pcu: Drop test TC_t3169
This test was added a long time ago to test what used to be the previous early implementation of T3169, which didn't follow specs as per TS 44.060. Since recently, osmo-pcu supports tracking UL PDCH blocks and hence properly implementing N3101 and N3101, finally also implementing T3169 correctly. The counters N3101/3 and timer T3169 are already being tested in following tests: TC_n3101_max_t3169 TC_n3103_max_t3169 Since osmo-pcu I2cec531e2633281b88f69ba065c0105580c81076, time-based T3169 is dropped and TC_t3169 doesn't pass anymore, since it had wrong expectancies (because it's not sending RTS to osmo-pcu, hence not triggering USF/RRBP N3101/3 timeouts). Change-Id: I023fb406f1df6e67e16982cb11dc1fcb6fb9b544
This commit is contained in:
parent
dee557059b
commit
8f56ecd65c
|
@ -1270,49 +1270,6 @@ testcase TC_mcs_max_dl() runs on RAW_PCU_Test_CT {
|
|||
f_dl_data_exp_cs(f_rlcmac_block_int2cs_mcs(g_mcs_max_dl, true), bssgp_ms_racap_egprs_def);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Verify PCU drops TBF after some time of inactivity. */
|
||||
testcase TC_t3169() runs on RAW_PCU_Test_CT {
|
||||
var PCUIF_info_ind info_ind;
|
||||
var RlcmacDlBlock dl_block;
|
||||
var uint32_t unused_fn;
|
||||
var GprsMS ms;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialize NS/BSSGP side */
|
||||
f_init_bssgp();
|
||||
/* Initialize GPRS MS side */
|
||||
f_init_gprs_ms();
|
||||
ms := g_ms[0]; /* We only use first MS in this test */
|
||||
|
||||
info_ind := valueof(ts_PCUIF_INFO_default(c_PCUIF_Flags_noMCS));
|
||||
/* Set timer to 1 sec (default 5) to speedup test: */
|
||||
info_ind.t3169 := 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialize the PCU interface abstraction */
|
||||
f_init_raw(testcasename(), info_ind);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Establish BSSGP connection to the PCU */
|
||||
f_bssgp_establish();
|
||||
f_bssgp_client_llgmm_assign(TLLI_UNUSED, ms.tlli);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Establish an Uplink TBF */
|
||||
f_ms_establish_ul_tbf(ms);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Send one UL block (with TLLI since we are in One-Phase Access
|
||||
contention resoultion) and make sure it is ACKED fine */
|
||||
f_ms_tx_ul_data_block(ms, f_rnd_octstring(10), cv := 1, with_tlli := true, fn := ms.ul_tbf.start_time_fn)
|
||||
f_rx_rlcmac_dl_block_exp_ack_nack(dl_block, unused_fn);
|
||||
/* UL block should NOT be received in SGSN, since we didn't get CV=0 */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wait until T3169 fires (plus 1 extra sec to make sure) */
|
||||
f_sleep(int2float(info_ind.t3169) + 1.0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Send an UL block once again, the TBF should be gone by now so no ACK */
|
||||
f_ms_tx_ul_data_block(ms, f_rnd_octstring(10), cv := 0)
|
||||
f_rx_rlcmac_dl_block_exp_dummy(dl_block);
|
||||
|
||||
f_shutdown(__BFILE__, __LINE__, final := true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Validate what happens when RACH to get UL TBF and then PCU receives no UL
|
||||
* data. It should end up in N3101 reaching N3101_MAX and finally triggering
|
||||
* T3169. See OS#5033 */
|
||||
|
@ -5773,7 +5730,6 @@ control {
|
|||
execute( TC_mcs_max_ul() );
|
||||
execute( TC_mcs_initial_dl() );
|
||||
execute( TC_mcs_max_dl() );
|
||||
execute( TC_t3169() );
|
||||
execute( TC_n3101_max_t3169() );
|
||||
execute( TC_n3103_max_t3169() );
|
||||
execute( TC_x2031_t3191() );
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue