a199a2e0a2
Previously the first timeout in TC_rach_content() caused test to fail. Related TC_rach_count() test shows that there're some (13-16 out of 1000) RA values which are problematic. Let's log all such values in TC_rach_content() before failing the test to, hopefully, spot the pattern which sets such RA values apart. Change-Id: Ibfeb377101f406608c0193f08729c0e6d084281e Related: OS#1854 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
BTS_Tests.cfg | ||
BTS_Tests.default | ||
BTS_Tests.ttcn | ||
README.md | ||
expected-results.xml | ||
gen_links.sh | ||
regen_makefile.sh |
README.md
BTS_Tests.ttcn
- external interfaces
- A-bis side: RSL (emulates BSC-side server)
- Um side: L1CTL to control MS
- PCU side: pcu_socket
{% dot bts_tests.svg digraph G { rankdir=LR; { rank=same; BTS, BSC}; BTS [label="IUT\nosmo-bts-trx",shape="box"]; ATS [label="ATS\nBTS_Tests.ttcn"]; BSC [label="osmo-bsc\nOML only"]; BTS -> fake_trx [label="bursts"]; fake_trx -> trxcon [label="bursts"]; trxcon -> ATS [label="bursts"];
BTS -> BSC [label="A-bis OML"]; BTS -> ATS [label="A-bis RSL"];
ATS -> BTS [label="pcu_sock"]; ATS -> BSC [label="VTY"]; ATS -> BTS [label="CTRL"]; } %}