pcu: TC_mo_ping_pong: Check DL block is sent and ACK it

Function f_rx_rlcmac_dl_block_exp_data() still misses proper
verification of data. Apparently the received message has 2 blocks,
first with expected 10 bytes, but next one contains 18 bytes with 4
actual bytes and other bits are padding.

Last DL ACK/NACK sent is not yet working correctly. osmo-pcu seems to be
unable to match it against sent DL block (I think due to non-matching
FN), and instead drops it and schedules after timeout an IMM ASS to try
to send DL block again.

Change-Id: Icf66dd5c07690368722c586632c38fb7e770053c
This commit is contained in:
Pau Espin 2019-12-02 19:16:26 +01:00 committed by pespin
parent 4b61204e85
commit a3f0a85eb2
3 changed files with 55 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -643,11 +643,11 @@ module RLCMAC_CSN1_Types {
}
}
private const ILevel iNone := {
const ILevel iNone := {
presence := '0'B,
i_level := omit
}
private const ChannelQualityReport c_ChQualRep_default := {
const ChannelQualityReport c_ChQualRep_default := {
c_value := 0,
rxqual := 0,
sign_var := 0,

View File

@ -256,7 +256,30 @@ module RLCMAC_Types {
}
}
/* Template fro uplink Data block */
/* Send Template for Downlink ACK/NACK */
template RlcmacUlBlock ts_RLCMAC_DL_ACK_NACK(template uint5_t tfi, AckNackDescription andesc, boolean retry := false) := {
ctrl := {
mac_hdr := {
payload_type := MAC_PT_RLCMAC_NO_OPT,
spare := '00000'B,
retry := retry
},
payload := {
msg_type := PACKET_DL_ACK_NACK,
u := {
dl_ack_nack := {
dl_tfi := tfi,
ack_nack_desc := andesc,
chreq_desc_presence := '0'B,
chreq_desc := omit,
ch_qual_rep := c_ChQualRep_default
}
}
}
}
}
/* Template for uplink Data block */
template RlcmacUlBlock t_RLCMAC_UL_DATA(template uint5_t tfi, template uint4_t cv, template uint7_t bsn,
template LlcBlocks blocks := {}, template boolean stall := false) := {
data := {

View File

@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ import from PCU_Tests all;
modulepar {
charstring mp_pcu_sock_path := PCU_SOCK_DEFAULT;
float X2002 := 0.2; /* Timer -2002, IMM ASSIGN confirm delay */
}
type component RAW_NS_CT {
@ -753,6 +755,19 @@ runs on RAW_PCU_Test_CT {
}
}
private function f_rx_rlcmac_dl_block_exp_data(out RlcmacDlBlock dl_block, octetstring data)
runs on RAW_PCU_Test_CT {
var template RlcmacDlBlock dl_template := tr_RLCMAC_DATA_RRBP;
dl_template.data.blocks := ?;
/* TODO: match data correctly: { valueof(t_RLCMAC_LLCBLOCK(data)) }; */
f_rx_rlcmac_dl_block(dl_block);
if (not match(dl_block, dl_template)) {
setverdict(fail, "Failed to match Packet data: ", dl_block, " vs ", dl_template);
mtc.stop;
}
}
testcase TC_pcuif_suspend() runs on RAW_PCU_Test_CT {
var octetstring ra_id := enc_RoutingAreaIdentification(mp_gb_cfg.cell_id.ra_id);
var GprsTlli tlli := 'FFFFFFFF'O;
@ -1320,9 +1335,15 @@ testcase TC_mo_ping_pong() runs on RAW_PCU_Test_CT {
var PacketDlAssign dl_tbf_ass;
var RlcmacDlBlock dl_block;
var PCUIF_Message pcu_msg;
var octetstring data;
var octetstring data := f_rnd_octstring(10);
var boolean ok;
var OCT4 tlli := '00000001'O;
var AckNackDescription ack_nack_desc;
ack_nack_desc.final_ack := '0'B;
ack_nack_desc.starting_seq_nr := 0;
ack_nack_desc.receive_block_bitmap := '0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000'B;
/* Initialize NS/BSSGP side */
f_init_bssgp();
@ -1354,7 +1375,7 @@ testcase TC_mo_ping_pong() runs on RAW_PCU_Test_CT {
BSSGP[0].receive(tr_BSSGP_UL_UD(tlli, mp_gb_cfg.cell_id));
/* Now SGSN sends some DL data, PCU will page on CCCH (PCH) */
BSSGP[0].send(ts_BSSGP_DL_UD(tlli, f_rnd_octstring(10)));
BSSGP[0].send(ts_BSSGP_DL_UD(tlli, data));
f_pcuif_rx_pch_imm_tbf_ass(rr_imm_ass);
ok := f_imm_ass_verify_dl_tbf_ass(rr_imm_ass, dl_tbf_ass);
@ -1363,7 +1384,12 @@ testcase TC_mo_ping_pong() runs on RAW_PCU_Test_CT {
mtc.stop;
}
/* TODO: ACK the assignment and the DL block somehow? */
/* Wait timer X2002 and DL block is available after CCCH IMM ASS: */
f_sleep(X2002);
f_rx_rlcmac_dl_block_exp_data(dl_block, data);
/* ACK the DL block */
f_tx_rlcmac_ul_block(ts_RLCMAC_DL_ACK_NACK(dl_block.data.mac_hdr.hdr_ext.tfi, ack_nack_desc));
}
control {