rename TC_ho_out_fail_no_ho_detect to TC_ho_out_fail_no_result_after_ho_cmd
Change-Id: If84a1d4535ee12e33a50588e178bf1ebb6fb2cd5
This commit is contained in:
parent
5b9ef14b90
commit
d8a602cbd4
|
@ -3121,11 +3121,8 @@ testcase TC_ho_out_fail_rr_ho_failure() runs on test_CT {
|
|||
|
||||
/* BSC asks for inter-BSC-out HO, receives BSSMAP Handover Command, but then no reply is received about HO outcome
|
||||
* (neither BSSMAP Clear Command for success nor RR Handover Failure). 48.008 3.1.5.3.3 "Abnormal Conditions" applies
|
||||
* and the lchan is released.
|
||||
* Note: this test is a misnomer. On missing HO Detect, normally the old BSS receives an RR Handover Failure from the
|
||||
* MS. Instead, this test is about the scenario in "Abnormal Conditions" as explained above. Leaving the test's name
|
||||
* unchanged to not confuse jenkins result reports. */
|
||||
private function f_tc_ho_out_fail_no_ho_detect(charstring id) runs on MSC_ConnHdlr {
|
||||
* and the lchan is released. */
|
||||
private function f_tc_ho_out_fail_no_result_after_ho_cmd(charstring id) runs on MSC_ConnHdlr {
|
||||
g_pars := f_gen_test_hdlr_pars();
|
||||
|
||||
var PDU_BSSAP ass_req := f_gen_ass_req();
|
||||
|
@ -3198,13 +3195,13 @@ private function f_tc_ho_out_fail_no_ho_detect(charstring id) runs on MSC_ConnHd
|
|||
setverdict(pass);
|
||||
f_sleep(1.0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
testcase TC_ho_out_fail_no_ho_detect() runs on test_CT {
|
||||
testcase TC_ho_out_fail_no_result_after_ho_cmd() runs on test_CT {
|
||||
var MSC_ConnHdlr vc_conn;
|
||||
|
||||
f_init(1, true);
|
||||
f_sleep(1.0);
|
||||
|
||||
vc_conn := f_start_handler(refers(f_tc_ho_out_fail_no_ho_detect));
|
||||
vc_conn := f_start_handler(refers(f_tc_ho_out_fail_no_result_after_ho_cmd));
|
||||
vc_conn.done;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -4135,7 +4132,7 @@ control {
|
|||
execute( TC_ho_out_of_this_bsc() );
|
||||
execute( TC_ho_out_fail_no_msc_response() );
|
||||
execute( TC_ho_out_fail_rr_ho_failure() );
|
||||
execute( TC_ho_out_fail_no_ho_detect() );
|
||||
execute( TC_ho_out_fail_no_result_after_ho_cmd() );
|
||||
|
||||
execute( TC_ho_into_this_bsc() );
|
||||
execute( TC_ho_in_fail_msc_clears() );
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
|
|||
<testcase classname='BSC_Tests' name='TC_ho_out_of_this_bsc' time='MASKED'/>
|
||||
<testcase classname='BSC_Tests' name='TC_ho_out_fail_no_msc_response' time='MASKED'/>
|
||||
<testcase classname='BSC_Tests' name='TC_ho_out_fail_rr_ho_failure' time='MASKED'/>
|
||||
<testcase classname='BSC_Tests' name='TC_ho_out_fail_no_ho_detect' time='MASKED'/>
|
||||
<testcase classname='BSC_Tests' name='TC_ho_out_fail_no_result_after_ho_cmd' time='MASKED'/>
|
||||
<testcase classname='BSC_Tests' name='TC_ho_into_this_bsc' time='MASKED'/>
|
||||
<testcase classname='BSC_Tests' name='TC_ho_in_fail_msc_clears' time='MASKED'/>
|
||||
<testcase classname='BSC_Tests' name='TC_ho_in_fail_msc_clears_after_ho_detect' time='MASKED'/>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue