Update patch set 1
Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Patch-set: 1 CC: Gerrit User 1000004 <1000004@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ae5363ded
commit
5574ccc5ff
|
@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"comments": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "d1d5146c_c519dd2c",
|
||||
"filename": "tools/gtp-tunnel.c",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 105,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 1000004
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2023-10-15T12:20:50Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "probably the same question like in the other commit: should we really call ipv4 just \"ip\"? I don\u0027t know where this kind of notation is used. I only know ipv4/ipv6 or ip4/ip6. The only situation where I know the 4 suffix is often skipped is inet/inet6, as that\u0027s how AF_INET/AF_INET6 are called.",
|
||||
"revId": "76e4793c596cc65125b5e7c41d71557f944f5963",
|
||||
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue