
"The MS is using full rate V2 codec, but the better cell is congested\n"
"at TCH/F slots. As the congestion is removed, the handover takes\n"
"place.\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "4",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "EFR",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "3",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_7[] = {
"2",
"TCH/F to TCH/H changing with AMR codec\n\n"
"The MS is using AMR V3 codec, the better cell is congested at TCH/F\n"
"slots. The handover is performed to non-congested TCH/H slots.\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "4",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "5",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_8[] = {
"2",
"No handover to a cell with no slots available\n\n"
"If no slot is available, no handover is performed\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "0","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_9[] = {
"2",
"No more parallel handovers, if max_unsync_ho is defined\n\n"
"There are tree mobiles that want to handover, but only two can do\n"
"it at a time, because the maximum number is limited to two.\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"set-max-ho", "1", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "0","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"meas-rep", "1", "0","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "2",
"meas-rep", "2", "0","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_10[] = {
"2",
"Hysteresis\n\n"
"If neighbor cell is better, handover is only performed if the\n"
"ammount of improvement is greater or equal hyteresis\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "27","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "26","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_11[] = {
"2",
"No Hysteresis and minimum RX level\n\n"
"If current cell's RX level is below mimium level, handover must be\n"
"performed, no matter of the hysteresis. First do not perform\n"
"handover to better neighbor cell, because the hysteresis is not\n"
"met. Second do not perform handover because better neighbor cell is\n"
"below minimum RX level. Third perform handover because current cell\n"
"is below minimum RX level, even if the better neighbor cell (minimum\n"
"RX level reached) does not meet the hysteresis.\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "10","0", "1","0","11",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "8","0", "1","0","9",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "9","0", "1","0","10",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_12[] = {
"2",
"No handover to congested cell\n\n"
"The better neighbor cell is congested, so no handover is performed.\n"
"After the congestion is over, handover will be performed.\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "4",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/H", "4",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "3",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/H", "3",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_13[] = {
"2",
"Handover to balance congestion\n\n"
"The current and the better cell are congested, so no handover is\n"
"performed. This is because handover would congest the neighbor cell\n"
"more. After congestion raises in the current cell, the handover is\n"
"performed to balance congestion\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/F", "4",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/H", "4",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "4",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/H", "4",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_14[] = {
"2",
"Handover to congested cell, if RX level is below minimum\n\n"
"The better neighbor cell is congested, so no handover is performed.\n"
"If the RX level of the current cell drops below minimum acceptable\n"
"level, the handover is performed.\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "4",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/H", "4",
"meas-rep", "0", "10","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "9","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_15[] = {
"2",
"Handover to cell with worse RXLEV, if RXQUAL is below minimum\n\n"
"The neighbor cell has worse RXLEV, so no handover is performed.\n"
"If the RXQUAL of the current cell drops below minimum acceptable\n"
"level, the handover is performed. It is also required that 10\n"
"reports are received, before RXQUAL is checked.\n",
/* (See also test 28, which tests for RXQUAL triggering HO to congested cell.) */
/* TODO: bad RXQUAL may want to prefer assignment within the same cell to avoid interference.
* See Performence Enhancements in a Frequency Hopping GSM Network (Nielsen Wigard 2002), Chapter
* 2.1.1, "Interference" in the list of triggers on p.157. */
"create-bts", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "40","6", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "40","6", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "40","6", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "40","6", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "40","6", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "40","6", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "40","6", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "40","6", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "40","6", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "40","6", "1","0","30",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_16[] = {
"2",
"Handover due to maximum TA exceeded\n\n"
"The MS in the current (best) cell has reached maximum allowed timing\n"
"advance. No handover is performed until the timing advance exceeds\n"
"it. The originating cell is still the best, but no handover is\n"
"performed back to that cell, because the penalty timer (due to\n"
"maximum allowed timing advance) is running.\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"set-max-ta", "0", "5", /* of cell */
"set-ta", "0", "5", /* of ms */
"meas-rep", "0", "30","0", "1","0","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"set-ta", "0", "6", /* of ms */
"meas-rep", "0", "30","0", "1","0","20",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_17[] = {
"2",
"Congestion check: No congestion\n\n"
"Three cells have different number of used slots, but there is no\n"
"congestion in any of these cells. No handover is performed.\n",
"create-bts", "3",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/F", "2",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/H", "2",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "2",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/H", "2",
"set-min-free", "2", "TCH/F", "2",
"set-min-free", "2", "TCH/H", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","0", "2","0","20","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "1", "30","0", "2","0","20","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "2", "30","0", "2","0","20","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "3", "30","0", "2","0","20","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "4", "30","0", "2","0","20","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "5", "30","0", "2","0","20","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"congestion-check",
"expect-no-chan",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_18[] = {
"2",
"Congestion check: One out of three cells is congested\n\n"
"Three cells have different number of used slots, but there is\n"
"congestion at TCH/F in the first cell. Handover is performed with\n"
"the best candidate.\n",
"create-bts", "3",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/F", "2",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/H", "2",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "2",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/H", "2",
"set-min-free", "2", "TCH/F", "2",
"set-min-free", "2", "TCH/H", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","0", "2","0","20","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "1", "30","0", "2","0","20","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "2", "30","0", "2","0","21","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "3", "30","0", "2","0","20","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "4", "30","0", "2","0","20","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "5", "30","0", "2","0","20","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "6", "30","0", "2","0","20","1","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"congestion-check",
"expect-chan", "1", "2",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "3", /* best candidate is MS 2 at BTS 1, TS 3 */
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_19[] = {
"2",
"Congestion check: Balancing over congested cells\n\n"
"Two cells are congested, but the second cell is more congested.\n"
"Handover is performed to solve the congestion.\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/F", "4",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "4",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "FR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "FR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "FR",
"create-ms", "1", "TCH/F", "FR",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","0", "1","0","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "1", "30","0", "1","0","21",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "2", "30","0", "1","0","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "3", "30","0", "1","0","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"congestion-check",
"expect-chan", "1", "2",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "2", /* best candidate is MS 1 at BTS 0, TS 2 */
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_20[] = {
"2",
"Congestion check: Solving congestion by handover TCH/F -> TCH/H\n\n"
"Two BTS, one MS in the first congested BTS must handover to\n"
"non-congested TCH/H of second BTS, in order to solve congestion\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/F", "4",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/H", "4",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "4",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"congestion-check",
"expect-chan", "1", "5",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_21[] = {
"2",
"Congestion check: Balancing congestion by handover TCH/F -> TCH/H\n\n"
"Two BTS, one MS in the first congested BTS must handover to\n"
"less-congested TCH/H of second BTS, in order to balance congestion\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/F", "4",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/H", "4",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "4",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/H", "4",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"congestion-check",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_22[] = {
"2",
"Congestion check: Upgrading worst candidate from TCH/H -> TCH/F\n\n"
"There is only one BTS. The TCH/H slots are congested. Since\n"
"assignment is performed to less-congested TCH/F, the candidate with\n"
"the worst RX level is chosen.\n",
"create-bts", "1",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/F", "4",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/H", "4",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","0", "0",
"meas-rep", "1", "34","0", "0",
"meas-rep", "2", "20","0", "0",
"expect-no-chan",
"congestion-check",
"expect-chan", "0", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "6",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_23[] = {
"2",
"Story: 'A neighbor is your friend'\n",
"create-bts", "3",
"print",
"Andreas is driving along the coast, on a sunny june afternoon.\n"
"Suddenly he is getting a call from his friend and neighbor Axel.\n"
"\n"
"What happens: Two MS are created, #0 for Axel, #1 for Andreas.",
/* Axel */
"create-ms", "2", "TCH/F", "AMR",
/* andreas */
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "1", "40","0", "1","0","30",
"expect-no-chan",
"print",
"Axel asks Andreas if he would like to join them for a barbecue.\n"
"Axel's house is right in the neighborhood and the weather is fine.\n"
"Andreas agrees, so he drives to a close store to buy some barbecue\n"
"skewers.\n"
"\n"
"What happens: While driving, a different cell (mounted atop the\n"
"store) becomes better.",
/* drive to bts 1 */
"meas-rep", "1", "20","0", "1","0","35",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
"print",
"While Andreas is walking into the store, Axel asks, if he could also\n"
"bring some beer. Andreas has problems understanding him: \"I have a\n"
"bad reception here. The cell tower is right atop the store, but poor\n"
"coverage inside. Can you repeat please?\"\n"
"\n"
"What happens: Inside the store the close cell is so bad, that\n"
"handover back to the previous cell is required.",
/* bts 1 becomes bad, so bts 0 helps out */
"meas-rep", "1", "5","0", "1","0","20",
"expect-chan", "0", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "1", "1",
"ho-complete",
"print",
"After Andreas bought skewers and beer, he leaves the store.\n"
"\n"
"What happens: Outside the store the close cell is better again, so\n"
"handover back to the that cell is performed.",
/* bts 1 becomes better again */
"meas-rep", "1", "20","0", "1","0","35",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
"print",
/* bts 2 becomes better */
"Andreas drives down to the lake where Axel's house is.\n"
"\n"
"What happens: There is a small cell at Axel's house, which becomes\n"
"better, because the current cell has no good comverage at the lake.",
"meas-rep", "1", "14","0", "2","0","2","1","63",
"expect-chan", "2", "2",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "1", "1",
"ho-complete",
"print",
"Andreas wonders why he still has good radio coverage: \"Last time it\n"
"was so bad\". Axel says: \"I installed a pico cell in my house,\n"
"now we can use our mobile phones down here at the lake.\"",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_24[] = {
"2",
"No (or not enough) measurements for handover\n\n"
"Do not solve congestion in cell, because there is no measurement.\n"
"As soon as enough measurments available (1 in our case), perform\n"
"handover. Afterwards the old cell becomes congested and the new\n"
"cell is not. Do not perform handover until new measurements are\n"
"received.\n",
/* two cells, first in congested, but no handover */
"create-bts", "2",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/F", "4",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/H", "4",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"congestion-check",
"expect-no-chan",
/* send measurement and trigger congestion check */
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"congestion-check",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
/* congest the first cell and remove congestion from second cell */
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/F", "0",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/H", "0",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "4",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/H", "4",
/* no handover until measurements applied */
"congestion-check",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "20","0", "1","0","20",
"expect-no-chan",
"congestion-check",
"expect-chan", "0", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "1", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_25[] = {
"1",
"Stay in better cell\n\n"
"There are many neighbor cells, but only the current cell is the best\n"
"cell, so no handover is performed\n",
"create-bts", "7",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","0",
"6","0","20","1","21","2","18","3","20","4","23","5","19",
"expect-no-chan",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_26[] = {
"1",
"Handover to best better cell\n\n"
"The best neighbor cell is selected\n",
"create-bts", "7",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "10","0",
"6","0","20","1","21","2","18","3","20","4","23","5","19",
"expect-chan", "5", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_27[] = {
"2",
"Congestion check: Upgrading worst candidate from TCH/H -> TCH/F\n\n"
"There is only one BTS. The TCH/H slots are congested. Since\n"
"assignment is performed to less-congested TCH/F, the candidate with\n"
"the worst RX level is chosen. (So far like test 22.)\n"
"After that, trigger more congestion checks to ensure stability.\n",
"create-bts", "1",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/F", "2",
"set-min-free", "0", "TCH/H", "4",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/H", "AMR",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","0", "0",
"meas-rep", "1", "34","0", "0",
"meas-rep", "2", "20","0", "0",
"expect-no-chan",
"congestion-check",
"expect-chan", "0", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "6",
"ho-complete",
"congestion-check",
"expect-chan", "0", "2",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "5",
"ho-complete",
"congestion-check",
"expect-no-chan",
"congestion-check",
"expect-no-chan",
NULL
};
static char *test_case_28[] = {
"2",
"Handover to congested cell, if RX quality is below minimum\n\n"
"The better neighbor cell is congested, so no handover is performed.\n"
"If the RX quality of the current cell drops below minimum acceptable\n"
"level, the handover is performed. It is also required that 10\n"
"resports are received, before RX quality is checked.\n",
"create-bts", "2",
"create-ms", "0", "TCH/F", "AMR",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/F", "4",
"set-min-free", "1", "TCH/H", "4",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","6", "1","0","40",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","6", "1","0","40",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","6", "1","0","40",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","6", "1","0","40",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","6", "1","0","40",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","6", "1","0","40",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","6", "1","0","40",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","6", "1","0","40",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","6", "1","0","40",
"expect-no-chan",
"meas-rep", "0", "30","6", "1","0","40",
"expect-chan", "1", "1",
"ack-chan",
"expect-ho", "0", "1",
"ho-complete",
NULL
};
static char **test_cases[] = {
test_case_0,
test_case_1,
test_case_2,
test_case_3,
test_case_4,
test_case_5,
test_case_6,
test_case_7,
test_case_8,
test_case_9,
test_case_10,
test_case_11,
test_case_12,
test_case_13,
test_case_14,
test_case_15,
test_case_16,
test_case_17,
test_case_18,
test_case_19,
test_case_20,
test_case_21,
test_case_22,
test_case_23,
test_case_24,
test_case_25,
test_case_26,
test_case_27,
test_case_28,
};
static const struct log_info_cat log_categories[] = {
[DHO] = {
.name = "DHO",
.description = "Hand-Over Process",
.color = "\033[1;38m",
.enabled = 1, .loglevel = LOGL_DEBUG,
},
[DHODEC] = {
.name = "DHODEC",
.description = "Hand-Over Decision",
.color = "\033[1;38m",
.enabled = 1, .loglevel = LOGL_DEBUG,
},
[DMEAS] = {
.name = "DMEAS",
.description = "Radio Measurement Processing",
.enabled = 1, .loglevel = LOGL_DEBUG,
},
[DREF] = {
.name = "DREF",
.description = "Reference Counting",
.enabled = 1, .loglevel = LOGL_DEBUG,
},
[DRSL] = {
.name = "DRSL",
.description = "A-bis Radio Siganlling Link (RSL)",
.color = "\033[1;35m",
.enabled = 1, .loglevel = LOGL_DEBUG,
},
introduce an osmo_fsm for gsm_subscriber_connection In the current implementation of osmo-bsc, the subscriber connection is not handled (very) statefully. However, there is some state keeping in the code that handles the mgcp connection, but there are still to much loose ends which allow odd situations to happen, which then lead severe error situations (see also closes tags at the end) This commit adds a number of improvements to fix those problems. - Use an osmo-fsm to control the gsm_subscriber_connection state and make sure that certain operations can only take place at certain states (e.g let connection oriented SCCP traffic only pass when an SCCP connection actually exists. Remove the old osmo_bsc_mgcp.c code. Use the recently developed MGCP client FSM to handle the MGCP connections. Also make sure that stuff that already works does not break. This in particular refers to the internal handover capability and the respective unit-tests. See also OS#2823, OS#2768 and OS#2898 - Fix logic to permit assignment to a signalling channel. (OS#2762) - Introduce T993210 to release lchan + subscr_conn if MSC fails to respond The GSM specs don't have an explicit timer for this, so let's introdcue a custom timer (hence starting with 99). This timeout catches the following situation: * we send a SCCP CR with COMPL_L3_INFO from the MS to the MSC, * the MSC doesn't respond (e.g. SCCP routing failure, program down, ...) The MS is supposed to timeout with T3210, 3220 or 3230. But the BSC shouldn't trust the MS but have some timer on its own. SCCP would have a timer T(conn est), but that one is specified to be 1-2min and hence rather long. See also: OS#2775 - Terminate bsc_subscr_conn_fsm on SCCP N-DISC.ind from MSC If the MSC is disconnecting the SCCP channel, we must terminate the FSM which in turn will release all lchan's and other state. This makes TC_chan_rel_hard_rlsd pass, see also OS#2731 As a side-effect, this fixes TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_refused(), where the MSC is answering with CREF to our CR/COMPL_L3. - Release subscriber connection on RLL RELEASE IND of SAPI0 on main DCCH The subscriber connection isn't really useful for anything after the SAPI0 main signalling link has been released. We could try to re-establish, but our best option is probably simply releasing the subscriber_conn and anything related to it. This will make TC_chan_rel_rll_rel_ind pass, see also OS#2730 This commit has been tested using the BSC_Tests TTCN3 testsuit and the following tests were passed: TC_chan_act_noreply TC_chan_act_ack_noest TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_noreply TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_refused TC_chan_act_nack TC_chan_exhaustion TC_ctrl TC_chan_rel_conn_fail TC_chan_rel_hard_clear TC_chan_rel_hard_rlsd TC_chan_rel_a_reset TC_rll_est_ind_inact_lchan TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sapi1 TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sapi3 TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sacch TC_assignment_cic_only TC_assignment_csd TC_assignment_ctm TC_assignment_fr_a5_0 TC_assignment_fr_a5_1_codec_missing TC_assignment_fr_a5_1 TC_assignment_fr_a5_3 TC_assignment_fr_a5_4 TC_paging_imsi_nochan TC_paging_tmsi_nochan TC_paging_tmsi_any TC_paging_tmsi_sdcch TC_paging_tmsi_tch_f TC_paging_tmsi_tch_hf TC_paging_imsi_nochan_cgi TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac_ci TC_paging_imsi_nochan_ci TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lai TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac TC_paging_imsi_nochan_all TC_paging_imsi_nochan_plmn_lac_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lacs TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lacs_empty TC_paging_imsi_a_reset TC_paging_counter TC_rsl_drop_counter TC_classmark TC_unsol_ass_fail TC_unsol_ass_compl TC_unsol_ho_fail TC_err_82_short_msg TC_ho_int Authors: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> Philipp Maier <pmaier@sysmocom.de> Neels Hofmeyr <neels@hofmeyr.de> Closes: OS#2730 Closes: OS#2731 Closes: OS#2762 Closes: OS#2768 Closes: OS#2775 Closes: OS#2823 Closes: OS#2898 Closes: OS#2936 Change-Id: I68286d26e2014048b054f39ef29c35fef420cc97
2018-01-28 02:04:16 +00:00
[DMSC] = {
.name = "DMSC",
.description = "Mobile Switching Center",
.enabled = 1, .loglevel = LOGL_DEBUG,
},
};
const struct log_info log_info = {
.cat = log_categories,
.num_cat = ARRAY_SIZE(log_categories),
};
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char **test_case;
struct gsm_bts *bts[256];
int bts_num = 0;
struct gsm_lchan *lchan[256];
int lchan_num = 0;
int i;
int algorithm;
struct bsc_api bsc_api = {};
int test_case_i;
int last_test_i;
test_case_i = argc > 1? atoi(argv[1]) : -1;
last_test_i = ARRAY_SIZE(test_cases) - 1;
if (test_case_i < 0 || test_case_i > last_test_i) {
for (i = 0; i <= last_test_i; i++) {
printf("Test #%d (algorithm %s):\n%s\n", i,
test_cases[i][0], test_cases[i][1]);
}
printf("\nPlease specify test case number 0..%d\n", last_test_i);
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
osmo_init_logging(&log_info);
log_set_print_category(osmo_stderr_target, 1);
log_set_print_category_hex(osmo_stderr_target, 0);
log_set_print_filename2(osmo_stderr_target, LOG_FILENAME_BASENAME);
/* Create a dummy network */
bsc_gsmnet = bsc_network_init(NULL);
if (!bsc_gsmnet)
exit(1);
bsc_api_init(bsc_gsmnet, &bsc_api);
ho_set_algorithm(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 2);
ho_set_ho_active(bsc_gsmnet->ho, true);
ho_set_hodec2_as_active(bsc_gsmnet->ho, true);
ho_set_hodec2_min_rxlev(bsc_gsmnet->ho, -100);
ho_set_hodec2_rxlev_avg_win(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 1);
ho_set_hodec2_rxlev_neigh_avg_win(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 1);
ho_set_hodec2_rxqual_avg_win(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 10);
ho_set_hodec2_pwr_hysteresis(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 3);
ho_set_hodec2_pwr_interval(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 1);
ho_set_hodec2_afs_bias_rxlev(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 0);
ho_set_hodec2_min_rxqual(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 5);
ho_set_hodec2_afs_bias_rxqual(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 0);
ho_set_hodec2_max_distance(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 9999);
ho_set_hodec2_ho_max(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 9999);
ho_set_hodec2_penalty_max_dist(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 300);
ho_set_hodec2_penalty_failed_ho(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 60);
ho_set_hodec2_penalty_failed_as(bsc_gsmnet->ho, 60);
bts_model_sysmobts_init();
test_case = test_cases[test_case_i];
fprintf(stderr, "--------------------\n");
fprintf(stderr, "Performing the following test %d (algorithm %s):\n%s",
test_case_i, test_case[0], test_case[1]);
algorithm = atoi(test_case[0]);
test_case += 2;
fprintf(stderr, "--------------------\n");
/* Disable the congestion check timer, we will trigger manually. */
bsc_gsmnet->hodec2.congestion_check_interval_s = 0;
handover_decision_1_init();
hodec2_init(bsc_gsmnet);
while (*test_case) {
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "create-bts")) {
static int arfcn = 870;
int n = atoi(test_case[1]);
fprintf(stderr, "- Creating %d BTS (one TRX each, "
"TS(1-4) are TCH/F, TS(5-6) are TCH/H)\n", n);
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
bts[bts_num + i] = create_bts(arfcn++);
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (gsm_generate_si(bts[bts_num + i], SYSINFO_TYPE_2))
fprintf(stderr, "Error generating SI2\n");
}
bts_num += n;
test_case += 2;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "as-enable")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Set assignment enable state at "
"BTS %s to %s\n", test_case[1], test_case[2]);
ho_set_hodec2_as_active(bts[atoi(test_case[1])]->ho, atoi(test_case[2]));
test_case += 3;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "ho-enable")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Set handover enable state at "
"BTS %s to %s\n", test_case[1], test_case[2]);
ho_set_ho_active(bts[atoi(test_case[1])]->ho, atoi(test_case[2]));
test_case += 3;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "afs-rxlev-improve")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Set afs RX level improvement at "
"BTS %s to %s\n", test_case[1], test_case[2]);
ho_set_hodec2_afs_bias_rxlev(bts[atoi(test_case[1])]->ho, atoi(test_case[2]));
test_case += 3;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "afs-rxqual-improve")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Set afs RX quality improvement at "
"BTS %s to %s\n", test_case[1], test_case[2]);
ho_set_hodec2_afs_bias_rxqual(bts[atoi(test_case[1])]->ho, atoi(test_case[2]));
test_case += 3;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "set-min-free")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Setting minimum required free %s "
"slots at BTS %s to %s\n", test_case[2],
test_case[1], test_case[3]);
if (!strcmp(test_case[2], "TCH/F"))
ho_set_hodec2_tchf_min_slots(bts[atoi(test_case[1])]->ho, atoi(test_case[3]));
else
ho_set_hodec2_tchh_min_slots(bts[atoi(test_case[1])]->ho, atoi(test_case[3]));
test_case += 4;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "set-max-ho")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Setting maximum parallel handovers "
"at BTS %s to %s\n", test_case[1],
test_case[2]);
ho_set_hodec2_ho_max( bts[atoi(test_case[1])]->ho, atoi(test_case[2]));
test_case += 3;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "set-max-ta")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Setting maximum timing advance "
"at BTS %s to %s\n", test_case[1],
test_case[2]);
ho_set_hodec2_max_distance(bts[atoi(test_case[1])]->ho, atoi(test_case[2]));
test_case += 3;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "create-ms")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Creating mobile #%d at BTS %s on "
"%s with %s codec\n", lchan_num, test_case[1],
test_case[2], test_case[3]);
lchan[lchan_num] = create_lchan(bts[atoi(test_case[1])],
!strcmp(test_case[2], "TCH/F"), test_case[3]);
if (!lchan[lchan_num]) {
printf("Failed to create lchan!\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
fprintf(stderr, " * New MS is at BTS %d TS %d\n",
lchan[lchan_num]->ts->trx->bts->nr,
lchan[lchan_num]->ts->nr);
lchan_num++;
test_case += 4;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "set-ta")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Setting maximum timing advance "
"at MS %s to %s\n", test_case[1],
test_case[2]);
meas_ta_ms = atoi(test_case[2]);
test_case += 3;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "meas-rep")) {
/* meas-rep <lchan-nr> <rxlev> <rxqual> <nr-of-neighbors> [<cell-idx> <rxlev> [...]] */
int n = atoi(test_case[4]);
struct gsm_lchan *lc = lchan[atoi(test_case[1])];
fprintf(stderr, "- Sending measurement report from "
"mobile #%s (rxlev=%s, rxqual=%s)\n",
test_case[1], test_case[2], test_case[3]);
meas_dl_rxlev = atoi(test_case[2]);
meas_dl_rxqual = atoi(test_case[3]);
meas_num_nc = n;
test_case += 5;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
int nr = atoi(test_case[0]);
/* since our bts is not in the list of neighbor
* cells, we need to shift */
if (nr >= lc->ts->trx->bts->nr)
nr++;
fprintf(stderr, " * Neighbor cell #%s, actual "
"BTS %d (rxlev=%s)\n", test_case[0], nr,
test_case[1]);
meas_bcch_f_nc[i] = atoi(test_case[0]);
/* bts number, not counting our own */
meas_rxlev_nc[i] = atoi(test_case[1]);
meas_bsic_nc[i] = 0x3f;
test_case += 2;
}
got_chan_req = 0;
gen_meas_rep(lc);
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "congestion-check")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Triggering congestion check\n");
got_chan_req = 0;
if (algorithm == 2)
hodec2_congestion_check(bsc_gsmnet);
test_case += 1;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "expect-chan")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Expecting channel request at BTS %s "
"TS %s\n", test_case[1], test_case[2]);
if (!got_chan_req) {
printf("Test failed, because no channel was "
"requested\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
fprintf(stderr, " * Got channel request at BTS %d "
"TS %d\n", chan_req_lchan->ts->trx->bts->nr,
chan_req_lchan->ts->nr);
if (chan_req_lchan->ts->trx->bts->nr
!= atoi(test_case[1])) {
printf("Test failed, because channel was not "
"requested on expected BTS\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (chan_req_lchan->ts->nr != atoi(test_case[2])) {
printf("Test failed, because channel was not "
"requested on expected TS\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
test_case += 3;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "expect-no-chan")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Expecting no channel request\n");
if (got_chan_req) {
fprintf(stderr, " * Got channel request at "
"BTS %d TS %d\n",
chan_req_lchan->ts->trx->bts->nr,
chan_req_lchan->ts->nr);
printf("Test failed, because channel was "
"requested\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
fprintf(stderr, " * Got no channel request\n");
test_case += 1;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "expect-ho")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Expecting handover/assignment "
"request at BTS %s TS %s\n", test_case[1],
test_case[2]);
if (!got_ho_req) {
printf("Test failed, because no handover was "
"requested\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
fprintf(stderr, " * Got handover/assignment request at "
"BTS %d TS %d\n",
ho_req_lchan->ts->trx->bts->nr,
ho_req_lchan->ts->nr);
if (ho_req_lchan->ts->trx->bts->nr
!= atoi(test_case[1])) {
printf("Test failed, because "
"handover/assignment was not commanded "
"at the expected BTS\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (ho_req_lchan->ts->nr != atoi(test_case[2])) {
printf("Test failed, because "
"handover/assignment was not commanded "
"at the expected TS\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
test_case += 3;
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "ack-chan")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Acknowledging channel request\n");
if (!got_chan_req) {
printf("Cannot ack channel, because no "
"request\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
test_case += 1;
got_ho_req = 0;
send_chan_act_ack(chan_req_lchan, 1);
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "ho-complete")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Acknowledging handover/assignment "
"request\n");
if (!got_chan_req) {
printf("Cannot ack handover/assignment, "
"because no chan request\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (!got_ho_req) {
printf("Cannot ack handover/assignment, "
"because no ho request\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
test_case += 1;
got_chan_req = 0;
got_ho_req = 0;
/* switch lchan */
for (i = 0; i < lchan_num; i++) {
if (lchan[i] == ho_req_lchan) {
fprintf(stderr, " * MS %d changes from "
"BTS=%d TS=%d to BTS=%d "
"TS=%d\n", i,
lchan[i]->ts->trx->bts->nr,
lchan[i]->ts->nr,
chan_req_lchan->ts->trx->bts->nr,
chan_req_lchan->ts->nr);
lchan[i] = chan_req_lchan;
}
}
send_ho_complete(chan_req_lchan, true);
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "ho-failed")) {
fprintf(stderr, "- Making handover fail\n");
if (!got_chan_req) {
printf("Cannot fail handover, because no chan "
"request\n");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
test_case += 1;
got_chan_req = 0;
got_ho_req = 0;
send_ho_complete(ho_req_lchan, false);
} else
if (!strcmp(*test_case, "print")) {
fprintf(stderr, "\n%s\n\n", test_case[1]);
test_case += 2;
} else {
printf("Unknown test command '%s', please fix!\n",
*test_case);
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
}
for (i = 0; i < lchan_num; i++) {
struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn = lchan[i]->conn;
lchan[i]->conn = NULL;
conn->lchan = NULL;
introduce an osmo_fsm for gsm_subscriber_connection In the current implementation of osmo-bsc, the subscriber connection is not handled (very) statefully. However, there is some state keeping in the code that handles the mgcp connection, but there are still to much loose ends which allow odd situations to happen, which then lead severe error situations (see also closes tags at the end) This commit adds a number of improvements to fix those problems. - Use an osmo-fsm to control the gsm_subscriber_connection state and make sure that certain operations can only take place at certain states (e.g let connection oriented SCCP traffic only pass when an SCCP connection actually exists. Remove the old osmo_bsc_mgcp.c code. Use the recently developed MGCP client FSM to handle the MGCP connections. Also make sure that stuff that already works does not break. This in particular refers to the internal handover capability and the respective unit-tests. See also OS#2823, OS#2768 and OS#2898 - Fix logic to permit assignment to a signalling channel. (OS#2762) - Introduce T993210 to release lchan + subscr_conn if MSC fails to respond The GSM specs don't have an explicit timer for this, so let's introdcue a custom timer (hence starting with 99). This timeout catches the following situation: * we send a SCCP CR with COMPL_L3_INFO from the MS to the MSC, * the MSC doesn't respond (e.g. SCCP routing failure, program down, ...) The MS is supposed to timeout with T3210, 3220 or 3230. But the BSC shouldn't trust the MS but have some timer on its own. SCCP would have a timer T(conn est), but that one is specified to be 1-2min and hence rather long. See also: OS#2775 - Terminate bsc_subscr_conn_fsm on SCCP N-DISC.ind from MSC If the MSC is disconnecting the SCCP channel, we must terminate the FSM which in turn will release all lchan's and other state. This makes TC_chan_rel_hard_rlsd pass, see also OS#2731 As a side-effect, this fixes TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_refused(), where the MSC is answering with CREF to our CR/COMPL_L3. - Release subscriber connection on RLL RELEASE IND of SAPI0 on main DCCH The subscriber connection isn't really useful for anything after the SAPI0 main signalling link has been released. We could try to re-establish, but our best option is probably simply releasing the subscriber_conn and anything related to it. This will make TC_chan_rel_rll_rel_ind pass, see also OS#2730 This commit has been tested using the BSC_Tests TTCN3 testsuit and the following tests were passed: TC_chan_act_noreply TC_chan_act_ack_noest TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_noreply TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_refused TC_chan_act_nack TC_chan_exhaustion TC_ctrl TC_chan_rel_conn_fail TC_chan_rel_hard_clear TC_chan_rel_hard_rlsd TC_chan_rel_a_reset TC_rll_est_ind_inact_lchan TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sapi1 TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sapi3 TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sacch TC_assignment_cic_only TC_assignment_csd TC_assignment_ctm TC_assignment_fr_a5_0 TC_assignment_fr_a5_1_codec_missing TC_assignment_fr_a5_1 TC_assignment_fr_a5_3 TC_assignment_fr_a5_4 TC_paging_imsi_nochan TC_paging_tmsi_nochan TC_paging_tmsi_any TC_paging_tmsi_sdcch TC_paging_tmsi_tch_f TC_paging_tmsi_tch_hf TC_paging_imsi_nochan_cgi TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac_ci TC_paging_imsi_nochan_ci TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lai TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac TC_paging_imsi_nochan_all TC_paging_imsi_nochan_plmn_lac_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lacs TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lacs_empty TC_paging_imsi_a_reset TC_paging_counter TC_rsl_drop_counter TC_classmark TC_unsol_ass_fail TC_unsol_ass_compl TC_unsol_ho_fail TC_err_82_short_msg TC_ho_int Authors: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> Philipp Maier <pmaier@sysmocom.de> Neels Hofmeyr <neels@hofmeyr.de> Closes: OS#2730 Closes: OS#2731 Closes: OS#2762 Closes: OS#2768 Closes: OS#2775 Closes: OS#2823 Closes: OS#2898 Closes: OS#2936 Change-Id: I68286d26e2014048b054f39ef29c35fef420cc97
2018-01-28 02:04:16 +00:00
osmo_fsm_inst_term(conn->fi, OSMO_FSM_TERM_REGULAR, NULL);
lchan_free(lchan[i]);
}
fprintf(stderr, "--------------------\n");
printf("Test OK\n");
fprintf(stderr, "--------------------\n");
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
void rtp_socket_free() {}
void rtp_send_frame() {}
void rtp_socket_upstream() {}
void rtp_socket_create() {}
void rtp_socket_connect() {}
void rtp_socket_proxy() {}
void trau_mux_unmap() {}
void trau_mux_map_lchan() {}
void trau_recv_lchan() {}
void trau_send_frame() {}
introduce an osmo_fsm for gsm_subscriber_connection In the current implementation of osmo-bsc, the subscriber connection is not handled (very) statefully. However, there is some state keeping in the code that handles the mgcp connection, but there are still to much loose ends which allow odd situations to happen, which then lead severe error situations (see also closes tags at the end) This commit adds a number of improvements to fix those problems. - Use an osmo-fsm to control the gsm_subscriber_connection state and make sure that certain operations can only take place at certain states (e.g let connection oriented SCCP traffic only pass when an SCCP connection actually exists. Remove the old osmo_bsc_mgcp.c code. Use the recently developed MGCP client FSM to handle the MGCP connections. Also make sure that stuff that already works does not break. This in particular refers to the internal handover capability and the respective unit-tests. See also OS#2823, OS#2768 and OS#2898 - Fix logic to permit assignment to a signalling channel. (OS#2762) - Introduce T993210 to release lchan + subscr_conn if MSC fails to respond The GSM specs don't have an explicit timer for this, so let's introdcue a custom timer (hence starting with 99). This timeout catches the following situation: * we send a SCCP CR with COMPL_L3_INFO from the MS to the MSC, * the MSC doesn't respond (e.g. SCCP routing failure, program down, ...) The MS is supposed to timeout with T3210, 3220 or 3230. But the BSC shouldn't trust the MS but have some timer on its own. SCCP would have a timer T(conn est), but that one is specified to be 1-2min and hence rather long. See also: OS#2775 - Terminate bsc_subscr_conn_fsm on SCCP N-DISC.ind from MSC If the MSC is disconnecting the SCCP channel, we must terminate the FSM which in turn will release all lchan's and other state. This makes TC_chan_rel_hard_rlsd pass, see also OS#2731 As a side-effect, this fixes TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_refused(), where the MSC is answering with CREF to our CR/COMPL_L3. - Release subscriber connection on RLL RELEASE IND of SAPI0 on main DCCH The subscriber connection isn't really useful for anything after the SAPI0 main signalling link has been released. We could try to re-establish, but our best option is probably simply releasing the subscriber_conn and anything related to it. This will make TC_chan_rel_rll_rel_ind pass, see also OS#2730 This commit has been tested using the BSC_Tests TTCN3 testsuit and the following tests were passed: TC_chan_act_noreply TC_chan_act_ack_noest TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_noreply TC_chan_act_ack_est_ind_refused TC_chan_act_nack TC_chan_exhaustion TC_ctrl TC_chan_rel_conn_fail TC_chan_rel_hard_clear TC_chan_rel_hard_rlsd TC_chan_rel_a_reset TC_rll_est_ind_inact_lchan TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sapi1 TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sapi3 TC_rll_est_ind_inval_sacch TC_assignment_cic_only TC_assignment_csd TC_assignment_ctm TC_assignment_fr_a5_0 TC_assignment_fr_a5_1_codec_missing TC_assignment_fr_a5_1 TC_assignment_fr_a5_3 TC_assignment_fr_a5_4 TC_paging_imsi_nochan TC_paging_tmsi_nochan TC_paging_tmsi_any TC_paging_tmsi_sdcch TC_paging_tmsi_tch_f TC_paging_tmsi_tch_hf TC_paging_imsi_nochan_cgi TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac_ci TC_paging_imsi_nochan_ci TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lai TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac TC_paging_imsi_nochan_all TC_paging_imsi_nochan_plmn_lac_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lac_rnc TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lacs TC_paging_imsi_nochan_lacs_empty TC_paging_imsi_a_reset TC_paging_counter TC_rsl_drop_counter TC_classmark TC_unsol_ass_fail TC_unsol_ass_compl TC_unsol_ho_fail TC_err_82_short_msg TC_ho_int Authors: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> Philipp Maier <pmaier@sysmocom.de> Neels Hofmeyr <neels@hofmeyr.de> Closes: OS#2730 Closes: OS#2731 Closes: OS#2762 Closes: OS#2768 Closes: OS#2775 Closes: OS#2823 Closes: OS#2898 Closes: OS#2936 Change-Id: I68286d26e2014048b054f39ef29c35fef420cc97
2018-01-28 02:04:16 +00:00
int osmo_bsc_sigtran_send(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn, struct msgb *msg) { return 0; }
int osmo_bsc_sigtran_open_conn(struct gsm_subscriber_connection *conn, struct msgb *msg) { return 0; }