The idea of this test case is to verify SS session termination
due to expiry of its guard timeout. The timeout value is
intentionally set to a few seconds in order to speedup
test case execution (we don't want to wait 2 minutes).
We expect OsmoMSC to inform both session entities (MS and EUSE)
about timeout expiry before releasing the transaction. The MS
should receive GSM 04.80 RELEASE COMPLETE message with optional
cause, while the EUSE should receive OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_PROC_SS_ERROR.
At the moment, it's not clean which cause values should be used:
- for GSM 04.80 RELEASE COMPLETE the cause IE is optional,
and possible values are defined in GSM TS 04.08, annex G-H.
The H.6.7 Cause No. 102 "recovery on timer expiry" seems to
be suitable;
- for OSMO_GSUP_MSGT_PROC_SS_ERROR the generic cause IE could
be used, but actually this IE is not generic at all, and
limited by 'gsm48_gmm_cause' enum;
so we temporarily expect arbitrary cause values in both messages.
Change-Id: I3e1791773d56617172ae27a46889a1ae4d400e2f
Depends-on: (OsmoMSC) Icf4d87c45e90324764073e8230e0fb9cb96dd9cb
Related: OS#3655
The idea of this test case is to check the reaction of OsmoMSC
on MS-initiated release during an active transaction. In other
words, when the network is waiting for some response from a MS,
subscriber can press the 'red button' in order to terminate
this conversation.
It is expected that the MSC would terminate the transaction
as on DTAP interface, as on GSUP interface.
Change-Id: I7936ed5072ed2ae02f039dc90a1fece1e7f70a70
This change introduces two new test cases for network-initiaded
USSD notification and network-initiaded USSD request, which are
based on the existing SS/USSD related test cases.
The idea of TC_lu_and_mt_ussd_notification is to verify that
a network-initiaded USSD notification can arrive subscriber in
IDLE mode using Paging procedure.
The idea of TC_lu_and_mt_ussd_during_mt_call is to verify that
a network-initiaded USSD notification can arrive subscriber in
DEDICATED mode (in this case during a call) on a separate
transaction.
Change-Id: I073893c6e11be27e9e36f98f11c1491d0c173985
As we are about to finish the implementation of GSM TS 09.11, in
our case it is 'SS/USSD over GSUP', OsmoMSC will not decide itself
which USSD request-code is known, and which is wrong.
Change-Id: Ic104a49bb2dce2127063bcef8443ee6b639c9f19
The idea of this testcase is to check if MSC can correctly
handle a USSD-request during an active call.
What we do here:
1) Perform Location Update
2) Establish a MT-call
3) Perform *#100# request
4) Release the call
Change-Id: Ifa3cd1aeeb34ccf5864f78b76a88aaa6d5e51839
The idea of this testcase is to check reaction of the network on
reception of USSD request with unknown/unhandled request code.
It is not clearly defined by the GSM specs, how the network
should react in such cases, but looking at GSM TS 04.80,
section 4.3.2 "Error types description", the UnexpectedDataValue
error looks suitable. Commercial networks also use this error
when an unknown request code is sent.
Change-Id: I6a3fcaafc37972a38c13722f0b511ea5e1e3fbd8
In this testcase we perform LUR, then request our own number and
then expect the response with matching MSISDN.
Change-Id: I82450c6f48f6c17bc33e0ec6c91f2a73e44793ad
The test case TC_establish_and_nothing is now passing.
Update expected results list accordingly.
Change-Id: I925fa4ad2e38e189cf5dd1ae76a24cdb9011fdc8
Related: OS#2879
'make clean' as generated by ttcn3_makefilegen removes all *.log files, which
of course cleans out expected-results.log, which should not happen. Since this
is a junit XML file, rename the suffix to .xml.
Change-Id: Ic334f6b758eef865e3a497aa430691a3ae696d25
Vadim Yanitskiy