The testcase failed becaues of an unexpected RSL Error Indication from
the LAPDm system which was in the RSL emulation queue when tearing down
the test environment.
By calling f_rsl_chan_deact() the queue gets flushed until the RSL
deactivate channel is received. It's also more clean to release the
channel.
Fixes: OS#4051
Change-Id: I55827626803ca81b68f905fd0df3126367951f39
A large number of our tests is currently failing with
BTS_Tests.ttcn:341 Dynamic test case error: IPL4 Test Port not mapped
which was introduced by Change-Id Ie7d311bf8f03bf9b1d29b5bb28ffad793f215fd1
Change-Id: Ia1ef4ac7dcfec137a8613bc49a7f312d81a86153
Before this patch, sending special TRXC commands to FakeTRX, such as
FAKE_TOA and FAKE_RSSI, from ConnHdlr resulted in a receive timeout
waiting for the response.
As it turned out, both the test_CT and the ConnHdlr have a TRXC port,
as depending on the test one would want to globally control it
from test_CT or from within a ConnHdlr.
However, only one of the two should be active (connected) at any given
point in time. Otherwise we'll have two UDP sockets on the same bind
port, and it's more or less random on which of them it ends up.
Let's add an optional parameter 'trxc_comp', which would indicate
whether we need to control TRXC from ConnHdlr or not.
Let's get rid of both f_trxc_connect() and f_main_trxc_connect(),
which basically do the same, but run on different components.
Change-Id: Ie7d311bf8f03bf9b1d29b5bb28ffad793f215fd1
Closes: OS#4039
This adds the following test cases to BTS_Tests_LAPDm.ttcn:
* TC_sabm_retransmit_bts()
* TC_sabm_invalid_resp()
* TC_sabm_dm()
* TC_establish_ign_first_sabm()
* TC_iframe_seq_and_ack()
* TC_iframe_timer_recovery()
Change-Id: I4e1136c0c0f10d5bc8d01e826ae5d92f17a0b2aa
The f_init() function itself can very well derive the identity using
the built-in testcasename() function. There's no need asking users
to do that - many of them don't do it in the first place :/
Change-Id: I17a61a84fba4df31b8baab1f631c8aa55d894dbd
The idea of this test case (as can bee seen from its name) is to
verify handover RACH detection. What we basically do is:
1. Activate a logical channel on the BTS side (HO_SYNC for now);
2. Switch the MS (e.g. trxcon) to that channel without waiting
for Immediate Assignment and sending Access Burst;
3. Send an Access Burst on that channel using RA = HO_REF;
4. Wait for RSL HANDOver DETected from the BTS;
5. Release a dedicated connection.
There is no way to verify if the Handover Reference received
from the MS matches the one that was sent to the BTS. We can
introduce a separate test case that would just send an Access
Burst with RA != HO_REF.
Change-Id: If2e8d9c9947823df62f4bcc9a7fcd20734ff7858
Depends on: (trxcon) Ia967820a536c99966ba2c60b63d2ea9edb093f46
In BTS_Tests.ttcn we used to compose L1ctlDataReq manually. This
can be done by ts_L1CTL_DATA_REQ_SACCH() template itself, so
let's abstract BTS_Tests.ttcn from doing that.
Change-Id: I1ae948bd0314cdf15c21ce4b6346d5e32f1fcf95
When no PCU is connected to the BTS, the BTS should mask the GPRS
indicator from the SI3 rest octets to indicate "no GPRS support"
in the cell. This will cause phones not even trying to send us
RACH requests for GPRS ATTACH, RAU, etc.
Change-Id: I37efb712ee0c513aea230beeb35e7dabce698a34
Related: OS#4023
Related: OS#3075
This test will currently fail due to a MODE MODIFY NACK, even though the
channel mode is not modified.
Related: OS##3750
Change-Id: I4cbea499bb6a331d314e6573548a4540945208b5
When executing the test on our build slaves, we ran into the following:
> Number of TDMA Frames (1100) not matching (1073 .. 1093)
> Number of TDMA Frames (1096) not matching (1073 .. 1093)
So it seems the tolerance was a bit too tight. If the timer runs
for a bit more than the requested amount of seconds (e.g. due to
high system load), the number of TDMA frames is likely a bit higher
and hence we need to permit a larger tolerance.
Change-Id: Ib00bb7e7f223fb0329d00e3835127b8c31299e27
This adds TC_pcu_socket_connect_multi, which verifies that a second
connection to the PCU Intrerface socket is denied while the first
connection is still established.
Change-Id: Ib484a0a39e719cb2ce00a9464fc1207357ec9e93
Related: OS#4023
In OsmocomBB/trxcon Change-Id Ia94ebf22a2ec439dfe1f31d703b832ae57b48ef2
we introduced a new mode CCCH_MODE_COMBINED_CBCH to indicate that the
channel combination is a CCCH+SDCCH/4 with one SDCCH stolen for CBCH.
Let's make sure we actually use that mode in our CBCH related tests
Change-Id: I27ee2c81bec7175c1ea09d4f3f6037f2866fe242
Some of our files didn't have a copyright notice at all, let's add
it. Also, update the notices in other files and ensure a SPDX
identifier is present in all but the most trivial files.
Change-Id: If7fa19ce484b415bc645e39b3d0d666b44b5f0fd
This test opens a SDCCH and sends a RR SUSPEND message from the
simulated MS. It then expects the BTS to pick that up and forward
it to the PCU socket rather than via RSL to the BSC.
Change-Id: I4da6e9d7c5dfbd0e017d2a63c6474da700c38e52
Related: OS#2249
Related: OS#4023
The four existing test in BTS_Tests.ttcn so far didn't have any chance
to verify if the invalid messages actually ended up on the air interface
or not. By using virtphy instead of trxcon, we can finally add that missing part.
Change-Id: Ie05d6b1530bd4d4cf4eaa574b068870682439ee4
Related: OS#4023
As trxcon+fake_trx don't have GPRS (TBF) support yet, we cannot do
any PCU related tests involving the Um interface yet. Instead, let's
use virtphy to fill that gap. Using virtphy, we can actually
receive/transmit GPRS blocks on the simulated Um interface.
TC_pcu_data_req_{pdtch,ptcch} are moved to a new test suite
"BTS_Tests_virtphy.ttcn" which should symbolize that the related tests
are to be executed with osmo-bts-virtual + virtphy instead of
osmo-bts-trx + fake_trx + trxcon.
You also have to set the following module parameter to make this work:
BTS_Tests.mp_bts_trxc_port := -1
Related: OS#4023
Change-Id: I677f660b1076148b3317b08b06eb3d6551d9b577
This new test verifies that the expected amount of PCUIF_RTS_REQ are
observed on the PCU Interface for both PTCCH and PDTCH.
Change-Id: Ic27cdd4f4adf11f871b84bd72692a03280274fe2
Related: OS#4023
As we don't yet speak OML directly from the TTCN3 test suite,
this requires a currently "RFC/WIP" state patch turning OML
Failure Event Reports into CTRL TRAP on the BSC, see
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/osmo-bsc/+/14177
Change-Id: I6c7641b37b6ee2177d43127140cc0b625409379c
Depends: osmo-bsc I4f8a9737c6ef1b951ea8e742cdbd3689371a99d5
Related: OS#4023
Add three BTS_Tests.ttcn test cases for verifying the BTS behavior
regarding CCCH LOAD IND (RACH).
Related: OS#3750
Change-Id: I6c9dee1d7d3eaa218fdce7ebb8e334858aedb736
This introduces a set of CBCH related tests for osmo-bts.
Warning: Those tests currently require a patched trxcon to work.
Related: OS#4011
Change-Id: I955b4000c12180a39b0205b69b7b2c8cee8c9da3
Those two new tests test the subtle rules related to how the presence
of certain IEs in the RSL CHAN ACT influence when exactly DL SACCH
transmission should start during hand-over related channel activation.
Change-Id: Ia88f3ab160891cdbbb8fa6e765f137edd04c6e81
Related: OS#3570
Related: OS#4008
Related: OS#4009
According to 3GPP Ts 48.058, every logical channel can receive some
specific SACCH filling at the time of RSL channel activation. This
overrides the global SACCH FILLING.
Related: OS#3750
Change-Id: I8adb371a7e0b80792dd2fa35e5204802068df5ba
Section 7 of the RSL specification (3GPP TS 48.058) describes how the
BTS shall respond in various error situations, including wrong message
type, wrong message discriminator and invalid message sequences.
Let's add three test cases for the above three scenarios.
Change-Id: If507a14bbed9cdcc62cd966468222186590fc965
Related: OS##3750
The module parameter mp_ipa_up_delay ads a delay after the ipa bring up.
This is relevant for the tests with real BTS hardware, but it is not
relavent for the regular TTCN3 tests.
Lets set the default to 0.0, since the delay caused problems with
TC_rsl_ms_pwr_ctrl and TC_si_sched_13_2bis_2ter_2quater.
Change-Id: I7663cad5df1ee5a8bcdbbf522881999f1be9f4fe
Related: OS#3960
When running tests with real hardware it is important to wait for some
time (3 sec. should be enough) before exiting f_init(). This is to
ensure that the BTS supplies a stable carrier before the test proceeds.
Change-Id: Ib78633a33a15cd40514e15b6ebf9a0a8fb7b9c68
Related: OS#3863
The default value for the module parameter mp_ipa_up_timeout is set to
10 sec. Given that the sysmobts needs around 10-11 sec. to perform one
restart cycle this is to low and causes tests to fail occasionally. Lets
increase the default value to 15 sec to get reliable.
Change-Id: I5bb290d00a02a25672305688352a03f3bf484ff3
Related: OS#3863
According to 3GPP TS 04.60, section 11.2.5a, the extended (11-bit)
Access Burst on RACH/PRACH is used by the MS to indicate its EGPRS
capability. One of the alternative synch. sequences (see 3GPP TS
05.02, TS1 and TS2) shall be used.
Add a test case to verify extended (11-bit) RACH decoding.
Depends: (OsmocomBB) I36fd20cd5502ce33c52f644ee4c22abb83350df8
Change-Id: I8fe156aeac9de3dc1e71a4950821d4942ba9a253
Related: OS#1854
When running PCU-related tests against BTS use name of the test as a PCU
version string sent from TTCN-3 code. This makes it easier to separate
OsmoBTS log output related to different test cases.
Change-Id: I9ef9e46061ef116529bdea196050f914804615b3
By default Misc_Helpers.f_shutdown() will set test verdict to
'none'. Let's fail test explicitly if we had any timeouts.
Related: OS#1854
Change-Id: Ifff8b3b83eeedea0d308f7ab0bfe347e2dc278c8
Previously the first timeout in TC_rach_content() caused test to
fail. Related TC_rach_count() test shows that there're some (13-16 out
of 1000) RA values which are problematic. Let's log all such values in
TC_rach_content() before failing the test to, hopefully, spot the
pattern which sets such RA values apart.
Change-Id: Ibfeb377101f406608c0193f08729c0e6d084281e
Related: OS#1854
Test BTS_Tests.TC_dyn_osmo_pdch_act_deact was sporadically failing due
to receiving IND_INFO on the PCU port with pdch_mask related TS bit set
to 0 after sending a PDCH ACT. That happened due to a race condition
because PCU send IND_INFO periodically. As a result, it can happen that
BTS sends an IND_INFO after PCU.clear was called and before the PDCH ACT
is handled.
Change-Id: If11ef05d97aa5f6caaa731f3817c1fecfc3edf7c
It was observed that 'BTS_Tests.TC_rach_max_ta' started to fail
with the following reason: "BTS_Tests.ttcn:1091 : RACH passed
but was expected to be dropped: -2560".
My initial assumption was that the test case basically sends
FAKE_TOA command on a wrong TRXC interface, and it was
confirmed using trx_sniff.py:
# TRXD of the BB side
$ ./trx_sniff.py -p 6700
[DEBUG] trx_sniff.py:110 L1 -> TRX burst: fn=616 tn=0 pwr=0
[DEBUG] trx_sniff.py:110 TRX -> L1 burst: fn=597 tn=0 rssi=-60 toa256=-2560
[DEBUG] trx_sniff.py:110 TRX -> L1 burst: fn=598 tn=0 rssi=-60 toa256=-2560
...
# TRXD of the BTS side (Uplink bursts only)
$ ./trx_sniff.py -p 5700 --direction L1
[DEBUG] trx_sniff.py:110 TRX -> L1 burst: fn=719 tn=0 rssi=-60 toa256=0
and additionally be enriching logging messages of fake_trx.py:
[DEBUG] fake_trx.py:186 (trx@0.0.0.0:6700) Recv FAKE_TOA cmd
Sending FAKE_* commands on TRXC interface of the BB side affects
the bursts being forwarded to this side, so we should use the
TRXC interface of the BTS side to simulate Uplink delay.
The reason why the test case has been passing some time ago is
that there was a bug in fake_trx.py, that has been fixed recently.
This patch makes 'BTS_Tests.TC_rach_max_ta' green again ;)
Change-Id: I7736abd85407c186856be9f1a22613a1fa6e0c32
Usually the MS power is controlled by the BTS and there is no continous
supervison by the BSC needed. However, a scheme where the BSC takes care
of the power control loop exists. The power is then set via RSL using an
RSL MS POWER CONTROL message.
This tests establishes a dchan and then sends MS POWER CONTROL messages
with differen power levels and then checks the presence of the power
level set in the MS POWER LEVEL field of the SACCH L1 header.
Change-Id: I82b04a3bf94d355175f7f6ff3fdc43672e8080a2
Related: OS#1622
With some real HW setups, there's no PCU (osmo-pcu) available locally,
for instance when using a sysmobts, or when using a nanoBTS. There's no
need to waste time and generate extra output by running this tests in
this case.
Furthermore, some tests seem to crash sometimes in that setup, probably
due to using invalid fd (-1):
MTC@801a0da9866a: Setting RSL_SYSTEM_INFO_4 (4): '31061C62F224002A4740E50400'O
/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/bts/BTS_Tests: Segmentation fault occurred
/usr/lib/titan/libttcn3-parallel-dynamic.so(_Z14signal_handleri+0xa3)[0x7f0c33b48073]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x33060)[0x7f0c321aa060]
/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/bts/UD_PT.so(_ZN12UD__PortType15UD__PT_PROVIDER13outgoing_sendERKN9UD__Types14UD__send__dataE+0xf0)[0x7f0c349e42f8]
/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/bts/PCUIF_CodecPort.so(_ZN16PCUIF__CodecPort16PCUIF__CODEC__PT4sendERKNS_17PCUIF__send__dataERK9COMPONENT+0x19e)[0x7f0c37e1731a]
/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/bts/PCUIF_CodecPort.so(_ZN16PCUIF__CodecPort16PCUIF__CODEC__PT4sendERKNS_26PCUIF__send__data_templateE+0x5f)[0x7f0c37e174f7]
/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/bts/BTS_Tests.so(_ZN10BTS__Tests20f__TC__pcu__act__reqERK7INTEGERS2_S2_RK7BOOLEAN+0x411)[0x7f0c3eec3210]
/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/bts/BTS_Tests.so(_ZN10BTS__Tests28testcase_TC__pcu__deact__reqEbd+0x15d)[0x7f0c3eec4f27]
/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/bts/BTS_Tests.so(+0xfb65d)[0x7f0c3eeef65d]
/usr/lib/titan/libttcn3-parallel-dynamic.so(_ZN11Module_List15execute_controlEPKc+0x1c)[0x7f0c33af3fbc]
Change-Id: I773c7ec52dd8532bf160e92ffefc8d936ca55de2
Some test env may take more than 10 seconds to (re-)start a BTS, so
let's make it variable through this parameter.
For instance it was observed that running osmo-bts-sysmo through ssh
inside a sysmobts can sometimes take a good number of seconds (specially
because ssh connection can take a while to be established successfully).
Change-Id: Ieb046358d8266ac94bd7b9e916e85f84de3ad319
We cannot notify RSL Emulation layer about expecting a specific FN
(during ts_RSLDC_ChanRqd) because we only know the FN after sending the
RACH request, and since notification to RSL Emulation happens async, it
can happen (verified) that ChanRqd message from BTS arrives and is
handled before we register the RACH req into the ConnectionTable.
Change-Id: I438fd3ee82d88498d928dbcc89ce9bd80d37ab64
Alexander Couzens
Harald Welte
Eric Wild
Philipp Maier
Pau Espin