This function starts the SCCP component which will relay the BSSAP
messages to/from port SCCP_SP_PORT which is connected to BSSAP_DIRECT.
Ticket: OS#3286
Change-Id: Icee085d5fe610061c85d7fe7cf62cbccd8cfa556
The idea of this test case is to check the reaction of OsmoMSC
on MS-initiated release during an active transaction. In other
words, when the network is waiting for some response from a MS,
subscriber can press the 'red button' in order to terminate
this conversation.
It is expected that the MSC would terminate the transaction
as on DTAP interface, as on GSUP interface.
Change-Id: I7936ed5072ed2ae02f039dc90a1fece1e7f70a70
This change introduces two new test cases for network-initiaded
USSD notification and network-initiaded USSD request, which are
based on the existing SS/USSD related test cases.
The idea of TC_lu_and_mt_ussd_notification is to verify that
a network-initiaded USSD notification can arrive subscriber in
IDLE mode using Paging procedure.
The idea of TC_lu_and_mt_ussd_during_mt_call is to verify that
a network-initiaded USSD notification can arrive subscriber in
DEDICATED mode (in this case during a call) on a separate
transaction.
Change-Id: I073893c6e11be27e9e36f98f11c1491d0c173985
As we are about to finish the implementation of GSM TS 09.11,
OsmoMSC will forward all SS/USSD messages over GSUP to HLR,
and will expect responses back from HLR. The SS/USSD payload
processing will be out of scope for OsmoMSC itself.
Let's modify the existing test cases in order to expect and
reply SS/USSD messages over GSUP protocol.
Change-Id: I01de73aced6057328a121577a5a83bc2615fb2d4
In order to avoid code duplication in the upcoming test cases,
let's introduce a few functions which basically do a GSUP/DTAP
message matching within the alternative statement.
Change-Id: I846c2d40a7c37afa8647e644673b4df905e3e116
Pass the CTRL_DETECT_CONNECTION_ESTABLISHMENT_RESULT parameter to
the TELNET port by default. This allows tests to make progress
into an error handling path if they are started while the osmo-*
program they want to connect on VTY is not running.
Observed with osmo-ggsn tests, where if the one test runs
into a VTY connection failure the subsequent test would get
stuck forever in a map() call on the VTY TELNET port.
Teach the function f_vty_wait_for_prompt() about connection
reports by the TELNET module. We may now receive an integer which
represents the socket file descriptor for the telnet connection.
This case was not handled by the previous change made in
commit cb111b21ab. As a result,
BSC tests started failing with "VTY Timeout for prompt" because
the alt-statement in f_vty_wait_for_prompt() would not progress
past the integer sitting on the VTY port's receive queue.
Change-Id: I56925f93af6c55e93f3f417099db135744da6a40
Related: OS#3149
With this patch, I see all ttcn3-bsc-tests failing with
"Verdict: fail reason: VTY Timeout for prompt"
This reverts commit cb111b21ab.
Change-Id: I215d7ab5eee75cf6d3afaac760af64356c943140
Pass the CTRL_DETECT_CONNECTION_ESTABLISHMENT_RESULT parameter to
the TELNET port by default. This allows tests to make progress
into an error handling path if they are started while the osmo-*
program they want to connect on VTY is not running.
Observed with osmo-ggsn tests, where if the one test runs
into a VTY connection failure the subsequent test would get
stuck forever in a map() call on the VTY TELNET port.
Change-Id: I9acf7793d5d68aec6d087cff254a10d8b673dab1
Related: OS#3149
The random length for that test could go out of bounds leading to a
Dynamic test case error when sending the message.
The limiting field here is the lengthIndicator of PDU_BSSAP which
includes the length of the PDU_BSSMAP mesageType, cellId as well as the
layer3 info IE and lenght indicator additionally to the l3info payload.
So maximum length for the payload can only be 240 bytes (if the cell ID
is encoded in the longest possible way as BSSMAP_FIELD_LAC_RNC_CI).
Change-Id: I7be33e261a11f03a80a6b770b6acf0a4be49b85b
This test suite acts as an SCCP server on top of M3UA.
SCCP tests are run against the sccp_demo_user program which
can be found in libosmo-sccp/examples. This program must be
started in client mode: sccp_demo_user -c
The SCCP test suite should then work out of the box with
the provided SCCP_Tests.cfg file and this additional change
to sccp_demo_user default point codes:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/libosmo-sccp/+/9652/
There is currently only one test, for the libosmo-sccp crash
reported as issue OS#2666. The implementation of this test
is currently using an ugly workaround due to shortcomings of
the M3UA Emulation layer (see source code comments). Whether
a better solution is feasible is still to be determined.
The test requires a patch to the SCCP Protocol Emulation which
has been submitted upstream: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/124552/
Change-Id: I03f5e8b282a7396b45417495c88d8fb81b26cda8
Related: OS#2666
BSC_ConnectionHandler.ttcn:563 This helps TC_gsup_cancel which
previously encountered a Dynamic test case error: Using the value of an
optional field containing omit. The test still fails, but this time
because it "Received unexpected BSSAP instead of CM SERV REJ".
Change-Id: I9fedf2573487066b951804a328ba428d2189c4a4
Call mtc.stop after setverdict(fail), add reasons to most failures and
fail with verdict error for internal errors.
Change-Id: I9b618235939fa41160b9be6677b121963d3ec857
The test currently crashes osmo-msc, which is fixed by
I5c30e0f9545fb76615776ff6cc16b56aeb5b043a (osmo-msc).
Related: OS#3062
Change-Id: Ic80646e1fba37bb6163ca3a7eead7980b4ad7a51
Overlong IMSIs used to trigger an assertion failure in osmo-msc.
This problem has been fixed but there was no test for it yet.
A lazy way of testing for this problem is to send an overlong IMSI
from an existing test which already verifies related behaviour
and would fail if the MSC crashed: TC_lu_by_tmsi_noauth_unknown
However, osmo-msc currently accepts overlong IMSIs and silently
truncates them, so this change as-is currently breaks this test.
But I would argue that osmo-msc's current behaviour is unreasonable
anyway and have proposed a patch to change it:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/osmo-msc/+/9739/
With that patch applied to osmo-msc, this test keeps passing.
Change-Id: I2c472bee76086f6c84ec684d2e58b3351ebc3147
Depends: I785c994f41a646d8d83d3d82f5a9ae6b572eb641
Related: OS#2864
Related: g#9739
As we are about to finish the implementation of GSM TS 09.11, in
our case it is 'SS/USSD over GSUP', OsmoMSC will not decide itself
which USSD request-code is known, and which is wrong.
Change-Id: Ic104a49bb2dce2127063bcef8443ee6b639c9f19
PARALLEL | VERDICTOP will log when the port is dying or when other
components will change to fail. This helped to find a timeout in the
SGSN tests where a function call message timed out.
Change-Id: I770ac964dc37e2752e7d35e493f707b091c739b0
The idea of this testcase is to check if MSC can correctly
handle a USSD-request during an active call.
What we do here:
1) Perform Location Update
2) Establish a MT-call
3) Perform *#100# request
4) Release the call
Change-Id: Ifa3cd1aeeb34ccf5864f78b76a88aaa6d5e51839
The idea of this testcase is to check reaction of the network on
reception of USSD request with unknown/unhandled request code.
It is not clearly defined by the GSM specs, how the network
should react in such cases, but looking at GSM TS 04.80,
section 4.3.2 "Error types description", the UnexpectedDataValue
error looks suitable. Commercial networks also use this error
when an unknown request code is sent.
Change-Id: I6a3fcaafc37972a38c13722f0b511ea5e1e3fbd8
In this testcase we perform LUR, then request our own number and
then expect the response with matching MSISDN.
Change-Id: I82450c6f48f6c17bc33e0ec6c91f2a73e44793ad
Update MSC_Tests.default according to the current MSC_Tests.cfg
used by docker-playground.
Add osmo-msc.cfg and osmo-stp.cfg example configuration files.
Allows the MSC tests to be run locally.
Change-Id: Ia00f0315a5246c3ec55563ebd21a586aec8e4688
The test case TC_establish_and_nothing is now passing.
Update expected results list accordingly.
Change-Id: I925fa4ad2e38e189cf5dd1ae76a24cdb9011fdc8
Related: OS#2879
The many SS_* types depend on MAP, whcih in turn depends on ROSE.
Add all of this to the MSC testsuite so we can do SS related testing.
Change-Id: If5084decb5391736ab5cadd86adb2ffa78e7140f
In non-handler mode, the SCCP emulation is currently started before
there's a user registered to SCCP_SP_PORT. If the first BSSMAP
package arrives from the network, then the SCCP_Emulation will crash
as it cannot deliver the resulting SCCP user primitive to the user.
Let's split start from initialization, so user code can still register
something to SCCP_SP_PORT before starting SCCP_Emulation.
Change-Id: I55c94f18531bb7e5369500dc90f4b0ff3a420774
This should fix the bogus failures we are seeing in this test. The pcap
usually shows that the Clear Command does arrive after about 5 seconds,
but sometimes the internal timer fires before that. Double the timeout
of the test here.
Change-Id: I998cfb52a3813dd9f76d3787e4d0d448752ec847
With f_init(), the user has the option to specifiy how many bsc
instances should be created. A for loop then iterates over the
prepared configurations and calls f_bssap_init(). The first
parameter g_bssap is tied to index 0 constantly but should be
tied to the iterator i.
- use i instad of 0 as iterator for g_bssap
Change-Id: I490bab70224d236ab576a2ea3863f6d0afd5f22a
In addition to the existing 3GPP AoIP stacking, allow BSSAP to
run on top of a SCCPlite stacking. Implement both the server and the
client role for IPA.
Related: OS#2544
Change-Id: Ie844c4de62e0ef5d5c4c366185968211a7f6d676
In Change-Id I52a4c8118828c1605cf672889982f987568ad17d we introduced
a name change for the SCCP/M3UA components, which meant that the log
level configuration did no longer apply as intended.
Change-Id: Iebdaf3446a81ea5f8310110f5cca2bdb3e552e3f
The L3 transaction-id in MT-SMS is allocated in the MSC, so any
messages we expect from the MSC must carry c_TIF_ORIG.
Change-Id: I6ea977a7662fdfc9c504f13ac5632ac20a04f522
'make clean' as generated by ttcn3_makefilegen removes all *.log files, which
of course cleans out expected-results.log, which should not happen. Since this
is a junit XML file, rename the suffix to .xml.
Change-Id: Ic334f6b758eef865e3a497aa430691a3ae696d25
The testcase intentionally responds to the RAN sided CRCX
with a garbeled message to cause the MGCP handlin inside
the MSC to fail. The MSC is then expected not to perform
further MGCP operations since it did not get a proper
response to the first CRCX, so the specific endpoint name
is not known, eventually preventing from doing an MDCX.
However, the testcase responds to incoming DLCX commands,
instead setting the verdict to fail.
Also the altstep that dispatches the message after the
errornous MGCP response unconditionally catches all BSSAP
messages before entering the sub-altstep
as_clear_cmd_compl_disc() that handles the clearing of
the connection. Eventually the clear command is never
received in this sub-altstep.
- Make sure the verdict is set to fail when an MGCP
message is received after the errornous response to
the CRCX.
- Remove the unconditional BSSAP.receive in order to
be able to dispatch the clear command properly
- Update the expected-results.log file
Change-Id: I806491741d310e4410f6cb4ce0309235e9bf4300
Related: OS#2882
When the MS sends a Clear Request in the middle of a Location Updating, it
should be permitted for the MSC to send a Location Updating Reject back. Extend
with an alt that also allows a LU reject before the Clear Command.
The test explicitly hints at https://osmocom.org/issues/2862 which rightfully
forbids the MSC to send a second Clear Command after the first is completed.
However, this test so far explicitly permits a second Clear Command, so it was
probably passing in error all the time. Set verdict to failure if a second
Clear Command is received before the DISC_IND.
This changes the test verdict to failure with current osmo-msc master,
rightfully so; the failure will be fixed by the upcoming MSC subscr conn FSM
refactoring.
Change-Id: I7bc5555b829d61b0a2529107bc9b58446865545d
Compare current test results to the expected results, and exit in error on
discrepancies.
Add compare-result.sh: (trivially) grep junit xml output to determine which
tests passed and which didn't, and compare against an expected-result.log,
another junit file from a previous run. Summarize and determine success.
Include an "xfail" feature: tests that are expected to fail are marked as
"xfail", unexpected failures as "FAIL".
In various subdirs, copy the current jenkins jobs' junit xml outputs as
expected-results.log, so that we will start getting useful output in both
jenkins runs and manual local runs.
In start-testsuite.sh, after running the tests, invoke the results comparison.
Due to the single-line parsing nature, the script so far does not distinguish
between error and failure. I doubt that we actually need to do that though.
Related: OS#3136
Change-Id: I87d62a8be73d73a5eeff61a842e7c27a0066079d
In Change-Id: I52a4c8118828c1605cf672889982f987568ad17d we introduced
config file syntax errors. It seems that change was not tested at all
before pushing :(
Change-Id: I80577798b502957afaa46abb510bcca3dc174ee4
The upcomming tests for inter-BSC handover make it necessary to
simulate multiple (two) BSCs to the MSC, while the current
Implementation can only handle one BSC instance at a time.
- Allow multiple BSC instances to be created
- Add a simple reset-test to test what happens when
two BSC instances are started (BSSMAP reset from two
different BSCs)
Change-Id: I52a4c8118828c1605cf672889982f987568ad17d
Related: OS#1609
Harald Welte
Daniel Willmann
Vadim Yanitskiy
Neels Hofmeyr
Pau Espin
Philipp Maier