Start a second
- MT SMS
- MT call
while a Paging is already ongoing.
The second trans being an SMS works.
The second trans being a call fails with current osmo-msc master; a fix is in
the related patch (s.b.).
Related: Idd4537b5f4817d17e5c87d9a93775a32aee0e7be
Change-Id: Ieeae6322d4e80893ea3408c6b74bf8e32bea8e46
Long story short: some time ago I noticed that OsmoMSC crashes if
T3212 expires during the Paging procedure. This is not the case
anymore (as the test case shows) and apparently the bug has been
fixed, hovewer I believe it makes sense to add this test case.
Change-Id: If9147ae8b07d5120d2853b9acda2313910ac48be
Since Ibca0e9196c25ab00803041b81f7b490ba2f0a3ba we can have up to
16 components of type BSC_ConnHdlr running in parallel. Both
TC_multi_lu_and_{mo,mt}_ussd test cases have been updated,
but their Iu/UMTS siblings have not. Let's fix this.
Change-Id: Iaa7347e973ee617cc1780b84e0c298f0a302227c
Both test cases make use of the existing functions:
- TC_multi_lu_and_mo_ussd: f_tc_lu_and_mo_ussd_single_request(),
- TC_multi_lu_and_mt_ussd: f_tc_lu_and_mt_ussd_notification(),
starting several (*) BSC_ConnHdlr components in parallel.
(*) The maximum amount is limited by 16 - this is as much
as both GSUP and SCTP emulation components can handle.
Change-Id: I2fb1c5d285163d5245d92fa24c197a5027ecbe6f
Related: OS#2931
The testcase will ensure paging is repeated by the MSC.
Repeating will improve the reachability of MS when a Paging is lost
or not received because the MS is moving between states.
Change-Id: Ib5bf0b62e0639436cdcba03acbaedf1458e18873
Some of our files didn't have a copyright notice at all, let's add
it. Also, update the notices in other files and ensure a SPDX
identifier is present in all but the most trivial files.
Change-Id: If7fa19ce484b415bc645e39b3d0d666b44b5f0fd
Verify that the MSC rejects a location update from a Cell/BSC that
contains a PLMN which does not match the core network's PLMN.
Related: OS#3162
Change-Id: I676894358259b9cc0f973769ce552ba58a2a58a1
This might look a bit like copy+paste programming for our testcases.
However, we actually want the Iu related tests show up as separate
'testscase' in the TTCN-3 sense, so there's no way that's more elegant
than this :/
Change-Id: I3b56e17487c9df839e67ed390a1ff89979683e8e