In TTCN-3, array assumes a fixed number of elements. A 'record of'
type is more like a 'list' in Python, so let's call it this way.
Change-Id: Ib7df7efaa28a53a45d981d1c99f9eb1ac26fd91c
This change will facilitate adding test cases for multi-slot TBF
allocation across several TS and/or TRX instances of a BTS.
Change-Id: I9bff9e912bf73ad6259946a6ea5b08f3e2f728c8
Related: OS#4756
Immediate Assignment is sent on AGCH/PCH, while on PACCH we have
Packet Uplink/Downlink Assignment instead (see 11.2.29, 11.2.7).
Change-Id: I56473ae5dfa565d2c9d26984b14685a4163bf69a
Fix confusion: f_ms_establish_ul_tbf() vs f_establish_tbf(). The
new name precisely describes what the function does. Sending a
RACH.ind and receiving a DATA.req with RR Immediate Assignment
is just a part of the TBF establishment process.
Change-Id: I1e22b9936bf68ebcaf70cefbc57345995ebbbaed
Both f_ms_rx_imm_ass_ccch() and f_ms_establish_ul_tbf() functions
are actually twin brothers of good old f_pcuif_rx_imm_ass() and
f_establish_tbf() with some minor changes.
The former accepts a GprsMS parameter, that is never used. The
latter simply calls f_ultbf_new_from_rr_imm_ass() in the end.
Let's avoid code duplication:
- call f_establish_tbf() from f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(),
- remove f_ms_rx_imm_ass_ccch(), use f_pcuif_rx_imm_ass().
After the removal of f_ms_rx_imm_ass_ccch(), the implementation
of TC_ta_idle_dl_tbf_ass() does not need the GprsMS state, so
let's make it look like it was before.
Change-Id: If6c0b8796500e96525b7b1cadb61ab2fc84b4744
Before this patch, each test had to somehow keep state for all the
transactions needed. Now, most of the state is moved to generic GprsMS,
UlTbf and DlTbf structures, and APIs to maintain its state, as well as
function helpers to submit or receive messages from it. For now
specially the Tx side was improved, some of the Rx parts are left for
later and are still using the old APIs.
This will allow for more complex scenarios and more complex tests
running several MS.
All the tests were updated to use the new APIs, reworked when needed and
even totally rewritten in some cases since they were doing
inconsistent/wrong stuff from the point of view of what the scenarios
or code paths they were expected to test. There's no test regressions.
Change-Id: Ib3fee37580f0ea0530a659dec83656799bf57288
We don't (yet) support multi-BTS test cases anyway. Ideally, each
virtual BTS would be a separate component with an individual port.
Change-Id: I8b639d179db259bf0e43cf1929447a44d5736f62
Some stuff like EGPRS Ack/Nack description is still not implemented, but
it's enouh for now to be able to match against this kind of ACK blocks.
Change-Id: I8066fba0e71911f0c6344c1540a501f1853daa7f
This is a first step towards refactoring of all functions to use MS and
Ul/DlTBF objects containing state.
Change-Id: Ieae27d6e707f79ec2145864ef5cd67ddbbec9314
Vadim Yanitskiy
Pau Espin