There is no reason whatsoevery why a L3_Templates.ttcn file should
ever include types from RLC/MAC. This creates a dependency nightmare.
The type for which ts_RaCapRec is written (MSRACapabilityValuesRecord)
originates from titan.ProtocolModules.MobileL3 so it's completely
unclear how any of that ever related too RLC/MAC.
Change-Id: Ie1ccef090ad51e26ccae17998e4294c6e27cf9c8
Let's test the code path where UL TBF is requested through DL ACK/NACK
here, since we already test the usual UL TBF through CCCH approach in
most tests.
rlc_mode is changed to ACKED since that's the mode we are using so far
in tests.
Change-Id: I5a9a2e8107c87fdbf74cc2f09ae5eeafbb13ad55
Some stuff like EGPRS Ack/Nack description is still not implemented, but
it's enouh for now to be able to match against this kind of ACK blocks.
Change-Id: I8066fba0e71911f0c6344c1540a501f1853daa7f
Old code was not setting Single Block Packet Access type, and 2phase
access was not properly triggered.
Once it's triggered, message flow changes quite a lot from the 1phase
access, specially because the 2nd Ul Assignment arrives through PDCH
instead of CCCH, which means a different record is received and hence
code for 1phase cannot be easily re-used.
For similar reasons, f_tx_rlcmac_ul_n_blocks() is modified to receive
the only required tfi param instead of a full dl_block.
Some functions are also extended to support SingleBlock Allocation
instead of usual DynamicAllocation.
Change-Id: If636a4898dfa175fdbd6baf04f7f2c955a9c525d
RLCMAC blocks have a lot of fields and we will potentially require lots
of different templates, as well as functions to handle related structs.
Change-Id: I9c6597178168aa3848b21930f33be698dd2ce545
Pau Espin
Harald Welte